Well, I think so - and even voted for it on Film2003's poll as such. It's atrocious, and this is from my memories as a kid when I loved some real stinkers.
It looks like it was filmed on a camcorder (a very cheap one) and has no dialogue, acting, staging, direction, sets. In fact, if less money has ever been spent on a film (in proportion) then i'd like to know about it.
Avoid - unless it's purely for the novelty of being able to say you saw "The Worst Film Ever"tm
It looks like it was filmed on a camcorder (a very cheap one) and has no dialogue, acting, staging, direction, sets. In fact, if less money has ever been spent on a film (in proportion) then i'd like to know about it.
Avoid - unless it's purely for the novelty of being able to say you saw "The Worst Film Ever"tm