Reviews

18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Watch if you enjoy "Challenging films", ones that require evaluation.
19 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Title says it all really, avoid if you don't enjoy thinking about films DURING watching a film; this one's not for you.

In the "good old days of IMDB" I would have taken to the forums to discuss the film with my fellow Cinephiles, since they got rid...I guess I'll post here instead.

All of the elements that make a competently made film, designed for a mature audience are present & correct: Acting. Cinematography, scene selection and such. Clearly the script is the thing that divides audiences the most. Here are my thoughts on the divisive elements of the script:

1) The "non-linear storytelling" in the post "Memento" era of cinema, is fairly commonplace now. The difference is WHAT story it is, that is trying to be relayed to the audience? This is where this film distinguishes itself. By creating "potential realities", ones where Leo (J. B) could be recalling a memory, or just as equally a "non-memory", the viewer is left to consider "Is this real or imaginary?", therefore requiring a degree of analysis in a real-time LIVE moment of recall themselves, to review what facts are known/suspected regarding the character in question. A prime example of this is where the "Greece" scenes play out, culminating in his death in the row boat, after chasing tail from the bar, he succumbs to exposure out in the middle of the ocean. This clearly cannot be real as he would never have returned to N. Y in that case. Confirmed minutes later during the penultimate scene, where he recalls his daughters' (Molly) name & that he returned from Greece (after having previously abandoned his wife & child) due to presumably; guilt. The irony here, is that cerebral function(real time processing) is clearly beyond Leo himself in his current condition, and that is only one of the points that makes the style of narrative implemented here, so effective. A bait & switch approach, if you will...plus it makes you (me) think.

2) Using subtle clues and images placed throughout, to provide subliminal messages. E. G: picture of 1st love Salma Hayek in his wallet, 1st child/son & dog sharing a name, the "plot" of the book he was writing in Greece JUST SO HAPPENING to tell the identical same story as his own, just in the future. Think about the scene where he asks the girl at the other table in the Greek taverna "After being gone for so long, is it possible to salvage the relationship, is it too late?", to which she answers "Well of course it would be, after so much time, how could it not?", he then muses "Would it be?". Think about it; both points of view are true at once, it is both too late (Dementia) and NOT, as he is physically there & recalls Molly's name. So is that an answer, or isn't it? More obvious is the red light from the port side of the boat, motoring away, doubling for the police cars of N. Y. as he hallucinates his way around barefoot. Port you say...?

3) The final scene is very clever, as it displays how his legacy is inherited by Molly, depicting her in "2 places at once", something Leo has been doing throughout this entire feature. I presume that this sort of imagination is commonplace where writers are concerned, their inherent ability to "split consciousness" between the here & now, and the imaginary world their novels reside in. Perhaps a subtle nod, that being the daughter of 2 writers (Bardem and Linney), perhaps it was for the better that her career is stumbling, due to caring for her dad & having to split her time and attention. Maybe she could have found her true calling as an author?

The film is not feel good at all and shouldn't be watched with that eye, the performances are all 1st rate and my only complaint is the same one others have made, that only the main character has a satisfactory back-story, all other characters are 2D (reflected in the economical run-time?).
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
County Lines (2019)
9/10
Brutal depiction of a serious modern crime epidemic...
24 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Firstly; I will say, clearly this film will not cater to all tastes. I agree with many of the other reviews; pacing is certainly one of the biggest issues with the script, which lurches between acts in places. That said, it does not hurt the film as a whole, as it can clearly be seen what the director was trying to do, without outstaying their welcome.

Whilst bleak, the story is one that needs to be told, preferably to the largest audience possible. I also agree with the point many others have made; this is the closest to the classic "Wheel TV/Video combo into class & watch documentary/public safety films in junior school" material that has been produced in recent years. As it was/is a sign of that era, it is something that has sadly died out by-and-large of late. This is unfortunate, as films made in this style are essential to tell stories/get the message across to the yoof.

The story is tightly & efficiently told, using a minimum of actors/supporting cast. All of which do a top job in their respective characters. There are literally NO "known actors" apart from a couple that have done soap's (soap operas), this is of no consequence & in fact IMHO helps to deliver a certain "authenticity", in that the characters are portrayed as "nobodies" essentially.

The actor playing "Simon" (The pusher-man) does a superbly understated and restrained job of presenting a man of quiet menace. Only going to anger in short bursts, just enough to inform the viewer that this person should not be crossed. The scene where "T" enters the restaurant, and sees him sitting with his wife and young daughter, essentially the mirror to his own family unit (the overwhelming use of glass in the scene a nice D. P touch), is especially poignant as it effortlessly tells 2 stories at once: 1) This life of crime can get you these nice things.

2) But it's not for the likes of you boy, now get out of here!

The final scene does a great job of framing the story as a whole, "Why do you do this to people?"..."Because it's easy..." Yes; easy for the ones who already have the advantage over poorer, more easily manipulated individuals. Dark characters with zero moral compass, or integrity, who take great delight in controlling and dominating others in this life.

Powerful stuff, not exactly a "feel good film" for sure...
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Let Her Out (2016)
6/10
Run-of-the-mill horror title; tried to be "Smart" but mediocre sadly.
10 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I would probably not have bothered with this film, but a good friend REALLY wanted to see it, so we went and checked it out. At this point in modern film-making, there is nothing new under the sun...especially in the "Horror genre"...sadly that is also true of this title. The plot has been done before in 2009's "The Unborn" more or less, but this run through has 2 twin sisters, rather than a boy and a girl.

The beginning is OK, there does seem to be a supernatural basis to the origin of the individual who gets the ball rolling in the first 5 mins (pun intended), but this element is never really pursued again; if at all...then only in the final 20 minutes, but it is never specifically mentioned as such...merely by assumption.

There are your compulsory characters that serve no purpose other than to die! Obligatory annoying individuals who you wish would die (some do thankfully), littered throughout, along with the typical in the social media/see short attention span modern age; jump cuts that make up for not having sensible transition scenes between main scenes. To be fair the editing is probably the best part of this film, so they at least did a competent job of splicing all the celluloid together (if they even still do that?).

The acting is passable in the main. The 2 female leads do OK, but their friendship being not quite sisters/not quite lovers/who knows what, really fails to convince and you can almost see them switching out of character before the director yells "CUT!" in a handful of scenes. I had to laugh where she ties herself up thinking it will stop her nocturnal antics; as if she tied herself up...by definition she can untie herself!...Anyway if she was serious in any way about protecting those around her, she would have asked to be committed/observed...I mean seriously; the operation was in a couple of days for Christ sake! The ending is totally predictable, by 25 minutes in you know the next hour is a formality. There is no 1 memorable scene unless you like freakish transformation effects (barely there tbh), and I cannot think why anyone would want to see this more than once...so buying on DVD is a non-starter.

With so many other horror titles available, including a back catalogue of quality films from 60s/70s/80s, it is hard to recommend this film for any particular reason. If you're watching cable TV late and are too lazy to reach for the remote...check it out...Maybe!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Intikam Benim (1983)
9/10
Supreme Turkish madness courtesy of Cuneyt Arkin-Seagal for the ages!
19 June 2017
Despite viewing this film in its native Turkish, minus any fan-subs or dubs, one might say...is not the ideal way to consume a film. In all honesty I think this just added to the anarchic mayhem rather than spoiling it!! Our favourite Turk action man plays (Basically) a middle eastern Bond, complete with hard drinking, womanising and driving fast cars (well that last one isn't strictly true as instead he has a clapped out Merc/Driver combo tooling around town, so he don't have to get his hands dirty). He does hop on the occasional motorbike here and there however (same bike as in Col for those fanboys out there). This film is just crazy nonsense from start to finish, I have no idea what they were saying, but to be honest I don't care as the action set pieces are handled so bloody well. Cuneyt is the man; he does all his own stunts and fight scenes, which just have to be seen to be believed. Special mention goes to the "stitched together suit of clothes lit on fire being thrown down the stairwell", and also the classic "blows two Hench-men into the pool like the big bad wolf).

So many scenes have been copied straight out of Bond films, they even swiped some stock footage (Diamonds are forever) and some music/soundtrack action. They have their own version of the pool scene (Diamonds again) and bits and bobs all over the place...see if you can spot them all! These films make superb drinking games if so inclined ;) For any fans of the big man out there, this feature is chock-a-block full of all the other actors that have popped up in other titles from the same stable. My mates and I had loads of fun pointing out characters/actors who played roles in such legendary titles as "Adam-The man who saved the earth", "Death Warrior" & "Col".

I have to say that we are sick individuals who enjoy this tripe, where most "Norms" would baulk at it...the other films were great, but this is in a whole new league frankly! Great pacing, crazy fights, goons, guns, girls and a frankly genius scene where his police chief boss chastises him for alcoholism, then swiftly pours him a drink! Keep an eye out for the "fighting his inner demons" scene, 3/4 of the way through.

Don't delay; seek this film out and treat you, your mates and anyone you can find along with a bottle of whisky...make up your own dialogue, we did, it all adds to the fun!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Accept this for what it is...
25 April 2014
Too many people watch films expecting EVERY SINGLE ONE to be Oscar worthy! In fact statistically you will find that most cannot hope to deliver a product at that level! This is one of those films, shall we call them "Friday Night Films". I usually have a gathering of friends round mine on Friday nights (too old to go out on the town nowadays), where we line up 2-3 titles to pass the time. Some weeks are "serious", some not. Last week we watched 12 years a slave, Argo & Munich, the week before it was this, Troll 2 & Hell comes to frogtown...catch my drift? The Lost Empire is a campy, exploitation piece of cinema with copious amounts of nudity, some hopeless "fight" scenes that have to be seen to be believed (especially the wooden shuriken to the back of the head scene), a craptastic villain complete with henchmen and little/no story. The women all look good, especially the 3 leads, but the extras aren't too shabby either! The story requires little/no attention to be paid to the screen throughout, which is exactly what crap film nights are all about, as more time is spent laughing and chatting than watching.

If you're a fan of trash cinema like Death Wish 3, Street Trash, Tromaville films, etc then you really can't go far wrong with this! Enjoy.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Grudge 3 (2009)
4/10
Way below par..!
4 March 2009
I always preferred the original Japanese titles to the second rate American remakes, but as there was no Jap Grudge 3 it became a no brainer (in every sense of the phrase). I enjoyed the first two films a fair bit; I wouldn't have said that they rocked my world, but were not such a bad way to spend an hour and a half.

This third installment is almost not part of the same franchise; OK, so there are the same main characters from the previous two and the so-called curse that is supposed to be attributed to the location where the murders took place (therefore how can it move to the USA just because the story needs it as a plot device?), other than that nothing much. The characters are all horrendous stereotypes from clichéd horror films which were all done far better than this mess, the story plods along slower than it has any right to and the majority of the first hour does little other than explain who the 4 main characters are, which could be done in around 5 minutes if handled correctly!! There is little by way of gore apart from a couple of stabbing scenes and an off-screen pulverisation; which for most of us horror film fans is the ultimate pay off and the reason we sit through the rest of the tiresome background building sections and introductory necessities! The end is a complete formality and would have been better to have just ended on a blank screen and a decent, well-produced sound-byte...most of which are handled atrociously incidentally...

I give it 4 out of 10; one point for each of the deaths and one point for the joyous sight of the end credits appearing. Avoid unless sleepless...this may help!
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Insanitarium (2008 Video)
5/10
Watchable; if you like gory films and zombies...
11 July 2008
I watched this last night with some friends, who all appreciate gore-fest style films. I thought it was a watchable film that does show some potential at the start, but about halfway through does unfortunately descend into standard slasher/horror cliché territory...

One of the redeeming qualities of this title was the gore, it has plenty to keep even the most ardent crimson fan happy. The make up is quite well done, considering that most of the meagre budget was probably spent on the two main stars. There are the usual huge plot holes; such as people who are supposedly insane, suddenly becoming lucid and capable of defending themselves, perfecting motor functions and having sensible conversations (keep the bullets, we'll need them!).

The main features include: a doctor having her arm torn off, scalpel to the chin, cleaver to the face, metal spike through the head/mouth, a fair amount of topless female nudity & a couple of cheesy one liners! It won't rock your world by any means, but if you are a fan of this kind of film and you need a bit of escapism (no pun intended), you may find this appealing. I would recommend watching this after going down the pub/bar for a couple of drinks, then back to a mate's place to watch this at the weekend.

I give it 5 out of 10; not Oscar material by a long shot, but not such a terrible way to spend 80 minutes of your life, especially with some friends...
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Superb; what more can you say?
29 November 2007
Films of this type should never be viewed seriously, they are made deliberately to poke fun at clichéd film genres and are primarily there to make you laugh after stumbling in after a night out on the lash with your mates at the weekend! Weng-Weng once again plays the role of super smooth action hero 00-Weng; irresistible to women and hard as nails...he takes on all the bad guys & wins! Scenes to watch out for are definitely the "Jumping the ravine on a monkey bike doing 5 Mph", suspended by monofilament wires. Self-destructing television sets; Pre-recorded videos that ask interactive questions and respond to live answers; this film has it all, no doubt about it!!! "You don't know me and you don't have to know me..." Genius!
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It blows all the recent martial arts films out of the water!!
2 July 2007
I have been a fan of martial arts films for ages; I was always slightly disappointed that the emphasis would often be on ridiculously convoluted plots rather than being focused on the fights themselves. Thankfully this is not the case with "Buddhist Fist"; the plot centres around a pair of childhood friends who go their separate ways in their teens, a few years later one is recalled home after events transpire in his home village. He is now a hairdresser (a bad one) & in traditional Kung-fu cinema style has a clumsy sidekick in tow; whilst the other friend is a Buddhist monk at the village temple. Not wanting to spoil the film for anybody, that's all I will reveal, but essentially it is the tale of what occurs to the two friends as the village is manipulated by the bad guy, imaginatively titled "Big-small feet" (no prizes for guessing why!)

The stand-out moments from this title have to be the astoundingly choreographed fight scenes...I mean these sequences are AMAZING: it's as simple as that. I have seen more martial arts films than I've had hot dinners (almost)and these scenes are something else!! The fighting borders on dancing in places, it is so technical and astounding to watch, I mean I didn't know human beings were capable of such things. Also worthy of mention are the comedy moments; I never really liked the slapstick elements of martial arts films, like the ones in Jackie Chan films which are always way OTT(with sound effects to match), but they really work here...especially the hunchback "poisoner" whose special technique is "Holy Ghost Claw". Plus I challenge anybody not to laugh when the compulsory Master/Sensei pulls out his bag of tricks to upstage the youngsters with his moves..."Strength is improved: by form breathing..." Classic!!

Lots of these kinds of films are too heavy on the fights without justification. Films like "Mystery of chess boxing" for example, where there is a brief introduction similar to the rest, character gets wronged by indiscriminate bad guy, gets taught Kung-fu by a "master", becomes an unstoppable force for good, wins in the end...in that order. Buddhist fist on the other hand, balances out the fights with just the right amount of story in between & even attempts to provide sensible reasons for each encounter, instead of the usual "you tripped me up in the street; now defend yourself or die!". Each fight gets more and more frenetic until the energy-fuelled finale, which has to be seen to be believed.

There is no real nudity, no real gore, no romance element, but if these are the reasons you watch this kind of film, you're doing it for the wrong reasons IMHO; it's about the Kung-fu and the physical feats of the actors. Definitely in my top 5 martial arts films of all time, a lost gem from the hugely talented Yuen Wo Ping stable of the far east!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
What can you say? Absolute Classic 80's Actioner...
15 June 2007
This film is in a league of it's own: I won't bother to re-state what every other person has already posted regarding the plot. Needless to say it makes no sense what-so-ever in the big scheme of things, but there is plenty of violence and preposterous characters such as the "Crystal Skull" liven things up no end. The best line in the whole film has to be "We can't move; we're immobilised" (by an invisible force field), so how come he can still move his jaw to speak? As I say ultimately in a league of it's own and one of the best examples of how practically any script was considered during the 80's as a potential blockbuster!
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Farscape: DNA Mad Scientist (1999)
Season 1, Episode 9
9/10
One of the best Season 1 episodes...
7 June 2007
This episode is a clever take on the old "Carrot & Stick" ploy; of offering something badly wanted, only to deliver a short sharp shock! The crew of Moya encounter an alien geneticist who can track down a path across the universe to the home world, simply by sampling the races' D.N.A. Then deliver the results in the form of an interstellar map. The introduction of such an opportunity causes major upheaval to the crew, as Rygel, Zhaan and Dargo quickly decide that the cost (one of Pilot's four arms)is well worth the sacrifice, much to pilot's dismay. Crichton and Aeryn object but are not consulted in time to stop the event occurring, needless to say Crichton in his human-ness is horrified as is Aeryn (possibly due to the fact that Crichton has no foreseeable route home anyway & Aeryn cannot return from exile to the peacekeepers and has no home"world" to boot, unlike the other 3). The geneticist then proceeds to graft pilots' D.N.A into Aeryns prompting major changes to her overall form.

This episode is one of my favourites from Season 1, for many different reasons: It highlights how quickly the crew turn mercenary and forsake pilot to look out for number 1. It is also one of the major indicators that Aeryn and her "tough-girl" attitude is all a front, as she leans on Crighton heavily throughout the second half of the episode, reaching out to him both physically and emotionally for help and reveals a great deal of her inner feelings. P.K Tech girl highlighted her jealousy of having a significant rival for John's attention, but this episode far outstrips it with real emotional turmoil sparking the start of what I consider to be THE best "Space-Opera" romantic relationship, that takes well over 3 seasons to properly develop. It also shows us how aggressive Zhaan's encounter with Maldis in the previous episode has resulted in her being decidedly darker and quicker to anger than we had come to expect from earlier episodes.

All in all this episode really delivers on many different levels and represents why so many fans have heaped critical acclaim upon this fantastic and underrated Sci-Fi series...Superb!
26 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well made under-stated piece of cinema
31 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Inevitably each of us audience members will take something different away from watching this film; for me it was just how far some people will go to get what they want in this modern world, with a complete lack of moral obligation! **Minor spoiler on next 3-4 lines; skip if you want** Don't get me wrong, I felt as though it was a little OTT (considering a late teen/early 20-something could team up and commit murder/voluntary manslaughter{not sure what the correct charge would be} with step-dad), but then again I'm sure stranger things have happened in real life! The twist was obvious to me, considering the character in question; but probably not to all, but it did try to tell a moralistic tale without all the heavy lecturing narratives or sudden change of heart.

The acting was all first rate, Carrie-Anne-Moss was stunning both to look at and to watch at work as the hopeless self-indulgent mother, Baldwin was brilliant and expertly brought a refreshing duality to the step-father character: seemingly both apprehensive in some scenes & prepared to do what it took in others, which I would imagine is not an easy thing to do when reading the text on a page when getting into character. The young star Nicki Reed was great for a newbie, I have seen "13" in the rental store but I never felt like actually picking it up, but after seeing her performance in this I may decide to check it out; one to watch following in the footsteps of Christina Ricci etc playing the young but totally savvy & remarkably inventive Mini. Goldblum plays himself; almost aping himself at times & Luke Wilson follows with another underrated performance ala Royal Tennenbaums & steals the show as the doggedly determined cop who does a performance in his best "Columbo" mode.

As I stated earlier; each will see this from a different perspective, many religious people may see it as glorifying the "get rich quick by doing whatever you have to" mentality of modern people (both young and old), but remember that story is told by a character who had no real father at all (Baldwin only started acting like one during the film by the lead characters own admission 20 minutes or so into it) & a mother who takes every opportunity to dig at her with snide remarks and even use her daughters bed for her own carnal needs, without a second thought. Coming from a similar upbringing myself I can relate to certain parts of the character that mean you have to grow up fast to protect yourself from outside influences & if not kept carefully in check by the personal moral values of the self; it is easy to adopt a "mercenary" attitude, caring about nobody & nothing but your own selfish needs.

This is how I would imagine the director meant the work to be seen; a lesson in how ignoring your children's emotional and personal needs as they grow up can create damaged and sociopathic personalities, not straightforward 2-dimensional "Michael Myers" types, but perfectly adapted clever ones who pick up on the pretend niceties and morals of the adults around them & develop the facility to use all means at their disposal to manipulate and prey upon such things...Unique...
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Badge 373 (1973)
10/10
In a league of it's own-Dated before it was made!
12 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
My views on films are enigmatic sometimes; this is one of those times..!

I tend to like 2 completely mutually exclusive types of film; really good enjoyable movies & really bad enjoyable movies. Some can be a bit of both and this is the category I present for "Badge 373". A group of my friends & I enjoy nothing more than film nights which include a wide variety of good and bad films; all ultimately just fodder for us to critique, but features like this one really help break up the monotony of current Hollywood sensibilities and political correctness.

I won't bother to re-iterate what has already been posted regarding "plot" etc, but I will add comments to justify why I think it deserves to be included at the very top of the "So bad it's good" selection.

To start Robert Duvall...He has two characters in his repertoire "Angry man" (Network,Badge373,etc) & "The thinker" (The Apostle,THX1138). Thankfully he plays his angry man who practically shouts all the time in this..and shout he does; obscenities and racist remarks a given (sexist,racist,homophobic{before most knew the meaning of the word} and practically ever other you can imagine). The dialogue is simply ridiculous and even Duvall must have had many quiet chuckles to himself "memorising" such unforgettable lines as "I hope you're circumcised as survival in prison is measured in terms of inches"! Yep you guessed it; this film was produced pre-certification...

Need I say more regarding the dialogue? It really has to be heard to be believed..! I would certainly agree with what other critics have said here..that it is a "Cop-film" born of the times it was made; with the copper portrayed as a hard-as-nails, uncompromising, morally challenged, thug: Who is as bad as the criminals he is chasing down. As has been said; It does not do the fine job that French Connection did, but then can you really compare the two directors (William Friedkin vs Howard Koch)?

Do yourself a favour and get hold of a copy if you can; it took me close to 7 years to track down a copy after seeing the trailer on a bootleg VHS of "Cheech & Chong's - Up in smoke". I will now list reasons for your time & effort to source this feature: 1.THE most ludicrous dialogue ever committed to film 2.Hopeless action/fight scenes that don't even look rehearsed(Comic genius) 3.The cop who's story is being filmed acts in a supporting role 4.No films like this will ever be made again(Un-PC) 5.Duvall has THE worst undercover costume ever(Wig & tashe) 6.The main villain is called "Sweet William" 7.It has possibly the most ridiculous chase scene ever with a bus-load of innocent civilians dragged into one mans vendetta & after all the effort to chase him, in order to kill him, they just thump him in the gut and leave him alone!...I could go on forever..."the learning to shoot with his left hand" scenes are pure gold, as is the "Until they kill me" line delivered with possibly the worst Brooklyn/Irish hybrid accent you ever heard.

All that's left for me to do is write up the tag line: "A gun in his sock, an iron bar in his belt & no badge!" 5 Star atrocious goodness. Watch this after going down the pub for a few beers & you will laugh yourself silly...I know we did!
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Clever film that avoids cliché's and heavy handed religious overtones
21 March 2006
I watched this film last night with a friend who also appreciates "Exorcist" style films and horror movies; neither one of us had heard of the film previously.

I was pleasantly surprised by the way it avoids all the usual religious and moralistic pitfalls; telling people what they should believe in and chastising anyone who doesn't pray regularly...Instead the agnostic defence lawyer played by Laura Linney, is gradually exposed to reasonable doubt herself: over the guilt of her client and his whole system of belief and right/wrong ; good versus evil. It is a clever story of how even selfish and self motivated people still do the right thing where innocence has been made to suffer and/or die, going as far as to portray death to those who try to take the stand and testify against the devil (that poor Psychiatrist)! After seeing all this coincidental evidence over the course of the trial, leading toward the only possible explanation that there are supernatural forces waging war on earth with the lives of all us minions held in the balance, she cannot help but pursue an honourable course of action.

Another underrated and excellent performance by Laura Linney (gorgeous to boot); demonstrating good acting and a believable character change arc resulting in a quietly spoken modern suspense film, that probably dips down under your radar.

Having neither the violence or gratuitous gore of many horror/suspense films; it is one that most of the family can enjoy, and Christians etc will especially enjoy the moral drama aspect of the fathers' plight.

Rent this film & you wont be disappointed.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Fog (2005)
2/10
Carpenter my son; you have sinned...!
21 March 2006
I wasn't expecting a great deal from this movie; I am a self-confessed fan of the Original (A great hokey ghost story, that doesn't really take itself too seriously) so thought I would give the remake a try from the local Blockbuster...boy what a mistake...

Everything that was done right the first time around seems to have been deliberately done wrong this time; the total unbelievability of every single "Actor/Actress" involved and the complete lack of "Character driven acting" means this lumbers along at little over 80 mins (thank god), giving the audience a regular fix of CGI Ghosts, flashback sequences and pointless history that adds nothing what-so-ever to the plight of the characters that night!! To remake this film is a mistake of the highest order; as much like Halloween, the original stands the test of time because it solidly personifies a moment in cinema history, that could never occur again...memories of a past era of cinema caught on film.

I may sound cynical; but each and every remake seems to solidly bear the banner of "Cash Cow" film making, JC knows he has had his best years in Hollywood during the 70's and 80's; the current trend of "Documentary" style and realistic raw & gritty filming of footage, do not compliment Mr Carpenters unique style; and he does not seem capable of moving with the times...

I would warn any fan of early JC works; away from this corporate exercise in cold money making over substance. Do yourself a favour and watch Assault on Precinct 13 Original once more; or face the sad truth of a director now "Born outta time"!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Has its own charm for sure...
30 September 2005
John Carpenter has always been an acquired taste: with his films you either love them or you hate them. Many people consider his stuff to be rip offs of greater films, but I beg to differ...Yes I admit that he may well pay homage to films that he also loves, but he always gives them a unique twist of their own that make them "Carpenter" (take "They Live" as a prime example). Personally I have always loved his films, Big Trouble In Little China, The Thing, They Live, The Fog, Halloween: need I continue? As an aspiring musician I also can appreciate the fact that he scores his films himself.

It is no secret that the studio did not deliver the goods in terms of financing for this film, but at least the man has attempted to do something a little different. To me this film will always be "The Exorcist X 100; Multiple possessions"...Harmless fun really folks!
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Fog (1980)
10/10
Superb work from the master of suspense: John Carpenter
8 January 2005
Considering that this film was only his 2nd "Professional" film after his "Film school projects"; Dark Star & Precinct 13, it is a masterpiece of suspenseful storytelling. I have always been a fan of ghost stories from a very early age and enjoy a good scare as much as anyone. With this one I crept down from upstairs after my bedtime as I was so desperate to see it after catching a glimpse of the front cover of the video in the video store. As a ten year old at the time, I was absolutely scared to death all the way through this film and have loved it ever since, I mean it is one of the only films that can still scare me even after having seen it so many times. One of the things I was most surprised of was that it took so long to receive a UK region 2 release (Oct 2004) after having been out in the states for such a long time. The DVD release has fascinating featurette interviews telling how complicated the process of producing the film had been, with a really good informative commentary by John Carpenter and Debra Hill (the original writers); once again proving that he is the most generous director in terms of trivial information on the film in question. Many directors actually sound apologetic during commentaries, but this is probably the best one I have heard so far (which is quite a few!).

If you don't already own a copy, rectify the situation straight away!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Farscape: Premiere (1999)
Season 1, Episode 1
10/10
Outstanding & Underrated show that re-defines Sci-Fi
5 January 2005
Not many television shows appeal to quite as many different kinds of fans like Farscape does...I know youngsters and 30/40+ years old;fans both Male and Female in as many different countries as you can think of that just adore this T.V miniseries. It has elements that can be found in almost every other show on T.V, character driven drama that could be from an Australian soap opera; yet in the same episode it has science fact & fiction that would give even the hardiest "Trekkie" a run for his money in the brainbender stakes! Wormhole theory, Time Travel in true equational form...Magnificent. It embraces cultures from all over the map as the possibilities are endless having multiple stars and therefore thousands of planets to choose from.

With such a broad scope; it would be expected that nothing would be able to keep up the illusion for long, but here is where "Farscape" really comes into it's own element...It succeeds where all others have failed, especially the likes of Star Trek (a universe with practically zero Kaos element!) They ran out of ideas pretty quickly + kept rehashing them! Over the course of 4 seasons they manage to keep the audience's attention using good continuity and constant character evolution with multiple threads to every episode with unique personal touches to camera that are specific to certain character groups within the whole. This structure allows for an extremely large area of subject matter as loyalties are forged and broken in many ways on many many issues. I happened to see the pilot (Premiere) in passing and just had to keep tuning in after that to see if Crichton would ever "Get the girl", after seeing them all on television I was delighted to see them available on DVD & I have to admit that it was the only thing that kept me sane whilst I had to do a 12 hour night shift and developed chronic insomnia...Farscape was the only thing to get me through those extremely long nights...

Do yourself a favour; Watch the pilot and see what I mean...

Farscape Comet
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed