Review of Kim

Kim (1950)
5/10
Kim 1950. Holds one's interest, but it has a few faults.
25 July 2005
I enjoyed most of Kim, having never seen the Peter O'Toole version. However, I don't know where the director, or whoever, came up with the costume for the Lama. It looked more like it belonged in "A Man For All Seasons" or some such. Also, I don't think the Mahbub Ali character, portrait by Errol Flynn, who was very interesting in the book, was well enough drawn in the movie. Maybe with a more fully drawn character, Errol Flynn would have risen to the occasion.

Lastly, I don't think the change in the ending was necessary. I really preferred the version in the novel. But that seems so typical of Hollywood, then as well as these days..
7 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed