Holes in the Sky: The Sean Miller Story (2021) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
42 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Average
dancurtis-info16 November 2022
This is one of those disposable films I put on just so I have something to watch, and not expect too much. Of course I'm always open to an unexpected gem, but this was not one of those.

It is just your basic generic disposable 'at least its not unwatchable'. Not really engaging, and some fairly problematic premises. I was hoping for more, I give it 5 stars because anything lower is reserved for films that make me mad for being so bad, waste of time, or films that prioritize commentary over artistry.

Better than a student film project, but nothing inspiring at all. There wasn't any point in the film, turn of events, or surprise or sequence that had any impact at all. Not necessarily a train wreck, but more of a quarterback fumble on the 50 yard line.

The worst most annoying part is some of the footage is supposedly shot by the film maker on his cell phone, and guess what? The filmaker is shooting cell video in portrait mode. I mean...
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Very Meh. Cool premise, dull watch.
temptedblaze9 February 2023
Not sure how to feel about this movie. So I went into it knowing only that it's a found footage mockumentary of an alien abduction story. Sounded right up my alley; I love that kinda crap.

Right off the bat you can tell it's trying to be super cheesey and fake, especially when it shows the filmmakers repertoire. He's done some pretty awful horror movies and not much else. At the same time, you can tell they just didn't really have any budget so they had to go this route and make it seem like it was done on purpose. I was wondering for awhile why it was focusing so much on the documentary filmmakers backstory, but it becomes clear that when they went to make the documentary they experienced some weirdness of their own and that's what the true story here is. It took a pretty long time to actually get to Sean Miller's Story, despite that being in the film's title. I think they should have put his story in sooner than they did because it ends up just kind of getting lost. I found it pretty hard to focus on this movie because most of it is dull B-roll. Because it was hard to pay attention to it I can't tell if it was actually hard to follow the story or if that was just because my attention kept wandering. It's very much a film where if you blink you'll miss the punchline of any given scene, but also, some scenes just don't have a point to them really, so you end up either missing the "good" parts, or having to endure a whole bunch of boring content to get to them. Most of the effects are really cheap and cheesey, which is expected for the most part with a movie like this. There were some actual cool and freaky bits in there, but not really enough.. they all happen very late in the game when you're already kinda over the movie and the characters. I'm not sure what else to say really. I didn't fully hate it and I didn't really enjoy it, so I gave it an average rating of 5, right smack dab in the middle. That might be pretty generous of me, honestly, but I've watched some terribly awful movies this past month, so I'm going easy on this one.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Ambivalent focus and generic story bring movie down
Armin_Nikkhah_Shirazi23 July 2023
HOLES IN THE SKY: THE SEAN MILLER STORY is a mockumentary (fake documentary) which purports to tell the story of someone who has had highly unusual experiences which are traced back to possible encounters with extraterrestrial beings.

In order to increase the feeling of authenticity, the credited film crew members play semi-fictional versions of themselves, and one suspects that even the name of the actor who plays the eponymous character, credited as "Sean Ed", might just be his first and middle name.

An issue that becomes apparent right away is that, contrary to what the title indicates, the story is not (just) about Sean Miller but even more so about the documentary film crew that goes to his house to interview him and film the strange happenings there. In principle, there is nothing wrong with that approach, but given the title, it amounts to a bit of bait and switch.

Apart from the ambivalent focus of the story, what is presented here is not any different than what has been presented in numerous alien encounter/abduction movies before.

From the perspective of someone who really believes in these kinds of encounters, it could be argued that this is the very point, that people should be exposed to the "usual" or expected manifestations of possible aliens encounters to recognize them for what they "really are", in the same way that we do not want novelty and variation of content in any given set of public service messages, since that would only undermine them by causing confusion.

But the problem with that argument is that whereas public service messages of the usual kind (e.g. About buckling up, avoidance of drunk driving, vaccination etc.) have essentially conclusive evidence behind them that is denied only by hardcore conspiracy theorists, the evidence for alien counters still falls sufficiently short that it has so far only convinced hardcore conspiracy theorists. In short, the evidentiary status of this subject is exactly the opposite of what it needs to be in order for this argument to work.

Apart from that, one can imagine that even within the confines of an entirely standard presentation of alien encounters, it is possible to weave compelling and innovative human interest stories. The closest the film comes to that is with the story of Brett, who is already facing severe life challenges when he takes on the assignment, but somehow his story failed to touch me.

Although toward the end, we are treated to a few special effects, the overall low production values did not do the movie a service.

I think this is a film that only fans of the subgenre of alien encounter found footage movies will enjoy.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A whole lot of nothing!
htownklown4 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I read all the user reviews and most of them were 9 or 10 out of 10?! How? One possible answer is a lot of the crew asked friends to log in and give it a great review.

This movie tried waaaaay too hard to be a Blair Witch ripoff with aliens instead of a witch. Not only was I not scared, I was getting bored. Too many fade-ins from black, audio only. Weak script. Terrible acting.

The friend who came over and wanted to pee in the bushes...? He confronts the "man" standing in the field. He comes back disoriented and spits up black stuff. Cut to another scene. We never see him again. No mention of what the black goo was or if the guy was alright. Did he die? Did his wife put him in a car and rush him to the emergency room? Don't know. That was not deemed important enough to put in the script. Dumb.

How about when the hypnotherapist comes out to hypnotize the main guy? What happened there during his hypnosis shouldn't have rattled the therapist. Her job would have been riddled with patients over the years that unconsciously emoted based on past experiences - yelling, crying, laughing, begging, screaming, etc. And yet, the main guy, Sean, his actions sent her running for the exit. She did, however, remain cool-headed enough to grab her sippy cup before she walked out of the house to get in her car.

Hopefully they don't get greenlit for a sequel. If this is available free on Netflix, then watch it if you're needing background noise to fall asleep on the couch. Does not fall under my criteria for entertainment.
21 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Lacks focus and direction
cozbirn9025 November 2022
The biggest fault of this movie is that it focuses way too much on the filmmakers, which really skews the focus of this movie. The part where they talk about sad songs is super cringe, and it feels like a vanity project. They don't even describe what the original Sean Miller story was until like a third of the way in. It feels like a student film, not in a good way. The audio is not good. I feel like we saw way too much of the filmmakers for this to be a believable found footage "documentary" film. The video quality is also pretty poor. The acting is poor. The most common voice and face is Ash, who's supposed to be a professional filmmaker/documentarian, which goes against how you make a documentary. This definitely feels like the filmmakers had friends left positive reviews, so the IMBD score is egregiously skewed.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Documentary & Found Footage
vanessamotherofmovies28 November 2021
Despite the niche of filmmakers with tight budgets to tend to rely on this type of movie, Holes in the Sky: The Sean Miller Story is a well thought out and entertaining film.

What stood out the most was the solid performances of the cast. Convincing portrayals of witness and experts really help the narrative along when you're trying to convince an audience the fictional story you're telling is based on fact.

I loved the nods to other dissapearance related documentary shows as well as the commentary.

Like any film with a small allowance, it's east to see where cuts were made. But these were done with care.

Really great work. Watch it, don't skip it.
7 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Ignore Any Good Reviews!
lisajn-3008125 November 2022
I actually paid to watch this movie. What a BIG mistake! Nothing really happened until the last 10-15 minutes of this movie, and then what happened wasn't scary at all because it was filmed SO poorly. Shaky camera without a full view of the action. I had to watch the ending 2 times for it to make any sense. Bland, uninteresting characters whose actions often made no sense. The movie could have done without the characters of the sister and her awful husband. Did not care that the movie ended with the disappearance of 2 of the characters. Was looking forward to watching this movie. Should have spent my money on another movie. Skip This Movie!!
16 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Good UFO/Alien mockumentry
Vatrasi5 February 2023
I dont review too many movies but this deserved it.

@Ash Hamilton. This is simply great !

This is the kind of found footage movie you want to see after the genre getting stale over the years.

Good Dialogue...

Good Sound Effects...

Great Story...

Great Acting... Sean Millers expressions looked so genuine. Somebody please give him an award !!

Great Direction... Want to see more from you Ash !

Mediocre on the visuals (I was hoping for more action in the end) but understandable as this is still a low budget film.

This movie was gripping throughout and was overall refreshing. Definitely give it a watch !
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ridiculous
frozen-190881 June 2023
It was the dumbest movie I seen so far . So bad that within ten minutes of the movies . I got to do the kitchen, feed the chickens, went horse back riding . Check my fence line came back to see a kitchen pan thrown across the kitchen. You know how many pans been thrown at me for coming late . . I started watching UFO's on the mountains of Mexico. Pop a Corona Extra , kept me in my toes pop tops the whole night . Like dark of if moon. The Alien space station in the moon . Million times better . This should of been a comedy movie there some real funny stuff. Like when the guy started spitting chocolate through his mouth after the neighbor get caught steering. Man it turn into a love scene they go at each other given chocolate mouth to mouth .
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Real??
jensgems-6576622 February 2023
So well done!! I keep hearing its a true story in one search then its not in another. Either way it was worth a view. The only part when I said ok this cant be real was the end. A little crazy. This is why I ask if its a true story or if seans story was true and they made a film around that. Kept me watching the whole time. Beginning slow but needed. Good job guys. Real or not. This also took place near my hometown so hoping its made up. Really the 1st I have seen to cross aliens and ghosts together unless the aliens were doing all the poltergeist stuff. Not sure. Lots of questions but only finding reviews online and all have different answers for same questions guess it was made so we never know the. Truth. I just need to know. I think it's just a movie added to a story someone told about their abduction. Ifanyone has facts or knows please lmk. Lol thanks.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The cast and crew...
sventempest8 November 2022
... Obviously inflated the user reviews.

Some films use found footage and documentary style shots as an artistic choice. From the very first frame, it's plain to see this was not made out of artistic choice but budget necessity.

Meandering, boring, full of clear self insert characters, wouldn't fool even the daftest human alive for a millisecond that it's real... Genuinely more of an endurance test than a movie.

Tries to keep building and building this sense of mystery and curiosity, but basically just stretches out it's very basic story of maybe, two or three sentences and stretches it out to movie length.

Utter waste of time.
13 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A thoughtful exercise in suspense.
truthseeker-213038 November 2022
For those of you looking for a bombastic aliens vs. Humans shoot-em-up... just keep moving. We have those films already and they're not difficult to find. The abduction phenomena is a multi-faceted puzzle where the media rarely shows more than ones side. It is a complicated and often frustrating side of UFOlogy that often leaves researchers scratching their heads. It is full of poltergeist like activity, dopplegangers and, for the experiencers, a lot of PTSD.

Director Ash Hamilton has chosen not only to show that side of the phenomena, but in a way that conveys that same sense of dread and unease that the subject often evokes. Everything from the interviews to the supposed "found" footage gives us an air of not only plausibility, but one that rings of years of research and the painstaking attempt to characterize it in a way that feels more like documentary reporting and less like parody. In other words, this film shoots straight.

The scares, when they do come are jarring and hold an unsettling otherworldly quality that films of this budget often fail to realize. For all that is shows us, Holes really succeeds in what it implies; glimpses of a story too bizarre to really discern and that is where the film truly gets under your skin.

A slow burn that often tries to work outside of its budget, Holes in the Sky is a perfect example of a filmmaker doing their homework.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Fell asleep three separate times ...
cjmouserlittlervlife10 November 2022
I feel like a fool for paying to watch this. When I think of the time I invested searching for a good movie to watch, and fell for the reviews on this one, it chaps my ...

I'm sorry, but you have a responsibility to provide a modicum of entertainment when you require someone to pay for entertainment.

There were so many twists and turns and strange events - that in no way tied together or even made sense on their own - that it was impossible to stay focused and maintain interest.

Unbelievable, unrelatable, nonsensical, no discernible plot, no answers to any questions. Certainly not the slightest bit scary.

Zero value for investment.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wtf.
michelemorin-037358 January 2023
..... Went in to this after reading reviews and the synapse of the movie. .... I thought this was a movie about, A CHILD, that was abducted. A documentary film, about a potential alien abduction.

This was. Not what I was expecting. If the synapsis if the movie was better it would have been 100% less confusing. I don't know. Just not great visual effects were horrible and should have been left out, and if they wanted to make it more realistic with the documentary they would have been better at filming the alarming events that took place. Or any other normal human interaction. Could have been a good bad movie but it left a lot to be desired. And the ending was ... Dumb. Sorry Brian.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Any review above a 2 is fake
drjacobgrayson21 January 2023
This mockumentary has a budget of a few thousand dollars and it looks like it. It's about the same as what you could do at home with your phone. After the first 15 minutes I had to recheck the IMDb rating which is above a 6 amazingly. I figured it must get better or something for the ratings to be that high. So I watched another 15 minutes before checking all the reviews and I see that mostly there are 1s and 2s and then incredibly a bunch of 9s and 10s. I kind of checked out when the crew had a long conversation in the car about sad love songs or something. I finally gave up when they spent several minutes spooking themselves out about "unexplained phenomena" which was a light turning on or off.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
fun...
ops-525353 November 2022
To make movie, and to do it basicly from home, a 101 encyclopedia how to make a fictious documentary about a F. L. crime dissapearance, involving loads of hi tech stuff and trying to make an ''invaders from space'' abduction into something cool and nervewrecking...

well dissapointed i was, not by the efforts and esteem, more the fact that the story is very generic...based on all the true life incidents that runs the gossip over there usa... that leads to a heartstuck lack of realism, and i do feel that i am one of the best moduscandidates to test such a film on, mostly due to im a grumpy old man, i am considering me as an eminent observer and viably sceptic and fully litterate norwegian that thinks far beyond the countyborder...

yes its a film for the digital generation, baiting every conspirative thout on social media, and for the rednecked illiterat... a 2 star recommendation is generously given to ''holes in the plot''
13 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
When a documentary gets a little too real..
timmermanwoodcraft3 November 2022
The first 10-15mins or so i had to pause and check if this was a real documentary or not, but i decided against it and carried on watching..

I must say from the start, Ash and Channell's 'acting' was so real it unnerved me a bit, so much so that after 25 mins in i had to stop and tell myself : "this is just a story, everyone is fine.." (I hope..)

Sean also played exceptionally well, if this was acting it was the most fluid form I've ever seen..

This to me is not horror of course, it is a drama/paranormal documentary style film.. But oh my word did it leave an impact..

I must commend all the people who worked on this, all actors and crew did a phenomenal job

Will I watch it again?....not a chance....lol.
8 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Holes in the Plotline: The Fraud Miller Story
LordGriffiths26 November 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Ash and Chanell (his wife) portray the events in this "documentary" as a true story based in reality. This could not be further from the truth.

The thinly veiled lie Ash is telling on film, in tears no less, doesn't make him a "great director", it makes him just another fraud within a community already rife with frauds attempting to capitalize off of "believers".

There's a scene where Sean Miller and his wife are outside their house at night, approaching a side door, and you can hear a few knocks at the door. There's a painfully obvious CGI version of a ghost edited into the movie, that knocks on the door and then runs off into the back yard. It's incredibly cheesy.

Sean Miller's sister & her husband (Drew) show up for a bbq, and there's a scene where Drew approaches a figure standing still out in the middle of a corn field. The whole scene is a crock of baloney, 1) Drew is a horrible, disaster of an actor, 2) Drew gets impregnated by the 'figure' in the cornfield, 3) Drew starts acting like a feral animal, spewing up warm dark chocolate all over Ash, 4) they couldn't call an ambulance because "Drew has a warrant", 5) Drew and his wife just vanish out of the plotline, no follow up to an obvious "alien encounter", no further discussion about it, etc. If this really happened, it would've been National News.

There's a scene where Ash is awoken in the middle of the night by 'strange noises', he gets up, starts recording and looks out the window - he sees an obvious person standing in the middle of the yard, arms outstretched like a zombie, and immediately starts running at the camera. Ash turns away and you hear stomping on the roof. Not once did Ash call 911, wake anyone up, or do anything about it. The whole event goes by and absolutely nothing is done about it. It's such bs.

There's a scene towards the end of the movie where Ash and Channell are about to leave Sean Miller's house, but woops they stayed too late and it's nighttime now. They see a light out in the middle of the corn field, so they run back inside....except Ash has to go outside and inspect. Ash grabs a camera and approaches the cornfield, to find a face-shaped light with a CGI face on it hiding behind a tree, sticking its head out from both sides...like a child would do. Ash freaks out, runs back inside, and no footage of what Ash captured is ever discussed or shown on film.

This is where they just shove the film over the cliff of BS mountain - Ash goes to extreme lengths to make himself look like an honest, generous and very humble person, he talks about "writing checks to people" to the people/families he's hurt but no one is accepting his money or taking his calls, he talks about how he can't tell people what truly happened because they wouldn't believe it, he even outright contradicts himself (Rick James' style) by talking how he couldn't release the documentary while at the same the only people taking his calls are people that want his documentary and he's constantly taking the blame for every little bad manufactured event.

The whole film just screams thirsty for attention with insulting undertones for making a "documentary" in the hopes people will buy it, and when called out on their BS, they simply point to the fact the movie is listed as a "horror movie". This is the most slimy type of film making, it's not entertaining and the whole premise is based on the hope the audience buys a seemingly delicious fruit, with an absolutely rotten & disgusting center. In other words, what we have here is regurgitated bait and switch on the community of "believers" - it will not stand.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
WATCHED TWICE BACK TO BACK! INSANELY REAL
dorigeemale27 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Well, I'm the viewer that did not realize this was found footage even though I have seen several found footage films. That is a testimony to its effectiveness. I was trapped into every second of it's unnerving, ufo-dangling plot. Loved the seamless crossover of paranormal and sci-fi. There were a few quite tasteful clue hints that didn't find it necessary to explain themselves, which was pretty clever. The best one was when Sean came into the kitchen with the goop running out of his ear. It was the same goop that his brother-in-law barfed up. So you knew if you were up on UFOism that Sean got occupied or implanted. When Brett was abducted and he was hanging upside down I could have sworn that he said something like "it's okay" which is why he was let go of? Can anyone clarify that? It had just the perfect amount of interview and "real" footage to keep you hanging through every minute of this movie. I think they did leave an opening at the end when he said that he wanted his best friend back and the fact that Sean's wife chose to stay in the house, which one can only assume was because she was waiting for him to be returned to the same location. That would make a great sequel don't you think? Thank you again for such a wonderful romp thru my favorite genre. The sound effects were awesome too, especially the light shrieking that the creatures did to communicate. The creature at the end who peeked around the tree looked exactly how I would expect an alien to look. And we do know if we're into this sort of research that they are able to take on human form and look like people so that was very realistic too. I've never watched a movie back to back. And it was super late already and I had to get up early but I couldn't stand it. And I wanted to watch it a third time tonight. What a great movie! More please!!! Thank you.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The funniest thing I've ever seen!!
bxrhvpvx21 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This show is the most entertaining if you want to see the worst editing!! This movie is kept me laughing, basically throughout the entire time. And I would truly recommend it if you just want to see the worst possible outcome & acting!! The acting in this video is just so horrible. Look at the vehicle whenever they are driving into this property. The top of the vehicles is falling down they are so broke and they're reaching out to try to make it. All of the glitches and pieces together do not match this film is just like trash. All the actors are horrible this is a 100% joke. The McPherson tapes were way better than this and that was made what - 23 years ago?
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
DONT WASTE YOUR TIME!
redoakfireman3 August 2023
I do believe there are things we don't understand. But, this is the fakest thing I have ever seen. What bothers me the most is stuff like this really muddies the water of the stuff that really needs to be put out there for people to see. Very disappointed!!!

Very poor audio and video. Seems to be thrown together. They talk about the travis Walton account. This is by no way even remotely close to what I think is an actual true experience in the Travis Walton case. I do think it spends an awful alot of time trying to showcase the people making the film.

Only rated it 1 star because that was the lowest I could go. Not even worth 1 star.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Can you say Blair Witch
vbnelsen13 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Well I start watching assuming it was a reality documentary show but I have seen some hokey stuff before but this is way beyond that. The 'filming' is jumpy the dialog is non descript and beyond belief. Slightly entertaining but it kept getter more disjointed and lacking substance. A good watch for a cloudy Sunday afternoon while trying to solve the day's Wordle ! I wasn't trying to get much out of the show except maybe learn information about what I thought was a true story and that didn't happen so am left with watching some old Classic show on Pluto where I can be entertained but know it's all make believe.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Yet another pseudo-doc
vephurst-7210716 August 2023
This wasn't the worst mockumentary I've watched, but not the worst. In my opinion, this and found footage are two genres that could forever disappear without a care from me, so either of those two are going to start low in my book. However, the acting was at times impressive (in SOME of the characters), considering it's obviously small budget. I was surprised at the director's choices and (although their name escapes me now) I think they are talented. I would like to see them work in a different horror sub-genre. (Please stop making pseudo-docs/found footage. Please!) I wouldn't pay to watch by any means, but if you're into the genre I would recommend it. If you share my feelings about this tired format, skip it.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Such a fun documentary
craigahrens3 August 2022
Anything involving UFOs and abductions... Sign me up. I thought this was such a fun watch! My wife and I enjoyed it from beginning to end! Good work to the talented folks that put this little gem together! A thumbs up from me!
8 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Blair Witch Project,.....
dcsupnax10 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Got to give it to them, they kept you watching just when you really wanted to turn it off. Strange things, ghosty figures, and normal chit chat that was important to literally - no one. Memory lane stories that had nothing to do with the movie, just added as footage fillers. The second they kept innerating about Bretts personal issues and possible instability, I knew we were being fed doses of fubar. Especially when a professional hypnosis technician goes bazerk and takes off screaming. They did a decent job, but yeah....still fubar. Lol. So anyone who is contemplating whether it was true or not - don't lose any sleep over it.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed