The story needs to be told and I did learn a lot but I think it would have been better in half the time. Too much time spent trying to convince us what they are saying is true. We believe you, we want more details. I also think more follow-up would be helpful, like ok this happened, now what is being done about it? It was interesting being done by the people who experienced it, but I think it would have been even better if an actual journalist/ reporter asked the questions of them and then did more follow-up directly to the people responsible to put them on the spot. I think because they were in it they are not able to see it from the audience view and the extra questions we have. Like, ok you weren't allowed to talk but you must have found some secret way to communicate? Could you sneak notes to each other? What happened if you were sick? Were you allowed to cover the windows so you couldn't be accused of looking out.
