User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Everyone will come to Bonelli's
bkoganbing11 September 2018
This episode of MSW has Jessica Fletcher guesting on celebrity chef John Saxon's cooking show where they are both selling her latest book with a recipe that was spiked with poison, in the book. It's whipped up and enjoyed on the show.

Saxon is also hawking a new restaurant of his own that will open soon and on the strength of his name and reputation he hopes it will be a success. But he needs financing from racketeer Tony LoBianco who is moving in on the business.

During the course of things both Saxon and LoBianco get murdered the chef with poison and the racketeer with two bullets.

This particular episode showed some downright hostility between Angela Lansbury and NYC Detective Fran Bennett. Nevertheless when Jessica Fletcher realizes the significance of an ordinary item left by Saxon's body the whole thing falls in place.

Hope the restaurant was a tribute success to its late owner.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Proof in the pudding
coltras351 June 2022
When Jessica Fletcher investigates a murder committed after her appearance on a TV cookery programme, the detective assigned to the case resents her interference. John Saxon plays a headstrong chef who has a fair share of enemies, including a mob-connected person wanting to buy into his restaurant, and gets a kitchen knife in him for his trouble. There's a second murder with the mob guy getting shot. Jessica thinks that both murders were done by one killer, and she proves it in her inimitable fashion in this standard, yet watchable entry.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"Proof in the Pudding" another all-time favorite
letterl30 June 2022
Season 10 features two of my all-time favorite episodes of this long-running detective series. Earlier, we had "Love and Hate in Cabot Cove" and now we come to "Proof in the Pudding". The setting alternating between a new restaurant and the fast-paced world of a television studio makes this a must-watch.

I'm puzzled by the low ratings for "Proof in the Pudding". Other reviewers and raters must not be as taken with this episode as I am. I'm so enamored with this episode, I can quote long stretches of dialogue by heart.

The supporting cast does a wonderful job and there are enough differences in personality that first-time viewers will have a challenging time figuring out the murderer and how it was done. I especially love the relationship that evolves between Detective McKenzie and Jessica Fletcher.

If you can, try to find the DVD version of "Proof in the Pudding". The syndicated versions on both HMM and Cozi TV cut out some of the greatest parts which aren't necessarily crucial to the plot but are memorable nonetheless, including toward the end after the murderer has been revealed and taken away; there's a great short scene of only five or six seconds between McKenzie and Jessica Fletcher that is never shown on TV anymore. Or, come to my house. I'll be glad to watch the unedited version of "Proof in the Pudding" anytime.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of series ten's best episodes.
Sleepin_Dragon10 July 2023
Jessica is invited to the opening of a new restaurant, she is less than happy with the behaviour of head chef Bernardo Bonelli, ever the professional, Jessica knuckles down and gets on with the job......investigating murser.

I have to be honest, this has been my favourite episode so far from the tenth series, I loved that storyline, loved the acting and characters, and it was so nice to see Jessica back in her element, climbing over crime scenes and giving The Police her special brand of 'help.'

I loved the contrast between studio and restaurant,

There's that classic death scene with the hand on the knife, this episode really does feel like an earlier offering.

The acting was spot on, John Saxon and Michael Brandon were both superb. A really good supporting cast.

I loved that advertisement sequence, and being a Brit I'm naturally horrified by America's intense medication advertising.

Classic episode.

9/10.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"Like the Drip, Drip, Drip of the Teardrops when the Restaurant Bodies Fall"
WeatherViolet22 March 2010
This opens with a senseless act of vandalism, as a perpetrator enters the kitchen of the soon-to-open Bonelli's Restaurant to pour a one-quart can of paint upon its floor, to delay the grand opening until after clean-up.

When Philip Bonelli (Bobby Di Cicco) discovers the paint-splashed floor the next day, he telephones his Uncle Bernardo Bonelli (John Saxon) at a New York City television studio as Bernardo prepares to host his daily cooking program.

Station Manager Alex Weaver (Michael Brandon) says that he's unable to advance Bernardo's salary to pay for the clean-up operation, while Alex's wife, Food Critic Diane Weaver (Valerie Wildman), continually makes unrequited passes at Bernardo, which Alex perceives as somewhat invited, regardless that Bernardo wants nothing to do with Diane.

Television Reporter Lorna Thompson (Heidi Swedberg) has invested her inheritance from her grandmother's estate into Bonelli's Restaurant, possibly to assist Assistant Chef Manuel Ramirez (Jsu Garcia) to remain close at hand even though Bernardo reprimands Manuel for nearly every detail and threatens to fire him, which would have to lead to Manuel's deportation from New York City.

Loan shark Paul Avoncino (Tony Lo Bianco) threatens Bernardo unless he agrees to strike a deal for a fifty percent ownership in Bonelli's Restaurant, a notion to which Bernardo adamantly object, but Bernardo realizes that he needs funds to wipe the can of paint from his kitchen floor, and no one else has the money to finance the clean-up operation after the banks refuse the loans to Philip and wife, Jeannine Bonelli (Liza Snyder).

At different times, Paul Avoncino is seen with his thug, Sal Randazzo (Sal Landi), and his shrewd lawyer, Timothy Milner (James Ingersoll). One theory has it that one of them is responsible for cleverly pouring the quart of paint onto the restaurant floor.

When Lorna Thompson welcomes her dear old friend Jessica Fletcher (Angela Lansbury) to the studio as a guest, to share with Bernardo Bonelli a Risotto recipe from her latest Mystery, "The Uncaught, Murder in White," Manuel substitutes a less expensive spice for the Saffron, and so Bernardo fires him on the spot.

On the evening of the grand opening of Bonelli's Restaurant, Jessica has a confrontation with Paul Avoncino and notices the unhappiness between Jeannine and Philip Bonelli, between Diane and Alex Weaver, and between Lorna Thompson and Manuel Ramirez even though Lorna still tries for Manuel's re-hiring, so Jessica must do what she can to champion young love because the already married couples don't need or want it.

But the next morning, when a body is discovered in the kitchen, the no-nonsense Detective MacKenzie (Fran Bennett) arrests Lorna because her fingerprints are found on the knife, which she handles to try to help the victim.

Detective MacKenzie orders Jessica not to interfere in the investigation, and she repeats the directive once a second body turns up along the sidewalk, and a gun is found in Manuel's locker, thus warranting his arrest in spite of an obvious frame-up.

Jessica insists that the two murders must somehow be related and, therefore, investigates anyway, in order to clear those who are falsely arrested and attempt to patch up the forsaken young love in the process.

However, it does seem like a goof when Jessica claims Lorna's innocence on the basis that Lorna can't boil a pan of water, whereas it would require an experienced chef to know which knife from the rack would kill. Face it: this is a series in which victims are slain by ashtrays, pillows, trophies, binoculars, flashlights, paper-weights, corsages, tuning-forks, lock-picks, neclaces, screwdrivers, thermometers, puppets, vases, rocks, scissors, newspapers and Quinine water. So, now they're trying to say that none of these other long sharp knives could murder someone?

While watching one of Diane Weaver's food critique programs, Jessica notices a commercial for Drip-Stop and suddenly realizes how the murders tie together, glibly turning the tables on the perpetrator, after observing the "Proof in the Pudding."

The cast is rounded out by Rachel Bailit as Stage Manager, Tiffany Terry as Drip-Stop Girl, Gene Ross as Desk Sergeant, and Lew Saunders as Police Officer.

This episode represents the most recent appearance to date by Tiffany Terry, as well as the first of two "MSW" appearances for Jsu Garcia, the second of two each for Bobby Di Cicco, Tony Lo Bianco and Lew Saunders, third of three "MSW" guest roles for John Saxon.
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Half baked
xbatgirl-3002925 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
The best moment in this episode was Jessica trying the risotto. The faces Angela Landsbury makes and her timing are hilarious. Aside from that...

The script tanked this episode for me. Was too much time spent getting to know the suspects? Finally the first murder happened, then the second quickly after. It seemed almost no time was spent investigating then, poof, Jessica has it solved. I felt like I blinked and missed half the show. The Drip Stop commercial almost felt edited out of the old SNL.

I never could figure out if the writers intended for Bernardo to be a fraud as a chef? Or was that an accident? One moment he's well respected by everyone, the next moment he can't taste different spices, he doesn't know how to prepare his dishes, and someone else is the one cooking all his recipes. And then Italian food isn't really known for using cilantro, which makes me think there were just poor writing choices here.

John Saxon was always a favorite of mine and he's certainly giving it his all here as a hyper demanding and critical chef. But his accent was amusingly closer to Dracula half the time instead of Italian. I also noticed Jessica pronounces "restaurant" the French way several times. And the detective called Manuel "manual" at least once. Then every so often we have Susan from Seinfeld, popping in, completely out of place. Definitely an off week, in my opinion. So far, I'd rate this episode in the bottom for the season, but partly because this season has some really good episodes. This just seemed rushed and thrown together. More like a first draft than a finished product.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A severely under-cooked pudding
TheLittleSongbird13 November 2017
Have always been quite fond of 'Murder She Wrote'. It is a fun and relaxing watch that makes you think as you try to unwind in the evening. If one wants more complex, twisty mysteries with lots of tension and suspense 'Murder She Wrote' may not be for you, but if you want something light-hearted and entertaining but still provide good mysteries 'Murder She Wrote' fits the bill just fine.

Season 10 has seen some good episodes, of the previous episodes from the season even underwhelming episodes like "The Phantom Killer" were still watchable. "Proof in the Pudding" is sadly to me closer to a clunker than to a winner. It's not awful and it certainly has good things, but a lot works against it. For an episode centred around murder and tensions in food and a restaurant this felt underdone, and one does expect much more tension in portraying an industry that while exciting and very rewarding is also very competitive and stressful.

The mystery is really not one of Season 10's, or the show's in general, better or most engaging mysteries. The atmosphere lacks tension and urgency, it takes rather too long to get to the mystery with one having to wade through under-cooked melodrama and less than lively pacing to get there and it's both formulaic and not that hard to figure out. Providing one still sticks with the episode, once we do find out who the killer is it's hard not to care. Especially when the reveal itself is ridiculous, not that shocking or clever and has one of the season's and show's stupidest killers.

Not to mention the aforementioned head-scratcher regarding the knife and not only how Jessica got to the conclusion but also how she proved the innocence of the accused (the latter was not easy to swallow). Dialogue-wise, some of it has the amiable lightness one associates with the show, other parts are contrived.

For all those weaknesses, there are good points. The acting is good. Angela Lansbury successfully rises above her material, as do particularly John Saxon and Tony Lo Bianco of a game supporting cast.

As ever, the production values are slick, stylish and suitably cosy. The music has energy and has presence but also not making the mistake of over-scoring, while it is hard to forget or resist the theme tune. A few good moments in the writing.

In summation, has its moments but severely under-cooked. 4/10 Bethany Cox
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
One of the most ridiculous solutions I can recall
planktonrules30 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
So far, I've noticed that season 10 of "Murder, She Wrote" is much better than season 9. While this is generally true, "Proof in the Pudding" is so bad it should have been from season 9!

Bernardo Binelli (John Saxon) is a celebrity chef with a TV show of his own. Additionally, he is opening a restaurant...so he should be a happy man. But he isn't...because a sleazy mobster (Tony Lo Bianco) is trying to extort Binelli into making him a partner. And, so, when Binelli is murdered, the assumption is that the mobster is behind it. But when the mobster ALSO is killed, it becomes confusing. Good think that Jessica pulls the solution out of thin air and the killer admits what they did!

This is a bad episode. Up until the ending it's okay (aside from Saxon's odd accent), but the solution Jessica comes up with is incredibly tenuous and ridiculous. I can't believe they 'solved' the crime this way...and it betrays some pretty bad writing.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed