The Invisible Man (I) (2020) User Reviews

A crisply done suspense thriller, with plot holes

[josephbrewster-88279 · 7/10 · 10 July 2020]

This movie largely succeeds, despite giving away its premise from the start, as both a nail-biting dramatic thriller and poignant social commentary on unhealthy relationship dynamics. Does it have plot holes? Yes. Do they spoil the movie to the extent some reviews are suggesting? Not unless you are uncommonly cynical and picky.

This is not an HG Wells Invisible man. I've read the book, and this is not it.

I was skeptical that a rather worn horror/thriller trope could yield fresh frights, and while I don't think the scares are all incredibly original, the film does what it sets out to do. It was infuriating to constantly know that a jump-scare was looming on the horizon, yet still feel jolted in that disconcerting way that makes jump-scares an enduring staple of the genre. I want to complain that the sparse soundtrack and tired inception "booj" effects were unfairly wielded or that the timid, slow-pan camera was applied too often, but honestly, it worked. I could have done with less predictability in the sound design, however. I was scared, despite myself. I was thrilled. And isn't that what thrillers are supposed to do? It kept me on the edge of the seat.

Acting was solid, with the lead giving a praiseworthy performance of a harried, mentally unstable victim, whose mannerisms and appearance gradually deteriorate into convincing madness. Her character is believable in ways that Barbieesque horror girls often are not. She possesses an every-woman charisma reminiscent of the first Halloween movie, or Drew Barrymore's Scream opener, seems impossibly average, and the audience is both compelled to empathize and also dared to question her sanity, so that the plot manages to leave a few questions to be answered until the closer (and perhaps even after). It's not a cliffhanger or a I-didn't-see-that-coming movie, but it's still satisfying.

If you like a good thriller, see it. If you like a good psychological thriller, see it. If you like fast-paced thrillers, maybe pass on this one. If you nitpick plot holes, go suck on a lemon and frown at the mirror, or stretch your imagination and enjoy this simple, but entertaining, ride.

It's worth the price of admission.

(I made it all the way through with no "invisible" puns, and I'm quite proud of myself)

Effective thrills, but with some logic issues

[cardsrock · 7/10 · 28 February 2020]

I really enjoyed the first 2/3 of this film. They are filled with palpable tension and a general unease at not being able to see the "monster." This is another example of how what you cannot see is often scarier than what you can see. The direction is great and perfectly places the viewer in Elizabeth Moss' shoes, which is what generates most of the tension as you the viewer are also unsure where this invisible person is at all times. The spin of domestic violence also lends a new, modern twist on the classic premise.

Where the film falters is in its third act with some significant plot holes regarding cameras and visibility of certain actions. There were also several times where the film felt like it was at its conclusion, but kept going. The ending will likely be divisive, however I didn't hate it. The Invisible Man is technically a very well-made thriller, but loses a few marks due to some issues with the plot.

what a difference a talented director makes

[killercharm · 7/10 · 28 April 2020]

The previous versions of this movie left me not expecting much but what a difference a talented director makes. In this story of the man who discovers a way to render himself invisible the tension is kept taut all the way. I was roped in immediately. The cast is spot on - both the casting and acting is great. While the special effects are beautifully fluid they are not overwhelming. A great ride.

good movie; not as many plot holes as people say

[johnral321 · 7/10 · 27 April 2020]

I'm surprised at the number of highly negative reviews on here. Most of them pertain to plot issues. I'm all for exposing plot holes, but most of these could be easily explained with a little creativity. Just some examples: People complain that the antagonist has super-human strength. This is not the case at all. He has the advantage of the element of surprise. A moderately strong (invisible) male could lift a female in the air, and could toss her across a table; and could beat the crap out of bigger dudes. People complain about the third suit: But there could have been ten suits, and he could have lost track of a suit. People complain about the dog being at the house; but for all we know she lost track of the dog on the night of her escape and the dog returned to the house later. People complain that she would not risk her plan by taking the dog with her; but it would be simple enough to take the dog with her and meet her sister in the road, while her husband sleeps. People complain about how he gets around: but his brother could drive him; or he could jump on a bus and hide; or he could just take off the suit and drive around like a normal person; or he could put on a wig and makeup. People complain about the guards not defending themselves better; but they have never encountered an invisible man before and would not know what is going on. People complain at her reaction in the restaurant; but she would be in shock and there's no telling how a person would react to that. Some people complain about how quickly the Uber driver arrives; but the scene does show her looking at her phone (and the Uber app), and we don't know how much time has elapsed before this time. (It's possible that she was running and hiding in the neighborhood for 5 minutes.) Maybe the husband developed the suit at a research facility and made a few extra suits for himself and took them home. I'm not saying there are no plot holes, but the complaints here are far too harsh, and lack imagination. The movie is novel, suspenseful, and interesting, and well-acted. (This is not exactly a plot-hole, but wouldn't a DNA test on the fetus prove that it was his son, and thereby implicate him in the crimes? The brothers weren't twins.)

As good as a modern Invisible Man movie can be.

[lnvicta · 8/10 · 24 March 2020]

Leigh Whannell is not a subtle filmmaker - at least, that's what I used to think. The Saw and Insidious movies are over-the-top and shocking, which is fine, and I enjoyed Upgrade quite a bit, but I was afraid the Invisible Man would fall into the same trap of shock-value over substance. Thankfully, I was wrong.

From the opening scene, the movie sucks you in with tension and unease. Cecilia (Elizabeth Moss) is trying to escape from her abusive boyfriend while he is asleep, and with practically no dialogue or exposition, we immediately understand the situation and feel for Moss' character. She's trapped in an abusive relationship and fears for her life. It's a testament to Whannell's deliberate direction, using visual cues to give us the information we need while slowly ratcheting up the suspense. The movie is not reliant on jump scares. There are a few, but they're 100% earned and actually effective because we care about the characters. The excellent score helps add to the atmosphere, alternating between pulsating ambience and melancholy orchestral bits.

From the concise writing, likable characters, clever directing, a powerhouse lead performance, and a genuinely scary villain, The Invisible Man gets just about everything right. I suppose you could nitpick some of the logic, but that's missing the point. It's a film about gaining freedom from a toxic relationship, and Whannell knows exactly how to pace the story so that we don't spend too much time dwelling on potential plot holes. Overall, a gripping and expertly crafted psychological thriller.

Worth the watch

[jeffburkart · 7/10 · 14 March 2020]

It was enjoyable. It was mostly predictable, but was still pretty well done and the turns towards the end made it much better.

A nail-biting thriller that has more on its mind than providing simple thrills.

[DJKwa · 8/10 · 26 February 2020]

What would you do if your abusive ex figured out a way to stalk you without fear of being discovered? That's the conceit at the centre of Leigh Whannell's latest film, The Invisible Man, a nail-biting thriller that has more on its mind than providing simple thrills.

Starring Elisabeth Moss as Cecilia Kass, a woman who is rendered helpless in the face of an invisible evil, Whannell spins H.G. Wells classic science fiction novel of the same name into a timely and provocative exploration of psychological abuse.

Having escaped from a controlling relationship, Cecilia's rehabilitation is cut short by the sudden intrusion of her ex who has figured out how to regain control over her life without anyone knowing: by becoming invisible.

Expertly utilising sci-fi trappings to take gaslighting to a whole new extreme, the film depicts first-hand the anxieties faced by many modern-day survivors of abuse. As Cecilia stresses to those around her that her genius scientist ex has become invisible, we are left conflicted by knowing the truth of her words but also the understanding that, without hard evidence, it's hard to accept her story at face value.

By operating in that grey area, The Invisible Man proves the horror genre to be one of the most effective means to reflect modern day anxieties to mass audiences.

The trade-off, however, is that by focusing solely on Cecilia's plight, the films feels somewhat underexplained in terms of its villain. Certain actions of his seem straight up superhuman and, without an explanation, it feels as if some logical concessions have been made for dramatic purposes. Granted, to Whannell's credit, he wisely abides by the notion that leaving certain things up to the imagination is better than over explaining to the point of exhaustion.

Where so many would-be franchises have failed by focusing too much on setting up sequels, The Invisible Man plays squarely to its strength as a strong, character driven film. Whether it connects to an extended universe remains to be seen, but the film, much like its protagonist, feels much stronger standing on its own.

Missing parts

[audrey_o · 7/10 · 10 March 2020]

I'm not sure if it was intentional or scenes cut from the movie found their way into the trailers, but I was a bit disappointed when I noticed key points were not shown. I was looking for the scary hand in the shower scene...... CUT. The part when she indicates "someone" is sitting in the chair........ CUT. I didn't enjoy it as much as I should have as I was focusing on the parts I'd seen in the trailer and thinking.... when will they feature in the film?? A good, tense movie nonetheless

Have you seen "The Invisible Man"?

[bob-the-movie-man · 8/10 · 9 January 2021]

Cecilia Kass (Elisabeth Moss) is trapped in a highly controlling and violent relationship with technology mogul Adrian Griffin (Oliver Jackson-Cohen). Escaping from his fortress-like home, she lives in fear of his retribution. So she is much relieved, if a little surprised, at the report of his suicide. Now living with old friend James Lanier (Aldis Hodge) and his teenage daughter Sydney (Storm Reid), Cecilia can finally start to relax. But as strange things start to happen, is the ghost of Griffin back to haunt her? Or is it really all in her rapidly disintegrating mind, as her sister Emily (Harriet Dyer) and James suspect?

Australian writer/director Leigh Whannell is famous as the writer behind the "Saw" and "Insidious" franchises. So he knows a thing or two about crafting horror movies. And in this Blumhouse production, after a clever attention-grabbing opening, he really takes his time in building an understanding of Cecilia's mental state. When things start to happen, they happen so stealthily that I needed to hit the rewind button a couple of times (no cinema experience for this one I'm afraid). Cinematographer Stefan Duscio keeps slowly panning away from Cecilia across the room to show empty corridors before slowly panning back again. It's superbly effective and was comprehensively creeping me out!

When the set action pieces do occur then they are satisfactorily exciting, albeit wildly implausible. I did not see some of the "Surprises" coming, making them jolt-worthy. And the denouement really delivered for me, reminiscent of Hitchcock's style.

Now most famous for "Mad Men" and "The Handmaids Tale" on TV, Elisabeth Moss has delivered a range of impressive film performances including in "High Rise" and - as most closely related to this role - in "Girl, Interrupted" as mental patient Lisa. It's a star turn, no doubt about it.

This movie was intended by Universal to be part of the "Dark Universe" series. But the Tom Cruise flop "The Mummy" unfortunately put paid to that. Which is a great shame. If they'd started with this one, then they might have had a hit on their hands. With a post-credits "monkey" (there isn't one in this movie by the way) they could have lined up into the follow-up movie and started the ball rolling.

It's a rollicking action flick that had my attention throughout. This is all helped along by a very effective soundtrack by British composer Benjamin Wallfisch, using strange atonal electronica to heighten the suspense.

However, the initial question it poses - haunting, 'all in the mind' or something else - gets clarified a little too early for me (and - note - is spoiled by the trailer), so the movie falls short of being a classic for that reason.

There's one aspect of the movie that really irritated me. And that is that there was no credit whatsoever for the idea of H.G. Wells that originated this story. There's a discussion of that here: since Wells died in 1946, his copyright will have expired on his works 70 years later. This is definitely NOT a retelling of his story, but in reusing the novel's title it would seem at least 'polite' to include a "Based on an idea by H.G. Wells" in the credits somewhere.

All in all, this is still a bit of a B-movie, but its a bloody good one! Utterly preposterous at times, and with decision-making that would feel at home within the Trump presidency, it's an entertaining rollercoaster of a movie. Definitely comes with a "recommended" from me and I'll look forward to a re-watch at some point.

For the full graphical review, please check out "bob the movie man" on the web - thanks).

Loses it's way halfway through

[mbrcf · 6/10 · 7 March 2020]

This is a film about an abusive relationship and what is does to the tormented, well... except it's not. Around halfway through the story turns away from a suspenceful psychological thriller and shapes itself into a rather generic, mainstream, twisty and predictable piece.

After seeing this I thought the movie works because of Elisabeth Moss's work as lead actress. Her Cecilia is present in almost evey scene and her acting range, her connection to the character and her talent is what elevates this film a couple steps above your typical low-budget thriller. Also speaking of budget, the film is VERY good looking for just a 7 million. I've had some fun with this, I wish it could have gone a different path but it's what it is I guess.

Exceeds Expectations...

[Xstal · 8/10 · 21 April 2020]

Immerse yourself in a not uncommon story of a woman fighting an aggressive and violent male predator, where the assaults can come out of the blue, often do, and for little or no reason, or justification (not that there could ever be any).

An outstanding lead from Elisabeth Moss in a genuinely suspenseful piece of cinema with a refreshing perspective on a tried and tested theme.

Mixed Feelings on the Subject of Domestic Abuse

[Her-Excellency · 6/10 · 24 March 2020]

While I understand that every person is different and reacts differently to different situations, the scared-as-a-mouse performance by Elizabeth Moss upon leaving the relationship, to me, was just not believable. It takes A LOT to leave a relationship which has become as abusive and controlling as the one that was alluded to in this film. By the time one is emotionally ready to walk out, generally, you've been through all the pain, the doubts ... the weakness; by the time one has been driven to stand up and leave, generally, there is nothing as frightening "out there" as staying IN the relationship would be, and there is NOTHING more empowering than the moment you step out of that door KNOWING that it is the last time you will ever allow yourself to go back. Now, again, I understand, and would like the reader to understand, that this is just my opinion. For others it may be different and very well may be as was depicted in the film, where the recovery process takes a while longer and during that time the survivor still feels emotionally or physically vulnerable and at risk. Either way, people (I won't define by gender because there are men who are abused too) who find their legs and leave a situation such as this, sooner or later do discover that they are indeed among the strongest on earth.

That being said, what I did like about the film is that none of the prior abuse was actually covered or depicted. If people are really thinking about the subject matter, it opens you up to the thought that in many of these real-life situations, the abusee is sometimes doubted, seen as not entirely credible, or are downright disbelieved by others. This film brought that home by picking an "abuser" who looked like a nice, average-looking guy, with an obviously good job, who looked like he could "never do anything like that". That was brilliant.

The special effects were nicely done as well.

Going back and forth between what I liked and did not like (ergo my title of Mixed Feelings), contrary to what I see is a popular opinion, I do not think this ties in well with the "Invisible Man" franchise. If the creators were not actively saying it is, I would have figured it was a script about a tech-genius who discovers how to make himself 'not seen', and NOT about THE "Invisible Man" we've read about and have seen in the past.

There were also plot holes galore which I took the time to list, but then thought better of it so that even though this is tagged with a spoiler warning, if you have not seen the film it won't spoil it too much for you.

While I have some problems with the film, I still suggest you watch it. It is entertaining enough, suspenseful in some places, and most of the acting and special effects are pretty great.

6.5/10

Invisible Suits and Opaque Storytelling

[sanadalsalt · 4/10 · 4 December 2023]

Upon first viewing, the movie seems interesting and well-paced, with a satisfying conclusion in which the protagonist gets away with killing her abusive ex-boyfriend. However, upon closer examination, it becomes apparent that there is little evidence to support her claims of abuse, and the boyfriend's manipulative behavior is not well-established. The film's primary focus on the invisible suits raises questions about their origins and purpose, and how many were actually created. Additionally, certain plot points, such as the missing suit and the murder in the restaurant, seem poorly thought out and unrealistic. Ultimately, while the movie may be enjoyable on a surface level, it falls short upon further reflection and analysis, leading to a lower rating.

Terrible On All Levels

[RonellSowes · 29 August 2021]

You van go ahead and make a movie that's like a cross between Gaslight and Sleeping With The Enemy with a bit of a techie twist to it and call it 'The Invisible Man', but don't try and sell it off like it has anything to do with the H. G. Wells story. I wouldn't be surprised if the incognitive minds behind this had never even bothered to read the novel considering how it has absoloutley nothing in common, and just marketed it for the established intellectual property. And even if they made these decisions but the finished product turned out to be of some quality, it could be overlooked. However, that's not the case either; even if you judge the movie based off the filmmaker's intentions it's terrible. I could list everything wrong with it, but why bother. There isn't one facet, one moment in The Invisible Man that isn't flawed.

Feels...Familiar...

[jmiron1 · 6/10 · 2 March 2020]

Here's my review of the new "The Invisible Man" movie for those who care...

Hollywood Producer: "Hey guys, as we know, reboots are all the rage right now. So we'd like to do a remake of Julia Roberts' Sleeping With The Enemy movie from 1991. Any ideas?"

Hollywood Writers: "What if we made the husband crazy AND invisible this time?"

Hollywood Producer: "GENIUS!! Let's get to work!!"

Amazing film: scary and anxiety inducing

[hungry_nirupam · 9/10 · 26 February 2020]

First of all, let me start with how excited I was to see this movie. Luckily, I got to catch this in an advanced preview. And I will say this, the excitement, counting of days, posting on social media, all paid off.

This movie definitely scares you. It's not just jumpscares or loud noises, it's something psychological. From the first opening shot, you're immediately put inside Elisabeth Moss' character Cecilia's head. She is stuck in an abusive relationship and can't get out of it. The whole opening scene makes you uncomfortable as we see Cecilia trying to make her escape. This kind of tension is kept on throughout the film.

Another thing this film succeeds upon is the writing. The story progresses in a fast paced way which doesn't seem hurried. The 2hr runtime feels achieved. There's definitely more than one 'WTF' moment in this film to keep you on the edge of your seat.

The score and the sound design definitely puts you in Cecilia's shoes as you struggle with her to point out where exactly the invisible man might be. The camera work is exquisite, I mean did we really doubt the director who brought us Upgrade? The action sequences definitely feel thrilling and the way it's shot makes you feel like you're living it.

In my book, Elisabeth Moss can do no wrong. Her acting here is definitely something to be noted. From her being hysterically scared to her fighting back, Moss sells it. She makes us root for her. Oliver Jackson Cohen, who plays her abusive husband has a small but really pivotal role and boy o boy he is scary. The rest of supporting cast is also really good. Overall, this is Moss' movie and she carries it with ease.

This year (so far) there hasn't been many horror movies that genuinely gave me anxiety or made me jump. So I am happy this film succeeded in doing both. Leigh Whanell is an amazing horror writer/director and proves that he can still give us a solid entertaining flick.

There's some solid moments of blood so gorehounds can rejoice.

I thought about it a lot and I can't really think of anything that didn't work. Some of you might complain about the camera work and how it focuses on the actor's faces more than the action but to me that worked. I think that definitely sold the drama.

All and all this was a terrific film, really made the universal monster scary by mixing the monster with a relevant story. I will give this film a 9/10.

If you liked this review please like my page Let's Talk Horror.

Creepy domestic violence tale.

[jmbovan-47-160173 · 7/10 · 16 June 2020]

Mad scientist is also an abusive stalker. Starting when Cecelia gets away from the abusive stalker, she nonetheless continues to be impacted by the echoes of the emotional abuse. But these aren't echoes. Elizabeth Moss does well to turn the woman of domestic violence into one of psychological breakdown. She keeps the movie engaging. Whannell manages the direction of this film well (he also wrote the story and screenplay). He frames shots expertly to give empty space a personality. Worth the rental.

It's Plain to See That This is an Excellent Thriller

[Lebowskidoo · 9/10 · 24 June 2020]

"He said that wherever I went, he would find me, walk right up to me, and I wouldn't be able to see him."

I probably yawned and rolled my eyes when I first heard they were rebooting The Invisible Man. This idea had been done and done and done...right? Wrong! Director Leigh Whannell breathes new life into the concept. Now it's a vehicle for Elisabeth Moss, as Cecilia, who is in every scene and steals them all.

Sound and vision are used to keep you on edge. Is Cecilia suffering a mental breakdown because of her abuse...or is there an invisible man following her? Moss and Whannell squeeze every ounce out of this scenario and it all works. This movie even sidesteps the science missteps of earlier versions with an updated version of the character. Though very different from the book by H.G. Wells, I feel like he would approve.

HOW WAS THE PAINT ALREADY OPEN!?!

[mrbillcole · 7/10 · 28 March 2020]

Can someone please explain how she got that paint can open?? Who leaves a paint can with paint still in it open?? It would dry up fast af. I can't sleep because it's driving me crazy!

Leigh Whannell crafts a visceral thriller with a new updated take on the classic story.

[gillianronnie · 9/10 · 26 February 2020]

WHANNELL has been in my opinion one of the most underrated director /writers for a long time. He was mostly behind the insidious and saw franchises And came out with the spectacular futuristic thriller upgrade in 2018. His brilliant style is once again back with full force in this new adaptation of the invisible man. many people will just look at this like another Blum house manufactured film at first but realize that just because it has the production name on it doesn't mean it will be another throwaway film. This film much like upgrade thrives with a crisp smart script and fantastic visuals. Whannell has a keen eye for detail and it shows in bunches in this film. Elizabeth Moss also gives a phenomenally dedicated performance And sheds emotion throughout. There are many moments in this vicious film that you will not see coming and I was actually surprised by the amount of brutality which serves the overall story well. This is a new take on a classic universal monster that you will not want to miss and it's definitely worthy of going to see in the theater unlike many films of late.

Pretty good effort

[Leofwine_draca · 7/10 · 27 September 2020]

THE INVISIBLE MAN is another pretty good sci-fi/horror movie combo from Leigh Whannell, whose previous effort, UPGRADE, was similarly enjoyable. This turns out not to be a remake of the Universal classic at all but rather a look at abusive relationships and gaslighting. A lot of the goodwill comes from Whannell's understated directorial style and Elizabeth Moss's performance, which is very strong and very physical. It's a slightly overlong production with one twist too many for my liking, but there's plenty of suspense punctuated by the occasional set-piece (including a TERMINATOR 2-inspired bit in a mental hospital which is really good) that makes this work a treat.

A Genre Defining Example Of Making A Quality Horror Film

[garethvk · 9/10 · 27 February 2020]

Cecilia Kass (Elizabeth Moss) is a woman living in fear. Despite living a life of wealth and privilege in a seaside home; she is ready to take drastic steps in her life. Cecilia is trying to escape from her controlling and abusive husband who despite being considered a wealthy genius in the field of Optics; has made her life a living hell and forces her to make a daring escape that has her barely getting away with the help of her sister Alice (Harriett Dyer). The film picks up two weeks later where Cecilia is hiding with a friend of her sister Officer James Lanier (Aldis Hodge) and his daughter Sydney (Storm Reid). Cecilia is scared to even leave the house and do simple tasks such as checking the mailbox and is livid when her sister comes to visit as she is sure that her husband will find her by tracking her Sister. Alice informs Cecilia that her husband has killed himself and she is now free to live without fear. Cecilia gets a letter informing her that she is to receive 100K a month to the sum of five million dollars as part of her husband's will. The fact that nobody should have her mailing address does seem odd to her as does that fact that the estate is being handled by her ex's brother Tom (Michael Dorman). With her new wealth Cecilia gifts James and also sets up a school fund for Sydney and begins to emerge from her shell. It is around this time that unusual things begin to happen to her. A lost item from the night of her escape shows up and a mysterious kitchen fire starts. Cecelia also wakes up to find the covers off the bed and what appears to be something unseen standing on the blankets when she attempts to pull them up. When she expresses her concerns to James that her husband is alive and exacting revenge, both he and Tom ignore her and when things begin to escalate, Cecilia is the one who starts to look more and more unstable as the tormenting continues and her life spins out of control.

The film is Written and Directed by Leigh Whannell who rose to prominence as one of the co-creators of the "SAW" franchise. The film is the perfect example of how to do a film of this sort as it is very clever in how it is paced and allows for the suspense to build without relying on many of the standard Horror Film staples.

The film is also good about having things happen before it pulls back so it is not an extended series of intense moments but several incidents between the tension and setup.

The cast is very good and what is amazing is that the film was made for a $7 million dollar budget yet looks every bit of a major studio film.

There are some interesting twists along the way as while I was able to predict two of them; the others were a very nice surprise. It is so refreshing to see a film like this come along as in many ways it can help redefine the Horror genre and proves that you can make a quality movie that is also scary and intense.

I for one hope we see more from this franchise in the near future.

4.5 stars out of 5.

Invisible hubby !

[saptesh786 · 7/10 · 4 April 2020]

Good story plot and a well direction makes this movie watchable till the end with suspense even some flaws having with. A woman flees away from her hubby due to avoid motherhood. Later she came to know that he died but he is haunting her still invisibly. What is the end ? You have to watch this suspense and science fiction thriller. However there is no explanation about invisible suit then one can confused. But movie is watchable. Acting by leading lady is perfect makes you linking the movie. Movie theme based on looks like some bollywood movies i.e. Do gaz zameen ke neeche, Main zaroor aunga, Agni sakshi, Darar and hollywood like Sleeping with enemy etc but in different and better way. Must watchable.

Suspenseful build up to a very silly ending

[VinS · 3/10 · 13 December 2023]

So someone invents what is arguably the biggest weapon ever for any military in the world and what do they want to do with this invention? Of course try to get back their jilted lover. Because what else matters in life, right?

OK, let's suspend belief and play along that all that matters in life is pettiness. How the hell does an invisible person navigate across crowded places without people bumping into him? And also am I supposed to believe just because one is invisible they can simply force others into holding knives?

I feel writing a review for this silly pulp movie is a massive waste of my time but yet here I am to vent my anger at already wasting a good couple hours watching this tripe. Gah.

Hard to watch

[coastcoastproductions · 29 February 2020]

The main character was beyond stupid In this whole movie Time and time again She kept not doing things That made the whole movie frustrating to watch I won't spoil anything on what those things were But this movie was painful I have no clue why it's rated so well And how people got enjoyment out of this crap

I will never tell someone not to watch something But I certainly won't say I enjoyed it

There were a few scenes that were cool And the Concept of things was intriguing But not enough to save the film