Goodfellasz Reviews

Quantum of Solace (2008)

underrated bond film

[10/10 · 18 April 2014]

This very entertaining sequel to the popular Casino Royale has received a lot of critique and it must be said that this critique is not deserved.

QOS can be seen as a direct sequel to casino royale. And this is probable one of the reasons that this movie has been received rather negatively. Casino royale was a near perfect film while QOS is one of the better bond films (but not films in general). After CR the expectations have been to high for this rather small sequel. Nevertheless QOS is an entertaining movie with a mediocre to good villain.

The editing of the movie has a rather quick pace, this together with some of the action scenes make the movie a rather Jason Bourne - James bond cross-over. If you can look past this fact you'll find the story to be quite good. More important the action scenes feel more bond than some of the scenes in CR. This together with some subtle references to previous bond movies (Dr. No, goldfinger and The spy who loved me) mixed with the incredible soundtrack of David arnold make this a worthy successor to CR and a great Bond movie.

The Great Gatsby (2013)

unique and beautiful but not for everyone

[8/10 · 15 April 2014]

Let me start by saying I have never read the book and never saw the movie with Redford. Also ever since Romeo + Julia I have been avoiding every Baz Luhrman movie. The way he destroyed that story still give me the creeps. However I heard that this movie was quite good, so I decided to watch it after all and I must say I was surprised by how good it really is.

The beginning of the movie makes you remember Moulin Rouge, placed in a more or less fairy tale setting this movie has nevertheless a very dark and dramatic tone mixed up with a romantic story. Tobey Maguire and Leonardo Dicaprio do a good job, but it is Joel Edgerton that steels the show. In an unbelievable way he transforms himself in a very energetic antagonist that just gives you the chills.

The Soundtrack is amazing, I was surprised about the mixture of the modern soundtrack and the old setting (beginning of the 20th century). Personally I thought it was a vivid and energetic mixture that makes the movie even better.

After having seen the movie I didn't understand how so many people could hate this picture, the movie is definitely not for everyone but nevertheless it's a must see for everyone who likes a real dramatic love story.

Watchmen (2009)

Underrated

[9/10 · 13 April 2014]

In my country this movie didn't last long in the cinemas, so the first time I saw this movie it was on DVD. I had been attracted to the story and after a first viewing I was blown away by the CGI, acting performances and the story.

Personally I still believe that this movie remains underrated (even after five years there are only two graphic novel/comic book adaptations that are superior to this movie and these are sin city and the dark knight). Watchmen gives a raw perspective on the lives of different vigilantes. The mixture between the rather unknown actors (and not blockbuster actors) and the perfect CGI makes this movie so great. Add an incredible soundtrack to this mixture and you're in for one hell of a ride.

Personally I have seen both the theatrical version as the director's cut and I have tried to watch the ultimate cut. It must be said that the first two versions are very good to near perfect (especially the director's cut adds some very beautiful scenes to the movie). If you're watching this movie for the first time though it might be better to watch the theatrical cut because most people don't like three hour movies. Personally I prefer the director's cut, but that's only because I'm a huge fan of the movie and prefer a longer version of the story. The ultimate cut though is not for everyone, I have tried to watch this version but had to stop. This version adds the story 'Tales of the Black Freightner' and because this story is an animation 'movie' every scene that is added from this picture forms a kind of a fracture with the main (watchmen) storyline. I think that the ultimate cut is only for the real die hard fans of watchmen (and especially of the graphic novel).

Overall I think that Watchmen should be seen by everyone because it's one of the few successful hero-stories that doesn't show a hope-giving picture of these men and women but that tells a real dramatical series of events.

Alexander (2004)

Alexander revisited vs theatrical cut

[9/10 · 12 April 2014]

The first time I saw Alexander, I saw the theatrical cut. To be honest I have always been intrigued by the unique life of Alexander the great (I still believe that it is impossible to not have some kind of respect towards someone who conquered such a great part of the then-known world in only ten years) And having seen this theatrical cut I thought the movie was mediocre, watchable but not as good as brave heart or the Vietnam drama Platoon.

Nevertheless I heard that the revisited version of this movie was much better and having seen this version now I must say don't waste your time with the theatrical cut, but go see the three and a half hour long version. Despite the fact that this version is without doubt of epic duration, the movie seems less long and boring than the original cut. I don't want to spoil anything but in this version Stone has also switched the order of some scenes which makes it easier to watch this movie without getting bored but which at some times can be confusing.

However adding and reshaping the storyline doesn't turn this movie into a perfect picture. The flaws that were present in the theatrical cut remain in the revisited version however they seem to be less annoying. Colling Farell performs very well and in the extended version a more emotional dimension is being added to his character explaining some of his reactions that seemed somewhat strange in the original version. Val Kilmer gives one of his greatest performances, although he has not that much screen time. Anthony Hopkins seems to be less great in his role. Sadly enough Angelina Jolie still gives the worst acting performance in the history of mankind. Her forced accent sounds so terrible that one would mute the sound so he would no longer be tormented.

Historical this movie is more or less accurate (Alexander was no blonde and some of the events mentioned may not be 100 percent accurate but overall this movie shows a rather true image of this man. There is much ado about the action scenes, there wouldn't be enough action in this movie and the action scenes would be too long. However this movie is no action movie and chooses to focus on the emotional side of Alexander.

So don't waste your time with the theatrical cut, but go watch the revisited version.

The Square (2013)

See the revolution trough the people's eyes

[9/10 · 22 March 2014]

What an amazing movie, if you ever want to learn the story of the Arab spring in Egypt and its after match, than you must go see this movie.

the documentary mostly made up out of material shot by protesters tells the intense story of the Arab uprising in Egypt, Cairo.

Told by a youngster one can only show admiration for how persistent these men and women fought for their freedom, at the same time it shows the after match of this revolution.

Sadly enough this movie didn't win the Oscar (which it should have won). Told by real bystanders and shot by bystanders this gives a very dramatical and realistic image of the uprising, a must see for everyone.

Crimi Clowns (2012– )

Amazing, at times sick, but nevertheless amazing

[8/10 · 21 March 2014]

The first season of this series is without doubt good and entertaining but nothing more, season two is on the contrary legendary and amazing. This is the second time (after matroesjka's) that a Belgian series is able to concur with the great American crime-series such as sons of anarchy. Especially season 2 shows the greatness of this series, here the makers have learned from their mistakes of the first series. The found-footage is better and the story is more elaborate.

The actors are, you can see it by their looks, perfectly casted and perform amazingly. And much like the characters of series like S.O.A. and the shield, the viewer also bounds with the characters and starts to feel pity for them, because you know they's evil and criminals but still you have to admire the way they live.

To put it briefly crimiclowns is one of the better Belgian series that becomes really addictive after the first season. Nevertheless it must be said that there are a lot of explicit scenes, so don't watch this with your children, because this is not about funny clowns. Still with better placed nudity than series like Spartacus and with a language that will remind you of the sopranos this series is a must-see for all crime- lovers, the found-footage filming will not be annoying, that much I can say.

V (2009–2011)

Good...but too short

[7/10 · 21 March 2014]

Being a fan of alien-invasion movie/series, I started watching this v with much enthusiasm. Nevertheless the first season left me a bit hollow and confused. But having seen already half of this series I decided to also watch the second season.

And it must be said, season two is without doubt the superior part of the series, most likely because they knew there wasn't going to be a third season and wanted to end all the story lines.

And ironically the rather fast pace of the second season makes you want to watch a third season, which probably will not be the case.

Overall the series has a mediocre storyline that kind of dooms itself by wanting to tell too many stories. As for the acting, it's not the greatest acting ever, but nevertheless v is a highly entertaining series that sadly enough ended way too soon and thereby leaves the viewer with a bit of a hollow feeling. Nonetheless the series is definitely worth watching.

300: Rise of an Empire (2014)

For glory's sake ... war

[8/10 · 21 March 2014]

eight years after the first movie, 300 rise of an empire is released. But it's not a sequel, not really. Filmed exactly in the same fashion that made 300 an instant classic, 300 rise of an empire will definitely not disappoint you.

Eva Greens part is without doubt amazing, playing a completely different role than she is used to, she def innately not disappoints. Sullivan Stapleton gives a firm and good performance, but is without doubt no Gerard Butler, although you really cannot compare the two roles (also in history Athens and Sparta were two very different city-states. Without wanting to give away too much information, 300 rise of a nation is must-see that is a fair successor of the original movie and explains a lot of story lines. The makers of this movie had a very great idea with the chronology that there is in this movie and the relation it holds with his predecessor gives the entire story a strong boost.

Smallville (2001–2017)

surpasses every superman-adaptation

[10/10 · 14 March 2014]

Being a great fan of the superman-franchise, I have always been a bit disappointed that there never has been a perfectly made superman-adaptation (Man of steel was great, but cannot tip this great series). Nevertheless this series seems to top every superman-movie ever made. The casting is without doubt tremendous. Tom Welling does a great job as Clark Kent, as no other he shows the true nature of superman (namely a man with a pure heart who believes there's good in everyone), after three seasons comes Erica Durance (who plays Lois Lane), the creators of this series had search a long time after this actress, but this was not in vane. The magic that sparkles between Durance and Willing is so addictive that you just can't stop watching this series.

At last the writing may show some plot holes, but nevertheless whenever there a weak moment in the story it's saved by the great acting and even greater soundtrack. The constant cliffhangers (especially the seasons finale of season 3 and 9 are so amazing)

If you are searching for a great science-fiction series or a great comic-adaptation are if you just want to see a darn incredible series, than you just simply have to see this series. Personally I finished this 10-season long series in six weeks, so just saying, it is highly addictive.

Dexter (2006–2013)

tonight is the night

[10/10 · 14 March 2014]

The mixture of great acting, great storytelling, a marvelous soundtrack makes Dexter one of the greatest modern TV-series. As addicting as the sopranos and breaking bad, dexter takes deep in the psych of a serial killer.

It's the mixture of the brutal, emotionless dexter and the way he interacts with the people among him (who seem to cherish him no matter what) that makes the series so addicting, mix some perfectly timed humor to it and what you get is one hell of a series.

Michael C. Hall plays tremendously. As no other he can change from a sweet loving brother into a brutal psychopath in only a matter of minutes. Having seeing him play in six feet under, it was quite clear that he is a great actor, nonetheless he surpasses himself.

Although there is a lot of commentary on the last seasons, I must say that even though they are not as good as the first four, they are without doubt still better than anything you'll ever see on TV nowadays.

If you haven't seen this and you love witty, intelligent, well-written series with outstanding acting than this is without doubt a must-see for all.

Transformers: Dark of the Moon (2011)

This gives a new definition to the word brainless

[2/10 · 1 February 2014]

I am a huge fan of Michael Bay movies and I must admit the first two Transformer movies were actually quite good and entertaining. The First Transformers was a action-packed, funny and good written movie. The Second installment was somewhat a put down, but nevertheless watchable.

But what has happened to this third installment. The acting is horrifying, the writing is crap and the special effects may be the only good thing in this movie.

Where the humor in the first two movies was well placed and actually a contribution to the movies, the humor in this part is just bad.

As for the story, it must be said there is just no story. People keep complaining how Man of Steel is just a brainless action movie with no story, but it must be said, transformers dark of the moon has even less story in it.

Like I said the only good thing in the movie may be the special effects and CGI, however watching this movie one gets the feeling that he is in a computer game and not even a good one. More than half of the movie is just pure computer added effects, making you wonder if Bay should even have taking the effort to film any actual scenes.

If you are a fan of brainless action and just want to sit down in your seat after a hard day of work, watching the Apocalypse with some weird humor than you should really go and watch this movie. If you are not looking for this then I would suggest to just skip this movie and go watch another Michael Bay movie.

Furious 6 (2013)

Brainless.... but so much fun

[8/10 · 1 February 2014]

This movie must be one of the most brainless movies I ever saw in cinemas, along with the expendables that is. However it was just so much fun.

What makes the Fast and the Furious so great is without a doubt the incredible team that is behind this series. It must be said there isn't much of a story in this installment of the series. However after having seen five brainless fast and the furious movies one does not expect a strong storyline. The really lovely thing about this movie is that the viewer really can see how the actors actually must have had a great time shooting this film. As in the previous movie there is a great cooperation between Vin Diesel and The Rock, now teaming up in one of the greatest bad-ass end battles in movie history.

But also the character of Roman gives an extremely witty feeling to this movie. As said it is not the immense stunts, the incredible special effects or the beautiful soundtrack that makes this movie, it is simply the great acting team behind this movie that makes it so entertaining.

A must see for every fan of action, comedy and just pure entertainment.

Man of Steel (2013)

This is madness

[9/10 · 19 January 2014]

When I heard that Zack Snyder was going to do a film on superman the first thought that came to me was; wauw. Being a huge fan of Watchmen (that still remains one of the most underrated movies ever), I had high hopes for this movie. However coming out of the theaters I didn't really know what to think of it.

Let's start by saying that choosing Snyder as a director was a good choice, the man had proved that he is familiar with the world of comics and graphic novels, combine this man with David S. Goyer and Christopher Nolan and you should get one of the greatest comic adaptations ever. However why didn't it feel like that? The answer is quite simple, despite the fact that I love this movie, it is just to dark. Superman is contrary to batman not a symbol of darkness, revenge and bitterness. The man of steel represents hope and showing hope in a dark and destructive movie like this is just not possible. And I think that's why most people say this movie isn't that good, well that and the enormous amounts of destruction that is at display.

However if you can get over this darkness and over the destruction, then you must admit that this is a really enjoyable, highly-entertaining and actually very good movie. The casting is simply put perfect, Fishburne plays a very realistic Perry White, Costner and Crowe each perform tremendously the role of loving father (although it's quite funny that superman has in this movie two robin hood fathers). However the real star of this movie is Shannon playing Zod.

In short if you expect to see a superman comic than you shouldn't go watch this, because well it isn't. If you however desire to see a bad-ass movie that is highly entertaining and happens to have superman in it, then you really should just go and watch this.

The Sopranos (1999–2007)

If you can quote the rules, then you can obey them.

[10/10 · 19 January 2014]

Having seen this series years after it's finale and after having heard how great this show really was, I had high hopes concerning this show and it must be said I was not disappointed.

Let's start by saying that this show is not you average crime show in which you witness the rise and fall of a criminal family, on the contrary this show starts with an average day of the soprano family. Tony having a weird obsession for some ducks that keep coming back to his pool, his kids just living their lives. And this is what separates the Sopranos from all other crime shows. There isn't a gang-related shooting every three minutes, there aren't great wars that are being fought in the streets, instead there is only the story of a man who happens to be applied in a criminal environment. The sopranos tells how Tony fights his inner demons as much as he has to fight his outer demons (competitors who want his job, his money, the FBI who wants to see him in prison, friends who betray him).

And it is in this perpetual fight that the real story lies, expect the unexpected is the only thing one can say about this series. Expect to be surprised in the first season, but expect even to be blown away by the unforeseen in an average episode. And that is one thing that makes the show so awesome, the fact that it's so unpredictable and that the viewer cannot know what comes next.

And than there is of course James Gandolfini who is and will always remain Tony Soprano. Never before has an actor performed so intense on television. More realistic than Brando, more shocking than Pacino (Scarface), more brilliant than Liotta (Goodfellas). The sopranos is a great series and is brilliantly written, but due to Gandolfini the series is truly perfect.

If you're a fan of crime series, drama series or just bloody good acting than all say is go watch this series.

The Wolf of Wall Street (2013)

goodfellas meets Casino

[10/10 · 19 January 2014]

Let's start by saying that this movie isn't for everyone. Like usual in Scorsese's movies, this film is also filled with explicit scenes, explicit language and explicit everything, however the tremendous difference between this movie and most other explicit movies is that the wolf of wall street is not just a movie, but a piece of art.

Starting with the first scene I had an instant flashback to Casino, in which Scorsese also used the unique narrator-technique throughout the movie. Ironically Casino also had a hard time when it first came out in theaters, because just like TWOWS people were shocked by the explicit language and the amount of violence used in the movie. And yet nowadays Casino is seen a one of the greatest movies in the oeuvre of Scorsese. And I think this is also a bit the problem with this movie. Most people are surprised by how the movie is filmed and by the many nude scenes because of the fact that most people expect to see a biographical crime drama. But just like many of Scorsese's films this movie is a mere reflection of today's society and moreover it is a direct attack to the how Wall Street abused the people and money they had and how this lead to the many crisis the world is face with today. And this is were the protagonist of The Wolf of Wall Street meets the characters from Goodfellas and Casino. Like them Dicaprio's character doesn't want to be saved, he doesn't want to be a good guy. In fact he even chooses to remain bad when he is offered a deal to avoid jail time. And that is were TWOWS encounters Henry Hill (from Goodfellas. Hill also didn't want to be a hero, he wanted to be a wise guy, but in the end he had to cooperate with the FBI, just like in this movie. And this is why I believe this movie is without doubt a Goodfellas-Casino mix without any of the weaker point these movies had.

Overall this movie is definitely Oscar-material. Like usual it starts with the cutting and editing. Only one director in Hollywood has been so obsessed with the editing of his movies. Like Raging Bull The wolf of wall street has a number of scenes were the editing is just phenomenal. Also the soundtrack is once again perfectly chosen, Scorsese knows where to put certain songs and places for instance the happy song ça plaine pour moi in the dramatic rescue scene. And this is only one of the many examples. And then there is the acting, Leonardo Dicaprio performs at his best. This movie is once again an example of just how big an actor he is. But it must be said he is accompanied by none other than Jonah Hill, which was I must say an extremely dangerous choice as Jonah is not the star actor Leonardo is. Nonetheless Hill gives here a performance that will literally blow you away. And last but not least there is the directing. It is funny how even now no one asks himself is the new Scorsese good are bad? Instead you just ask yourself how good is he, because well, he doesn't make bad movies.

In conclusion it can be said that this movie is without doubt not for everyone, but it cannot be argued that this movie will without doubt be one of the greatest movies released in 2014.

The X-Files (1993–2018)

It makes you believe

[10/10 · 30 December 2012]

Growing up I followed two series: Stargate SG-1 and the last seasons of the X-files. At the moment I loved both of them and thought they were the best series ever. Some nine years later I re watched the entire series in a pretty short period and I must say that despite the enormous progression in both CGI and make-up design The X-files still remains the best series ever made.

What is that makes it so strong? In short it is the interaction between the believer David Duchovny and the non-believer Gillian Anderson. I don't think that even though in the after match of the x-files many series have had the same unmatchable couple (that later turns out to be the best couple ever), there has been a series that has found two actors that have this kind of mind blowing effect on the viewers.

Each episode knows to surprise the viewer and knows just how to make him wonder what monster or mystery has turned up to terrify the neighborhood. It still surprises me that some episodes, even though I have grown up, continue to scare me.

That other strength the series has is that every time the season starts losing its pace or its quality, there is this one episode that reminds you of its geniality.

You should think that a series would lose its fastness after nine years and 201 episodes, but nothing is more false here. After having watched 201 episodes and two movies you just want to see another episode. The X- files left me wandering and looking for a new series, but even though others (like supernatural and fringe) have tried to reforge the sphere that was overall in the x-files, it must be said that no series has ever reached the same plane as this one.

In short I can't deny that after 201 episodes I do not want to believe, but I simple believe.

The Dark Knight Rises (2012)

The Dark Bane Rises

[9/10 · 29 December 2012]

At first I couldn't wait until this film got out in theaters. I had seen every film of nolan and seeing that they keep getting better, I expected The Dark Knight rises to be his magnum opus. But I should have known better: how could someone, even a Christopher Nolan, outdo the Dark Knight.

Watching the movie I was blown away by the opening scene. For the second time Nolan has found an extraordinary and brilliant way the introduce the main villain Bane. And it must be said, Tom Hardy is as wicked and genius as Heath Ledger was. After having seen this movie multiple times I'm still amazed with what Hardy does with his face. Although he has besides his eyes no other facial means to express himself, he uses these eyes in a magnificent way.

As I was saying the opening scene and Bane in general is without doubt the greatest thing there is to mention concerning this movie. Because despite the fact that The Dark Knight Rises starts huge, the film quickly changes into a fantasy film that doesn't manage to keep up with its predecessors. It is painful to see just how many plot holes this movie has.

Why than the high rating? Simpley put: despite everything the last batman movie is still pretty amazing. As said is Tom Hardy his performance Oscar worthy, don't let yourself be fooled by the negative comments of his voice, the voice AND the accents are a perfect fit. Of course there is also the astonishing music score, I don't think there is any movie who has a more entertaining score than this trilogy. And at last you can't neglect the special effects which were once more pure art.

In short Nolan knows one more just how to combine the unrealistic Bane with the realistic character Bruce Wayne has become. Despite the fact that the movie loses its pace in the second part, the movie still has a better pace than most modern action movies.

Skyfall (2012)

50 years of James Bond

[8/10 · 29 December 2012]

2012: Bond is back ... or not? Seeing this movie the first time I had high hopes for Skyfall. Me, being a huge bond-fan, hoped that this movie would be all about the action. However I should have known that director Mendes didn't want another Bond-movie, instead he wanted an Oscar-movie with a character named Bond. Does this mean that Skyfall failed: not at all. The strength of the movie is hidden in a little thing called nostalgia.

Director Mendes is able to combine the action of the older (brosnan en Dalton) Bond-movies with the brains of modern action-dramas. Skyfall is a more realistic Bond-movie than Moonraker, Die another day or even From Russia with love could ever be. Nevertheless Skyfall has a greater Bond-sphere (i.e. Sean Connery sphere) than both Quantum of solace and Casino Royale.

Bond-actor Daniel Craig is playing Bond for the third time and he is finally becoming one with his character. Despite the fact that his workout has undoubtedly had its results, it must be said that his aging hasn't gone very well. Nevertheless he once again given a splendid performance.

Than comes Javier Bardem, the appearance of his character made me think of Max Zorin (played by Christopher Walken in A view to a kill (1985) and just like Walken I expected him to be the better actor in this movie. Without wanting to spoil anything I can only say that the performance of Bardem immediately made me think of Heath Ledger (playing the Joker), with that little difference that Bardem failed in every way. Not only has he no credibility, also his manner of speaking is extremely annoying.

As for Action and special effects: despite the fact that most action (other than the opening sequence which is pretty amazing) is rather limited, is must be said that that limited action has been brought both beautiful and realistic.

In short Skyfall is a more realistic Bond movie, in which not the action of gadgets, but the story and its characters of most importance are. Despite the disappointing soundtrack you'll find Skyfall to be a very entertaining and bond-worthy movie.

The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (2008)

Here we go again

[5/10 · 18 August 2008]

Here we go again. The mummy was enjoyable, the mummy returns was funny, the mummy 3 is hell. Rob Cohen, not the better director, made the mummy series into a B-film without brains. 1. The Mummy had this special effects, a Egyptian mummy and a great thriller effect. 2. The Mummy returns had this sense of humor. 3.The Mummy 3 had yeti's, a dragon (greec mythology) and a kind of dog.

Also the story was crap, it's an indiana jones copy. Indiana jones 4 : indy is a secret agent. The Mummy 3 : O'Connels are secret agents. Indiana jones 3 : eternal life. The Mummy 3 : Eternal life. If you make a film, make it good and original, don't copy another film, if you do that, you might wanna make a remake. The huge army of mummies was just a replay of the second film, the impossible love is a copy of the mummy. All good and well, but a mummy in China??? I have never heard of a archaeological site were they use guns. And the worst thing is the absence of Rachel Weise. The mummy3 is a nice film, but no mummy legend. *****

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (2008)

The man with the hat

[10/10 · 1 August 2008]

the man with the hat,

Even after 19 years he still surprises me. Indiana jones used to be an amusing adventure film. Nowadays they just don't make such films anymore. The story was just as to the other indyfilms (1 and 3 : Christianity, 2: dark religion 4: Scientology).

The action was good, sometimes (refering to the begin) the story isn't clear and fine. Other times (refering to the whole jungle chase, the story is exciting as the first film. => The film could have been better, but he is enjoyable.

The scene with the red ants was perfect The only irritating thing was the accent of the Russians. Shia LaBoeuf was better than usual. The fact that things (the dead of certain characters and the old indy) happened made the film only more realistic.

The Dark Knight (2008)

let's put a smile on that face

[10/10 · 1 August 2008]

wow, some time ago I saw the dark knight and all I can say is :wow.

the film started as a crime film and ended as a real dramatic story. the joker is the only "bad guy" I like in the batman series and Heath ledger preformed an amazing enemy.

The story of Two-Face was dramatic and sad, 10 times better than Jones (Batman forever)

BAtman himself was probably the best of all.

my favourite scene : every scene with the joker.

only one disappointment : the film was to short.

Yesterday I red that the sequel would contain the Riddler (good choice) and the Pinguin (afwul choice)

All I can say is : hopefully the writers erase the Pinguin and replace him by another enemy.