Only good thing about the film is its plot which is quite conveniently lifted from foreign film-changing lanes. Even that is shoddily done with so many holes that see the result yourself.The film is a textbook on direction flaws as well as logical blunders. Here are few examples- 1. Nana Patekar is shown to be in a financial mess as he did not even have money to pay for electricity bill/ ration/ his son's school fees yet he manages to keep one cell phone and one land line phone. 2. Nana Patekar's taxi seized by the police and they obviously had taken away his license too. Later in the film, after a short time lapse he is shown driving another taxi. How can anybody lend him another taxi to drive without checking his license? 3. When Policemen frisk Nana Patekar for locker keys why can't they find currency notes given to him by John when same notes Nana takes out at the time of paying school fees of his son. 4. John's girlfriend send goons to beat up Nana in order to take away locker keys but can't she think off sending same goons to locker's office and get the locker broken down to get the papers which are root of all the evil. 5. Just because someone told Nana's wife, his real occupation by default which isn't so rosy doesn't mean it will make Nana or anybody else angry to such an extent that he even try to kill the same man. 6. so many times both the protagonists covers the long distance of mumbai roads from one end to the other end in a single day and that too in just a couple of hours. 6. Not even once in film, there is any concern shown towards rise in the number of accidents in the city due to speeding vehicles as a cause of huge ambitions and anxiety on the part of drivers as well as the travelers. I wish film makers had some social and moral responsibility as it is a well known fact that many from the audience just blindly ape their respective screen idols. But leave aside just film makers , who else cares by the way?
Review of Taxi No. 9 2 11: Nau Do Gyarah
