It seems that everyone is really down on this movie because it wasn't like or as good as the book. Personally i can't think of more than one or two movies that were as good as the book they were based on. Also, of course The Mists of Avalon would not be exactly like the *900* page book. Harry Potter was only about 300 pages and they had to cut a bunch of stuff out. Although I didn't read the whole book (I thought it got too tedious...I was also only 12) i thought the movie was good. I would not say I was great, but most of the characters were well cast and well acted. I would give it a 7 out of 10.
Review of The Mists of Avalon
