The Dead Hate the Living! (Video 2000) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
92 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Everyone tries hard, but tough.
capkronos14 February 2002
I liked SCREAM as much as the next guy, but it's all but ruined horror films from 1996 and beyond. It's a shame to see it rub off on so many young horror filmmakers and an even bigger shame that they allow an overabundance of film references and endless blabber about various horror films to take the place of a plot and REAL dialogue. It's really a lazy way to construct a movie and really just a way to demonstrate the filmmakers know their s**t. Who really cares? And if they DO watch and love the horror films of Romero and Fulci, they'd know that nothing is worth sacrificing atmosphere, scares and a true sense of humor over. This movie is also derivative in its style- it is well photographed and richly colored in different shades, but even THAT aspect is just copycatting Dario Argento.

Everyone has already summed up the confusing "plot," of this Full Moon feature, so I won't waste time on it, just to say that THE DEAD HATE THE LIVING is made up of so many different elements from so many other zombie/horror movies that its OWN identity becomes lost in the shuffle and it doesn't quite make it as a comedy, a parody OR a horror film. However, I think some of the cast members (Jamie Donahue, Brett Beardslee..) have the potential to make an impression in the horror genre given the right opportunities.

Score: 3 out of 10.
15 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The living hate this movie
jimbo1516 December 2001
I write this review with serious doubts that anyone will have kept reading through all the 50-odd previous comments to get here. There is, however, the problem that this movie is getting some seriously mixed reviews here. In order to do my part, I cast my vote for "It Sucked!" and hope I can save someone the depression that follows renting a movie with glowing quotes on the box, only to wonder if those quotes weren't from the people who actually made the film.

I'll give it this; it's an educated film. Made for horror fans, by horror fans (who have a shoestring budget and no sense of continuity). Throughout the movie you'll see various references to influential directors (I saw the "Stab" poster, and as far as I know "Nails" cigarettes don't exist outside Kevin Smith movies) and various homages to previous zombie movies (like, all of them). This is, unfortunately, one of it's downfalls because much of the movie is extremely predictable. Also, the director tries to run with what works in the genre (anxiety, extra gore, handy power tools {Where the hell did that chainsaw even come from?}), but it is often executed poorly, regardless of budget. I didn't expect Citizen Kane here, but I also didn't expect a home movie made in a weekend.

For horror fans who think they can look past the directorial mishaps, think again. The zombie volume is next to nothing (2 henchmen zombies and a couple dozen shady figures in cobwebs), the special effects just remind you how crappy the film is (if someone is getting electrocuted, sparks will do nicely, we don't need this crappy cgi fireworks display that looks like a screen saver), and the death scenes are mostly tame (1. character vanishes in mist, throw bucket of blood from off camera. 2. Character has head removed, off screen. Carry crappy fake head back into scene. etc.). The irony here is that the characters in the movie were in the process of filming their own horror movie which actually looked better than the one they got caught up in.

So why did I give it a 3/10 and not a 1/10? Well hell, I can't make a movie. The effort alone is always worth something, no matter what the outcome.
16 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Total cheese - it's not that bad if you keep this in mind.
goomage17 July 2003
Warning: Spoilers
You have to remember that we are dealing with low budget cinema here, folks. As much as it disheartens me to see this B movie industry try to mime what American horror cinema has become (i.e. catering to the lowest common denominator by throwing in WB teenies in "funny yet spooky" situations) this ripe piece of cheese has its moments. And oddly enough, I really enjoyed some of the characters. Up until the end, that is, which is horrible!!!

*SPOILER WARNING*

I mean - come on... I laughed laughed my ASS off at some of the "goofs" in the film. Like when Topaz and the director crawl out of the ventilation shaft and into the cold storage and the "dead" guys eye twitches when the lighter Topaz is holding gets close to his face. Or in the same scene when the zombie chick under the sheet on the gurney is can't minimalize her breathing so you can see her chest rising and the sheet moving. Or when they meet "Rob Zombie" in the dressing room / graveyard set and one zombie manages to rip out of the ground a bit too hastily and you catch a glimpse of the set underneath. Waitaminute, what are zombies doing buried in a mock graveyard anyway??? Oh yeah - and what can be said about the lame CGI fire?

OK, so it's not a great movie...ok, it was a bad movie. I guess I was expecting this, so this wasn't a major disappointment for me. I have no expectations from American cinema (I have moved on to Jap horror and let me tell you - this is where it is at, folks!) - so I cannot be let down. But I can still have fun watching.

All in all I give it a 5 / 10.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
More of a bad trend.
blackxmas2 June 2001
I'm so tired of supposedly clever, overly self-conscious horror films. I know there are generational differences and a lot of people find this type of thing humorous and hip. In the early 90's, there was a film called "There's Nothing Out There" which was about a slimy green monster from outer space killing vacationing teens at a house in the woods over Spring Break. There was a horror movie nut who bothered everybody by making references to other horror films. At the time, that seemed funny and the movie itself is a ragged, messy charmer. I believe this is the film Kevin Williamson used to help him along in writing the script for "Scream", which while I did enjoy it, has hurt the horror genre through it's lazy deconstruction of modern horror. "The Dead Hate The Living" is a bandwagon film that only goes to show that even with a larger than usual budget and good intentions (but obviously pandering to the "Scream" demographic), a horror movie you cannot make.

I do have a theory that maybe people who like horror a little too much and are too eager to please cannot make a decent, serious horror picture. I do have a problem with people who like references to Warbeck and Campbell and Fulci. Do you like being patronized? I don't think you do. Why do you make special concessions for filmmakers who obviously take the easy way out by making you feel superior because you can pick up on what are basically pop-culture references? All the horror films of the past we champion have none of these obvious references. Are we so devoid of creativity or original thought (or filmmaking prowess) that we cannot make(or get to see) a good horror film anymore? I think they got us in a box and we can't get out.
15 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
you say Homage, I say Rip-off, let's call the whole thing off
movieman_kev18 October 2005
A group of young filmmakers break into an old abandoned hospital to shoot a film and inadvertently open a portal that unleashes zombies on the hapless cast and crew in this horror-comedy. Mixing horror with comedy is a VERY tricky thing. The ones that work do so amazingly well (Dead Alive, Return of the Living Dead, Re-animator, bad taste, etc...). The movies that don't work are usually total ass.This self-referential name-dropping, scene stealing film is part of the latter and ranks down there with "Dead Heat" as far as what NOT to do to succeed. Horrible acting, music, lame jokes, stealing scenes outright from far better films, dime-store special effects, and an unengaging, unoriginal story all add up to a putrid stench-filled film.

My Grade: D-

DVD Extras: Commentary by Writer/Director Dave Parker, and actors Eric Clawson, Matt Stephens, Brett Beardslee, & Jamie Donahue; photo gallery; production art; a 20 minute behind the scenes featurette; Music video; a ad for the puppet master toys; and theatrical trailer

Gripes: If you have the commentary turned on and then go to the extras NONE of them will play sound. word of warning
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not as bad a people say
loveaweeble4 May 2021
Yes, the plot is cheesy, but the makeup isn't bad for the small budget. I'm not saying this is a masterpiece. It's a fun low -budget zombie movie. The CGI fire at the end was terrible, but they probably did that for safety reasons.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
this could have been good
magicmanst15 July 2001
i hoped that this movie would be good.......I really, really hoped....But it isn't....In fact, it turned out to be bad. It wasn't campy enough to be a "good bad movie", and it wasn't serious enough to be a "thriller horror" movie, so it turned out to be junk....too bad.....I do love the references to all of the horror greats~
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
God do people hate this movie! i actually liked it for it being a schlocky B-Movie.
badgrrlkane30 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I mean TDHTL is not by no means a great horror film.It is what it is.A low-grade B-movie but it has it's moments of being a cool horror film even w/h it's name-dropping. And it's thankfully a short film though i would like to seen a sequel to see what happens to the 2 main characters after they enter the land Of the Dead. i mean i 've seen way worse horror films, watch death tunnel & you'll think this one is a gem.Good directing from Dave Parker & i actually liked the storyline though the acting was a bit lame. Reminded me at times of low-grade 80's horror but all in all it's what i expected.I think these bad reviews are from people expecting B-horror to be good horror & films such as this one,Boo,nIGHT oF THE Demons etc are not really meant to be good.They appeal to a lovers of B- grade horror films. And w/h this being a horror comedy it's meant to be cheesy.For those who are trying to say it should've been serious well stick w/h more mainstream or actual scary HORROR FILMS.IDO WHEN I WANT TO SEE THAT TYPE OF MOVIE. But when you watch a B-movie you know is a horror comedy don't compare Dead Alive,Evil dead & all the classics as that's not what these movies are even trying to become. I liked this & would recommend it to true fans of silly Horror comedy.And if you hated this stay away from the Sleepaway Camp trilogy.** out of *****
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
and the Living hate this movie..
Rob_Taylor25 October 2004
Ewww! What a hideous mess of a film. I understand the movie was deliberately made to be bad and littered with scenes and references from horror movies, but come on! When the best line of dialogue in a film is "Hmmm. What would Bruce Campbell do?" you know its time to leave. However, luckily for you, I was paralysed with disbelief and unable to leave before it was done.

The film is just awful on so many levels. Crap acting, crap story, crap dialogue, crap make-up and crap errmm crap. The main bad guy, who resembles Rasputin, is found inside some techno-gizmo that opens a gateway to.....aaaaargh! Good God! Why am I even trying to explain this? Explanation would imply that a lot of thought went into this production, which it clearly did not.

See, the thing about truly good, bad movies, is that they don't usually know what they are. Someone made them with the thought that the film would be really good and it turned out so bad that it was just a priceless gem waiting to be watched. But with this atrocity, they set out to make a "so-bad-its-good" movie. And it just fails. Fails so awfully that it just makes you cringe to watch it.

In fact, nothing remotely like action occurs for 45 minutes. Instead we're treated to what I'll very generously label "character development". A series of scenes between the different characters that only serves to make you hate them with a passion and to highlight their lack of acting talent.

Then we get to the techno-gizmo and Rasputin and the gateway to Hell etc. etc., yadda-yadda, boring! Seeing the characters killed one by one was not nearly as satisfying as I had hoped. In fact the ultimate horror (and, in fact, the only real horror this movie offered) was the ending which hinted at a sequel, for God's sake!

Rent another zombie movie rather than this one......any one, it doesn't matter. I guarantee it'll be ten times better than this dross.
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It was Fine
oddpodshow12 April 2020
Wasn't as bad as I thought it would be, had some nice shout outs to classic horror directors etc. The story wasnt amazing but the effects were fine and it kept me entertained. Very early 00s ha ha
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The lack of originality spoils the fun
The_Void11 September 2005
I'm a big fan of zombie movies, but this low budget fan-made stuff doesn't tend to appeal much. It's not that I don't enjoy the splatter, it's that recycled ideas can only go so far before you're completely watching someone else's film; albeit regurgitated. The Dead Hate the Living isn't a complete dead loss, and it's easy to see what the filmmakers were trying to achieve - but it suffers from the common problem with films like this, in that it doesn't have enough ideas in it's own right to be fun enough to completely keep the audience going with it. The film definitely has it's moments, though, such as the ending which brilliantly pays tribute to Lucio Fulci's "The Beyond". The constant name-dropping gets tired after a while. It's not bad at first, as you can see that the film is made by fans of this sort of stuff (people like me and, probably, you) but once the point has been made; it doesn't need to be made again. And again, and again. The plot is typically thin, and it follows a film crew making a no-budget zombie movie in an old abandoned hospital, which also happens to be a resting place for a doctor that wants the dead to take over the Earth.

This plot probably took about five minutes to think of, and the same again for script writing time; but funnily enough, the plot is what gives the film it's main point of originality in the way that the characters are making a film, which turns out to be about what's happening to them. What makes this idea fun is the way that the film almost spoofs itself with the way that we see the crew making their film, and then ending up getting butchered for real. While the plot isn't bad, the plotting will no doubt get on many people's nerves. The gore doesn't turn up at all in the first half of the movie, and even when it does it isn't thick or fast and the result isn't all that fun to watch. It's also ironic that you spend the first half of the film waiting for the zombie mayhem to start, and when it finally does; you realise that the first half of the movie was actually better! The Dead Hate the Living is a film that I would recommend to zombie enthusiasts only. There isn't enough about it to appeal to people who aren't zombie fans, and in that respect even zombie fans may be a little disappointed. A note to everyone; beware of the truly awful CGI towards the end!
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A surprisingly good horror flick!
Slasher-1021 February 2000
This is a surprisingly good horror flick which can be sort of viewed as an updated version of the Evil Dead. While the film doesn't really hold a candle to the Evil Dead it's a fairly good time. The Dead Hate the Living does have many flaws such as cheap visual effects, a not so threatening Rob Zombie - like clone villain, and the background plot of the film isn't completely clear, but remember this is a low budget horror film. An attractive cast, decent acting, and unendless references towards various horror films and celebrities keep the momentum going. It's quite clear that the film makers are huge horror buffs (The end is an obvious ode to Fulci's The Beyond) and any serious horror guru should at least appreciate the film for that.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Gory zombie fun for the whole family!
mizziah7416 February 2000
Director Dave Parker makes a credible film debut with THE DEAD HATE THE LIVING - the latest horror offering from Full Moon Entertainment. While most of Full Moon's recent releases have been tragic misfires (the awful SHRIEKER, TALISMAN & BLOODSTORM: SUBSPECIES 4 come to mind), Dave Parker and crew actually made an attempt to create a quality film that stands out as the best Full Moon release in years!

A ragtag group of low-budget filmmakers are holed up in an abandoned hospital to make the ultimate zombie film. As they begin to explore deeper inside the building, they stumble across an actual corpse and decide to use it in the film. When they accidently revive it, the lines of reality begin to blur as the group suddenly find themselves trapped inside the building with an ever-growing number of the undead.

THE DEAD HATE THE LIVING is low-budget, but Parker obviously tried to get as much mileage as he could with what he had.

Even though the film isn't as graphic as past entries in the zombie subgenre (like the Lucio Fulci flicks of the late 70's/early 80's, from which this film drew some influence), there's still plenty of effective bloodletting and well-crafted zombie make-ups to satisfy horror fans. The film also benefits from a great location, a decently-written script and one of the best ensemble casts ever to grace a Full Moon opus.

However, the film's not without its shortcomings. Fans of zombie flicks may be disappointed with the relatively small number of zombies in this film (I assume due to budgetary restraints). The film generally (and wisely) avoids computer-generated effects, but it occasionally uses them...and they're among the worst I've ever seen. I'm not kidding. They completely destroy the mood and effectiveness of the scenes they're used in. Fortunately, they're sparsely used, so they don't ruin the film completely.

Overall, I was impressed with this one. The film stands out with Full Moon's DARK ANGEL - THE ASCENT and CASTLE FREAK as examples of quality genre filmmaking. I just hope Full Moon doesn't screw things up by turning this into a crappy series!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
GARBAGE........
vallely0020 May 2000
I just finished watching it,and all I can say is that this film is "hurtin for certain"!!!This film is so corny, it makes "Raiders of the Living Dead" look like a brilliant,action-packed cinema innovation.My favorite part was after the film,when they showed "the making of".The loser Director and no talent cast sit around talking about how different this film is then all the other films that are out there.They discuss the original approach they took when writing this!!!!!!!!This film contributes nothing new,nothing impressive,and has no business asking $4.00 to be watched.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
He he, well.....
demonictoys5529 April 2001
This is one of those movies that you don't see very often. It was good and bad. The good parts in this movie are the deaths and violence. The bad parts are that there was a long boring beginning. If you like zombie movies, rent it. It's not the best, but it's alright. I gave this a 8.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Warning!!! Do Not See This Film
murphy-381 July 2001
Oh my!!! What a terrible movie. I'm a fan of "B" films but give me a break. The director/writer does not have a clue on how to tell a story. This movie is very slow, the editing is all over the place, and the dialogue stinks. Director/writer "Dave Parker" thinks he's clever, instead he just insulting to his audience. He tries to pay homage to Fulci, Argento, Carpenter, & Bava but fails in doing so. In addition, the commentary track on the DVD is shameful. I have never heard such an arrogant selfish person in my life. I would not be surprise if any of the good reviews on this service came from the director himself.

Hollywood hear my cry!! Don't let this boy direct, write, act, or edit a film again.

Do yourself a favor and give your money to charity instead.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A cleansing of the eyes with lye might be preferable.
leagueofstruggle5 February 2004
The Dead Hate the Living is a zombie movie. One would think the formula for zombie movies would be rather simple. Walking dead, scared individuals, head shots ensue as the dead lumber after the scared protagonists. Instead we get a meandering film that is likely to bore an individual to death. The plot is straightforward enough dumb, young, filmakers in abandoned hospital open one of the Gates to Hell mentioned in Fulci's The Beyond aka Seven Doors of Death. A couple of zombies come out of said gate and mediocre mayhem begins. A lame film that stumbles around not unlike a walking corpse and never really finds its feet.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It had potential.
Aaron137525 June 2002
Along with potential it also had some good death scenes. Unfortunately, it was to like the typical 90's horror movie to be anything special. One of the things that bugs me about this movie are all the references to Fulcio and other earlier horror movies like that is what they were trying to make. I am wondering have they ever actually watched any of these movies. All the cast are the typical 90's cast, while in Fulcio's and other earlier flicks generally use more mature if not more established actors. It also takes awhile before the killings start. They reference "the Beyond" in this movie, but in that flick there were deaths throughout while this one is a bit bottom heavy. And there are other examples of this throughout the flick. Other problems, to much comedy...I am sick of seeing comedy in frikin horror movies. It worked in some (return of the living dead), but most of the time all it does is take away from the flick. And please, don't make a zombie be intelligent and talk, they're not supposed to.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Homage? No. Stupid? Yes.
AndyVanScoyoc28 February 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I have a few filmmaker friends. I saw the budget for this film and it was pretty good for what ended up being the junk this film is, so I need to ask them (as none of them have a budget anywhere near what this film budget was) WHY, if filmmakers get any decent budget they decide to waste that money filming idiotic, worthless crap, rather than trying to make a decent movie?

The acting wasn't as bad as I've seen in other films and that's the only positive I can say about it.

Watched this on Amazon Prime (free) and while it was stupid fun while it lasted, it's not like I'm recommending anyone else endure the torture of watching this craptacular waste...not even for free...unless...you host a beer and pizza party and everyone gets falling down drunk.

Then, I'm sure everyone would have a blast.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Living Hate this Dead Awful Tripe
Contrarian25 April 2000
I'm not going to waste much time on a review. The film itself has already bled me of 90 minutes of my life. But out of common decency I do feel that I should warn others who may be thinking of renting this out... just put it back on the shelf and walk away. Intending to pay homage to classic horror films it doesn't even manage to parody them. Boring, sub-amateur rubbish.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mildly amusing zombie flick.
HumanoidOfFlesh24 November 2002
This is amateurish horror film making at best!There are a few huge plot holes,but there are also some great inside jokes.Horror fans will find references to Rob Zombie,Megadeth,John Carpenter,Tom Savini,Lucio Fulci,David Warbeck,"Evil Dead 2","The Beyond" and "Cannibal Ferox".The acting is pretty bad,but there is plenty of cheesy gore(heads get ripped off,throats ripped out,and the poor guy is dragged around by his intestines).Director Dave Parker is apparently a big Raimi/Fulci/Romero fan!The are also the digital effects,but they totally suck(electricity bolts,fire and a gunshot to the head).If you like zombie flicks give this one a look.6 out of 10.The plot:a small group of people shooting a low-budget zombie flick in an abandoned hospital unleash the living dead! Fulci lives!
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not great.
poolandrews13 December 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The Dead Hate the Living! is set in an abandoned hospital where several enterprising young filmmakers have broken into illegally to shot a low budget zombie horror flick (art imitating life maybe?). The director Dave (Eric Clawson) has his two sisters Shelly (Wendy Speake) & Nina (Kimberly Pullis) in the leading roles, his mate Paul (Brett Beardslee) is doing the make-up effects & he has got the hot Topaz (Jamie Donahue) to be a production assistant. While exploring the hospital the crew come across a strange looking coffin like object in a downstairs laboratory, they open it up & the dead body of Dr. Eibon (Matt Stephens) falls out, sensing a bit of an opportunity Dave decides to put the body in his film but after accidentally bring it back to life using the strange coffin thing the crew have to fight for their lives as zombies start to appear everywhere as it quickly becomes clear that the dead hate the living...

Written & directed by Dave Parker this cheap as chips zombie flick isn't as bad as it could have been & isn't as bad as a lot of low budget crappy horror flicks I've endured recently but it's still not very good. Low budget horror film maker, Full Moon Pictures president & killer puppet lover Charles Band was the executive producer although even he couldn't bring himself to release The Dead Hate the Living! through his Full Moon Pictures company, hey he might not have particularly high standards but at least he does have standards. Anyway, here the script takes ages to go anywhere, apart from a brief pre-credit sequence it's well over 50 minutes before any zombies show up to terrorise the cast & that ladies & gentlemen is just too long. The whole first 50 minutes establishes that a film crew are making a horror film in hospital illegally & basically that's it, until the first zombie show's up this film is firmly entrenched in snoozesville. Then there are lots of questions over the plot, if the guy killed himself during the pre-credits sequence how did he end up in the coffin thing? Where did the zombie that was seen during the pre-credit sequence go? Why didn't that zombie follow Dave & Topaz into the air vent? Why did Dave emerge the other side in front of Topaz when Topaz climbed into the vent before Dave to begin with? Why are some of the zombies easy to kill while other's aren't? Why do some talk while other's don't? Why can some sense when someone is alive & other's can't? What was that coffin thing? Where did it come from? Who made it? What was it's function? Why is The Dead Hate the Living! such a poorly constructed film where things just happen for the hell of it with little regard if anything makes any reasonable sense? Don't ask me, ask the people who made it. There are also some glaring references to other horror films, actor's & director's from John Carpenter, Sam Raimi, George Romero, Lucio Fulci to Bruce Campbell, Dick Miller & the obscure Italian special make-up effects man Gino De Rossi who besides doing the gory effects for such Italian splatter fare as Zombie Flesh Eaters (1979), City of the Living Dead (1980), Pirahna Part 2: The Spawning (1981), Cannibal Ferox (1981) & The House by the Cemetery (1981) also worked on the latest Bond film Casino Royal (2007)!

Director Parker does OK on what was admittedly a low budget, at least there's some cheap gore effects here. There's a decapitation or two, some rotten zombies one of whom has their face literally punched in, there's some bubbling skin effects, someones guts are pulled out & there's some blood splatter. As in a lot of low budget horror flicks these days there are some truly awful CGI computer effects, when you have literally millions to spend on computer effects like Spider-Man (2002) they can look absolutely spectacular but when your working on the sort of budget the makers of The Dead Hate the Living! have it's impossible to create realistic computer effects. Here they use CGI to make three zombies appear as if they are on fire, they probably couldn't afford to achieve the effect on set & it looks terrible, I've seen PS3 computer games with better fire effects. It's not scary, there's very little atmosphere or tension & the story is far too loose to be gripping. Amusingly I watched this on cable TV last night (yep, at least I didn't spend any money on it) & during the continuity announcement just before it started the woman called it 'The Living Hate the Dead' rather than The Dead Hate the Living!, I'm not being funny but you would have though a TV station would at least know the correct name of the film they are about to show or is that asking for too much?

With a supposed budget of about $150,000 this was definitely a low budget flick, unfortunately that doesn't automatically mean we should ignore all it's faults because at the end of the day it will cost as much to rent or buy this as a big Hollywood blockbuster like Transformers (2007) & to be brutally honest I know which I'd rather watch & to give you a clue it's not The Daed Hate the Living!. The acting could have been worse & Jamie Donahue who played Tpoaz is hot & helps make this a bit more watchable.

The Dead Hate the Living! isn't that good, it's not as bad as some low budget efforts out there but that doesn't amount to much in itself. If your a real low budget horror film junkie than this may pass 90 odd minutes harmlessly enough but I'd struggle to personally recommend it to anyone.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Dude...
Keelax3 March 2019
Watch this with some alcohol and a group of friends with some movie-riffing abilities, and you'll have a good time.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better then it seems.
nogimmicks9 July 2001
I don't really understand why everyone seems to have such malice for TDHTL. I really enjoyed this movie. Is it Zombi 2, or The Beyond? No. Its not even House By The Cemetery. But it sure as hell is more fun to watch than City Of The Living Dead, or Demoni, or Demoni 2, or Blade In The Dark (whole other can of worms...), or Day Of The Dead. I didn't expect much from it, and you know what? I was pleasantly surprised. This is a "Rent before you buy" kind of thing, so check it out at your local video store, and you might be pleasantly surprised, too.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Name-dropping can't save this one
hippiedj27 September 2001
I LOVE horror films, even horror spoofs....but when a film like The Dead Hate The Living doesn't offer any real scares or genuine laughs, I feel that the $7.99 I paid for the DVD was even too much.

I was originally looking forward to seeing this film. It even got a few "hip" critics and a vague, partial quote from Tom Savini to praise it (although just quoting Savini saying "Unique!..." on the cover doesn't really say much, it could be it's uniquely bland). Problem is, you get a few critics from Deep Red or Eon magazines praising it, some viewers will automatically say they like the film lest they feel they're not cool if they say they don't like it.

Name dropping....everyone keeps praising how this film is full of names like Lucio Fulci and Bruce Campbell and references oodles of other films. So what. That doesn't make it any more clever. While I'm not impressed by "teen" thrillers, at least Scream worked in its references because it was cleverly written. Another film that worked well in the name-dropping sense is Free Enterprise. It's as if by constantly mentioning Lucio Fulci and others, The Dead Hate The Living is basically distracting horror buffs so they'll go "OHHHHHHH, I know that one! Kewl!" and just maybe will keep them from realizing there's not much else going on. Even a film like The Return Of The Living Dead tried to cover its lack of genuine scares by throwing in an extra dose of disenchanted youth and full frontal nudity. Not much of that in this film really, but they did manage to throw in the F-word enough to, um, I guess give it an edge?

In the DVD's audio commentary, it was said that they were concerned mentioning Marilyn Manson would date the film. Oh, and like making Dr. Eibon an exact replica of Rob Zombie DOESN'T date it? And the constant use of the word "dude" doesn't help much either. Still trying to figure out exactly which era Eibon is supposed to be from, since he looks straight out of the 1700s in some scenes and then seems to know a lot about technology. The obvious glued-on beard didn't help much either.

The dialogue,,,,oh geez. Things like the stoner cameraman taking a deep drag on a joint and saying "Rock and roll!" just made me groan instead of laugh. The lead actor seems to remind you of a more MTV groomed version of Tim Daly (of TV's "Wings") and his best pal gets the weakest lines throughout the story--that whole bit about what's outside..."DEATH........" is rather weak. I know director Dave Parker was working on a very very low budget, but those makeup effects and face wounds were so unconvincing. In the audio commentary they constantly pat themselves on the back about how GREAT it all looks. In one scene where the few surviving characters were confronted by zombies on a cemetery set and a fight ensues--yes a fight rather than a struggle--wide shots reveal that there aren't as many people there as you thought and not as much action is happening either.

I have plenty of punk and thrash music in my collection, but those songs by Penis Flytrap ("friends of mine," says director Parker) were embarrassing. That title song, whether it was meant as being silly or serious, comes off as contrived cookie-cutter stuff in its music and lyrics ("The dead hate the living they wanna hate the living tonight....." EEEEK!) Anyone seriously wanting to mosh to that needs to take a closer look at themselves. For some reason being cool these days means liking bands with "you-can-come-up-with-a-better-name-than-that" names (Saliva, Korn, Limp Biskit....yawn) and talking about Japanese anime as if it were a revelation. Kids, MTV doesn't really have all the answers...learn the meaning of the word INDIVIDUALISM.

One of the "positive" critical quotes on the cover was how the movie was an nightmare on the level of Argento... Well, it was Argento-like basically in the lighting scheme, but to say it resembles the work of Dario Argento is going way too far. Yes, the film has interesting lighting and some energy, but when everything else comes off as cheese it left me disheartened by how the film kept going and getting less and less interesting.

I was SO looking forward to this film, and was left disappointed and annoyed. The Dead Hate The Living was obviously pandering to a crowd that is easily riled up by that moment's music trend, pot references and "Dude!!!!!" I wasn't scared by its intended scares, and didn't laugh at the jokes. Killer Klowns From Outer Space managed to pull off thrills and giggles well, and was CLEVER. That's an example of how to do a not-so-serious horror film right.

The only thing the guys behind this film seemed the proudest of is that they found an actual dead cat to use in one scene. Awesome. Not.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed