anchoreddown Reviews

Black Panther (2018)

Marvel did it again!

[9/10 · 17 February 2018]

I had a small window of an opportunity to go see this movie opening day between things I had to do, and I'm glad I did. That's saying a lot from someone who's used to routines throughout the week. They pack a lot into this chapter for the panther. I haven't taken the time to actually research the comic book character. Thankfully, there's plenty of exposition at the beginning, which is a good thing considering that there has been plenty of hype for each Marvel movie that comes out. It really helps the audience because this day in age, most people won't bother to do any research. For some movies, yes, you should get on Wikipedia or YouTube the character and see what pops up. There's a lot that Black Panther is, and there's a lot that it isn't in the way of comic book adaptions. Marvel is getting better and better at keeping the superheroes fresh for the intended audience. The problem with DC is the way they've been handling their superheroes, but that's a whole different topic. Yes, this is a bit of a political storyline, but at the same time the political side of the movie thankfully doesn't overpower the rest of it. There's plenty of action, ripped guys w their shirts off for the girls to leak their hormones all over, plenty of comedic moments and everything else in between. Martin Freeman's character is rather left hanging on as the comedic role, considering he's done this before w The Hobbit trilogy. As far as the culture of Wakanda, it's a mix between Iron Man's work and something you might see in Bruce Wayne's Bat-cave. Several parts made me think they could've used some of this technology in The Dark Knight trilogy. That is one impressive cave the panther has. The only thing that really stood out to me that was different was seeing that one guy who had that ornamental piece attached to his lip, ;-) I've said it before, and I'll say it again, I've learned to stop reading reviews and what critics are saying about movies today because all they ever do anymore is shred the filmmakers to pieces. I want to be entertained, not to go into a theater to judge a movie. The rare exception would be sitting down to some Batman movie that would be similar to Batman & Robin. I'm a huge Bat-fan. Well, I certainly enjoyed this entry in the MCU. Would probably get it when it's out on home video, or available for streaming off Amazon.

Jurassic Park III (2001)

Underrated and extremely overlooked,.......

[8/10 · 31 January 2018]

This may be the lowest point in box office for the Jurassic Park franchise, however, in light of both reading up on the spinosaurus and watching several YouTube videos on the franchise, I'm coming to appreciate the work that went into the third Jurassic movie. First off, as most people have noted, this is not like the other three films. Yes, it may not have much of a scare tactic, but it all boils down to how well you know your dinosaurs. Go back to 2001. Research for undiscovered dinosaurs, like the spinosaurus was quite new and different. This animal was chosen for it's distinctive size, power and energy. The production team was looking for something larger than the T-Rex and the reason this dinosaur was chosen was for it's crocodile like snout, which makes it stand out next to it's cousins in the relative chain. Upono closer inspection, if you actually know something of the animal, it was more of an aquatic animal, and the research, as eluded to in the trivia section had the dinosaur standing on four to two legs, depending on your source material. Therefore, with this kind of information, you can get an idea of what's really going on behind the scenes for the storyline when it comes to actually breeding the animals. It's an obvious hybrid, even through it isn't stated in the film. I honestly don't think it was the studios intention to create a hybrid dinosaur. What we got is actually quite brilliant, it's a monster movie, but with a Jurassic Park twist. The fact that they chose to do it this way and leave the audience w questions until the next movie furthers the idea that the spinosaurus is a hybrid. Most people are probably looking at the animal and wishing it was a T-Rex, because that is the star of the franchise. Mot people probably didn't like it for several obvious reasons, but it's the dinosaurs that shine the most in this episode of the Jurassic Park franchise. Two thumbs up for doing something completely different!!

Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017)

Not a bad entry,........

[8/10 · 8 July 2017]

I'm no Spider-Man comic book expert, but based on what we've seen so far, this is a great fresh reboot for Mr. Spidy. Without posting any spoilers, if you saw the last Spider-Man film, the introduction gives multiple nods to both the previous Spider-Man film as well as give the audience a full introductory into the MCU, in a very strong way. A lot of people get nit-picky with their preferences on which movie does better. I prefer to take these kinds of films at face value rather than become the critic. I liked the movie, the direction it took made me feel like it was something the fans have been waiting for. Spider-Man is actually on the short list of my top five super heroes list, number one being Batman. There were a number of Easter eggs that I caught. Michael Keaton nailed his role as the slightly grouchy old dad and business man. It's almost like he's arched back into the favorite character of Batman, again, in a good way. The instructional videos w Captain America were hilarious by the way,.....

Ghostbusters: Answer the Call (2016)

Better than expected!!

[7/10 · 15 July 2016]

The fab seems to be the idea of cranking out more sequels and reboots, specifically from the 80s. For a lot of people, its a mixed bag of reviews, most of them negative. To date, this might be one of the few positive reviews for the new Ghostbusters. At first, I was excited to hear about the new Ghostbusters. Having been a child of the 90s, I grew up watching both films. Who wants to mess with perfection??? This movie has a few quirks and weird parts. Honestly, I think the story-line was fine and that their reboot is somewhat original. The few things that it lacked was that the cameos of the original cast did not have their original character names,.....regardless, its works either way, but it would make the passing of the torch a whole lot better. The other thing I'd like to mention would be that both the original and the sequel both centered around Dana Barrack, in some form or fashion. The opening was great! The idea of the haunting in that old mansion had some gravity to it. Really, that isn't even much of a spoiler alert. The strongest point of this Ghostbuster entry I'd have to say is the fact that the story-line and the 'language' of the film converging was more than plausible. The first film hinted at cults and the reality of real haunting and poltergeists. This entry seems to take this concept, much, much further. The idea of even having a show-down at the rock concert made it feel like there was something larger happening. I would say, that this reboot could have been a lot worse,.....a whole lot worse,......

Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (2013–2020)

This show works well!!

[9/10 · 28 May 2016]

I don't really watch TV, but the only TV that I do watch is usually on a disc, so that gives you an idea of what kind of rating I might give this TV show. The idea of doing Agents of Shield for a TV is notable. I honestly didn't even know that it was based on the comic books until I actually looked it up. This is a diamond in the rough for TV these days considering that TV shows are getting more raunchy and more adult oriented than anything else. Agents, like the MCU movies pulls away from this and gives something that everyone can enjoy, adults and young kids alike. Agents of Shield seems to fall under the PG-13 category, but in a good way. They cover a lot of ground in each season. There's the 'short story lines' then there are the longer ones that go into detail about the major points of each season. With this kind of style w the writing, it makes the 'shorts' more enjoyable. If you like Marvel movies, you can definitely find yourself easily watching this show. I will also like to add that if you were at the Seattle Comic-Con for last year, (2015), you had the chance to see Clark Gregg and Chloe Bennett.

Something Wild (1986)

an underrated 80s flick

[8/10 · 13 May 2016]

I have a strong habit of trying to find diamonds in the rough when it comes to great underrated 80s films. This one seems more nostalgic to the time of its release, which was,......30 years ago,.....as of this year. I also noticed that there are less than 100 reviews on this,...... Okay, if you can get passed Melanie Griffith seducing Jeff Daniels, this movie is worth a go, but has plenty of adult themes. Seems like Daniels is very much an actor who holds well for this being a 'road' movie,.....like Dumb And Dumber, need I say more. This film draws attention to Ray Loitta in his pre-Goodfellas break out role, which is not that much different from the characterization. Overall, I found it enjoyable, even though some parts of the film were predictable. Does it hold any gravity at 30?? I'm sure someone from the 80s will remember this movie.

Lucy (I) (2014)

It works, if you think you're just human,.... ;-)

[8/10 · 8 May 2016]

Seems like a film like this should stand out along with the line-up of films from 2014. Either that, or it's seriously underrated. This film works on multiple levels, due to the science fiction side of the story. Your interpretation will swing one way, or the other on what the script-writers deliver to the storyline. There really is no need to develop many of the characters for something like this. You can, but that will either draw out the storyline too much, or enhance the tone of the film depending on the viewer. No, a standard 90 film length is perfectly fine for this plot. Why is it that we only use about 10% of our brain?? The real answer is simple and hard to understand, depending how you process it. The funny thing is,....the plot decides to leave God out of the equation, therefore, you're going to fall back on a more humanistic approach. This film is man's attempt to find the answers,.....but isn't that the REAL definition of 'religion'?? If you go back to what Lucy says about time and space, she specifically said that we are all subjected to time, the day were born to the day we die. We can't change that, therefore, we can't look at our lives in the viewpoint of a 'timeline', so to speak. In this sense, Lucy becomes like God. Does this mean we're destined to be gods?? The Mormons seem to think so, but that would mean we would create our own worlds, so to speak, and they wouldn't be as inclined to overlap to create the 'environment' we live in. The real reason why we don't use more the 10% is because knowledge gives power to do things. In a perfect world, no one would want to 'test the limits', or have the desire to 'sin'. It's temptation being removed from the equation, but in the 'world' we live in, the sin and temptation do exist. Where's the balance?? Wouldn't it then make sense to answer to the deity than ignore it?? Again, I go back to the idea that this story is about a world 'without' God in the equation. It's fine on its own, but to say that the material presented in this movie is real, would go back to the 'evolution' idea. Of course, what you see on the film isn't real. Everything that is linked together is purely fiction.

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)

A mesh of comic book galore!!

[9/10 · 27 March 2016]

Everyone has high expectations for Batman and Superman flicks, depending on how much you take in from the comics. For most people, explaining the origin stories is not rocket science, it's common knowledge. I always like going into the theater with a movie like this with little to no expectations because if I do, that might spoil the movie for me. This movie is eye candy. With Zack Snyder directing, it's going to have good visual effects based on his previous work, which does include Man of Steel. I'm more of a Batman fan, but I do know enough of Superman's origins to follow along with what was happening on-screen. This DOES stick to the comic books/graphic novels. Okay, it does seem like half way though that it starts to look like a film adaption of The Dark Knight Returns, only with two extra characters in the mix. Like I said, lower expectations might make this enjoyable depending on who's watching it. The reason this movie is rated R is because there's quite a bit of violence, but there are way more explosions,....and it's not the dramatic explosions you might get in, say a Michael Bay directed piece. No these explosions are more geared by reaction of the science behind the reaction on-screen. It's worth seeing whether your for Batman or Superman.

Deadpool (2016)

Not terrible.

[8/10 · 20 February 2016]

At this point most Marvel and DC fans are expecting a bit of a slow down with the rate of comic book related movies. The studios would probably agree that to keep audiences coming, they have to keep it interesting. This Marvel flick seems to fall into the middle category depending on your interest in the comic book character of Deadpool. Ant-Man had a similar take where it was good, but not as powerful as some of the other Marvel flicks we've seen. Most of the Marvel movies are good at delivering a punch for great fights between characters and short witty lines in the middle of the normal dialog. Deadpool seems like it's an extension of what we got w Andrew Garfield's take on Spiderman, who does more bantering with the villains. If you like bantering comic book characters, this is more for you as opposed to characters like Batman who don't talk all that much when in action. I'm actually glad the studio managed to satisfy the Deadpool fans enough to shatter the February record - for Valentines Day. (That comes off a little weird). Oh, and for the fans that are anywhere from 30 to 40 years old, you will appreciate the end credit scene.

Jurassic World (2015)

A worthy sequel installment

[9/10 · 12 June 2015]

Since the last Jurassic Park sequel, there has been lots of speculation as to whether a fourth film would happen. Jurassic Park fans finally got their wish in a very big way. Yes, there's been some odd-bag remarks, but ultimately you have to decide whether it's a worthy sequel or not. Set 22 years since the incident in the original film, Jurassic World takes a slightly different turn from the other two sequels. There's enough grounded material to remind the viewer that this is a Jurassic Park film, yet takes a few new turns. Steven Spielberg may not be directing this one, but he's got his signature all over it, everything from the visual concepts to the tid-bits. Yes, it's not Jurassic Park, but it's what Jurassic Park should have been if the attraction ever got off the ground. It's a well packed action movie that hardly lets down once it starts. There are plenty of Easter Eggs to be found with references to the first three films, relying heavily on the original Jurassic Park. This is scarier and more up-front in your face, but if your kids can handle a movie like Jurassic Park to begin with, I wouldn't worry too much. (Watch for a cameo from SNLs Jimmy Fallon as the commentator in the bubble cages)

Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015)

One great thrill ride.

[9/10 · 3 May 2015]

For some reason, or another this film seems to have a mixed bag of reviews, some love it while others hate this piece. Want an honest review??? When the studio reached the 'point of no return' by getting to The Avengers, it was the first Marvel film to reach the billion dollar mark. Up until this point, most of the Marvel based films received good reviews. What went wrong?? It seems to always be the common denominator, the audience. Movie goers seem to get more nit-picky of films that have background material these days. They keep praying that the producers keep 'messing up' on their favorite comic book characters. However, I mean no disrespect to anyone. This being said, it puts more pressure on the studios to do their job right. This is why films like Spiderman 3 failed to bring full force is because Sam Raimi could not give the script he wanted full treatment. Now that I have laid down some ground in the way Nick Fury would, as if talking to the team, here's my review of this movie. It's good to see new and old faces. With the grouping of the characters in Age Of Ultron, it's difficult to really put character emphasis on any one or two superheroes. We know the ones we've already seen in the Marvel Universe. Once again, this is part of the start of phase two in the writing process of both the films and Agents Of Shield. We got to see the alien life force from the first Avengers, so it makes sense that Age Of Ultron would have robots to accompany Ultron himself, seeing that he has to upload himself to a machine in the first place. This also eludes to the reveal that Marvel fans will eventually get of Thanos. Not only that, but now Spiderman will be able to join the roster again. Everybody knows that Agent Colson is still alive, so we have yet to see him show up again, but more than likely, will stay with Shield. What makes this film special?? I think it's the Scarlet Witch who taps into the minds of others, making them face their fears of their past. Bottom line is, don't let anyone tell you what you should and shouldn't watch. Sometimes you have to test the waters,......trust me, if you relax and sit back you just might enjoy this piece of film you may call 'a piece of crap'.

Romancing the Stone (1984)

great adventure!!

[8/10 · 29 December 2014]

Romancing The Stone really has it's history in correlation with Back To The Future. This truly was the under-dog movie. Romancing The Stone was originally a book by Diane Thomas. Designed to be her 'version' of Raiders Of The Lost Ark, she pitched the idea for the movie to Steven Spielberg. Having not wanting to repeat the recycled idea, Steven turned her to Robert Zemeckis and Bob Gale, who were his 'interns' at the time. Romancing The Stone has become one of the first in a long run of having a female protagonist as the lead role. Kathleen Turner may have had a defining role in Body Heat, but this picture gave us a more down to earth character for turner to play. It's a brilliant thrill ride from start to finish. All three of the films leads, Douglas, Turner and DeVito have been defined with this movie as a staple for their careers. The start of production of Romancing The Stone would also form a strong bond with each other. They all came back to do the Back To The Future trilogy as well as Roger Rabbit, Forrest Gump and countless other Hollywood hits. Romancing The Stone definitely comes recommended for fans of action flicks.

The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies (2014)

Nice finish!

[8/10 · 26 December 2014]

Picking up where we left off with The Desolation of Smug, this film plays out in the same format as any other Middle Earth film does. Less than ten minutes into the movie, the audience is back in the saddle for the third adventure of The Hobbit. This may not be the best rated epic from Peter Jackson, but I wouldn't say it was a disappointment. Some elements were missing for a proper epic piece, however the feel of the film speaks of conclusion and war. This seems to fit this reality. Lots of directors and writers speak of getting the feel of the film right. It's a departure from the last two films in The Hobbit, but when you cut it up into three sections of film, I say there's no need to add any more. Making line to the original LOTR trilogy, that part of it had to be in there. Ultimately The Hobbit should have been done in two films to better appease the fans, but I am not saying every chapter in a series of films has to do that. The third X-Men film was that way,......so I've heard,.......

Dumb and Dumber To (2014)

a fresh batch of 'dumb'

[9/10 · 14 November 2014]

It's Dumb And Dumber all over again!! Twenty years later,......Harry & Lloyd are back, and dumber than ever! Harry says he needs a kidney transplant, and would prefer to get it from his long lost daughter who is days away from making an extravagant speech at a science expo. This is just the beginning of all sorts of twists and turns in this comedy extravaganza. Don't kid yourself,......if you really are a fan of Dumb And Dumber, this is worth the watch. Yes, there may be some recycled jokes in this one, but there are plenty more to cackle at. The storyline this time follows Harry trying to track down his daughter at the same time that a love affair happens with his daughter's step-mother. Watch for a cameo from Jennifer Lawrence as a younger version of Fraida Felcher,(because I didn't catch it, apparently even though I at least tried!) Oh,.....and stick around after the credits for an extra scene that is as equally exciting as the extra scenes in the Marvel related movies.

Gone Girl (2014)

surprisingly well done

[9/10 · 4 October 2014]

These are the kinds of movies I go to the theater for,.......it's a good thing they aren't doing 3D with it.

Rosamund Pike and Ben Affleck star as a married couple that have their share of marital problems. That's what it looks like from the start.

She goes missing at about the twenty minute mark. He obviously wants her back.

The acting is very well done, and the fact that a Bond girl plays the female lead should be accredited to something,......

This is worth the watch for a great drama style thriller. One could say this is equivalent to last year's sleeper hit, Prisoners for those of you who enjoyed that one.

Trespass (2011)

surprisingly a good b quality

[7/10 · 30 June 2014]

Best known for his colorful schemes of imagery, Joel takes a stab at something slightly different. The script is a little predictable at times, however this hostage movie brings to life some new dynamics. Both Cage and Kidman have good presence and the other actors seem to pull their weight enough to make it plausible. A rich family gets their home broken into by a handful of thugs. Turns out, the stakes get higher as the film goes on, as you are guessing if Nicolas Cage is lying about his financial status. The distributors are better known for their sci-fi flicks, making Trespass a diamond in the rough. Worth the watch. Oh, and this one should be limited to the adults due to the amount of cussing.

Little Shop of Horrors (1986)

quite fun, in a twisted way

[10/10 · 26 April 2014]

Having been the third incarnated version of the 1960s short film that saw Jack Nicholson in his first movie, this is a great update, coming straight from the stage. It's been considered one of the great musicals of the 80s, although, technically in Hollywood a film has to be at least forty to reach the official 'classic' label. I'm more bent on definition when it comes to movies. This was one of the highly successful films that saw a lot of cameos from Spinal Tap's Christopher Guest as the first customer to Bill Murray's fanatic dentist patient. Having gained enough recognition from the Off Broadway B musical, Frank Oz takes the helm of directing and did a darn good job. Most people would agree that his alternate ending to the film was a good idea, after doing the original test screening that proved a point. However the truth still remains that most die-hard fans of the play would are more likely to appreciate the original ending where the plant eats both Audry and Seymour. It's a delightful piece with plenty of detail to follow, much in the way Frank's last two pieces with Henson did in 1982 and 1986 when they decided to try something new with puppets - The Dark Crystal and Labrynith. Worth the watch.

Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd (2003)

clear your mind first of your expectations

[7/10 · 22 March 2014]

Considering this is a prequel to one of the most popular cult classics of the 90s, something like this is going to get back-lashed.

First off, to all the critics, please stop calling this film a piece of crap. It may look like crap, but seriously people, I think Dumb And Dumberer is a great idea.

Didn't see this in the theater, but saw the trailer plenty of times to get me interested in the idea. The trailer alone was really funny, and reminded me that every once in a long while, there has to be a movie that has to be this ridiculous to laugh at. With that said, I honestly think that the sequel coming out later this year will hopefully resonate well with the fans.

Slap yourself a few times over, then sit down and see what you think of this movie when you put it in next, or when it shows up on TV.

The female lead will be at the Seattle Comic-Con this year, (2014) and will hopefully meet her.

It may not live up to the original, but they used plenty of original material to give you an idea of how dumb Harry and Lloyd really are.

(Loved the idea of Harry's invisible captain friend! Seeing the car hit that wooden wagon was pretty priceless!!)

Return to Oz (1985)

fits in perfectly

[10/10 · 31 December 2013]

The Wizard of Oz has been deemed to be the classic children's movie that gets played countless times for kids, and adults who appreciate the piece that is nearing it's 80th anniversary all too quickly. Fast forward to 1985. The decade of the 80s brought new technology for film, more specifically the early stages of CGI and anamotronics. Beyond that, the fantasy films of the 80s still lacked continuity with the many layers that often made the final cut look cheap, (despite that it was considered the best advances of the time). A piece like Return to Oz falls under the category of 'sci-fi and fantasy' and seemed to get lost in the shuffle of the many film pieces coming out at the time. I didn't pick up on this movie until Oz the Great And Powerful showed a documentary on The Wizard of Oz and it's involvement with Disney over the years. This is actually one of the few movies that actually got the layering effect right! I was very impressed with the clay-mation shots and the cutting away back and forth between the foreground and background parts of the stage. There aren't many notable actors who took the stage for the movie, however I did recognize western actor Matt Clark, who I remember from BTTF Part III as the bartender. Another notable piece of trivia concerning BTTF is that Christopher Lloyd and Mary Steenbergen almost got the roles of Mombie and the Knome king. This is an 80s gem, that for the kids who remember the movie can pass it down to their children as part of The Wizard of Oz folklore.

Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues (2013)

A good slap upside the head!

[8/10 · 31 December 2013]

I know this movie has been in the works and I am glad they finally did it. Looking back to nine years ago, Anchorman was very much a sleeper of a hit. For fans of Will it was new territory for material to use. Both the original and the sequel are quite funny. I think most would agree that Anchorman was a bit more on the raunchy side. This one sways a bit more towards a family friendly audience than the first film. Some concepts got a little stretched with what the writers chose to do when putting it on the final theatrical cut. Okay, most of it was down right silly, however that is the idea of what SNL is all about. It's about 30 minutes of adult humor, just extended for the sake of making it a movie. Ever since movies like Almost Heroes and Tommy Boy turned up, something special was starting to take place. SNL related movies can end up not being that family friendly, however they have gotten the best reviews over having some of the best laughs,(who could forget moments like 'fat guy in a little coat', or 'are you too good for your own home?') Hopefully this SNL related movie will earn a good reputation that can be considered a default movie that kids could watch.

Bates Motel (2013–2017)

excellent choice!

[10/10 · 27 September 2013]

If you're a fan of Psycho, you really should watch this. The show is answering the un-answered questions you may have about Norman and his mother. Going back to the era before Marian Crane and her story, this piece tries to help you understand the dynamics of the two characters that have been around since 1960. The writers have ignored a few key points of the Psycho folk-lore, such as living just outside of Fairbanks, California and having Norman's father dying from an accident in the garage rather than excessive bee stings(see Psycho IV: Back to the Beginning). Being set in a rural Oregon community gives hints on strong storytelling for anything from back-yard stalkers to cold blood murder. If you like that sort of thing, that means Bates Motel is double the treat for B-horror flick fans. Freddie Highmore literally disappears into his role as the famous Norman Bates. It almost appears as if he could go as far as playing a recluse. The TV show plays great homage to the classic Hitchcock thriller that is widely considered one of the greatest horror pieces of all time.

Man of Steel (2013)

Just what the fans ordered

[15 June 2013]

With the second major progression of superhero movies, it just keeps getting better and better. Ultimately, the CGI elements are what make these kind of movies possible, or else it's back to the dark ages of film. This version of Superman will not disappoint. The fact the Goyer and Nolan are a part of the screenplay says everything. They know their comic book history. Remember how detailed The Dark Knight trilogy was in contrast to the origin stories?? The writing style of Nolan's is present, but not as predominant as it was in Batman Begins. Even though some of the concepts were tweaked, it is a great storyline that was over-due for Superman. For those who remember the version with Christopher Reeve, the storyline helps explain the introductory scene of the original '77 version much better, and even though the black Spandex from the Superman II villains doesn't come right away, it does not disappoint. The action doesn't slow down and for a traditional two hour and twenty time frame, it takes up every minute of the film.

Who Framed Roger Rabbit (1988)

oooh, look! Stars!

[10/10 · 8 March 2013]

Great for it's imagery, Who Framed Roger Rabbit is a perfect nostalgic piece from the 80s for those who grew up watching it.

Oddly enough, Roger Rabbit serves as the middle chapter of the Back To The Future trilogy considering Robert Zemeckis & Bob Gale didn't do much in between BTTF and BTTF2. Not only that, but it was filmed primarily at Pinewood studios, just as Batman was being made.

It is normally extremely difficult to render live action with cartoon animation, especially for the actors. From what I've heard, Charles Flescher actually did rehearse with Bob Hoskins in a big rabbit costume.

Next to the cartoons, Christopher Lloyd as Judge Doom is another big part of the movie. As a theater trained actor, he is extremely good at what he does and gives that creepy vibe. Not only that, but he had to work with the animation for his big scene near the end of the movie.

Great piece of work. It's something that I could watch again and again and again. Also goes hand in hand w BTTF if you're into watching multiple movies in a row.

Oz the Great and Powerful (2013)

great update!

[9/10 · 8 March 2013]

Sam Raimi is one of those directors who knows what he's doing.

To recreate The Wizard of Oz would take a lot more time and expense. Not only that, but it's famous, for Pete's sake! Already having several number one blockbuster hits to his resume, Raimi takes on the task of hopefully adding another run-a-way hit. Not since Spiderman 3 has there been this much anticipation for him to make. Even though the third Spiderman was rocky and didn't quite go as planned, it generated enough dollar.

Great casting, and kudos to Kunis! I thought her role was the equivalent to Johnny Depp stealing the show in the original Pirates. Michelle Williams did a great job, and Franco had a lot of great reactions as the Great Oz.

The images were stunning, yet strangely familiar in some places,(most definitely needed to the proper placement), and for watching it in 3-D, it makes the performance very nice. Would recommend it in a heartbeat for fans of Raimi and fans of the land of Oz!

For a Few Dollars More (1965)

great spaghetti piece

[10/10 · 6 March 2013]

The Man With No Name is back. Two bounty hunters at opposite ends of the scope. Both killing for money. When they both discover they're after the same man, they start a feuding over who will walk away with the money. At times it gets confusing when you get two thirds into the movie when everyone starts double-crossing each other, but otherwise, it's a great shoot-out of a western. There are several nice pieces of machinery seen in the film, not quite as fancy as those in the Sabata trilogy. Yes, there are a handful of obvious low budget shots, but it still holds up well as the middle piece of the trilogy. It may be the not as popular as the other two, but it's still Clint Eastwood at his best.