A wealthy, popular white man, blamed for a murder. Someone had to pay (him). After the debacle of the OJ Simpson trial, the Government woud get their man. Depsite the first trial the DA went for him again, he was broke and couldn't afford decent lawyers (like me and most of us) for the 2nd trial, so he predictably lost the case. The evidence is not there to convict him; he probably killed Lana, but the eveidence it not there. Public outrage versus Evidence. Like the Salem Dunking Witch trials; if you sink to the bottom of the water you are innocent (but you die of drowning regardless) if you float your're cast as a witch and will burn at the stake.... Just like Phil Spector the proposed witches could not win. Sad reflection that society has little evolved from the 17th century. The 4 episodes reflect on a minority of contributors and very little factual evidence. It is intersesting to hear the views and recollecions of past acquantances of Spector, but none of the input helps the viewer to have a valid opnion on his guilt or innocence. 6/10.
Review of Spector
Spector
(2022)
Sad reflection that society has little evolved from the 17th century.
8 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers