4/10
An utterly magnificent movie, but stupid as hell
28 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
OK, this is noir, for sure. But it also shines for its shallowness and emptiness.

The movie opens with what promises a complex investigation about the murders of several girls, mixed with some political corruption.

But here is the catch, because it doesn't go anywhere further. The main character, Eddie Dunford, doesn't have a clue about anything. Neither about the case, neither how to proceed, neither about the basis of his job as a journalist. (though he claims and boasts a lot to be one)

The acting is well performed, though it's always difficult to say so when characters and situations are incoherent.

I admit the cinematography is perfect, in the mood of old 70's thrillers, which can lure many into considering it makes a good film, just because it looks smart.

Nevertheless, the scenario suffers from weakness and evasiveness. The main character is stupid and his main achievement would be to receive the result of one life's work and researches of his dead and more gifted friend, then give it to a cop.

So here is another movie with a beautiful photography, a static scenario, a stubborn and stupid character, whose pointless actions lead to absurd and nonsensical situations I found hard to believe. The famous "willing suspension of disbelief" failed to work here as far as I'm concerned.

I think I miss Chinatown, and will need to watch it soon after this mess. All the more so it looked promising.
24 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed