Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
America Revealed (2012– )
4/10
Great show. WORST presenter ever.
17 December 2014
Great direction, great cinematography, great editing, great post production. WORST presenter. Ever.

Yul Kwon is wooden, not talented, bad casting for this program. Another person would have made this program very well known and awarded.

They should make this again with a better presenter. Half of the opinions presented in the series are merely a TV writers opinion. But they are presented as facts.

One of the main problems is Yul Kwon's voice over is really wooden. he just doesn't have the talent for this type of program.

I hope some new series of this stuff comes out but just with a different presenter.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A good try from up an coming director.
9 June 2010
I saw this movie last night in Sydney as part of the Sydney Film Festival. I didn't know what I was seeing or anything about the movie. Overall unfortunately I have to say that while the best intentions were there the film just didn't work.

The main problem for me was that I don't think the director really knew what kind of statement she was trying to make with the film. I was waiting for the presentation of what the film was trying to say but it never came. This is surprising considering the subject matter.

The director stated at the end of the film in the Q+A that she wasn't making the film primarily about the adoption of children from other countries. But this aspect of the story was way more compelling than watching two boring main characters have lukewarm interaction. I feel the Director should have taken a stronger stance with how she felt about the subject matter she was trying to display. And my God if you are shooting a film in India just get right in there and soak it into the frames !

The beginning of the film was not helped by the music score which alluded to the film almost being presented as a comedy, especially with the choice of music score. That path soon faded away into discombobulation. While a few moments were interesting to watch it just didn't make it in the end.

I thought the Joel Edgerton character was not realized well enough. Weather this is through the fault of the director or Joels direction he took the character in. Because the 2 main characters are on the screen so much of the time I really wanted to see more chemistry between them but it just wasn't there.

Also the film being shot with the RED digital camera system I would have expected a bit more depth and vitality to the shot choices.

Having said all of this the creators of the film were very charming during the Q+A and I think Claire will go onto make some better material. Keep going guys !
10 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Capitol B for Boring. Saw the movie tonight with Director Q & A session.
27 September 2006
Boring Boring Boring.

Sometimes I go into a film not wanting to be there or with negative pre-conceptions only to be blown away with it's originality and entertainment values. This was not one of these films.

In an age of free to air TV programming mainly consisting of shows depicting death, killing and women using their sexuality to put men down, Suburban Mayhem has both for $15.

During the Q&A after film writer (Alice Bell) could not answer the question asking her whether she liked her main character or not. Considering the films content I wonder what did her father did to her ?

I cannot believe that the writer and the director would think that this was an interesting time for a movie like this. I cannot see anything new about it.

If you really want to see killing just turn on the TV, people are doing it for real !!!!!

The worst thing about it ? Its not entertaining !!!!!

Save your hard earned money.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed