So far, I've caught one episode of this, which began with orange-light sightings at Myrtle Beach. Mike Bara (well enough known from "Ancient Aliens", etc.) appeared here imponderably as the sceptical and sensible engineer within the four-strong team of investigators. His visit to a local AFB with F-16s convinced him that our witness's disturbing sightings and experiences actually entailed his seeing flight training with flares. So Bara lets a couple of flares off on the beach - and, guess what? They go up, glow a bit, fall back down with the occasional wobble; and flicker a bit; and then extinguish immediately when they reached the sea! In short a flare is a flare and this is what they (ALWAYS) do.
The witness said it was nothing like what he saw, and that can come as no real surprise, since he would hardly be ruining his own life over flares...
But then "Uncovering Aliens" did what "Skinwalker Ranch" and "Alien Highway" episodes have done in recent years - and actually saw and filmed strange (in this case indeed red-orange lights!)
So much for all those years of programming of a UFO profile that never found anything, never showed anything and had to make do with "recreations". Now three different shows have presented their viewers actual mysterious lights, yet have not spent more than 5-10 minutes on them before moving on frenetically to the next topic.
JUST HOW DOES THAT WORK?
If these things are nothing, or fakes, or explicable, why don't we know?
If they are real, why isn't it in every scientific journal and every news bulletin?
I just don't get the modern world, and can only say that - if (following the US Navy's admission that UFOs are real) we really are on that so-called "countdown to disclosure" (as seems plausible), then all these different shows on different channels are designed to work (conspire?) together to make that look like something everyday, trivial or even boring!
Frankly, when I look at these programmes, this is the only conclusion I can reach, but I always expected this news might come with "a bang and not a whimper"...
The conclusion seems only to be reinforced by several further issues:
1) this programme routinely offers up the idea that two of its investigators (inlcuding the rather personable fellow-Brit of mine Steven Jones) have met aliens - DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUH?
2) this programme is panned and dismissed by fellow ImDB critics and reviewers, even though - if it actually presents UFOs and artifacts - it ought to be one of the greatest moments in TV history, even if artistically or creatively the programme is indeed weak and nothing special: how come we are stuck in some nether zone instead of realising the truth of this?
3) apropos of the artifacts, this episode features a chunk of melted metal that apparently fell on the drive of a guy in Ohio (yes we jumped from a warm Myrtle Beach to a snowy Ohio without much warning, explanation or justification) when said guy's son plugged it with multiple rounds from a shotgun (this being America, he naturally had a weapon and ammo available just in case) - and the piece tested as an unusual alloy including aluminium and strontium and is not of known form or origin - so why is THAT also not front-page news if it is true?
I'm an old-fashioned kind of a guy looking for things to be true or false, looking for stories to develop in professional hands. Yet now we have an avalanche of this kind of thing. Certainly, this topic of ufology looks (even excitingly) different from how it looked in the 70s, 80s and so on through to a few years ago, but is hard to believe other than that the mishmash of amateurish hints and signs we get now from various sources gives every sign (to anyone who looks at the bigger picture of it) of being sponsored by the powers that be precisely to look mishmash and amateurish, in order to make people think there is nothing real, serious or earth-shattering to see here.
I always thought this development would be spearheaded by scientists, but instead it is in the hands of private-sector lowbrow media. How weird is that?
But also how actually extremely transparent?
0 out of 1 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink