Feral (2006) Poster

(2006)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
It's a little better than the usual Brain Damage fare
jmyr-695-11730012 July 2015
I am absolutely no fan of Brain Damage Films' movies. I started watching this one with the expectation that it would be about the usual offerings from BD: not good.

However, I was moderately pleased with the fact that the story was rather good and the acting actually approximating something reasonable and enjoyable to watch.

The storyline is interesting and the plot develops in a reasonable manner. There are not great leaps of faith or nonsense to confuse and annoy the viewer.

Who knows? If Brain Damage keeps this up I may start actually liking their offerings.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Shockingly Awful
eden_3657 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I hate to not be able to write something constructive about anything, but the only terrifying aspect of this film was the lack of technique and ability displayed.

The editing was horrible; either too fast that what was happening became too difficult to understand or so slow it was painful.

The framing was non existent, no thought or preparation was put into the shots, even at points the lack of fore thought left half of the on screen 'action' being missed.

The lighting... What happened with it I'm not even sure. Making a picture so dark that you can't begin to make out the characters does not create atmosphere. There was no white balance so everything became a grey tone. The lighting was so harsh with so much contrast faces were white circles against sludgy brown to black settings.

The cuts should have been introduced to prevent over prolonged sequences of actors getting out of cars, checking their hands then walking up to a door... then making you sit there and watch them fumble for their keys, all the while you are listening to static from a lack of sound editing.

Violins googled under the search "cheap 50's horror" will never get you an A* in suspense. Really. Never.

The only forgiving factor to this title is that it rates against the later Halloween disasters.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
More low budget horror crap.
poolandrews20 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Feral starts on Highway Forty-Five where a lot of animals have been disappearing recently & their mutilated bodies turning up shortly after, the local Sheriff (Louis Dupuy) is on the case. Willing to help him are a young couple named Stacey (composer, producer & director Merill Capps) & Michelle (Sheena Dodds) who live on Highway Forty-Five in a glorified shed but their help turns to desperation when their own baby daughter Sarah (Elizabeth Poirrier) is abducted herself without a single trace of who or what did it...

Co-directed by actor, composer & producer Merill Capps along with editor, writer & producer Britt Pitre I thought this was pretty bad. The script by Pitre which takes itself extremely seriously isn't what you might expect, if your looking for a straight froward horror about something nasty in the woods then forget it because Feral isn't it. Almost the entire running time of Feral is devoted to Stacey & Michelle & their attempts at getting their daughter back & the emotional strain of the situation which leads to Stacey accidentally shooting someone which starts a chain of events which include lies, kidnapping & murder as they will do anything to stay together as a family & find Sarah. As far as the 'thing' in the woods go we never see it, we never find out what it is & is almost inconsequential. Oh & if that wasn't dull enough there are loads of shots of people walking around the woods late at night, there is barely any dialogue to speak of, probably a few conversations throughout the entire film which gives it a gritty minimalist feel but also means you never feel like you know these people or care for them as we learn next to nothing about anyone & there seems to little or no reasoning behind the odd decisions made by Stacey & Michelle. It goes on for too long, not enough happens either & who the hell was that old guy with the beard who had that video camera set-up?

Director's Capps & Pitre obviously haven't made a film before, I'm not exaggerating when I say half this film is spent outside in the woods where it's so dark you literally cannot see a thing. I watched this on VHS so maybe a DVD release would be clearer but even so there were many occasions where the entire screen was black. There are no scares although to it's credit it has some tension & atmosphere but that doesn't save it from being rubbish. There's no real gore either, there are some puddles of blood, some bones & skulls with gore still attached & a scene when Stacey & Michelle supposedly cut someone up but this is achieved by using joints of meat from a local butcher & you never see anything graphic.

With a supposed budget of about $65,000 this actually looks alright, I can't believe I just described a film as looking alright when half of it was so dark you can't see what's going on but when you can see what's going on it does indeed look alright if you get what I mean. The acting is actually pretty strong although the lack of dialogue or character development meant I never really cared for them so it didn't matter in the end.

Feral is a total waste of time, there is no horror here & feels like a drama more often than not & that's when you can actually see what's happening on screen which isn't as often as it should be. I don't know who Feral would appeal to, I didn't like it & wouldn't want to watch it again therefore I can only give it 2 stars out of 10.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed