Gorky Park (1983) Poster

(1983)

User Reviews

Review this title
97 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Well Made, Bittersweet Police Procedural
Terrell-418 October 2004
It's winter and three corpses are found in Moscow's Gorky Park. They've had their faces and finger tips carved off. Arkady Renko, an honest, slightly obsessive Russian cop, is assigned to the case. He sets out to identify the bodies by reconstructing their faces, and as he gets closer he finds obstructions in his path. He finds a girl (Joanna Pacula) who was friends of the trio, a wealthy and ruthless American (Lee Marvin), an American cop (Brian Dennehy) out for blood, and more than he probably wants to know about sable coats and the animals they're made from. It becomes clear that corrupt higher-ups are involved in something with greater stakes than solving a triple murder. Hurt and Marvin do great jobs and are well matched.

This is a tight, very well constructed police procedural that is a little exotic, with the cops and functionaries being Russians. It's also a bit gloomy with a bitter sweet ending, but it still works as a very watchable film. A lot of the outdoor shots were filmed in Helsinki, and the movie takes place in the winter. The atmosphere looks cold and oppressive. The contrast is striking with the scenes set in a pre-revolutionary bath and an expensive restaurant, both reserved for the use of privileged Soviet officials.

The book, by Martin Cruz Smith, is even better. Apted also directed Enigma, and I like both movies a lot.
42 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Krasnya horrorshow
rmax30482330 September 2003
Warning: Spoilers
For some reason I almost always watch this when it appears on cable TV. The plot, twisted and complicated as it is, is a bit hard to follow at times although it does make sense if you pay attention. But I think it's the general milieu that is evoked by the location shooting, wardrobe, makeup, and art direction that makes this interesting.

Boy, it looks cold! Everyone seems to dress in multilayered dark clothing and the men wear Pelzkappe, those big furry caps. When characters speak in outdoor scenes, their breath steams, though not always, so you can pretty much distinguish the scenes shot in the studio from those outside. Smith's novel was a bit more explicit about the material culture of Moscow than this movie is. Not only doesn't Chief Investigator Hurt's cheesy looking compact car have a heater but his shoes are made partly of cardboard.

Viewers usually don't pay much attention to makeup unless it draws attention to itself but the makeup department should get a medal for this one. First off, everyone is pale, as they should be in the midst of a Russian winter. The usual tendency is to pile on the suntan and make everyone glamorous. If you want to see an example of what I mean, watch "A Time to Love and a Time to Die", the scene in which John Gaving as a German soldier returns from months at the front during the winter and takes a bath naked so we can all admire his muscles and that tan he sports all over his body, suggesting not November in Kursk but a summer at the beach in Zihuatanejo. Then there is Joanna Pacula's makeup. She's pale too but she's given just enough eyeshadow or kohl or whatever it is, and her brows and lashes are emphasized just enough to make her look even more modelesque than she ordinarily would. If her eyebrows were any darker she'd look like Audrey Hepburn in "Sabrina." As it is, with her blue eyes framed by those orbital rings and her chestnut curls cascading around her cheeks, she looks slightly predatory, maybe like a sable. In some later movie she played a vampire, I think, and I can see why she was cast. William Hurt, likewise pale, even paler than usual come to think of it, is likewise nicely handled. His thin stringy hair has been blackened for some reason. I don't know why. There are plenty of blond Russians. Look at Alexander Gudonov.

Hurt's character is nobody's idea of a superhero. He's just an earnest cop who can be beaten up, as he is several times. After he has killed a traitor who happened to be a man of considerable importance in the Soviet bureaucracy, he next shows up on screen with a small shiner the color of a storm cloud on one of his eyelids and a slight scab on his lower lip. He's been clobbered by the KGB for the killing, you see. But we don't see it on screen, or hear it described. The bruises on his face tell the story. How tempting it must have been to make more of these possibilities. A Makeup Department could have gone ape here -- one cheek stuffed with cotton, bandages on his head, his face a welter of bruises. But this is tastefully done, giving you all the information you need in order to know what happened. Actually, there is one tan face in the crowd -- Lee Marvin's. But it suits him. And he's an American businessman who only visits the USSR from time to time so, between visits, for all we know he may be stretched out on the beach at Bora Bora. He even wears beige and dark browns that match his suntan, and he's the only one in the bunch who actually looks spiffy. William Hurt may be chewed out by his superior for not having shaved closely enough but that would never happen to Marvin, who looks like he just stepped out of five-hundred-dollar a head hair salon.

There isn't a line spoken by Marvin that doesn't ring with irony. Every pause, every facial twitch, every curious line reading, tells us that this guy is very clever and he knows it. Pacula's performance is that of a model who's taken acting lessons. William Hurt, a fine actor, does some strange things here. He LOOKS the part of the determined militia detective, relatively quiet, rarely smiling, seldom physical -- but he drapes his speech in British locutions: "yore" for "your", "bean" for "been," and so on. We can only guess why. The two Americans (Dennehy and Marvin) speak frank American. The actors playing Russians are all from the UK except Pacula, who is Polish and kept help her Slavic accent. So by adopting a Brit accent Hurt places himself among the "Russians." Dennehy, by the way, is at the top of his form. Marvin is absolutely magnetic, as is Ian Bannon, whose readings have the same ironic pitches and stress as Marvin's. You never believe a word he says.

The film ends on a noble note. Pacula gets to go to America which, as everyone knows, is rich, democratically pure, and free of corruption. Hurt stays behind to save her from being followed and killed by KGB. The novel had a different ending. The hero follows the girl to New York City. They sit down to watch television. The program is one they have never seen before. It's title is, "The Price is Right." ("Come on DOWN!") The hero says something like, "THIS is what it's all about? Money?" And gets up and goes back to Russia leaving the girl flat.
27 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Too many people in our society disappear.
lastliberal2 December 2007
It has been a long time since I last viewed this film, but it was a welcome revisit, and a chance to see a great performance by William Hurt (Kiss of the Spider Woman, A History of Violence, The Proposition). After about a dozen of his films, I never tire of watching him act.

The cast also included Lee Marvin in a very good performance, and the ever-lovable Brian Dennehy. This was also the American debut of Joanna Pacula, who got a Golden Globe nomination for her outstanding performance. And, we also got to see her golden globes in a skintastic moment, right before she gets Hurt! This was her finest film in a career spanning 30 years.

Do not miss this fine police procedural with a surprise ending. The motive is brilliant.
29 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great thriller; they don't make 'em like this anymore
McGonigle17 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Watching this with a friend of mine, he commented "I was just saying the other day, even the 'B' movies from the 70s are better than the best movies today." Even allowing for the fact that this came out in 1983, that's an excellent point.

They rarely make movies like this anymore. It's an exciting spy thriller, but it's realistic, and it's got some brains behind it as well. There are no idiotic "Air Force One" acrobatics, no gigantic explosions (with a character jumping towards the camera in the foreground) and no snappy catch-phrases. Just a good mystery and a boatload of great performances.

One thing that's interesting about this film is that in the end, the mystery turns out to be about commerce, not politics, which is unusual for this sort of cold-war Soviet thriller.

Another exceptional feature is the great script by the legendary Dennis Potter. This sort of thing makes me wish he had done more movie scripts for hire. While it's certainly not a personal project like Pennies for Heaven or The Singing Detective, Potter still turns in a top-notch script, filled with typically Potterian touches (like frequent references to losing your skin, and the smart, snappy, hilarious dialogue in general).

Another Potter touch (also used in Christabel) is the way all the characters (except the Americans) use British accents. This is a little disconcerting at first, but once you're used to it, it works really well. First, an actor playing a Russian and speaking English with a British accent is hardly any more "unrealistic" than an actor speaking English with a Russian accent. More importantly, the use of British accents (as in Christabel) allows Potter and the actors to indicate the characters' relative social status, by the type of accent they have. Intellectually, it doesn't make any sense to have the Soviet administrators talk in an upper class British accent, and the regular cops speak with a Cockney accent, but artistically, it induces an immediate emotional response in the viewer that makes a real difference between the two characters instead of just presenting us with two indistinguishable "Russian cops".

All in all, this is an under-appreciated thriller that holds up extremely well, over twenty years later.
30 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Peek At New Mother Russia
bkoganbing17 April 2007
Though the story does drag a bit in the telling, Gorky Park is a good look at what turned out to be the birth of post Soviet Union Russia.

First and foremost Gorky Park is a murder mystery, despite the politics. That's what William Hurt is all about, he's for want of an American term, a homicide cop with the Moscow PD. He's been handed a nasty triple homicide, three young people, two men and a woman whose faces and finger prints were mutilated making identification a challenge.

Of course this was done for a reason and soon Hurt finds himself up to his neck in a turf struggle with the Soviet KGB. There's an American businessman played by Lee Marvin who's in the mix as well as Russian pathologist Ian Bannen and an American homicide cop Brian Dennehy. Hurt also gets involved romantically with Soviet dissident Joanna Pacula and it turns out she's the key to the whole case.

The film was shot in Stockholm, Helsinki, and Glasgow all cold climate cities that serve very well as location stand ins for Moscow. Best in the film is Lee Marvin who went back to playing bad guys as he did in his early years for this one.

In the turf struggle depicted between the Moscow Police and the KGB you see a whole lot of issues talked about and you can see why the Soviet Union fell apart as it did. Too bad the story couldn't have been better told in a tighter screenplay.
23 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Effective
Leofwine_draca22 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
GORKY PARK is one of those Hollywood films of the 1980s that explored Russian themes and backgrounds and took a look at Cold War relationships during the era; Schwarzenegger's RED HEAT is another of the popular examples. This one is based on the literate novel by Martin Cruz Smith and certainly has an air of authenticity to it, with Finland ably standing in for Moscow itself.

The plot involves William Hurt's impassive militiaman investigating a gruesome triple murder at the titular locale, one where the three victims had their faces skinned to hide their identities. His investigation takes him into the usual dangerous territory involving corruption, conspiracy, murder attempts and a femme fatale to boot. The film has a glacial feel to it at times, but James Horner's kettle drum score enlivens things immensely (just as it did in COMMANDO) and the excellent cast features good parts for Lee Marvin, Joanna Pacula and the scene-stealing Brian Dennehy.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Intrigue and Corruption in Cold War Russia
Uriah4316 August 2021
This film begins with three young adults skating on a frozen lake in Moscow. Not long afterward their bodies are found and to the horror of the investigating militsiya agent, "Arkady Renko" (William Hurt) their faces and fingerprints have been surgically removed. In addition to that, two of them were shot in the mouth rendering dental recognition almost impossible as well. Even more perplexing to him is the fact that the KGB insists on not taking over the investigation even when it appears that one of the victims is an American. To underscore his concerns his immediate supervisor, "Chief Prosecutor Iamskoy" (Ian Bannen) also voices his suspicions of KGB involvement in these murders and advises him to be extremely cautious. What he doesn't realize, however, is just how far up the corruption extends to not only his own department but within the KGB as well. Now rather than reveal any more I will just say that this was a pretty interesting film due in large part to the way the director (Michael Apted) captured the cold Russian winter environment of Moscow so well. I also liked the performances of both William Hurt and Joanna Pacula (as "Irina Asanova"). That being said, I found this movie to be quite entertaining and I recommend it to viewers interested in a film of this sort.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Farewell, Brian.
bgh10542 June 2020
In homage to Brian Dennehy and his recent passing, I wanted to revisit GP, having seen it upon its initial release decades ago. I recall being intrigued by the film's unpredictable plot twists.

However, such was not the case today. I could not get past William Hurt's unconvincing Russian accent. It was inconsistent and distracting and ruined my second (and last) viewing. I cannot recall why I liked the film so much the first time. But, I did appreciate BD (thankfully he played an American) and it was the only reason I finished the film. God bless you and Rest In Peace, Mr. Dennehy. Sorry, Mr. Hurt, I AM a fan of most of your other films though!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
intriguing police political thriller
SnoopyStyle15 September 2014
Arkady Renko (William Hurt) is a Moscow police detective. They find three bodies in Gorky Park with their faces and fingers cut off. KGB arrives right away but nobody wants the case. The girl was wearing skates stolen from Irina Asanova (Joanna Pacula). As Arkady investigates, the case leads to the government with possible KGB connections. Jack Osborne (Lee Marvin) is an American with government influence and dating Irina. William Kirwill (Brian Dennehy) is an American looking for his brother James. Soon Osborne becomes a prime suspect.

This has a bit of quite a few different genre. It's got the CSI police investigation thriller. It has that cold moody murder like a Scandinavian murder mystery. It also has the communist KGB political intrigue. In the center of it all, William Hurt holds the movie together in a murky police/political thriller. It just has a great murder mystery mood.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
...one day, Arkasha, one day!
mdewey17 December 2007
A very unique, fast moving and entertaining story about political and criminal intrigue in Cold War (real cold, just watch the movie!) Russia. The grisly murder of three young people sends our protagonist, Inspector Arkady Renko (W. Hurt), on a complex, intertwining mission to find out who and/or what was behind this dastardly crime. As the crime facts unfold, potential suspects begin to surface in the mind of the inspector, suspects that may include American collusion with KGB officials. Maybe not entirely novel on the surface, but the sequences of events and the characterizations set forth are anything but pedestrian.

Perhaps the sequences of the facial reconstruction of the 3 victims "de-skinned" facial bones and the subsequent deductions provide the impetus for an unusual plot setting. The involvement of the American cop (B. Dennehy), the Siberian beauty and romantic interest (J. Pacula) who wants out of her homeland, the rich American (L. Marvin), the inspector's police buddies, to name a few, provide more than mere tangential plot fodder: the sum of their actions coalesces in the inspector's mind and takes him closer yet to what could be a very inconvenient truth. All this is done cinematically with good pace and little wasted motion.

It is noteworthy that most of the so-called Russians are British Isles actors who maintain their native brogue while donning the usual Kossack-like apparel! Yet their histrionic adeptness suffers not and their characterizations come off well. After all, we've seen this type of casting done before, but I don't think we could pull this off in modern Russia. Instead of filming in Finland with British actors, we would be filming in Moscow or St. Pete with Russian actors.

Any additional reviewing will get me into the "spoiler" category, so I'll just sign off by saying see the movie. To me, it is William Hurt's best!
30 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Le Rouge et le Noir
JamesHitchcock12 February 2010
On a cold winter's day, three murdered corpses are found in the snow in a city park. The bodies have had their faces and fingertips sliced off in order to hinder identification. The police officer assigned to the case, however, proves to be a tireless investigator, and eventually succeeds in establishing the identity of the victims. His investigations lead him to suspect that the murders are linked to a corrupt businessman who is being protected by powerful vested interests among the Establishment.

That could be the plot of a Humphrey Bogart-style film noir, and "Gorky Park" can be seen as an example of neo-noir, the movie genre which uses modern cinema techniques in order to produce a contemporary equivalent of the classic noirs of the forties and fifties. (Other neo-noirs from the eighties include "Body Heat", which also starred William Hurt, and "No Mercy"). The difference here, of course, is that the city in question is not New York or Los Angeles, New Orleans or Miami, but Moscow. The police investigator is Arkady Renko of the Soviet militia, the park is the city's Gorky Park (hence the title) and the villain of the piece is Jack Osborne, an American fur importer with close ties to the Soviet Establishment.

In 1983, when the Cold War was still far from over, the idea of setting a crime thriller in the Soviet Union with a Russian hero and an American villain must have been a novel one, and one which might have disturbed some American patriots. Nevertheless, "Gorky Park" is far from being pro-Soviet. (Despite the suspicions of the likes of Joe McCarthy that Hollywood was awash with Communist sympathisers, there were very few American films during the Cold War era which attempted to make propaganda on behalf of Soviet Communism, Warren Beatty's "Reds" perhaps being an exception).

The film is set during the twilight years of the old Soviet Union, the brief interlude between the death of Leonid Brezhnev (an event referred to in the script) and the rise of the liberal, reforming Mikhail Gorbachev. The country we see here is still an oppressive dictatorship, but Russia of Andropov and Chernenko is a very different place from the Russia of Lenin and Stalin. The predominant atmosphere is no longer one of revolutionary fanaticism but rather one of cynicism and corruption. By the early eighties Soviet Communism had evolved into what George Orwell described in "1984" as "oligarchical collectivism", a strongly hierarchical system where those at the top of the pecking order use their position to secure privileges and material advantages for themselves. Senior officials in the KGB, the body supposedly charged with defending the purity of communist ideology, are happy to make a profit out of doing business with a ruthless foreign capitalist.

Given the film's attitude towards the Soviet system, it was clearly not going to be possible to shoot it in Russia, so Helsinki stood in for Moscow, as it often did in Western films made during the Cold War. (The Finnish capital was a versatile performer and could also be called upon to play the role of Leningrad). This meant, of course, that well-known Moscow landmarks such as the Kremlin, Red Square or St Basil's Cathedral could not be shown, but director Michael Apted and cinematographer Ralf Bode were still able to invest the film with a cold, bleak atmosphere redolent of the Northern European winter, and serving as a metaphor for the bleak, soulless system under which Russians had to live at this period. (A distinctive, atmospheric visual look is a common feature of neo-noir films).

The dogged investigator is another common feature of both noir and neo-noir, and William Hurt's Arkady Renko falls within this tradition. Like a number of heroes played by Bogart and other leading noir actors such as Robert Mitchum and Glenn Ford, Renko is taciturn and outwardly stolid and unemotional, but inwardly he a man of strong feelings with a burning determination to see justice done, even when he knows that he will be putting himself at risk by continuing with his investigations. Hurt, who gives an excellent performance, was a good choice for the role, as he is often very good at playing men who find it difficult to express their feelings, showing us the genuine depths of feeling which lie below his character's surface reserve. ("The Accidental Tourist" is another example of this ability).

There were too many good supporting performances for me to single them all out, but special mentions must go to Joanna Pacula as Irina Asanova, Renko's love interest and a woman with connections with both the three murder victims and with Osborne, and Lee Marvin as the villainous Osborne himself. This was Pacula's first film in the West (she was exiled from her native Poland after Jaruzelski's military coup and the crackdown on the Solidarity movement) and I am always surprised that after this excellent start she did not go on to become a bigger Hollywood name. As one might expect from Dennis Potter, the screenplay is literate and intelligent. Like "Body Heat" and "No Mercy", this is one of the better crime dramas of the eighties. 7/10
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Hugely underrated film
thao3 August 2006
Gorky Park is one of my favorite political thriller and a film I watch regularly. I have never understood why it is not better known and better rated.

As is often with Cold War Spy films, the system is corrupt on both sides, and it's the every day people who pay the price of the greed and dishonesty of those playing the games behind the scene. The only way to survive is to be invisible and never get mixed up in a case that has political ties. William Hurt plays Arkady Renko, a Moscow police man who gets one of those cases. Three bodies are found in Gorky Park. Faces and fingertips have been removed and KGB seams to know something about this but they do not want the case. KGB does not like Arkady Renko very much since he has tried to prove their guilt once before and he is sure that they are now out for a revenge. The case is somehow connected to Jack Osborne, an American business man played by Lee Marvin.

The film does not shy away from criticizing both sides. Not only do the politics come off as hypocritical, the whole world of espionage is shown as an inhuman and cruel game of greedy and power hungry opportunists.

Some have criticized the film for not capturing the book well enough. It is rather unfair to expect a 2 hour long film to include everything from a 600 page book. A feature film of such a long book is always going to be a shortened version. I think Dennis Potter (yes the one and only) does a great job of capturing the moral bankruptcy of both systems, communism and capitalism. How they are in fact the same. Just a way to keep the little man busy and blind so those in power can get rich by corrupting the system.

Not perfect but not far from it.
29 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Jack! Listen! I've got the money!
sol121819 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS** When three faceless bodies are found buried in the snow in Moscow's Gorky Park the city's police militia chief inspector Ankavy Renko, William Hurt, and his assistance Pasha, Michael Elphick, are immediately called on the scene. Things like this just don't happen in Moscow and the head of the city's police, Alexanderr Knox, wan't the killer or killers found before a panic breaks out among the population.

Right away Renko realized that there was a lot more to this triple murder then what at first meets the eye. Why did the killer slice off his victims faces with surgical precision and even more surprising why did the dreaded KGB in the person of Maj. Pribluda, Rikki Fulton, take over the murder case which didn't seem to involve national security? Or did it! Renko gets his first break on this puzzling case when it's reported that one of the victims-a woman-ice skates was reported to have been stolen from Russian actress Irina Asanova, Joanna Pacula, about a week before she was found murdered and mutilated in Gorky Park! That person is later identified as being Valerya Davidova, Marjaha Nissinen, who just happened to have attended the same collage with Irina as well as being her best friend! It also comes out that the other two bodies found at the murder site were that of Kostia Borodin, Heikki Leppanen, and American tourist James Kirwill, Jukka Hirvikangas, who were unloved in smuggling desperate Russian citizens out of the Soviet Union. It's James' brother a detective in the NYPD William Kirwill, Brian Dennehy, who's now in Moscow looking to find his murderer and bring him to justice! This in fact complicates things even more then they already are for the Moscow Police with Kirwill not willing to cooperating with them but going on his own in finding his brother's killer. In putting all the pieces together Renko soon finds out that the three murder victims as well as the terrified, in what would happen to her if she talks, Irina are all linked together to one person: American successful businessman and entrepreneur Jack Osborne, Lee Marvin!

Osborne it soon comes out has an inside track with higher ups in both the KGB and Moscow City Government and is in fact untouchable from the law even in the case of a multiple murder that he may very well have committed! As a by now obsessed Renko digs up more evidence on Osborne his life becomes endangered in that he's not just dealing with Osborne but top KGB officials as well as those in his own department, the Moscow Police Milita, who will go as far as murder to keep him from finding out the truth! A truth so shockingly mind boggling that if Osborne succeeds with what he's, and his renegade KGB and Moscow Police accomplices, attempting to do it can lead to the collapse of a major part of the Soviet economy that the Soviet Union totally monopolizes!

Unusual movie about Soviet Police procedure that doesn't have people being tortured and beating into giving written confessions to crimes that they didn't commit. In fact the way that Moscow Police Milita Chief Investigator Renko goes about his business in uncovering a baffling mass murder is so professional and calculating that even many US & Western Europe police department can learn from it.

***SPOILERS*** The movie ends in a OK Corral style shoot-out in the frozen woods outside Stockholm Sweden-not Moscow-where Osborne planned to not only make his escape but knock off everyone, including his accomplices in crime, who could connect him not only to the Gorky Park murders but to what his real motives were really all about: Destroying a major part of the Russian economy by making himself filthy rich off it.

Both William Hurt and newcomer Joanna Pacula as Ankady Renko & Irina Asanova give the film, that in many cases is hard to follow, the zip and tension that it needs to keep its audiences full attention even during the scenes when it gets overly boring. As for Lee Marvin as the mysterious Jack Osborne his weather beaten and wrinkled face, especially in his close-up scenes, looked like a road-map to a graveyard which his hard living and drinking lifestyles lead him into some four years later.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Could have been great, but...
Brundlefly29 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I've always wanted to see this film but didn't until I watched it on NetFlix in 2010.

The main problem with this film is the screenplay - I didn't read the book, but I am guessing the screenplay is very faithful, because it plays like Masterpiece Theatre with a budget.

As a result, its a long movie, but I suspect it was much longer as their are some situations and scenes which seem to have had supporting scenes which were cut.

There is just no interesting flow to this movie at all, the characters and relationships are very poorly developed, and the actors don't seem to have any significant investment in their characters or motivations either. Its almost like watching a long screen test.

Which is too bad - WIlliam Hurt and Brian Denehy are great actors, but could have both been replaced with competent unknowns - it probably would have been a better film, actually, as the viewer wouldn't keep asking themselves 'Why is Hurt acting like a limp noodle?' or 'Was Brian Denehy attached to this project late?'

There is no voice coaching in this movie - everyone speaks English - which is fine, since its an American movie - but the actor's individual accents are not coached out - the Russians in this movie mostly speak with British accents, but they vary into other accents as well. No Russian is fine, but at least keep the accents consistent.

There are some weird moments in the movie also - like 'how do the police come to know this pristine snow blanket is covering a murder scene"? Or 'Why did William Hurt just profess love to someone he barely knows?' or 'Why is William Hurt completely unconcerned that the man he has come to kill just pulled a pistol out of a drawer and loaded it?' or 'Why did Lee Marvin take that pistol out of the drawer in the first place'?

Its obvious stuff like this was taken out of the book, which had explanatory non-dialog text which put it into context, but when transferred to the screen, they forgot that the audience does not have access to that text.

An occasional musical interlude of 80's synth pad and drum machine also painfully dates the movie at certain points.

Anyways, a real yawner that seemed to try to capitalize on a bestselling book by throwing some budget and talent into a big vat with a book and stirring - but no one really bothered to make a movie here.
14 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One man versus the system
hgallon9 February 2000
This is a fairly common story, that of an honest man fighting alone against a corrupt system. The setting is unusual, and the plot has some entertaining twists.

William Hurt plays Senior Investigator Renko, of the Moscow Militia (i.e. police). He is assigned to a high-profile murder case, and finds himself alternately prodded on, hindered or even threatened by his own superiors, by the KGB and by his obvious suspect. All these people are acting so self-confidently compared to Renko's plodding, that the sense of loneliness, or even of paranoia is very apparent.

Much of the action is contrived and unconvincing, both in its development and denouement, although the film does build to a good climax. On the other hand, all the characterisations of ordinary russians, who must have been strange creatures to film directors and audiences alike at the time, is very good.

The directors discarded one of the original novel's best tricks, that of sending Renko to New York (to recover valuable state property), and confronting him with the law enforcement system which gave rise to "Kojak" and the "Hill Street Blues".

Overall this is quite a good film, and fairly close to the novel. There are some sequels written which deserve to appear on the screen.
13 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Left me cold, I'm afraid
Mr-Fusion25 March 2023
It's funny the way life works and just how any particular movie comes over one's radar. In my case, I stumbled on a YouTube video citing William Hurt as having the best non-native English accent in a film. And just like that, I was exposed to "Gorky Park", which had an authentic look and good production values (even Brian Dennehy, always a win).

Okay, well-played, I'm interested.

All in all, this isn't my cup of tea, and I suspect it's time that hasn't been so kind to this movie. Obviously the murders were shocking back in 1983, but the police procedural is dry as hell today, even with the shadow of KGB corruption looming overhead. To its credit, it does feel true to Russia at least as far as I can say for having never visited; not to mention the cold war '80s. I just found no thriller to get caught up in. I did want to, though.

Now if I can just get "Winds of Change" out of my head.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
more intrigue than mystery
kellielulu25 April 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The open shot is incredible. The Cinemetogrphy durning the first scene is what drew me in. I don't think the movie quite lived up to that first scene but it's worth watching .The scene is of course is in the famed title and triple murder on a skating pond . What unfolds is less that of a whodoneit or the why than the intrigues that surrounds the murders . The victims ultimately don't matter which is unfortuante but not unexpected. It's more about the KGB and a wealthy American and their own vested interest. Both get tripped up largely due to Moscow policeman (Renko)played by William Hurt but also with by the friend (Irina played by Joanna Pacula) of one of the victims and the brother (Det. William Kirwill played by Brian Dennehy)of another victim. The ending doesn't leave one totally satisfied but it's probably the more realistic ending.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A bit of a disappointment and a bit of a mess...
Pedro_H1 November 2005
A triple murder in a Russian park looks like the work of one man -- but can the police prove it?

I wanted to like this film a lot and give it a good review. It has a different setting, a classic book to work with and plenty of good actors -- including Lee Marvin in his last major role.

However it fails on many levels. For a start the plot doesn't hold much water. William Hurt is very good as a Russian policeman earning next to nothing and living in a country where graft is a way of life. The work revolves around getting your head down and getting on with it.

The acting is uneven with some actors using their original accents and some cod Russian ones. Talk about not singing from the same hymn sheet!

The worst part is that the thing is that we are not thrilled -- the plot only points one way and that is towards the main suspect.

Plenty of people praise the book and maybe one day I'll read it and try and find out why this film was made. But life in Russian (although things have moved on) looks cold, grim and almost unbearable. Even when you have dollars to buy stuff on the black market.

Another film that has to go down as a failure -- but just about carries you through to the end.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
good but!
zorro2a26 August 2006
I like this kind of film plenty of red herrings (no pun intended) no one seeming to be who he is, good performances by all, but why why why do producers cast English actors in this kind of film when they all talk with their own accent, Ian Bannan a top KGB man talking with a perfect English accent, Alexi Sale a perfect Liverpool accent even though he's a Russian crook, no one expects an "Allo Allo" forced accent but if they could try and put on a little bit of accent it would make it more realalistic, of course Lee Marvin & Brian Dennehy are always great to watch, l can remember when Lee Marvin was in a US cop show called M Squad, Anyway the story is good as l've said and if you like "Gorky Park" try Frederick Forsyth's "Just Another Secret"
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Average potboiler
adrianevitts27 June 2020
I enjoyed William Hurt in this rather implausible crime drama. The music is the worst I have yet to endure.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not bad, not bad at all
JGSR15 June 2002
I didn't have high expectations, but was pleasantly surprised. It's hard to write anything about this type of film without spoiling, but what I can say without telling too much about the plot is, that the film is a non-cliché film, which still is full of clichés (love scene being the biggest). Filming locations are good, though "Moscow" (Helsinki) is a bit too similar to Stockholm.

The movie may be a bit too long for the American taste, but for more European film taste the length was just perfect. The end was so complicated, that even Agatha Christie would have been proud. The final solution between the main characters was completely different from what I expected, and definitely was that cherry for the cake.

****/5
27 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Gorky pig
lee_eisenberg7 August 2006
Given that when "Gorky Park" was released, we were still in the midst of the Cold War - especially since Reagan had escalated it - it's amazing that an American movie could be set in Moscow and portray Russians as normal people (especially in what looks like midwinter). If only the usually dependable William Hurt had done a better job with the role. Incapable of a believable Russian accent, he makes the whole movie seem kind of silly. Still, it's impossible for the viewer not to get drawn into the intrigue involving the Soviet bureaucracy. The better actor in the movie is Lee Marvin as the American with his own mysterious agenda. This movie is worth seeing, even if the acting isn't top-notch. Also starring Brian Dennehy, Ian Bannen, Joanna Pacula, Richard Griffiths and Ian McDiarmid (that's right, the guy from "Star Wars" episodes 1-3).
4 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
If you like mystery dramas give this one a try.
david-james-623-23112931 December 2009
This film has stood the test of time and repeat viewings for me. Have watched about 10 times over the past 20 years and each time I am totally engrossed. Excellent crime-mystery drama. The dialog in this movie is as good as any I know. Scenery and the settings make you feel like you are in Russia during winter: bleak and frigid. Performances by Hurt, Marvin, Dennehey, and Bannen are all solid if not outstanding. Some may be put off by English and Americans performers posing as Russians, but don't let the lack of dialect authenticity get in your way of enjoying this gem. For comparison I would rank it with LA Confidential within its genre.
31 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Sables Make Fine Hats
view_and_review2 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Sex, lies, murder, and... sables? The necessary components of a good murder mystery? If the murder mystery occurs on Russian soil then yes. "Gorky Park" had all four.

But, before I go any further let me tell you what a sable is because I had no idea. I always thought a Sable was a cheap vehicle (if anyone remembers the Mercury Sable). The sable is a species of marten, a small carnivorous mammal primarily inhabiting the forest environments of Russia. Think furry weasel. Apparently, sables are used for their pelts like minks or chinchillas.

Why do I mention sables? Well, three dead bodies were found in Gorky Park in Russia with no faces. The murders were too professional to be dismissed. Eventually we found out that somehow sables were involved. I'm not giving anything away here, sables didn't commit the murders-though that would be funny-the murders had something to do with sables and I never fully figured out why.

"Gorky Park" started fast and stayed on beat for most of the movie. From just about minute one we were knee deep in a triple homicide loosely tied to the KGB. Arkady Renko (William Hurt) was a militia officer investigating and was doing his level best to find the killer(s). And that's how we were led to sex, lies, murder, and sables.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Lost in Confusion
Rodrigo_Amaro10 October 2013
One of Michael Apted's weakest efforts, this adaptation of Martin Cruz Smith's novel is a tedious mystery that has a good start, a messy and lousy middle and a thrilling ending but the picture as a whole isn't worthy of our efforts. It works as a way to see a more intellectual version of future action film "Red Heat" (a fun to watch), both films made during the Cold War whose main character is a good Soviet, far from the villiainesque stereotypes created by the American cinema, combative of the Communism just as its government but at least they knew how to offer a different point of view.

In it, William Hurt plays an officer in charge of investigating the mystery behind three faceless corpses found buried in Gorky Park and which may involve an American businessman (Lee Marvin) who deals with Russian officials. To assist Hurt, there's an American detective (Brian Dennehy), and to get on his way there's one girl (Joanna Pacula) who knows too much and you probably know the rest which concerns about her involvement and the main character, another lousy love story we can't possibly care.

The plot is terribly confusing and with meaningless dialogs and a pathetic romance that doesn't convince. There's nothing powerful here, and the reason behind the murders is something to be guessed by viewers only known of those who read the novel. When the charade is solved...it's so lighthearted and simplistic that it doesn't make us feel anything. "Gorky Park" lacks in flow and rhythm, painfully slow and morose, only hitting good notes when creating moments of enjoyable action.

On the bright side, we must appreciate the excellent use of locations in Helsink doubling for URSS, since they couldn't film in there, and Helsink proves to be a fine choice, beautifully photographed by cinematographer Ralf D. Bode. And there's good performances by Marvin, Hurt, Dennehy and Ian Bannen as the KGB chief. Pacula only gets credit for her good looks and use of a Russian accent, completely ignored by all the other "Russians" in the film, mostly played by British actors to differentiate from the English spoken by the Americans, characteristic used in other old films.

I love movies in that style but only when they're involving. This detective story just didn't work. 5/10
14 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed