Review of Rasputin

Rasputin (1996 TV Movie)
8/10
A Brilliant Madman, A Holy Man, or a Con Artist?
19 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I think most people already know the story of The Russian Revolution and the tragic end of the Romanov family. I'm not sure people really know all that much about Grigori Rasputin. this movie gives us a peak at a fascinating man.

Alan Rickman gives a wonderful portrayal of the mad monk. Ian McKellan shows us the family man behind Nicholas the bloody.

I have read some of the comments and I see that a lot of people seem to feel the movie wasn't accurate. I'm not sure it was supposed to be. This story was told through the point of view of a young boy.

My only complaint is that I would have liked to have seen more of his childhood. Why was he the way he was? I mean, the first born male of the Romanov family had been told for 350 years that they were ordained by God to rule and that they were infallible. You may not have agreed with the choices they made, but you can see why they made them.

I didn't end up seeing why Rasputin was the way he was. Was he truly a mad man? A holy man? A con artist? I know that relatively little is known about him, but the movie never even hazards a guess.

The film still keeps you riveted as it slowly moves to it's inevitable end.

Not a must see, but a good way to spend an evening.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed