Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Waiter (2006)
9/10
A crowd pleaser at TIFF
13 September 2006
I am pleased to report that Alex van Warmerdam's "OBER" was well received by the audience at yesterday's Toronto International Film Festival screening. Spectators can be fickle at 9:45 a.m., and it is a testament to the director's talent that his film elicited a laugh-out-loud response from beginning to end.

I tend to be skeptical of films from the Netherlands. I'm no philistine, but I have encountered several movies from this region that I can only describe as "weird." Now, I won't claim that there aren't unusual elements in this film, but they are employed in the service of comedy rather than abstraction.

Warmerdam, himself, plays Edgar, a middle-aged waiter who suffers through confrontations with his belligerent customers, unruly neighbours, his chronically ill wife, and his demanding mistress. Warmerdam's dead-pan performance is so consistent that the passivity that defines his character is not compromised when Edgar visits Herman, the screen-writer who is controlling his destiny; he is simply worn out, and has come to request, not demand, that his life might be propelled in a more agreeable direction.

Herman concedes, but as any screen-writer will attest, a compelling narrative requires conflict. The various fates that are in store for Edgar are, yes, unusual at times, but the comedy is particularly strong in this film because each trajectory is so "unexpected." Another festival film this year is "STRANGER THAN FICTION," (w/ Will Farrell & Dustin Hoffman) which has a similar premise. It was sold out before my tickets were assembled, so I can't assess whether or not it is as successful in its execution as OBER. I do feel, however, that Warmerdam's film has the potential to satisfy a wider audience than it will ever encounter, and I would urge people to seek it out. It is a film with great depth, but it needs to be emphasized that, first and foremost, OBER works as an accessible comedy that even the most skeptical movie-lovers will enjoy.
38 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mediocre
7 October 2005
This film is neither an outright success, nor a failure, but tends to alternate between the two. It begins with some wry subversion of the crime movie formula, but falls into those very conventions for most of the second and third acts. It then over compensates at the end as if to convince us that it's really smart... But is it?

The filmmakers strive for satire. At best, however, they achieve parody. Val Kilmer's performance is unusually phoned-in, probably the result of a one-dimensionally written character (a gay private eye whose ring tone is "I Will Survive"... ha ha).

Some of the gags do work. I will concede, in fact, that Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang is consistently amusing (bumping it up over the "5" mark). Also, there are some jaw dropping surprises that a less ambitious film wouldn't dare to include.

Ultimately, we're looking at an A for effort, C plus for execution. For a more successful comedy-crime-drama, I would recommend Matchstick Men (director Ridley Scott, 2003).
6 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed