Miss March (2009) User Reviews

Shut Down Your Brain and Start Laughing

[claudio_carvalho · 6/10 · 22 August 2015]

Eugene Bell (Zach Cregger) and Tucker Cleigh (Trevor Moore) have been best friends since they were children. Tucker has always had sexual attraction for women having his life driven by sex while Eugene and his sweetheart Cindi Whitehall (Raquel Alessi) do not have sexual intercourse waiting for their marriage. However on the day of their prom, Cindi decides that they should have sex. After the prom, they go to a party and Tucker convinces the nervous Eugene to drink a couple of drinks. Eugene is not used to drink and becomes dizzy, falling in the basement. Four years later, Eugene awakens from a coma and finds that Tucker is the only one that waited for him, since his father traveled abroad and his girlfriend has moved to another city. Further, Tucker is living with the schoolmate Candace (Molly Stanton) and he has atrophy of his muscles and incontinence. Soon they discover that Cindi is the centerfold of the March edition of Playboy magazine and she will be at Hugh Hefner's mansion in the anniversary party. Tucker has a serious situation with Candance and he needs to flee from her brother, who is a fireman. He takes Eugene with him and drives to the mansion to meet Cindi in a road trip full of incidents and confusions.

"Miss March" is among the most moronic and brainless films ever produced and certainly hated by professional critics. The story is politically incorrect since the very beginning. However if the viewer shutdown his brain and watch the movie, he or she will certainly laugh a lot. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "Miss Março: A Garota da Capa" ("Miss March: The Girl on the Cover")

WKUK sketches are better

[jedilr · 6/10 · 7 August 2009]

I don't know why they didn't add Timmy and other guys to the casting/scripting of this movie, but I'm sure hoping they will if they should ever create another one.

There were some very good laughs, but overall it felt kinda like 90's movie with Tom and Jerry like jokes(Which doesn't have to be a bad thing when well executed).

Also they were going WAY too much for the simple Hollywood recipe and moral story.

Whitest Kids You Know rocks 100% :P I sure can't wait to see new stuff from them.

...maybe my hopes were just too high for this one...

Crude humor need better leading duo

[SnoopyStyle · 4/10 · 26 March 2014]

Tucker Cleigh (Trevor Moore) is a loudmouth sex-crazed idiot. Eugene Bell (Zach Cregger) is his straight laced best friend. Cindi Whitehall (Raquel Alessi) is Eugene's girlfriend. They decided to save themselves but Cindi wants to take it to the next level. He promises to have sex on prom night. Then at the prom after party, he falls down a flight of stairs. He wakes up after a 4 year coma when Tucker hit him with a baseball bat. Cindy is the new Playboy centerfold. They take a cross country trip to the Playboy mansion to win her back.

The biggest problem is that the two leads who also co-wrote and co-directed this movie are completely lacking in big screen charisma. It doesn't help that they look like 30 year olds when their characters are in high school. Their age fits a little better after the coma. However the lack of charisma never changes. As for the crude humor, it has its moments. They are definitely pushing the envelope, but everything in between is dreadfully boring.

Shame shame shame

[zildjianboy · 1/10 · 1 November 2009]

I will not dignify this film with comments on the plot.. the characters.. the story line for this would be giving it more than it deserves.

Simply put this is one of those movies that you watch because its kind of like a car accident, you know you shouldn't be looking but you can't look away. The acting is so incredibly bad that you actually feel pity and shame for the actors who appear it in it.

It's a bad bad disease, please only watch this film if you watching it for the "it's so bad its good" factor.

Woeful.. awful... absolutely embarrassing for every single person involved. If I served the crew lunch I would want my name left off the credits in fear that this disaster would somehow follow me.

What a load of garbage

[scummieB · 1/10 · 19 March 2009]

Can I have my money back please? Awful acting and terrible gags (oh look someone has sh*t themselves again, how hilarious - no hang on, I'm not 8 years old......) make this the lowest common denominator comedy I've seen in a long time, I mean how many times have all these gags been done?

'Oh we're so down on my luck' they say as they are walking along the side of the road...... what is going to happen? Do you think a car containing two hot European lesbians is going to pull over and pick them up.......oh here comes a car....... Christ give me strength.

Oh yeah, someone drinks pee in the movie too - that's fresh writing, not like someone has done that before.

If the guy who played the moron in the beach shirt gets work again then God help the acting world.

The first thing that Playboy has ever had to be ashamed about

[Smells_Like_Cheese · 1/10 · 13 June 2010]

I've seen some bad films, you name it, some of the worst: Bio-Dome, Gigli, 10,000 BC, The Love Guru, Kazaam, etc. But Miss March makes my new top 10 of the worst. I cannot believe this, I saw the trailer for Miss March when it was being released in the theater and thought it actually looked very funny. It's actually got a very clever story in the sense where it could have been a great sex comedy. But everything about this film misfired and I ended up watching total trash. Let's start with the characters, Tucker is very possibly one of cinema's most obnoxious characters. I'm not talking like Stiffler from American Pie obnoxious where it actually gets funny again, I mean he's just terrible. He sexually harasses women and somehow has a girlfriend in the film who has to be the most stupid woman on Earth to think that any part of him is attractive. He drags his decent best friend down the drain with him and causes nothing but trouble. Basically a mentally deficient sea turtle with 1 leg has more life goals than Tucker did. Craig Robinson who is actually a funny actor falls flat on his face doing this stupid movie. The only likable character is our lead played by Zach Cregger, and he is made to look like a dork.

Eugene and Tucker are 18 years old high school students and best friends, about to graduate. Tucker continually checks out girls and makes perverted remarks while Eugene is still disgusted and tells Tucker to cut it out as he now has a girlfriend and feels uncomfortable checking out other girls. Eugene climbs up a tree and sits outside his girlfriend Cindi's window and proclaims his love for her. Cindi asks if they are finally going to have sex but Eugene firmly states no. Eugene then realizes his mistake and calls her and promises her that they will have sex at the party after the prom. After the prom, the group all heads over to the party. Cindi tells Eugene that she will meet Eugene upstairs in five minutes. Tucker decides to solve Eugene's nervousness by getting him totally drunk. Eugene gets really drunk and ends up falling down the stairs. Eugene wakes up in a hospital and is confused so Tucker explains. When Eugene fell down the stairs, he blacked out and fell into a coma for four years. Curious where Cindi is, Tucker discovers that she's Miss March in Playboy. Wanting to see her again, Tucker gets into some trouble and breaks Eugene out of the hospital and goes to find Miss March for an explanation on where she's been since his coma.

Miss March is one of the most vile films I have ever seen, it's just utter trash. I had high hopes because when I started watching the movie I got a couple of chuckles, but as soon as Tucker woke Eugene out of his coma with a bat, I think that was more of a metaphor for what the director wanted to do to his audience, I lost all respect for this movie. Also Hugh Hefner's performance was possibly the most unbelievable thing in the world as if we are supposed to believe that he would sit with a crazy pervert like Tucker and share his "touching" story of love. Love advice from Hugh Hefner is like getting a heart transplant by Stevie Wonder, you love the guy but wouldn't exactly want him to be performing the surgery. If you think this movie is honestly funny, what medication are you taking and could I have some too? The acting is awful, the direction is flimsy, the characters were just horrible people. If they had toned Tucker down a bit with his annoying flaws and kept the movie's focus more on Eugene, this movie would have been much better. I'm sorry that I wasted my time with it, it was just bad, I feel like I'm wasting my time with this review as I want to forget this film, but I do need to warn the public to stay away from Miss March.

1/10

Stupid, Moronic, Brilliant.

[meatloaf6 · 7/10 · 15 September 2010]

I think that this movie is a perfect example of the weaknesses of IMDb. You get too many people of the wrong mindset reviewing this movie. Being a huge fan of Youtube's "The Whitest Kids U' Know", I found the humour in this movie spot on. It is MEANT to be completely over the top (with some real cringy bits). Its just what they do, and to be honest, not many could do it better.

Yes, this film may not deserve a reputation for anything other than just another Teen movie, but in my books its darn good, and more than anything else, it made me feel a lot happier inside. Is that a bad thing?

Basically, if you are someone who is going to watch this movie without being able to handle sick, crude jokes, then why review it? it isn't for you. That's quite simple.

So in the words of Tucker himself, I would rate this film "A perfect seven".

Dumb and Dumb again!!!

[elbay-1 · 1/10 · 18 March 2009]

Whoever went to see this movie and thought: " Hey...it's funny...I really enjoyed this one". Must have been watching Road Trip...because this movie was the stupidest, dumbest and most ridiculous movie I have seen in years. I thought Max Payne was bad...Max Payne was Ben-Hur compared to this movie. The worst acting by both main characters, even worse by the secondary ones(the crazy epileptic gf,crazy firefighter,lesbian Russians,Hugh Hefner,the bouncer with glasses(he should stop doing movies)). I mean will you people stop giving all of these movies 5 stars up here. Fired up was a way better movie than this! And if the directors think we didn't notice a little bit amateur camera work around the motel scenes they are mistaken! Basically this movie sucked! Badly...Meet the Spartans was funnier, Scary Movie 3 was better. Date movie was more appealing than Miss March!

I'm gonna go against the majority on this one...

[rutherfo · 7/10 · 15 August 2009]

Okay, I agree with a lot of the criticisms this movie received. The plot was underdeveloped, the crazy firemen thing (as well as Candace's forgiving of Tucker after a truly lame speech) was a hard concept to swallow, and Cyndi's role in the plot was too large for her to play such little screen time. Nevertheless, I fully enjoyed this movie. Comedy is probably the one genre I can watch and can say to myself "Screw the plot." Obviously, every movie needs a plot, but in the case of comedy as long as there's one there at all, I can focus more on the interaction between humorous characters and the many jokes this movie provided. One criticism I can't wrap my mind around is the acting of Trevor Moore and Zac Cregger. They've been criticized for their performances while I thought they were hilarious. Their opposing personalities made for great conflict and they have chemistry considering the actors have known each other for years. People call this a "bad" movie, but I feel that if a genre succeeds in its purpose (in the case of comedy = laughs), it is good. I feel that people over analyzed this movie and subjected it to more criticism than need be. Anyone who has watched Moore and Cregger's "Whitest Kids U Know" sketches know that the two end many of their skits by breaking the fourth wall, saying something like "we didn't know how to end this skit." Miss March is much more about the laughs and gags than the plot. Sit back, and simply enjoy the movie for what it is. I promise many laughs!

What a load of crap

[tommywahlman · 1/10 · 4 September 2009]

Seriously does anyone think this is funny? Apparently some does, poop, people who are over the top hysterical and so on, this movie can only work in the United States, where ppl in the age span of 18-60 still fins pooping funny. In the rest of the world its kids in kindergarten who make poop jokes. i watched around 25 mins of it and i couldn't help but thinking is this really the mental state of that country? Some say its a sex comedy, but does it really have to be so flipped out whit over spaced ppl? Its utter crap not funny no matter what comedy it now tried to be. There is noway anyone can relate to anything as no character seemed real, to some ppl that is funny, to most its not.

not for all tastes but you might like it

[mattkratz · 8/10 · 18 March 2009]

Critics tended to pan this movie. While I'll admit that the movie tended to lean towards gross and raunchy humor at times (especially the sex scenes, the "flasher" scenes, and the lesbian car driver characters) and that it didn't seem to be fit for all tastes or aiming for being a classic, I still enjoyed the movie and thought it was truly hilarious. What else can you expect from a movie that centers around Playboy magazine? My favorite scenes were with Molly Stanton chasing after the best friend after, during a pole dance scene, he instigated her into having a seizure with strobe lights and tried to pry her off of him by stabbing her in the face with a fork. Her chasing after him and getting the fire department to do the same were, in my opinion, the funniest scenes. I also liked the road trip scenes and Tucker's meeting with Hugh Heffner. You might like this movie. It really depends on your taste and "material threshold." Give it a try if you're in the right mood.

** 1/2 out of ****

Virgin guy in coma wakes up after 4 years to discover his girlfriend for whom he was saving himself is Playboy's Miss March.

[nairab · 10 August 2011]

This movie had potential to be a decent romantic comedy but too many poop jokes just puts it in the "Crass" category.

It was a pathetic attempt to shock the audience with its crudity.

It does have a few moments though. The protagonist Zach, seems to have potential to do better roles.He is the best part of the movie, but unfortunately doe to the poop jokes centered around him, the audience is unable to sympathise with him.

Trevor Moore has also done a decent job of playing the insensitive friend. What is really sad is that the director had come close to pulling off a good movie, but loses the audience due to a few really crass sequences, which were really unnecessary.

Worth watching but not what it could be

[fluffy_reaper · 6/10 · 8 June 2009]

I've been looking forward to seeing this film for a while, as I know the creators from Whitest Kids You Know, which is one of the best and funniest sketch comedies on at the moment, it is seriously brilliant and off the wall but not in an 'attempting to be python again' kind of way coming into miss march was a bit of a downer, its a film thats more commercially acceptable, but really its just another twist on the 'road trip' genre, it has pretty interesting jokes but nothing really new Definitely worth a watch, but road trip, or American pie have done the same thing so much better, but really, check out whitest kids you know, same guys but absolutely brilliant

This Movie Sucks

[batdave0 · 3/10 · 7 August 2009]

There are some humorous moments in this movie, but, not enough to overcome how truly horrible it really is. In between the humorous moments is a stupid movie with very bad acting and scenes that look like they were added just to make the movie longer. I'm pretty sure this movie was written in someone's dorm room while they were failing out of everything. How it became a movie is astonishing, but, I suppose Zach Creggor and Trevor Moore deserve credit for selling it to someone. I wish I had the dollar back it cost me to rent it and the gas it took me to get to the redbox. If you must watch it, I suggest you surf the internet or play a game at the same time to help pass the time.

Patchy at best, but the laugh out loud moments are EXCELLENT

[intelearts · 5/10 · 15 July 2009]

I'd give this a 2 or 3 excepting that is has 5 or 6 absolutely laugh out loud and that's more than most movies. None of this is rocket science: two guys head for the Playboy Mansion to find an ex-girlfriend and have adventures on the way. It's all very silly indeed - but if you imagine you're aged 12 - 14 or are 12 - 14 then this is a not bad guilty pleasure. Awful in places, and in others a huge chuckle fest it really is not anyone's idea of a great movie... but darn, the laugh out loud moments are some of the funniest I've seen all year... and had been laughing when i remembered them afterward....

A "MISS" of epic proportions...

[tombstone81 · 2/10 · 10 February 2010]

It's been a long time since I've written an IMDb review but I feel I would be doing movie fans--and humanity--a disservice by not taking a few moments to describe how painful this movie is. It's only slight better than "Son Of The Mask" which I rank as my worst movie of all-time. Believe me...use the 90 minutes to call your grandmother or that old friend you keep putting off because you're "too busy"...or do some exercise...or clean up your garage. ANYTHING but sit on the couch and corrupt your humour glands with this filth.

I am not a prude by any means...I love any kind of smut and filth if it's done properly (i.e. American Pie; There's Something About Mary; etc)...but how this train wreck got produced is beyond me. That anybody in Hollywood in charge of writing the cheques for something like this could read the script and think "yeah, this deserves a budget of $XXXX!!!" makes me fear for the future of moviedom.

In the interest of fairness (what little this piece of trash deserves), I gave it a two instead of a one because I did chuckle--not a genuine LOL, but a guffaw--at least once in the movie and perhaps as many of three times. Certainly not more than that. And the saddest part is, the concept had the capacity to be a decent, poignant, road-trip movie with a decent script and some decent acting. But no, instead we are subjected to a 9-year-old-boy's masturbatory nightmare of degrading and scatological humour.

Avoid at all costs! Or better yet, jot down your own idea for a movie on your cocktail napkin next time you and your buddies are at the bar. No doubt somebody in Hollywood will write a big cheque for it.

Why Do They Still Make Such Terrible Movies?

[GirishGowda · 1/10 · 28 May 2010]

By the looks of the trailer last year, I thought it was going to be a fun movie. Still I had my hopes down because these kinds of films don't always reach expectations. I rented the movie a couple of days back and I only laughed at a couple of scenes at the beginning. The rest was boring and not even worth watching, except the last 20 minutes where a 'playmate of the year' comes in the Playboy Mansion. This is the most dumbest and ridiculous movie of the genre I have ever seen. After watching this I wanted to start doing drugs, smoke, etc. Will you guys stop giving such dumb movies 5 stars please? This film makes 'Van Wilder 3: Freshman Year' look Oscar worthy. And I laughed a lot more in Van Wilder 3 (which I found not to be that good) than I did in this excuse for a movie.

Eugene Bell (Zach Cregger) is a high school student who believes that one has to abstain from sex till they find their soul-mate. His girlfriend, Cindi Whitehall (Raquel Alessi) who is also a virgin doesn't believe that and makes a pact with him to have sex on prom night. His best friend Tucker Cleigh (Trevor Moore) doesn't have any respect for women and always trash talking them. However he has a found a girl, Candace (Molly Stanton) who loves him despite all his flaws, but he doesn't even consider her his girlfriend. On prom night, to decrease his fear about sex, Eugene drinks too much, falls down the stairs and goes into a coma which lasts for 4 years. When he wakes up, only Tucker visits him regularly and all the others have abandoned him. And to his horror Cindi is now a playboy model. They go on a roadtrip to the Playboy mansion to find out why she left Eugene.

Apparently Cindi is sexy enough to be a playboy model! I don't care about that, but this is a very disgusting movie. The lead characters are very very unlikeable. One girl is a psycho who has control over the firemen of all the different states under her. I dislike fart jokes, I can tolerate one or two in a movie. But in this they go a step behind and do sh it jokes. They even display it graphically which is vomit-inducing. One time is OK, but they do it repeatedly and cruelly. I only wanted to watch it for the playboy model, she was very hot and the mansion. But it turns out they only play a part in the climax. The secondary characters are downright unlikeable - the firemen, the Russian lesbians, the doctor and the nurse, Horsedick.mpeg (his climax is like, yuck). Anyway, don't bother with this. IMDb users are way too liberal with this one. I have given only one film a 1 rating till now on IMDb, this film deserves even lower than an 1. If you will excuse me, I have to go drown myself now for watching this garbage.

1/10

Very Funny!!!

[Pumpkin_Man · 7/10 · 12 September 2009]

I just watched this movie and I thought it was incredibly funny and was a lot better than I had expected. Eugene and Cindi are the perfect couple and on prom night, Cindi wants to take their relationship to the next level, but unfortunately, Eugene falls down a flight of stairs and puts him into a 4-year coma. He is woken up by his best friend, Tucker who is obsessed with Playboy. When they see Cindi posing in a Playboy magazine, they try to make their way to the Mansion to see if Cindi still cares for Eugene. Along the way, they get into hilarious misadventures such as alluding Firemen, burning down a hotel, and driving a car with lesbians in the back seat. I highly recommend MISS MARCH!!!

Whether you watch WKUK or not, proceed the film with EXTREME caution...

[pack_fan91 · 4/10 · 15 March 2009]

Some things you're likely to hear people say after seeing Miss March advertised on television. "Oh, that's Trevor Moore and Zach Creggar! They're from WKUK! I can't wait to see it!" or "Oh, I love WKUK, let's go check that out!" Do you know how I know this? I was one of those people. This is a film that according to many many critics, "If you're a fan of the show, you'll quite probably enjoy this movie." Guess what. The critics were wrong. I find Whitest Kids U' Know hilarious, sketch after sketch, it leaves me amazed. They were in my area and I would have killed to see them perform some sketches live. Trevor, Zach, and the other Whitest Kids are some of my favorite comic performers alive today. Anyway, now onto the film.

Miss March is about a kid who plans to lose his virginity to his girlfriend on prom night. The kid is Eugene Bell, played by Zach Creggar. His best friend, Tucker Cleigh, played by Trevor Moore, tells him he should get drunk first, because it will help him last longer. He gets drunk, going through the wrong door and falling down the basement stairs, knocking down a toolbox and it falls on his head, knocking him out. The next scene opens with him waking from a four year coma, only to find out that his girlfriend is now a Playboy bunny. With the annual Playboy Anniversary Bash right around the corner, the two friends must get to the Playboy mansion so Eugene can get his girlfriend back.

The acting from the main characters, and surprisingly enough, Hugh Hefner himself, was decent. I kind of liked the acting. One of the few things I enjoyed, honestly. The script was awful though. This is the worst writing that I've seen from Trevor and Zach, and I was left disappointed. The jokes were very repetitive and some of the most immature things I've seen from them(although Whitest Kids is a very immature show. Anyone who watches can vouch for this.), and most of the acting was mediocre at best.

Basically, I felt this film was terrible, and even if you do watch Whitest Kids U' Know, enter this film with caution, because this is definitely not a proper representation of the talents of Trevor and Zach, and cameos from the others would have been nice, too, actually. I would have loved to see Timmy, Sam, and the others appear at some point or another.

Not Bad

[one-x · 6/10 · 20 March 2009]

I went into this movie expecting something horrid. But I came out of the film pleasantly surprised. The 2 actors are really good its just the stuff written for them just isn't that good. I mean it has a few good laughs in their from the french kiss my d*** to the stabbing a face with a fork its just their isn't a consistent amount of good laughs in their. Its a good rental and I hope Zach and Trevor get to make a whitest kids movie because I know it would be hilarious. If you want to hear how cool and funny they are get the spill pod cast off i-tunes and get the interview they are pretty cool guys. Also I have to admit the playmates aren't too bad on the eyes either.

Beyond Stupid - 1/2 * (half-star) out of four

[dumontaaron55-1 · 1/10 · 5 October 2009]

The monumentally disgusting Miss March seems to have one key moral to guide it along: ignorance is bliss. Among the most notable examples of Miss March's caveman-like intelligence is that it almost seems like it wants to grab and keep hold of every cliché it can take, but of course, something this reptilian, queasy and nearly reclusive in its anti-comedic not-being-funniness simply doesn't just go for mere clichés--Miss March functions much like a vacuum, too. That is, it makes sure, using plenty of noticeable effort, to suck out all the possible fun and humor of pop culture references, physical gags, et cetera--Miss March is like some dead, strange thing, a type of indecipherable, cancerous lump that started out by meeting my already-low expectations and going only down from there. Miss March is not merely bad, it's sprawling, multi-layered and complex in its boring, plain awfulness, something so fascinatingly stale that it's like a labyrinth of stupidity.

It begins as some casual fluff, children playing inside the cleanest, cutest lil' house in the suburb--but it then downgrades with the two boys finding a Playboy magazine. The directors and writers, with all their uncreative might, seem to pack every endlessly, relentlessly immature joke possible, save for, of course, one, single, solitary, lonely relatively-funny joke (the abstinence assembly sequence even manages to be clever when satirizing all those super-clean sugary abstinence speakers). Of course, Miss March can't merely respond to the lowest common denominator of humor alone--it makes sure to be a leech off previous emotional-ride melodrama tactics used in infinity-plus other comedies that existed before it, not to mention adding all the phony inspiration to the sentimentality that a horde of living, breathing forms of smug, TV-bred culture can live off of for a lifetime. Of course, Miss March doesn't even have the brain or the self-referential fun to even poke fun or at least understand its own ineptitude; all the sappy, happily ever after segments are done without even the slightest bit of irony. It's cringe-inducing. And this may come out as cold and cynical (maybe because I am, maybe because I'm just bothered by this movie's existence), but for the crowd that actually laughs, cries and cheers for this stuff, and there are lots of you, I sure hope you find some joy out of it. Because all I can muster out of it is contempt.

I guess we just aren't allowed to have fun at the movies anymore...

[danomychowski · 8/10 · 16 March 2009]

Obviously, this movie is not for everyone. It makes last years Sex Drive look like a family movie. Because of this, many people will be turned off by the movie. About a third of the people walked out of the theater when I saw it, and most likely the majority of them went home and rated this a One. Being a fan of the Whitest Kids U'know, I was very excited to hear about this back in December. and then very annoyed when they kept pushing back the release date. But finally, It arrived and it was great, in my opinion. Not quite to my expectations but by no means bad. It is true that some of the jokes become incredibly repetitive, and they dragged the lesbians scene out to the point that it was no longer funny. But more often than not, the jokes are hits rather than misses. Many people have given the film poor reviews because of how unbelievably vulgar the jokes are. Which makes me wonder: Why would you see a raunchy teen sex comedy that takes place at the playboy mansion, and was written, directed by, and starring two of the Whitest Kids U'know if you are offended by vulgar humor? Trevor Moore was hilarious as always but I do feel that Zach Creggor's talent was in many ways wasted. He got very few of the best lines, though, one could expect that since he plays the cliché "serious" buddy that is found in all teen sex comedies. Craig Robinson was great, though I thought that his character got a bit annoying after a while. But despite the films dirty charm and frequent laugh out loud moments, there were also a fair number of flaws. Miss MArch suffered from the same issue that the latest Harold And Kumar installment did: Every once in a while they would go just a bit too far. In a film like this you have to walk the line. In many cases, they would take a flying leap over it. Which is fine, to a certain extent. The problem was that the just didn't seem to realize when to quit. Dirty does not always mean funny. If you are trying to decide whether or not to see it, just know that it can either be a laugh out loud hilarious raunch filled comedy roller-coaster or it can be a dull, lifeless, trashy, tasteless, bomb of a movie, depending on your taste, or lack thereof. I personally found it to be the former rather than the latter. But it is most certainly not the type of movie that you should see with your family. 8/10

Funny Stuff.mpeg

[viper14-1 · 7/10 · 25 August 2009]

I thought this was gonna be another crappy teen sex comedy but I have to say, it was pretty damn funny!

I love Horsedick.mpeg in the movie, he's brilliant... You'll see why... Watch it to find out I don't want to ruin the surprise :) Ohhh and the lesbians... god that's impressive! Keep a close eye on that bit, you'll want to watch it again and again, girl got some skills with her tongue.

The storyline as always is far-fetched but it doesn't really matter if you're just looking for a laugh out with the lads. There are parts(like i've read in other reviews) when you'll start to cry with laughter. You may not want to see it again but you'll enjoy it anyway, it's a fun flick and a good one to go see with some buds.. as I said, one for the lads.

Anyways. My verdict is:

Good one to watch out with the lads. Try to avoid thinking up plot holes, just go with the flow and you'll get into the film. It's worth the watch and will get you laughing.. when you come out you'll be like, "Oh my god what about that bit when he ... haha!" It'll keep you laughing on the way home and it's also a spreader, you'll tell all your mates to go see it, I did. So worth watching. Hope you enjoy it and thanks for reading my babblings. ;)

Cheers. ~Viper

An embarrassment from start to finish (or at least to middle where I bailed out!)

[fotie444 · 1/10 · 10 September 2009]

This is one of those films where less than five minutes in you're asking yourself "how the hell did this movie get made"? It's like watching a five year old trying to be funny, but I understand why adults lie and tell them they're being cute so as not to hurt their feelings. How could the filmmakers be so dense as to not realize that during the production...no one was laughing and the cast and crew were uncomfortable with how bad the material was.

I was actually feeling sorry for the two main guys until I looked the film up and saw that they are the writer/directors. Interesting that they managed to fail at all three jobs they had on this "film".

I very rarely can't tough it through even bad films, but this one is a league all it's own.

Worst Movie Ever!

[david_grills · 1/10 · 20 June 2010]

How did this movie get made? Why did High Hefner associate himself with this collection of garbage.

This was more a parody of a movie than an actual movie. A collection of targets to offend and very little to redeem it.

Look away! Look away! The gross-out sequences were too gross.

The unrated version had nothing of value and the extras were not worth including.

I fail to see why anybody likes this movie at all.

Bad script, bad acting.

Bad, bad, bad.