4/10
Never disturb a vampire having sex or he may bite off ur lips. Kinski as a Dracula in the 1979 version was bald but here he applied Minoxidil. Check out his long mullet.
1 September 2020
I saw this for the first time few years back but forgot to write a review. Since i am on a Dracula marathon, i felt like putting up a review of this messed up film. Dont wanna revisit this lame one. It has good atmosphere but lousy editing. I remember when it first released in India in a theater during the early 90s but never got a chance cos the movie was termed as a softcore n i wasnt an adult then. As a standalone vampire film, it works well when it comes to the foggy, gothic n brooding atmosphere. In fact it has some good kills. It has nudity of two hot babes. People r impaled on the iron fences, a man's lips r bitten off, etc. Due to the low budget, the gut exploding scene is badly done. From far off one can see a perfect circle hollow in the guts. In fact, John Saxon's much earlier made film, Cannibal Apocalypse got a much better gut exploding scene.

Our vampire once again played by the real life notorious Kinski, is easy on the females on screen, he never kills em but kisses their tits n fondles it. He even does thrusting n that too without getting naked on top of a nude babe. I dont kno hows that possible but his popped up forehead vein is hilarious. Now it gets even more wierd, a naked babe lays on top of Kinski n Kinski again with his full clothes on. Kinski in real life was accused of sexual molestation by his daughters. The actress from this film too accused him of sexual abuse. She accused Kinski of putting his fingers in her vagina. One helluva bad vampire man. The editing is lousy, the screenplay is abysmal n Christopher Plummer n Donald Pleasance r wasted. What prompted these two fellas to star in this lame film? But one thing is for sure, Kinski got the fun part.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed