The Crusades (TV Mini Series 2012) Poster

(2012)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Good story. Useless visuals.
deschreiber27 January 2012
I just watched the first episode of this series. I wouldn't watch another. The narration is good, giving a decent description of events. But it really could have been a radio program, because the visuals added almost nothing to the story. We saw the face of the narrator far too much, only because they had nothing else to show us, and other descriptions were illustrated by nearly irrelevant shots of modern cities--hundreds of street scenes of modern cities--landscapes, burning candles, horses' feet (for a cavalry charge, you see), with hardly three or four maps. The only serious illustration of the crusade came from a medieval illuminated manuscript, but we saw only two or three images, shown over and over again. I found myself looking around the room and at the ceiling occasionally, simply because there was nothing on the screen worth watching.

Get a decent book on the crusades if you're interested in the topic, a simple one will do, with lots of good illustrations. You will enjoy it more than this series.
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
THE CRUSADES is terrible TV and terrible history too
YohjiArmstrong8 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
As the other reviewer has noted, this was not a very well put together programme. The visuals are weak, relying heavily on footage of modern Turkey. At times this is ludicrous, as when the great Muslim relief army sent to Antioch is represented by images of three scrawny Turks hanging off a rusty tractor. The music is desperate to be epic but is merely pounding and annoying. The presenter, another bland subaltern type with an open shirt collar, can't write for toffee (laboured points, repetition, lack of colour and detail) and isn't helped by the directors love of lens flare. The editing is choppy and the frequent shifts in locations are insufficiently labelled.

All of which would be fine if the history was good - especially as the Crusades are such a topical subject, with plenty of fresh scholarship to bring to the public - but the history is terrible. For the sake of brevity I'll only use examples from the first episode, on the First Crusade.

Pope Urban's call to Crusade (a word not actually invented until after the events we associate them with) is explained using management speak and bereft of context. No mention of the requests for aid from the Roman Empire (Byzantium), of the recent depredations of the Seljuk Turks, no explanation of the state of the Muslim world (fractured - here it is all lumped together), of the surge of religious fervour and power in the West (the Peace of God movement, the homage of the Holy Roman Emperor to the Pope at Canossa), or of the new strength of the West (with the conversions of the Magyars and Vikings, and the expulsion of Muslim invaders from France and Italy).

The tale of the Crusade itself, one of the most astonishing epics in history, is reduced to a long walk. Little detail is given, there is no explanation of the problems of leadership (the Pope failed to appoint a commander, because he only expected a few knights to go help the Romans as mercenaries, as usual, rather than the huge numbers that did, which led to internal conflict between the great nobles), the existence of Christians in the Middle East (the pre-Muslim peoples: the Armenians and those conquered by the Arabs) is glossed over, and the important tactics (the wheeling horse- archers of the Turks, the invincible charge of the Frankish mailed knights) aren't even detailed.

It isn't that he says anything factually incorrect (although points could be debated) but that he leaves out so much context that the result is a very misleading picture of what really happened. You're much better off with the novels of Alfred Duggan (Count Bohemund, The Lady for Ransom, Knight with Armour, Lord Geoffrey's Fancy) or the relevant episodes of the wonderful 'Europe from its Origins' by Joseph Hogarty, which the author has made available for free (use Google).
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Too cheesy
anders-n-aa-larsson23 April 2020
Too cheesy for my taste. The dramatization of the story consists almost only of closeups of horses and the narrator talking to the camera like Hulk Hogan in the WWE.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed