Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
The biggest challenge the story faced was turning two mass murderers into characters you can follow, laugh with and have empathy for and I think this film does it really well.
29 October 2010
Released just in time for Halloween is the macabre tale of Burke and Hare! Set in 1820's Edinburgh, two Irish immigrants, William Burke (Simon Pegg) and William Hare (Andy Serkis), try one business venture after the next, and one after the next they fail. Just at the point where they're about to face financial ruin, the duo come up with an ingenious idea when they spot a in the niche in the market for the supply and demand of fresh dead bodies which manages to turn their fortunes around.

The story is inspired by true events which took place in Edinburgh between November 1827 and 31 October 1828 when the real life Bukre and Hare murdered 16 people and sold their bodies to a private anatomy lecturer, Doctor Robert Knox (played by Tom Wilkinson in the film), for dissection at Edinburgh Medical College. Although this is the 8th time their story has been brought to the big screen, this marks the first time that we see them as two likable lead characters.

From a screenplay penned by Nick Moorcroft and Piers Ashworth and directed by the legendary John Landis, Burke And Hare harks back to the days of the old Ealing Studios dark comedies like Kind Hearts and Coronets (1949) and The Ladykillers (1955) which director John Landis is very fond of. It looks at the friendship between these two guys and focuses on the idea of who the bad guys really are. The doctors or the killers themselves? Mixing in a little Shakespeare with an all female production of Macbeth by Isla Fisher's character, Ginny, an aspiring young actress whom Burke falls madly in love with, another layer is added to the story. While Ginny ponders what would drive a man like Macbeth to murder, Burke looks at her and explains the character's motivation; "He did it for love".

By and large, I really enjoyed Bukre and Hare. The biggest challenge the story faced was turning two mass murderers into characters you can follow, laugh with and have empathy for and I think this film does it really well. As Burke is talked into the business with Hare, there's never the slightest feeling that his friend is purposefully leading him down a path to his own downfall, unlike the real Hare who gave Burke up in the end to escape a public hanging. Another element of the movie which was enjoyable was seeing so many familiar faces turning up in smaller roles; Ronnie Corbett decked out in his red and blue uniform as Captain McLintock, Christopher Lee as Old Joseph, one of Buke and Hare's early unfortunates and perhaps the most hilarious scene of all is when they push Paul Whitehouse down a flight of stairs! It's a good one to see if you're after something dark and funny this Halloween.
61 out of 79 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Saw 3D (2010)
6/10
While we bid farewell to the horror series, we also have to ask, is it really over? Horror movies have a tendency to come back from the dead, very much like their characters.
29 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
What began 7 years ago with a film about a couple of guys waking up in a dingy bathroom has evolved into one of the most successful horror franchises in history and now comes it's grand finale, in time for Halloween and in "eye popping 3D"! The film also marks a welcome return for Cary Elwes, playing the role of Dr. Gordon whom we last saw crawling out of Jigsaw's bathroom at the end of the first film. 6 films later we finally learn about what happened to him.

The new film picks up right after the events of Saw 6 (2009) and shows Jill Tuck (Betsy Russell) putting the reverse beer trap on Hoffman (Costas Mandylor). As Hoffman escapes, Jill goes to the police and tries to cut a deal; information for protection. Meanwhile, a group of survivors from Jigsaws traps form a support group. Among them are Bobby (Sean Patrick Flanery), who has been making money from selling his story to the media and Dr. Gordon, minus his lower right leg.

Gibson (Chad Donella), the detective working with Jill Tuck, has a history with Hoffman and is determined to track him down, but as a new game is set in motion, time is running out. As all of the plots converge, Saw 3D is 90 minutes of gruesome torture and revelations which don't really come as surprise. For Saw fans, it's an ending they might have guessed a long time ago, but still, it's really good to see it on it screen, although you can't help but feel the franchise ran of out steam several movies ago along with Jigsaw and Amanda (Shawnee Smith) who snuffed it in Saw 3 (2006).

Though Jigsaw's aim was to highlight the error of his victim's ways and make them value their own lives, Hoffman's motives are those of a homicidal manic; he just wants to kill and therefore for the past 4 movies has not been as interesting as his predecessor was.

While we bid farewell to the horror series, we also have to ask, is it really over? Horror movies have a tendency to come back from the dead, very much like their characters. The Final Destination (2009), Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare (1991) and Jason Goes To Hell: The Final Friday (1993) are testament to that, so is it likely we'll see another one any time in the foreseeable future? While Patrick Melton, Saw's writer, has stated it is indeed the grand finale, I say "never say never". As long as there are horror icons, there'll always be a way to resurrect them if the fans want to see them.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The most immersive 3D film you'll see so far, but once you're there, there's not much to keep it going.
10 September 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Directed by Paul W.S. Anderson and starring Milla Jovovich, Ali Larter, Kim Coates, Wentworth Miller and Shawn Roberts and filmed with the James Cameron and Vince Pace 3D Fusion Camera System developed for Avatar, the fourth part of the Resident Evil series arrives in cinemas this week.

This new chapter sees our heroine Alice (Jovovich) continuing her journey to find human survivors and lead them to Arcadia, a place free of infection. Meeting up once again with her friend Claire (Larter) and a band of other survivors, they find the city of angels is now the city of the undead. Alice's battle with the Umbrella Corporation and Albert Wesker (Roberts) climbs a new level as they search for thousands of survivors who were supposed to have reached Arcadia. A mysterious ship sailing down the ocean may hold the clues. But are they walking into a trap? The 3D aspect of Resident Evil: Afterlife is a stunning mix of creativity and technological advancement. From the slow building opening sequence which takes place in Tokyo as rain cascades down onto the titles, hitting them and splashing off, to more complex scenes incorporating slow motion action sequences with fast moving elements such as a hoards of the undead, it's a visual treat. The depth of each scene is magnified to a level which I've never seen before in 3D cinema. One of the best scenes in the movie takes place in a prison bathroom as the Axeman and Claire go head to head. I guarantee you will duck as the axe comes toward you and you will certainly feel the effect of the blood splatter as it hurtles at you.

Director Paul W.S. Anderson spoke about Afterlife's 3D offering an immersive experience, drawing the audience into the story. This is certainly true, the 3D does pull you into the movie but once you are there you will find the story is rather thin and poorly executed. Rather like the Saw franchise, Resident Evil seems to have run out of steam and is unsure of what to do with its lead characters. It builds us up with the expectation of a payoff at the end, but this never arrives and is by far one of the weakest endings I have seen in a movie this year.

In terms of the kills in the movie, they are unfulfilling. Characters are mostly pulled off-screen to their deaths and as a horror-movie fan, this is not what I want. I want to see whatever it is the undead are doing to them and not just look at the other characters faces as they see what is happening. If it's an immersive experience you want the audience to have, then the filmmakers should have gone the full distance with Afterlife as the kills seem rather restrained and unsatisfying.

Backed by a thumping, industrial and electric guitar driven score produced by Tomanandy (The Mothman Prophecies, The Hills Have Eyes) it adds much "oomph" to the power kicks, explosions and transitions between slow and fast segments. Together with the 3D, the score is the 2nd thing I enjoyed most about the movie. However, Wentworth Miller left me with a feeling of déjà vu. We first meet him in a prison cell. I didn't find him believable at all, especially not in relation to his connection with Claire which I found unnecessary and is one of the points where the movie took a downturn story-wise.

Resident Evil: Afterlife is the most immersive 3D film you'll see so far, but once you're there, there's not much to keep it going in terms of character development and story driven elements.
19 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed