As unique and intriguing sci-fi Dune 1 was (10/10), Dune 2 was unfortunately a disappointment. It felt like a cheap copy of Dune 1. Dune 2 has shiny pictures, big actor names, yet no actual content.
There was almost nothing new, just a repetition of what we saw in Dune 1. The world, the story and the characters felt smaller. Seeing the same things (characters' actions, interactions, sceneries) again and again just made it boring. In the middle of the film I thought, I could leave right now and wouldn't care how the film ends. Did it have to be so long? There were a lot of insignificant scenes unrelated to each other that were too long (oh man and slow motion didn't help with that), while others related to character development were too short. It ended and not much of a story or character progress was made and nothing had stood out in my mind. Such a pity.
So many characters were badly developed. At one moment you see two characters still being in the same state they were in Dune 1 and at the next one they're deeply in love.
Why did they turn Bardem's character, a mysterious, strong and interesting character from Dune 1, into comic relief? Did we really need that?
(Too) late in the film we get introduced to Elvis, um sorry a bad guy - a totally generic character - and then we spend an oddly large amount of time just in the bad guy's world, where it feels as if a different film started in the middle of the actual one. Did they just randomly want to pay homage to "Gladiator"? Only Russell Crowe was missing from that scene sequence!
Lastly, they chose popular actors for small roles and cameos for no good reason. Was it for the hype? Christopher Walken's acting abilities were wasted. What did e.g. Taylor-Joy (The Queen's Gambit), Pugh (Oppenheimer) or Seydoux (No time to Die) bring to the table? Poor Seydoux, an actor I like, all her character's scenes were ridiculous, with the culmination being ******SPOILER****** her touching her belly after an implied sex scene and saying "The bloodline is secured."... I felt that the whole cinema wanted to laugh out loud with the ridiculousness of the scene!
There was almost nothing new, just a repetition of what we saw in Dune 1. The world, the story and the characters felt smaller. Seeing the same things (characters' actions, interactions, sceneries) again and again just made it boring. In the middle of the film I thought, I could leave right now and wouldn't care how the film ends. Did it have to be so long? There were a lot of insignificant scenes unrelated to each other that were too long (oh man and slow motion didn't help with that), while others related to character development were too short. It ended and not much of a story or character progress was made and nothing had stood out in my mind. Such a pity.
So many characters were badly developed. At one moment you see two characters still being in the same state they were in Dune 1 and at the next one they're deeply in love.
Why did they turn Bardem's character, a mysterious, strong and interesting character from Dune 1, into comic relief? Did we really need that?
(Too) late in the film we get introduced to Elvis, um sorry a bad guy - a totally generic character - and then we spend an oddly large amount of time just in the bad guy's world, where it feels as if a different film started in the middle of the actual one. Did they just randomly want to pay homage to "Gladiator"? Only Russell Crowe was missing from that scene sequence!
Lastly, they chose popular actors for small roles and cameos for no good reason. Was it for the hype? Christopher Walken's acting abilities were wasted. What did e.g. Taylor-Joy (The Queen's Gambit), Pugh (Oppenheimer) or Seydoux (No time to Die) bring to the table? Poor Seydoux, an actor I like, all her character's scenes were ridiculous, with the culmination being ******SPOILER****** her touching her belly after an implied sex scene and saying "The bloodline is secured."... I felt that the whole cinema wanted to laugh out loud with the ridiculousness of the scene!
Tell Your Friends