Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Age of Heroes (2011)
Very poor adaptation of what could otherwise have been a fantastic film
18 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
It definitely seems that this movie was butchered to bring it down to a shorter length action flick and take it out of the realms of a wartime espionage type thriller.

The plot is loosely based upon the experiences of Ian Fleming (ala. James Bond author) during his time in the commandos during WWII and really should have been much more of an espionage movie and less of a 'let's all do or die'. The story also really fails to even manage that also as the resultant feeling of the movie when all is said and done is kind of a 'let's barely manage to do and also pretty much all die' story instead.

Sure, realism is an important point in a war film as those that sugar-coat it too much or simply turn into weird fantasy come of feeling really false (think of the apparently drug-induced nonsense of Kelly's Heroes) but that doesn't mean to say it has to make you feel utterly miserable as many parts of this movie do.

With the inclusion of the Danny Dyer character from the stockade and pending court-martial, the training sequence in a bare landscape somewhere in England, the parachute drop into enemy territory, the maniacal SS squad hunting down the heroes through to the main mission and final escape to freedom, there seems to be too much borrowed from many other films (The Dirty Dozen, Where Eagles Dare etc.).

There are whole sections of this film that seem to be missing in the final cut which make things a little rushed and not to mention confusing. During the training sequence of the film Dyer's character is punished for being a good marksmen and subsequently told that if he had failed in his training and was being sent back to the stockade. 'Why?' you are left asking as there has seemingly been no cause for to be necessary as we haven't seen Dyer misbehave, be rude to anyone or fail any training task he has been given.

We also assume that Bean' and the Sgt characters are killed or captured during the final stages of the movie but we just don't know as it isn't part of the film nor is the air-drop into Norway where we lose a character due to a broken neck (presumably on landing).

My strongest dislike in the movie was the over-use of the 'F' word by pretty much all the squaddies, NCOs and officers as it just isn't necessary. One sentence from the Sgt's mouth was around twenty words long and over half of them where the 'F' word and I know from stories told to me by my late Grandfather, who was a WWII serving Drill\PT instructor in the British Army, that bad language was not permitted and quite often meant disciplinary action with the strongest language being permitted being around the 'bloody-hell' mark.

Besides all that the movie had the potential to be so much better and fails to deliver on so many levels that I would suggest people avoid it at all costs (something I very rarely say about a movie).

I give the movie a 2-star review as I personally reserve a 1-star for the truly awful but also feel obliged to add that if this film's plot, cast and editing where a whole 100% better than in the final release I would still not consider giving it more than a 4-star vote.

Final Words: do yourself a favour and watch the classic Where Eagles Dare instead of this movie as it is a truly awesome movie with everything that Age Of Heroes should and could have been and a whole lot more!
28 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nikita (2010–2013)
Good but will it last?
12 September 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I sat and watched the pilot episode thinking 'I know him' and 'I know her' for each character\actor which was quite interesting when I looked up what where I knew the cast from to find that they are all pretty much folks you played relatively small parts in other well-known films and TV shows such as Bones, ER, Desperate Housewives, The Pacific and X-Men2 to name a few and from my memory they portrayed the characters well in those performances so I would say their acting talent is good enough to see it do well.

The question in my mind is to whether or not the show is going to be bogged down with trying to be too different from La Femme Nikkita.

As the story on which it is loosely based is well established and liked by many I think it be a big mistake to try to distance itself too far from the original for fear of alienating potential viewers who enjoyed the 2 films and TV series of the 90's (yep, it was really that long ago).

My one real concern for the longevity of the show is that it's basic premise could be seen as too similar to that of the recent Dollhouse which was cancelled spectacularly last year.

Drawing some comparisons, both are based around a crooked organisation using people against their will\knowledge to perform murderous, covert and subversive ends, both have good guys working the inside angle to try to put an end to the crooked organisation and both have sympathisers to the good guys cause working for the crooked organisation.

At least Nikita has no association with Joss Whedon unlike Dollhouse and so it's chances of being on air for more than two seasons are pretty good and being on the CW network will help it too as they are known for keeping shows on life-support well after they are brain dead (I'm thinking of Smallville when I write that).

When all is said and done, I enjoyed the pilot and hope to continue enjoying the series for at least a handful of seasons.
8 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed