Reviews

11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Promises a lot, delivers very little
7 November 2007
Oscar season is here and the first real major film that wants to challenge for this years Best Film award is here.

Oh boy has the marketing machine worked its magic here. This film wants to be taken seriously, as seriously as The Godfather or Goodfellas, from everything from the slick trailers to the simple yet stylish movie posters and even intro credits.

The main selling point of this film are the lead actors Denzel Washington and Rusell Crowe.

I'll drop my first humdinger by saying I don;t think these actors are anything special nor are they even in the top few actors around at the current time.

Rusell Crowe has only ever impressed me in one film. The best film he has been in was LA Confidential, but that wasn't really down to him. In that film he played something of an oaf with little emotion. In Romper Stomer he played something of a thug. And in his award winning performance in Gladiator he played something, yes you guessed it, an oaf and a thug. I should add in here that Gladiator is in my opinion an utterly awful and overrated film with little substance. If American Gangster was to go on and win the Oscar for Best Film like Gladiator did then it would only cost the Academy Awards the little bit of credibility they have left IMO.

It is not all bad though because Crowe did put in a performance to be remembered in the film 'The Insider' which I thought was actually VERY good and easily the best performance I have seen form him (Beautiful Mind included).

Next we have Denzel Washington. An actor who IMO was nothing special. He then won an Oscar for Tarining Day and was propelled to mega-actor status. Since then he hasn't really put in a truly brilliant performance. The thing I don't like about Washington is arrogance, he exudes it, I am not sure if its on purpose or not but I think he can certainly add it - just look at his character in Training Day - arrogant to the extreme and this kind of carries on into other films, Inside Man for example. He is also a bit annoying in this film, whenever me says 'My Man' and smiles I just want to slap his face.

However, both of these guys have been in fairly decent films recently, especially Crow in 3.10 to Yuma. So I was of course open to them putting in great performances to make this a great film.

I am not going to go over every point of the film but I Will quickly go over its major flaws Accents - come on Crowe - you are meant to be one of the best. Crowes accent was all over the place in this movie. There is a thread running on IMDb currently running at 6+ pages debating this point but I am 100% sure his accent wasn't consistent throughout.

Gangster - this isn't a gangster film in the truest sense. Its nothing like Goodfellas/Scarface/The Departed/Usual Suspects etc. So you Will Be disappointed they used this title and made it look like something that it definitely is not (marketing eh?) instead expect something slower, much much slower...If you want to see loads of guns and killings and underground activity then this isn't the film for you.

The length and pacing of this film is all wrong. It is too slow and too long. The vast majority of scenes jump from one place to another too quickly. Most of the scenes are too short and there are probably only 2 or 3 really decent scenes. For my money none of these scenes really build up to some sort of peak like they do in the great movies.

So what about Washington and Crowe? Well it is fair to say Crowe was much better in 3.10 to Yuma and in this film he is only really something of a bit part character as he is probably only getting 30% of screen time compared to Washingstons 70%. They were both OK but nothing special.

Good points? Well there are not many. Of course the sets and costumes were definitely decent. The music was good but I was disappointed with the plot.

Having read some of the comments at IMDb the 2 most appropriate words would be 'uninspiring' and 'dull' - its an OK film but it's definitely not as good as they are trying to make it look.

Overall the film is above average. 7/10 - best of the year? Not at all. 3.10 to Yuma is much better overall and deserves any award before American Gangster.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Yes, this film really is about Perfume. And it is bizarre!
28 December 2006
Just got back from seeing this and it's fair to say the (small) audience was probably the most baffled cinema audience I have ever seen...there was total silence, something I've not seen at the end of a film before!

If you haven't figured it out yet this film is about perfume and murders. I won't give away everything that happens but some of it is very well done. There is a lot of sniffing and smelling and this is done really well on screen and aside from putting smells into the cinema it couldn't have been done much better.

On the negative side - if you are doing a period piece and it is this long then it had better be damn good - and unfortunately it wasn't. We had 4 walkouts within the first 30mins in our showing. I was starting to feel tired half way through! Whilst the film took a new angle with perfume as one of its main things it wasn't exactly what I would call thoroughly entertaining. Not to say it was boring - I would describe it as good but not great.

Most talked about will of course be the ending. I am of the opinion an ending is the most important part of a film and can totally change opinions of a movie - I certainly wasn't wrong in this instance. Up until a certain point a sudden turn in the way things were going was looking good but it soon deteriorated into madness. Minor point – the accents of the main character and Dustin Hoffman were all over the place. Other reviews suggest you read the book, or you should have read the book to get the best possible experience - IMO that's not a good enough reason for a film not to be good on its own. Having read a detailed description of the book I can see many areas that the film has changed or omitted things and of course this has been for the worse.

Overall, I would say it was a good film but I expected better. Some will love the ending whilst others won't Personally I think I preferred it to what was 'promised' to us at the start - though I was disappointed we didn't get that as well!

7/10
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hostel (2005)
1/10
Worst film ever...
26 December 2006
I am open to pretty much any type of film but this quite easily ranks as THE worst film I have ever seen (and I have seen quite a few stinkers) - what's worse is that it was made in 2005 with a relatively large budget and Tarantino as a producer - how is crap like this even allowed to leave the studio? I won't go into spoilers but this film pretty much fails on every single level and it is not even remotely scary. I can't believe that this film has been compared to SAW for goriness - it doesn't even compared and the storyline in this makes Saw look like Citizen Kane.

Rarely do I ever regret watching a film, no matter how bad, but I certainly regret wasting 94 odd minutes of my life on this crud.

I can hardly believe that a sequel is being made for this!
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Darr (1993)
8/10
C c c c crazy!
4 August 2005
This isn't far away from the trash that Bollywood normally makes but there's just something really good about it.

The title song is one of Bollywoods best and is haunting throughout. This is one of the films (along with Baazigar - a must see Bollywood film) that made Shah Rukh Khan and it's for this you have to check it out.

Other reviews give away the story - it is a fairly basic idea - ShaRukh definitely stands out and one of his final expressions right at the end made me give this film an extra star.

Its fairly cheesy but definitely worth watching if you are new to Bollywood or not! 8/10
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hide and Seek (2005)
7/10
OK films - gets slack because of De Niro!
9 May 2005
OK, just because De Niro is in this film it doesn't mean it will be a classic like Goodfellas and Taxi Driver. Unfortunately those days are probably over (in general really).

This film is still a worthy watch, it's a popcorn thriller with a few good moments. It's not a classic but it's not as bad as it's made out as being. It is getting a lot of flack because De Niro is in it and it doesn't measure to all his previous films.

Worth renting for sure! Don;t want to give anything away but don;t go in expecting a brilliant movie and you won't be disappointed.

Personally I gave it 7/10 - good for one watch but not a great film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An Indian Classic - not great by any means though!
4 November 2004
This is perhaps one of those films that is so bad it's good.

It was one of the biggest Bollywood films of the 80's - making Salman Khan a star. I would definitely say it can't touch 'Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak' (the other big film of the 80's) - It has an OK storyline, some serious dodgy editing and acting. Its what you have to expect from Bollywood though I guess.

It will always be a Bollywood classic and is worth checking out - I don't wanna give too much away!

The songs in the (UK) DVD version I have of this film are slightly different from the versions released on the official soundtrack (the soundtrack is better - the songs may have been redone after they made the film)
2 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Scary Movie 3 (2003)
7/10
It supplies the laughs
28 October 2003
The movie has a cheap feel to it and the jokes come thick and fast - most of them are cheap ones!

It does however have quite a few laugh out loud moments which definitley make it worth seeing, particularly the funeral scene as well as the Michael Jackson one.

Recommended.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Killer (1989)
7/10
Not as good as FACE/OFF
30 June 2003
A huge dissapointment - this film is pretty poor - there are many better action films out there and this one isn't even as good as Woo's best Hollywood movie FACE/OFF. Shame. I was expecting big things from this movie.
1 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Boring, pointless and on the whole a waste of time.
27 March 2003
Generally with films like this where its not a HUGE hit only those who liked it will seek it out to review - I only review/add comments when I feel strongly about a film.

This HAS to be one of the most boring and pointless films I have ever seen with a poor twist (which made the film interesting for like 5 seconds) and it all went downhill from there on.......

Other people are going on about the relationships and character development etc, but I just don't see it.

5/10 - NOT recommended.
7 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
OK Fight scenes let down by poor script/plot
7 March 2003
This film contains a LOT of fight scenes - in fact they get a bit boring after a while. The scenes themselves are OK but you could find better elsewhere

On top of that the plot and script are just pure lame - the film is just fighting with some talking in between - though I do feel the English translation was done VERY POORLY (as is the case in most translations unfortunatley)

One to watch if you like watching Kung Fu films (a night in with the lads perhaps) but one to avoid if you want a 'full' film.

6/10
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Baazigar (1993)
10/10
The best Bollywood movie ever!
7 February 2003
First off Bollywood produces a lot of CRAP. There are only 2 movies I would ever recommend to someone who hasn't grown up with Bollywood movies - or seen lots of them. Sholay and Baazigar.

This film launched Shah Rukh Khans career and with a string of other good films at the time made him into the superstar that he is today (notably 'Darr' which was released at a similar time)

This is without a doubt my favourite Bollywood film - it's so different than all the other stuff that comes out - for a start the storyline is quite complex and isn't totally based on a love story (well it is - but its more about revenge). I am a huge Hollywood movie fan and compared to the other stuff Bollywood produces this is the best thing you'll find. Lagaan is also amazing but it isn't really Bollywood IMO.

I don't like explaining what happens in a movie in a review (spoils it) but this is a definite must see. Shah Rukh Khan is brilliant- the songs are also good and it has a decent storyline and is the closest you'll probably see an indian movie to Hollywood (other than 'Kaante' which was made in the USA)

Definatley a must see - I dont understand why it has such a low rating - most people who watch Bollywood films are only in it for the songs and love story anyway. Unfortunatley there hasn't been a film out of Bollywood since that could even rival this (and this is MUCH better than the film its a remake of - check Movie connections of IMDB)
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed