Reviews

7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Family Double Dare Meets American Gladiators
17 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
My Dad is Better Than Your Dad is the new competition show in which four father/child teams compete for a chance to play for up to $50,000 in cash. The idea itself is not too bad, but the execution needs a little fixing.

The game breaks down like this; first, the four teams compete in mini-physical challenges, such as chopping down desks in order to collect the wood or hurling their kids at a giant-sized dartboard. After two of these, the lowest scoring team is eliminated. The three remaining teams will then be tested on trivia, with the children buzzing in and their fathers answering them. Another team is eliminated, then the remaining two fathers will go through another challenge, this time even more intense. The winner moves onto test how well he knows his child by answering a series of questions. For each question answered correctly, $10,000 is won. A top prize of $50,000 can be earned.

This would seem like good criteria for a game show, but the presentation needs some work. For many of the time-oriented challenges, the clock is rarely shown on screen. This contrasts to other shows where the timer is always displayed and you know how much is left until the challenge is over. Many of the dads are good sports and often root for their opponents, but the children (especially the daughters) are the opposites. They always shout at their fathers to "Hurry!" and go as far as to taunt their opponents.

I have noticed that there has been inconsistent judging for one particular event. In the challenge where the fathers send their kids flying towards the giant dart board, sometimes they will not accept darts thrown at the board and other times they will. This does not make sense because it unfairly puts teams that play by the rules at a disadvantage.

The structure and commercial pacing for My Dad is Better Than Your Dad is worse than other current prime time game shows. Sometimes, you can predict when they cut to commercial, but usually they do not break in between events. One time, they cut to commercial right in the middle of the "Braver" challenge and another time, they did the same thing after it had ended but before we found out the second team's score (just like the time, it was not displayed on screen for that function).

Overall, My Dad is Better Than Your Dad is worth watching, but it could be better if these things were corrected.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Family Feud (1999– )
4/10
Survey Says...Time to Retire
21 September 2007
All good things should come to an end, and I believe it's now time to cancel Family Feud. Too many times I've seen contestants reply with an answer they know will not be on the board, only to have their allies back them up by yelling "Good Answer!"

While John O'Hurley is a much better host than Louie Anderson or Richard Karn, the show has now become way too glitzy and obnoxious. When Karn replaced Anderson, he was okay for the first couple of seasons. Then, he began saying repetitive phrases like "A shot at TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS!!" or "I'M TRIPLING THE POINTS!!!" to make the audience and contestants scream. I think he just wanted everyone to have a good time, but didn't add anything else to the show.

Another thing, why is Fast Money STILL $5 a point if lost? It's been that way since 1976! I guess Fremantle is trying to save money so they can ruin another game show in the near future (Oh wait, they just made Sale of the Century horrific to watch. What's next?).

This show may have been fun for a while, but I won't miss it when the execs decide to eventually pull the plug.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kids (1995)
1/10
Distasteful and Unrealistic.
20 September 2007
I had a free night at college, so I attended a showing of this movie. I can assure you that anything they force you to watch in sex education was much better than this crap. I walked out somewhere in the middle, trying to decipher why this movie was made. Okay, so teens think they own the world and do whatever they want. Point made, but if I copied the behavior done by those extremely ruthless boys, I would most likely be in the slammer for life.

Which brings me to the characters. Nobody can relate to any of them because they're unlikeable. They're more profane and stereotypical than an episode of South Park, minus the humor. Yes, I know everything that goes on in this movie happens in real life, but the plot didn't seem believable in any way.

Bottom Line: Stay away from this movie.
13 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hamtaro (2000–2006)
8/10
I miss this show...
1 September 2007
I'm eighteen and I actually like Hamtaro. I can't believe it's been nearly four years since Cartoon Network gave it the boot. It's one of the few Animes I can tolerate because there are no violent monsters killing each other.

Anyway, the show is about a talking hamster named Hamtaro who has an owner named Laura. When Laura's at school, Hamtaro runs from his cage and hangs out with his hamster friends called the "Ham-Hams." They meet at an underground clubhouse and go on numerous adventures. Sometimes, when Laura goes on a trip with her family or friends, the ham-hams may tag along, too.

I believe one of the stronger points on Hamtaro was the dubbing. Many of the voices were good matches for the characters, particularly Boss (Ted Cole), Bijou (Chantal Strand) and Dexter (Samuel Vincent). The only thing I didn't like about the show was the introduction of Stan, Sandy's twin brother. I felt he didn't fit in with everyone else and his flirting made me sick.

I would definitely recommend Hamtaro if you are a parent of someone between the ages of four and ten. If you don't like robots or monsters battling their brains out on other Anime shows, then I also recommend it.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pokémon (1997–2023)
3/10
Used to be great, now it's extremely predictable.
25 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I remember falling into the Pokemon fad in the late 90s. I remember buying almost every video game and trading card I could get my hands on. The show, which was one of my first anime's, was just incredible. My brothers and I would record every episode in the first season (we still have the tapes). We would absolutely never miss a show.

Then, something happened and I just lost interest. It might have been when Ash lost in the Elite Four and gave up. Then, Brock left the group and was replaced with this dolt Tracey. I started watching again when Johto Journeys came on, but somehow it just wasn't the same. Since then, the show has gotten way too predictable. "Team Rocket's going blast off again! I totally expected that!"

As I'm typing this, Pokemon is in its NINTH season (English dubbed, that is). However, it appears that it had lost its quality a long time ago. I'm shocked as to how a show with that much originality can stay on the air for that long. Are kids' attention spans really that short these days?
6 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Absolutely Painful to Watch
1 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Like other IMDb users, I wish there was an option for zero, perhaps maybe negative stars. This is probably the worst excuse for a game show since Show Me the Money (then again, I'm not saying much). America is dumbing down and "Are You Smarter Than a Fifth Grader?" proves it. Seeing grown-ups stumble on questions that ten-year-olds can answer? Come on! Where do they pick these contestants!? Do they search random streets and bring the most moronic people they can find? The very first contestant really took the cake. He was a UCLA grad (or he says he was) and he had no clue that Andrew Johnson was the first president to be impeached. The next contestant thought Mexico had the longest border with the United States. Ugh. The only person who is about as clueless as the contestants is Jeff Foxworthy.

How many times can the camera focus on the fifth graders taunting the contestants and raising their hands before a question!? It makes me sick and I hope they get a taste of their own medicine.

The format is absolutely the worst part of the show. The pacing is horribly sloth-like and sometimes before they answer one question they cut to commercial. Hel-LO? They were at a commercial just before that one was asked! The worst thing is if a contestant gets a question wrong and the kid s/he called up gets it right, s/he stays in the game. It should be the reverse because THAT proves the fifth grader is smarter than the contestant. The so-called UCLA grad did not answer a single question by himself, yet because of the flawed format (using his "cheats"), he won $5,000. Every contestant so far has walked away in the middle of a question. They should make a new rule saying that the contestant MUST answer the question once he/she has seen it. If they walk with what they have, it just proves that they're absolutely retarded.

This show also seems rigged. Some of these questions I had no idea about at least until I was in tenth grade, yet all the kids answered it correctly. Anybody sense a hint of "Twenty-One"? I think the kids were given the answers.

This show should be called "Do You Know More Useless Facts Than a Fifth Grader?" I can't believe FOX still insists on keeping it.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the 50 worst countdowns of all time.
15 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
What's happened to GSN? Instead of the classics we know and love, we're now stuck with blackjack tournaments, reality shows, and "originals." As part of the "younger demographic," I have to say, that trash has got to go.

So, now we saw what they thought their favorite 50 game shows are. This program that originally aired in the summer of 2006 is not exactly a breath of fresh air for classic game show lovers. If you're wondering why shows such as "Dog Eat Dog" and "Love Connection" were on the list, here's your answer. The producers probably saw this as a pathetic attempt at promoting their shows instead of the classics.

For one thing, there were some shows that GSN mentioned but did not air an episode. Shows like "The $64,000 Question" I can understand because the show may have been destroyed by CBS. Why "Wheel of Fortune" and "Jeopardy!" did not have an episode is beyond me, since both those shows are in their library. Plus, ever since they lost the rights to "The Price is Right" and others, the network's gone downhill and hasn't been the same.

Several shows deserved to be lower on the list. While I like "Match Game," I feel it did not deserve the #1 spot. Other shows that had multiple re-runs on their schedule were put near the top as well. "Family Feud," was all right at #3, owing to the fact that it just entered its eighth season in third-run syndication. Other shows such as "Who Wants to be a Millionaire" at #5 and "The Newlywed Game" at #9 did not deserve this treatment. "Millionaire" was all right when it first came out, but it isn't old enough to be considered a classic. But this is GSN: The Network for Games, not Game Show Network, so what do I know?

Other ones, like "Beat the Clock" and "Tic Tac Dough" deserved to be much higher on the list. Another fact that their "original" shows scored better than gems is also unbearable. Who here thinks "Lingo" is better than "Name That Tune" or that "Whammy!" is better than "Twenty-One" (Even if that show was rigged)!?

In conclusion, if you really want to see "The 50 Greatest Game Shows of All Time," I recommend TVGuide's version instead. Things like this should not be left to people who time-compress shows and cut the credits in order to squeeze extra time for unnecessary commercials. This is probably the saddest excuse for a "Greatest List" I ever seen.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed