Prey (1977) Poster

(1977)

User Reviews

Review this title
46 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
very entertaining
ethylester22 December 2004
I laughed a lot near the end of this movie. I thought the character of Jo just got funnier and funnier the more jealous she became.

This movie has some really great moments. In particular, the drowning scene, the hunting scene, the fighting scene where Jessica gets knocked out, the drag costume, etc etc! All are pretty original and pretty hilarious when you think about it.

Why they needed the drowning scene to be in slow motion, I'll never know. And the idea of dressing an alien man up in drag, getting him drunk and playing hide and seek with him cracks me up.

Jo was such a drama queen, like when the chickens got killed, when she missed the shot at the fox, when she is yelling at Jessica or running out of the house, she is always freaking out so majorly, it's great! Such an unassuming body/face, and such a huge character.

I liked this movie a lot, it's worth checking out.
25 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Alien in dresses, battle-ax lesbians and celebrating dead foxes.
Coventry27 August 2007
A quick peek at the IMDb trivia section teaches us that "Prey" was shot in only ten days and that most of the script actually had to be improvised during shooting. These usually aren't very good signs, especially not when the director already holds the reputation of delivering movies with a low level of quality. Norman J. Warren's other films (like "Inseminoid" and "Satan's Slave") are fun but extremely unoriginal, mainly revolving on graphic bloodshed and copious amounts gratuitous sleaze. "Prey" is exactly like that, but now he totally didn't even bother to come up with a script. The result is a bizarre and often laughable film that makes no sense whatsoever, but the whole ineptness is irresistibly charming nevertheless. The story goes like this: An alien, who goes by the name of Keator, arrives in rural England with a mission to research possible new food sources to save his whole species, but the poor sucker never makes it further than the isolated mansion of two crazed lesbians. He ends up living with them; they dress him up in women's clothing like he's their third lesbian toy-girl and together they hunt down a fox. When the poor animal is eventually dead, they celebrate it with a giant party, which is just a little over-the-top if you ask me. In the meantime, Keator – whose human name is Anders Anderson (!) – develops a more or less intimate relationship with the youngest lesbian and she slowly falls for him. For you see, she's not a real lesbian but just an insecure girl and the other is a scary dominatrix that literally forces the young girl to be her lover. It's a mad world, indeed. The whole middle-section of "Prey" is rather tedious and uneventful, and only hilariously cheesy & inept dialogs keep it tolerable to sit through. Then the climax is extremely gross and bloody with a sudden massacre. Surely the sick puppies and avid admirers of 70's exploitation will appreciate the graphic bloodshed of the finale, but it comes ridiculously abrupt, like Warren suddenly got tired of his film and wanted to end it, and it totally misfits the rest of the film's tone. "Prey" is a pretty bad but curiously intriguing 70's trash-film, inclusively intended for fans of this type of cinema.
16 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Unassuming thriller works like a charm
Libretio28 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
PREY

Aspect ratio: 1.37:1

Sound format: Mono

A lesbian couple (Sally Faulkner and Glory Annan) living in a remote country house are driven apart by the arrival of a young man (Barry Stokes) who turns out to be a flesh-eating alien, the vanguard of a massive invasion...

Despite its shoestring budget and leaden pacing, Norman J. Warren's follow-up to SATAN'S SLAVE (1976) amounts to a great deal more than the sum of its meager parts, thanks to a surprisingly complex script by Max Cuff (apparently, his only writing credit): Faulkner and Annan indulge an obsessive relationship whilst living in isolated splendor within the English countryside (rendered alternately beautiful and ominous by Derek V. Browne's eye-catching cinematography), though Annan's discovery of bloodstained clothing in an upstairs room marks one (or both) of these doe-eyed lovelies as psychologically disturbed, which may explain the absence of their respective families, some of whom appear to have lived in the house at one time or another and 'left' under mysterious circumstances. Stokes' unexpected arrival throws the relationship into disarray, partly because Faulkner has a pathological hatred of men and partly because Annan is attracted to him, creating tensions which result in a climactic whirlwind of violence. There's an extraordinary, multi-layered sequence in which Faulkner attempts to 'emasculate' their clueless visitor by dressing him in women's clothing, though Stokes' alien mentality allows him to rise above the intended mockery.

In the early scenes, at least, the relationship between Faulkner and Annan is depicted with uncommon grace and dignity, but this heartfelt sapphic liaison quickly devolves into crowd-pleasing episodes of sex and pulchritude, culminating in an explosion of horror when Annan allows herself to be ravished by Stokes following a violent argument with Faulkner. The closing sequences are (quite literally) gut-wrenching, especially Annan's final scene, which appears to have been clipped for censorship reasons in 1977 and never fully restored (what remains is still pretty vivid, so brace yourselves!). Excellent performances by the three leads, bolstered by Warren's unobtrusive direction, which takes full advantage of the stunning woodland locations, thereby compensating for the film's budgetary shortcomings. Originally released in the US as ALIEN PREY.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What a concept!
lawfella17 August 2003
A cannibal alien from outer space on a reconnaissance mission to Earth drops in on the estate of a monied, eccentric British lesbian and her neurotic woman-child live-in girlfriend. Now how can anyone possibly go wrong starting with a premise like that? It has the feel of a Merchant-Ivory film adapted by Roger Corman (or maybe a Roger Corman film adapted by Merchant-Ivory?) As added attractions, the women are erotic and beautiful and the music, for some reason, is awfully nice in parts. A great B-movie.
27 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Dumb Sleazy Fun
TheExpatriate70025 December 2014
Alien Prey is a sci-fi / sexploitation movie that accomplishes what it sets out to do: offer cheap thrills and quick T&A. It's far from a good movie, but still fun to watch.

The film follows a shape shifting alien that arrives in the English countryside and starts killing people and animals. He moves in with a pair of lesbians, one of whom may be pretty dangerous herself.

This movie exists for two reasons: to show off the body of Glory Annen and offer some cheap gore. It succeeds more in the first department than the second. Although it offers plenty of titillation, the pacing, particularly in the middle, is rather slow. The climax does offer some surprisingly good gore though, and a twist I didn't entirely expect.

One major issue with this film, in retrospect, is its depiction of lesbianism. The more obvious lesbian, Josephine, is portrayed as a mentally ill misandrist, basically a walking negative stereotype of lesbianism. That said, this wasn't unusual for the time, and the film depicts the other lesbian as a sympathetic character.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This Movie Makes ZERO Sense.
cujoe_da_man6 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Nothing about this movie made any sense at all. I won't go into too much detail that many others have mentioned already, but you won't find anything more than some T&A and gore and lots of "staring at things".

Supposedly the creature lands on Earth "scouting" for whatever it is searching for. Along the way, it shows just how stupid and inept it is. It thinks it can walk on water and almost drowns. It doesn't have a basic understanding of human interaction- "what is a game?". It eats anything it can get its hands on like a wild animal, but it's obviously advanced enough to travel space. In the end, you find out it's been searching for 'something to eat' for the rest of its species, but what makes this movie even more ridiculous is that it would have found that out within the first five minutes when it ate the two kids in the Volkswagen.

This just shows a total lack of thought on the part of the writers and director. The entire movie should have been done in the first five minutes. At no point did anyone say "hey, wouldn't it have figured out humans are edible when he ate those two kids?"

For an alien species so advanced that they can travel such great distances in space, you'd think they'd be able to do some actual research on a planet they are visiting instead of just "go kill everything like an animal". I'd hate to see how they raise their kids.

I only gave it two stars because at least Jessica was easy on the eyes. The rest of the movie just made me want to get some eye bleach. Of all the bad movies I've watched, this really ranks up there as one of the worst of all time. It wasn't even that great of a twist ending because when it happens, you're like "huh, I should have figured".
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Slow, boring, pointless and very messy
d_m_s8 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
My overbearing impression of this film was that it was messy. There seemed to be no coherence in the storyline or character actions. This randomness took away any sense of grounding in the film and made it feel like lots of messy bits edited together.

Essentially, a lesbian couple are hanging about in a house, for what reason I don't know but they seem to be taking a break from it all though it's never really made clear. Anyway, alien disguised as human man turns up, kills a few people and animals and hangs out with the two women. They don't do a lot, just eat, drink, play a couple of silly games and argue a lot. Why the alien never kills them is unclear.

Anyway this goes on for ages and gets really boring. Nothing really happens. At end, he finally does kill the women then contact his home planet to advise humans are easy prey. When it finished it just felt like a completely pointless film to me.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Two Separate Plots Blended into a Cheesy, Sci-Fi Sexploitation Stew
brando64729 April 2016
Wow.

This one came out of nowhere. I'm just watching my way through some Z-grade movies, enjoying cheesy science fiction, laughing at half-baked plots, and struggling to get through some real duds. Then I get to PREY. This one stands out from the rest. Not because it's sexploitation (already got a bit of that in HUNDRA) but because it lures you in with one plot but then sucker punches you with another once you get settled. PREY is two-fold, with a pair of plot threads running parallel over the course of the movie. The first, most obvious, and primarily advertised is that of the alien. The movie opens with the landing of an alien ship in the English countryside. The alien quickly murders a man and assumes his identity, wandering into the forest until he comes to an isolated cabin and our second plot line. Living in this cabin are a pair of lesbian lovers, Josephine (Sally Faulkner) and Jessica (Glory Annen). Right from the start, something seems off about these two. Josephine in particular seems angered by the presence of this mystery man and seethes with a hatred for men in general. Jessica is the more naïve of the couple, kind-hearted and caring. Her first reaction to this stranger on their property is to give him shelter and see to whatever wound is causing his limp. Tensions mount as Josephine struggles to turn Jessica against the man, who has assumed the name Anders Anderson (Barry Stokes), while Anderson tends to his own shady business.

You see, the movie starts out as a sort of body-snatchers thriller. We get the alien landing and then it stumbles across an attempted date rape in the middle of the woods; it rips the man's throat out and transforms to assume his identity before proceeding to crush his date to death with its bare hands. All right, cool. We're off to a fun start and there's even some gore effects when he kills the dude. Then we move on to the cabin and…hold on…now the movie is about a young woman trapped in an abusive relationship with an older woman. Keep in mind, when we first meet the alien it rips a man's throat out and yet, still, Josephine comes across as the most evil character in the movie. She's spiteful and passive aggressive; she's mentally and emotionally abusive to Jessica, keeping her trapped on this little farmstead. Josephine fills Jessica's head with venomous lies, telling her that they have to stay in their hidden little cabin because the evil villagers don't approve of their lesbian lifestyle. Whether that's true or not is never seen, as we rarely wander far from the cabin. And Josephine is hateful of any sort of outside interference. We constantly hear of a man name Stanley, a friend who apparently used to come along once in a while before the movie but has since ceased contact with them. Jessica misses him but Josephine insists she's wasting her time prattling on about him.

So we've got an alien presence and an abusive relationship, but that's not all PREY has to offer. This movie is insane and the more you think about it, the crazier it gets. Keep in mind, the women have no idea Anderson is an alien. They assume from his bizarre behavior that he's just mentally disabled in some fashion. They invite this odd stranger into their home and, at one point, have a little party where they inexplicably dress him up in women's clothing, make up and all. OK, he's an alien and has no idea what's going on, but to these women he's just a mentally confused stranger they can slather in lipstick. It gets crazier. At one point, Anderson ends up thrashing in a lake because he can't swim. In the wide shot, he is very obviously in water that can't be more than six inches deep. And he's just splashing around in a panic. Then Josephine and Jessica jump in to save him and all three wind up thrashing in this shallow water in slow motion while the soundtrack pounds away. Mind you, this water was black and seriously nasty, and there are plenty of shots where poor Glory Annen takes in a mouthful of this muck. Ugh, poor girl. And her character is just so stupid. When Jessica goes in search of clean clothes for Anderson, she happens across a trunk in Josephine's room containing bloody clothes and an enormous switchblade. Just a big ol' box of evidence that Josephine has killed. Yet another reason this relationship needs to be aborted, but Jessica forgets immediately and goes back about her daily routine.

PREY is nuts and for that I give it a recommend. It's a science fiction movie about a cat monster from space (Anderson's normal form is that of a cat person) mixed with a suspense thriller about a young woman trapped in a dangerous relationship with a psychopath; two separate plots tossed in a blender and served as a cheesy, sci-fi sexploitation stew.
17 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
YOU HAVE MANY WALLY'S?
nogodnomasters10 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
An alien (Barry Stokes) meat eater lands on earth and takes human form as one of his victims. He is taken in as a house guest in an English country manor by a pair of lesbians. The two women are a bit odd. Jessica (Glory Annen) the not too shy owner of the estate inherited it from her parents. Jo (Sally Faulkner) worked there and stayed on as the alpha female in the relationship.

The alien is socially inept. Jessica is fond of him, "He's very attractive...for a man" to the dismay of Jo who suspects something is up. The film has slow scenes and takes time to build up to a climax that wasn't worth the wait. Low budget soft core sci-fi from the 70's. A drive-in movie flick.

Parental Guide: F-bomb, sex, nudity (Glory Annen, Sally Faulkner, Barry Stokes) girl/girl sex, cat fight.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of Warren's more enjoyable movies.
BA_Harrison6 April 2013
Popping a Norman J Warren movie into the DVD player is always something of a gamble: sometimes they're awful in almost every way imaginable (Inseminoid); sometimes they simply make no sense at all (Bloody New Year); occasionally they prove entertaining despite a total lack of logic and technical ineptitude (Terror).

Prey falls into the last category: it's got a completely bizarre and unpredictable plot and is far from what I would call a great piece of film-making, but there's something about it that I find irresistible (and I'm not just talking about the hot lesbian sex scene!).

I love it's completely off-kilter plot—a carnivorous, dog-nosed alien that assumes human guise and imposes himself on a pair of lesbians, one of whom is an insane control freak with a murderous past. I love it's shoddy make-up and gore. I love the crazy dyke with the jealous streak. I love the alien's bizarre party outfit (a black frock and a touch of lippy!!!). I love the silly surprise ending.

Of course, the hot lesbian sex scene doesn't hurt much either.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Whirpool + Vampyres + Xtro = One Odd Sci-Fi Horror!
fishermensmell28 December 2021
Bizarre and unique in tone and pacing, I cannot think of another film quite like this. As per my review title, it brings to mind elements of Vampyres (lesbians living an isolated existence in a nice English country house, into which a man imposes himself); Xtro (a disquieting and uneasy tone, with an alien disguised as a man, quietly observing) and Whirlpool (a strange love triangle developing in an isolated house with possible murder hanging in the air).

Really, the alien aspect is irrelevant for much of the movie - it is more about the strange relationship between Josephine and Jessica, passively observed by Anders. It takes a long time for the plot and direction to reveal itself: is the "Prey" of the title the pair of lovers being observed, or.is it Jessica, prey to the manipulative and possessive Josephine?

Although certainly different, much of this comes to nothing, ultimately. It still score points for characters, events and vibes that linger on long after the film has finished.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A superb movie from Norman J. Warren! Warning: Spoilers
PREY is the second of four horror movies made by Norman J. Warren between 1976 and 1981.

I bought this movie as part of the Norman J. Warren Collection, a wonderful coffin shaped boxset containing this movie, along with SATAN'S SLAVE, TERROR and INSEMINOID. The said boxset is loaded with extras and is a must have for any fan of the director's movies. Any cuts made by the censors to previous releases have all been waived, so all four movies are presented in proper uncut versions as the director intended them to be.

In this movie Norman J. Warren continues to demonstrate that he, along with the equally great director, Pete Walker, were the natural successors to Hammer, Amicus and Tigon. The three companies in question had dominated the British horror movie industry for over a decade, having made some truly superb productions. All three had ceased to produce horror movies at this point, paving the way for the two mentioned excellent directors to make independent movies now rightly appreciated as minor classics of low-budget cinema.

There is an exploitation element to this movie that shows the director's passion for experimenting with the subject.

I have to admit that for a while I was put off by the prospect of seeing PREY. Having read the plot of the movie in the leaflet accompanying the boxset I bought, I had expected a movie along the lines of PREDATOR but with a lower budget. I expected to see someone running around with silly monster makeup trying to look scary but instead looking silly.

But, my initial perception was entirely wrong.

To my surprise this movie was better than SATAN'S SLAVE and TERROR, both of which I had seen previously and enjoyed.

The plot is as follows - a cannibal alien arrives in the English countryside looking for somewhere to colonise as its race is dying and needs new food supplies. He stumbles upon a lesbian couple who catch him trespassing on their property. This is the basic outline but this simple set-up brings a great movie to the screen.

The director uses the opportunity to exploit sexual tension as it turns out one of the lesbians actually takes an attraction to the alien, who appears to them in the form of a young human male.

Another excellent tactic used to create tension is the portrayal of the alien as a wild animal during certain points whilst remaining calm and curious to what he sees around him the next. This technique makes the alien unpredictable as we really don't know what may trigger him to attack those around him. But more importantly, the technique eliminates the sense of calmness and tranquility associated with the beautiful English countryside (much of which is no longer here sadly!), and turns it into a potentially lethal battlefield where anyone could be attacked and killed at any time. These scenes are mostly shot during the day in the summertime, perhaps making the impact stronger.

The director knew he was working with a very low budget so he disguised it beautifully by leaving the most horrific images to our imagination. Whilst this may not satisfy those who love to see gore, it will please those who value atmosphere, tension and suspense. Those who love gore do have one treat to enjoy, but I won't spoil it by revealing where and what happens.

A very unusual but highly interesting moment in the second half is during a scene when the alien falls into a dirty lake. He appears unable to swim and the two women help him out. As they go into the water to help him, the camera slows right down as the alien panics violently. You actually get the feeling that he is going to kill them.

But I feel one of the director's finest moments and certainly the best from a directorial viewpoint in this movie is during a scene between the alien and the butch lesbian (who unlike her lover is shown to thoroughly dislike him up to this point). Prior to this scene, the alien has been dressed up like a woman. The two lesbians even decide to put makeup on him so that he appears effeminate. Anyway, he is left alone with the butch lesbian for a moment and there is an incredible scene of sexual tension when it appears that she is about to seduce him. An excellent sad love song plays in the background whilst this scene takes place, providing an electrifying audio effect to support the truly mesmerising visual imagery during this otherwise silent scene.

Looking back at the movie as a whole, it does appear that it is moving slowly. Yet I was captivated by it all the way through. Not one scene bored me in the least. This is a testament to some excellent scriptwriting, backed up by solid direction. Believe it or not, the script was written whilst filming was going on! Incredible!

The acting in this movie is absolutely fantastic. Barry Stokes gives his finest performance here as a genuinely creepy character. Some of his facial expressions reminded me very much of the Norman Bates character from PSYCHO.

The two female leads are equally good, with Sally Faulkner easily being the best of the two as the butch domineering lesbian.

Overall, this is a superb movie that is a lot better than its title and basic plot outline suggest. It is a rare gem from a bygone era, an era when British cinema is now widely considered by movie historians to have been in decline.

I can highly recommend this movie for anyone who is a fan of Norman J. Warren's other movies. I can also recommend it to fans of Pete Walker movies and exploitation movie fans in general.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
That's Why We... Prey... PREY... Prey... PREYYYY!!!!
TheFearmakers4 October 2020
A shape-shifting space alien takes the form of a handsome young man on Earth and, after violently doing what he was sent for (which we learn at the end), he finds two pretty lesbians holed-up in a rural country estate... just so he can study their daily/nightly routine... Which means that men are all the same no matter what planet they derive...

For a robotic-like Barry Stokes it's a complicated (and often risky) lesson of love and jealousy in what's an offbeat triangle within a low-budget science-fiction horror, with plenty of intended downtime...

Giving the feel that cult director Norman J. Warren's PREY is actually more of a deliberately slow-paced arthouse thriller, and, filmed in England with British actors, the acting's quite good when it really shouldn't be...

Featuring the more feminine and once straight Glory Annen (with an unseen backstory involving an ex-husband), who's given either loving/controlling kisses or dirty/frustrated looks by her shorter-haired yet equally attractive Sally Faulkner, the most fun is how the bickering couple tries figuring out this strange male visitor, who winds up like a benign, manipulated little brother of sorts...

Meanwhile the taboo exploitation gets sporadically intruded upon by what hardcore horror fans want much more of, like gruesome body count deaths by the alien, particularly while sporting full fangs, an interstellar wolfman, who, despite having plenty to watch (as a voyeur along with the intended male audience) has very little to do.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A very strange film indeed
augustian22 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of Norman J. Warren's better films, although having seen the Norman J. Warren Coffin Box DVD Collection, that is not much of a recommendation. This film is a strange concoction of sci-fi, horror, zombie, lesbianism and probably a few other genres. The film was shot in a matter of days on a low budget, very much on the hoof: the film was shot as it was being written. It had to be finished quickly because the mansion was due for demolition. Anders' alien face was laughable, looking like something that you get from a joke shop at Halloween.

The main cast is only three characters: Anders the alien (Barry Stokes), and the lesbian couple, Jo (Sally Faulkner) and Jessica (Glory Annen). The interaction between the three characters is handled quite deftly, with Anders getting close to Jo to the annoyance of Jessica, but then during the film it all changes with Jo becoming suspicious of Anders while Jessica suspects Jo of foul play and then falling for Anders. The growing antagonism between Jo and Jessica plays right into Anders' hands.

This film originally ran for about 85 minutes but it was cut by the BBFC and then further cuts were made possibly to get more showings during cinema show times. The only full version seems to be the North American VHS. I have seen several DVD editions and they are all missing several minutes of footage. The main omission is at 28 minutes when Jessica and Anders are talking about being scared and then Jo joins them to talk about music. Jessica goes to her bedroom to fetch something and Jo goes to talk to her and they argue. Jessica makes some cocoa in the kitchen then she shows Anders to his room. This sequence is about three and a half minutes. There are two smaller omissions: at 37 minutes, a 10 second clip of Anders sitting in a chair is cut and at 72 minutes a further 8 seconds are cut in which the alien is eating flesh and Jo is running down a corridor. The omissions actually give the film a bit more urgency. The French DVD is also the short version despite the cover saying 85 minutes.

Overall then, a quirky film for fans of quirky films. It really is a pity that as far as I am aware, no DVD edition has the missing footage as an extra.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I Like it
LewisJForce15 October 2001
I like this film. I like it a lot. I like it because it makes me incredibly nostalgic for a period in British cinema that has long since passed. The 1970's. A time when irreverent and irrelevant schlock like this could get made. I like it because it is monumentally silly yet eerily compulsive, possesses a truly odd atmosphere, and at one point it actually frightened me.

It was made in 10 days with whatever change the crew had in their back pockets. It's very entertaining.

How I wish up-and-comers would make stuff like this rather than the Tarantino and 'Trainspotting' tributes that they STILL are.

Norman 'J.' Warren, I salute you.
23 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
BAD MOVIE FANS...WATCH THIS!!!!!!!
Empire-32 January 2002
OK, this simply is the worst movie ever made. Period. Horrible acting, sets and music. Ok, everything sucks in this movie. I almost forgot! The special effects are "great" also. So if you like bad movies, watch this, it can surely make you laugh!!
0 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Where's Doctor Who When You Need Him/Her/They...
Xstal23 April 2023
An unexpected visitor's in the grounds, turns out his appetite and conscience knows no bounds, as he takes a little nibble, of living things their blood doth dribble, while he utters quite disturbing, alien sounds. Josephine and Jessica take stranger in, they are together although the partnerships quite thin, falling out and bickering, apart from bedtime when they fling, and enjoy the carnal pleasure of skin to skin. It's not too long before things rise, come to a head, when the visitor shows his plans to tear and shred, as the mask drops and reveals, some pointy teeth for taking meals, and the screams of Josephine fill you with dread.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
i'm Rested In The Middle
nammage25 May 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The alien, who looks sort of like a cheap imitation of a werewolf, and in any other cheap horror flick, could very well be one; though, of course this is Sci-Fi. It's not a long movie, and there really isn't much action minus a sort of consensual sex scene turned rape, and mutilation by the "alien" eating her, literally. And but for the sensual yet erotic sex scene dealing with the two main female characters, which for this type of film, I actually found to be tasteful, there's really not much else going for this film. Even when the alien dresses up in drag, seemed nonchalant. A part of me wishes they delved more into the story but, eh.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Strange and memorable little known horror
The_Void4 August 2008
Prey is, effectively, two movies. We have a film about an alien coming down from space to wreak havoc on the human race, and then we have the story of a man infiltrating a lesbian relationship. This does give the film more than enough to go on when it comes to keeping things entertaining; but on the other hand, the whole alien plot actually gets in the way of the other plot and while I essentially saw this movie because it's a horror film; it's the horror that spoils it! However, while it certainly does have it's failures; Prey is a movie that was obviously shot on a very low budget and since it is a rather original take on a common movie theme; it does deserve a lot of plaudits. The movie begins with a scene that sees a young couple in a car. After a bright light in the sky, the man gets out and ends up becoming possessed by the alien before killing the girl. This all happens not far from the home of Jessica and Josephine; a pair of lesbians living in a beautiful large house. After meeting the alien and seeing him hurt, they invite him in to stay with them.

The film is directed by Norman J Warren and that will be enough to put some viewers off I'm sure; as the director of such rubbish as Bloody New Year and Satan's Slave is not exactly well known for making good horror films. However, this is a cut above and surely his best work. That's not to say it's anything like high quality however! The acting is extremely poor in places and the plot doesn't exactly move smoothly; and that isn't helped by some extremely trite and stupid dialogue! The lesbian couple is much better portrayed than the alien and both do actually have some character and the dynamics of their relationship has a huge effect on how the story moves. The alien, played unconvincingly by Barry Stokes, is extremely poor and the performance relies too much on the alien not knowing much about Earth, which soon gets tiresome. However, it's only short and the weird goings on (such as a fox hunt and the alien being dressed as a woman) have a sort of surreal quirk to them. It all boils down to a gratuitous ending that works quite well. Overall, this is not great by any means; but it's an interesting cult gem and is at least worth seeing.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Uncle Norman's theatre of cruelty visits Shepperton studios
tommyrosscomix22 September 2017
You know the big house in the Omen (1976), the secluded stately pile in the English countryside where Ambassador Thorn and his wife intended to raise young Damien before they found out the hard way that he was the Anti-Christ? Well, that big old house was on the grounds of the now-defunct Shepperton Studios, and when cult director Norman J. Warren (fresh from a surprise hit with the slow- burning shocker Satan's Slave) found out it was free for ten days in 1977, he gathered a tiny group of actors (who wore their own clothes on camera) and technicians, and set about making a feature film in little over a week with a largely improvised piecemeal script. Actually, the story behind the making of Prey is a little more complicated than that, but this potted version of events simply underlines the freewheeling, anything-goes state of British cinema in the seventies, when apparently anyone with a few quid to spare and nerves of steel could shoot a film on loose change and have it playing in the Odeons and ABCs alongside the latest blockbusters from America in a matter of weeks. The fact that a turf accountant is mentioned in the credits for Prey tells you all you need to know, really.

There's not much of a plot here - a half-man, half-canine alien called Kator / Anders lands in the British countryside on a fact- finding mission and is adopted by a lesbian couple - one slightly butch and prone to possessive hysterics, the other more feminine and submissive. Things very quickly go awry as it becomes clear that Anders / Kator isn't all he seems, chickens are killed, policeman investigating the gruesome disappearance of a motorist are butchered, a fox is found half-eaten, and it's only a matter of time before the awful truth comes out. You've probably guessed the twist already, which is understandable because the title kind of gives it away, but not only are the man-dog-alien thing's alien brethren going to kill us all, but eat us as well. Yikes!

Norman J. Warren has been referred to in some quarters as the nearest British cinema's ever come to its very own Fred Olen Ray, but that pat description manages to belittle both parties. Warren was a knowledgeable craftsman and canny director, capable of performing minor miracles on the tightest of budgets, and stands nicely alongside his closest contemporary Pete Walker as one of the true 'wide boys' of seventies exploitation. If Walker offered the public unsentimental tales, however, Warren could be downright misanthropic, presenting a very dim view of humanity with his endlessly shrill and argumentative characters, skew-whiff pocket universes where an attempted rape, a bloody murder or a Suspiria- referencing set-piece lurked around every corner, and happy endings were for wimps and ten-year-old girls. He may have looked like a personable supply teacher, but there's a solid core of pitch-black nastiness at the heart of Warren's best films, and Prey is no exception. Relationships are open wounds, conversations are punctuated by recriminations and hysterics, blood (and vomit) pours off the screen and nobody emerges with any real credit. Throw in some hilariously awkward transvestism, skid row special effects, a commendably gloomy atmosphere of infinite foreboding and you've got a unique, if undeniably flawed little oddity that should please anyone with a taste for the forgotten avenues of schlock horror.

A note on the performances, in particular Barry Stokes's turn as the androgynous, almost catatonic alien. Having previously hammed it up in no-budget sex comedies (something he'd do again in the Warren- directed 1979 soft-core science fiction spoof Spaced Out), Stokes proves here that he's just as comfortable with the opposite side of the exploitation coin, and he's hauntingly effective in his role. Sally Faulkner is memorable, if occasionally a touch overpowering, as the dominant half of the partnership, and the late Glory Annen (who would be reunited with Stokes in Spaced Out two years later) should, by rights, have become a legitimate film star - she certainly had the charisma, the acting chops and the looks for it, but it seems she never got the right breaks. Ivor Slaney provides the pulsating electronic score which is appropriately other-worldly and disconcerting, particularly during the genuinely nauseating scene where the three leads thrash around in a heavily polluted river in glorious slow motion - to be honest, in spite of the plentiful blood and viscera on show in certain other scenes, that's the part of Prey most likely to turn the average viewer's stomach.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Cult films don't get culty-er than this!
Nightman8517 August 2010
Alien lands on earth and takes on human form only to end-up being a pawn in the lives of a bickering lesbian couple.

The premise of Alien Prey alone will give one a glimpse into the off-beat weirdness that is this strange low budget sci-fi/horror show. Among the crazy offerings you've got animal-men attacking people, an alien in drag, some howlingly bad dialog, a party for a dead fox - its difficult not to find this a tongue-in-cheek effort. Also this bizarre flick has enough sleaze for any exploitation fan thanks to some drawn-out sex scenes. This is all capped off with a surprisingly violent (and bloody) finale and one pleasingly nihilistic ending.

The direction isn't bad and the filming locales are nice. The cast's performances are just erratic enough to add even more weirdness to the film. Sally Faulkner throws out a perfectly 'bitchy' vibe only matched by Barry Stokes' deliciously odd 'stowic' performance as the alien - who you just might be rooting for in the end.

Alien Prey is simply a hoot for cult fans. There's definitely no other film like it and whether you laugh or groan you're bound to be entertained regardless!

*** out of ****
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A little kinky
dgci-net26 June 2007
I'm glad I didn't go out and buy, or even rent this movie, but watching the low-resolution version on MovieFlix.com was enjoyable enough.

Glory Annen played the best character, the somewhat vapid lover of the older lesbian. Trapped in a relationship that doesn't really excite her that much, and wanting to learn more, she plays a key role in bringing the "newcomer" into their lives.

This movie was nothing special, fairly typical, if a bit kinkier than usual, Brit fare. But it was entertaining enough to watch it all the way through, which is more than I can say for a lot of films I've watched lately. A mildly interesting plot, a totally hokey alien, enough skin for the prurient, something to make a bowl of popcorn and watch when you have naught else to do.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Joyously sleazy "carnivorous alien in lezzyland" schlock.
EyeAskance22 August 2005
Instantly watchable and delightfully cheap British sci-fi finds a male alien missionary on Earth being taken in as a house-guest by an unsuspecting separatist lesbian couple. The true fanged creature is concealed beneath a stolen body, but occasionally emerges during conflicts and feeding frenzies(and looks a bit like the titular terrors of THE BAT PEOPLE). The decidedly non-vegetarian visitor becomes caught in the middle of the womyns' peculiar psychodramas and recurring hostilities, and at one point is cross-dressed by them and finds new pleasures in the consumption of champagne....allthewhile drooling over a pet bird they have kept in a hanging cage.

This film, for all its misgivings, remains one of the more "out there" entries in the sci-fi/horror genre...a bad film, to be sure, but one recommendable for its sheer uncommonness. At least they were clearly trying for something altogether different...and they sure did succeed in that task.

5.5 out of 10 -- for decent performances and overall...erm...queerness.
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Alien Gay
Bezenby25 August 2016
It's hard to root for the person most deserving of the young girl's affections in this film. Should it be the borderline psychotic jealous lesbian lover who may have possibly murdered a previous suitor or should you root for the carnivorous alien invader who has little interest in hanky panky and just wants to eat swans, foxes, chickens and policemen? I thought, upon reading the synopsis, that this would be a seventies bore fest, but I was really, really wrong. Apart from providing us with four murders near the start of the film, things take a turn for the surreal when the alien is dressed in drag and forced to take part in a game of hide and seek while aggresso-lesb is waiting to kill him with a switchblade. Madness.

Although just a three character play, this film keeps you interested by having at least two of those characters to be totally mental. The alien doesn't do a great job of being human (his chosen name is Anders Andersson!) and it's a good laugh to see him trying to fit in, badly. On the other hand the more aggressive of the lesbian lovers is almost Dennis Hopper/David Lynch film crazy, and may be the most interesting character here.

Well worth a watch, and as an added bonus, there's a ten minute lesbian love in and sporadic nudity after that. Good stuff.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nice little horror tale from Warren
Bogey Man25 August 2002
Warning: Spoilers
***SLIGHT SPOILERS*** British horror film maker Norman J. Warren's Alien Prey (aka Prey, 1978) is a story about two lesbian lovers, Jo (Sally Faulkner) and Jessica (gorgeously beautiful Glory Annan), who live together in their big house in the countryside and don't see too much other people. Jo is very dominating and jealous of Jessica and she wants to own Jessica completely. Their relationship gets disturbed when they find a strange man (Barry Stokes) on their private property and Jessica wants to help him and take him to their house while Jo, of course, opposes. The man turns out to be an alien visitor from some other planet and he is in the Earth in order to find protein and food for himself and for others of its kind. The girls soon get clue about this as he acts very strangely and seems not to know any manners and human habits. Things go even further when Jessica starts to fall in love with the man as she is tired of being with the selfish and dominating Jo.

This film deals with the themes of jealousy and what it requires to really live in love affair with another human being. Jo is very selfish as she wants to have the total power over Jessica while Jessica just wants to live happily with the person she loves, and during the film it turns out that Jo is not the one for more sensitive and sensual Jessica. Jessica finds her love from this strange visitor, but that visitor has its own jealous aims and, in this world, it seems like Jessica is way too pure and good (as good as human nature can be) to live happily in.

The actress Glory Annan/Annen is very beautiful and erotic here, and she is really the kind of girl that deserved better as she's very positive character unlike Jo and the visitor. There's only these three and perhaps 2-3 other characters in this film, but there's no need for more when the film and story is like this. This is a little low budget horror film and pretty great in its own genre, but only if you love these films and can appreciate them when they deserve it.

Technically this film is pretty dull at times with some bad editing and very unfinished looking scenes, and I think they are like that because of rush in production or something like that. I think Warren could've been able to make this film look better if he just had wanted/been allowed to. After all, there's much more amateurish and in all ways bad films in existence, without any positive elements so it is easy to forgive the few mistakes in Prey.

There's plenty of nudity in this film and all these three main characters get naked and make love, but not all three together, of course. There's also some gore, but the strongest scene involving throat biting and cannibalism comes at the very end, but it is very restrained, yet shocking and this film works fine without huge amounts of gore every 5 minutes. I think this is a horror story, but also a depiction of rotten love affair involving one selfish and dirty character, who doesn't know what love's all about. From the films by Norman J. Warren that I've seen, I think this is his most mature film and thus among his most noteworthy achievements.

7/10
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed