Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
I wish I could rate this higher
14 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Although I consider myself quite a big Disney fan, I usually skip the sequels - mostly because they seem awful from the trailers. Because I felt like watching a new Disney film, I said what the heck, and saw LK2, knowing they couldn't go too wrong in a sequel to their biggest hit. I'm a afraid I was proved wrong. I admit my expectations were low to begin with, but this movie sucks on so many levels.

I have yet to see a sequel with SO many references to the original. Any character mannerism you can think of in the LK is here (including Pumbaa's flatulence jokes). It's OK if it's done subtly and in crucial points of the story, but it's there every two minutes and it's so tacky. I lost count of how many times someone hung off a cliff in this movie.

The story is a rehash of TLK, only instead of hyenas you get the outlanders - a pack of lions and lionesses exiled from Pride Rock and led by Zera, the female version of Scar. There is an abundance of cringe-worthy moments, mostly thanks to the "brilliant" script (one such moment has Simba survive an attack by the outlanders and upon returning to Pride Rock, murmurs to his minions "Kovu... Ambush..." and bang, he passes out. It was worth it, I admit, I laughed out loud.

Songs - usually they're the highlight in a Disney movie, not here. Whoever wrote the lyrics should be sued. "Upendi"? "Not One of Us"? I'm sorry, the Disney Channel's chicks offer better music than this. And that's saying a lot.

Animation - as in most Disney sequels, the animation is Saturday-morning cartoon style, leaning heavily on cheap computer graphics that give it a sterile and stagnant look. No trace of the earthy, organic visuals of the 1994 classic. The characters, as you've probably concluded, look off model most of the time and move awkwardly.

Disney should pay respect to their classics and avoid a sequel if it's not going to receive a normal treatment.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Beauty and the Beast
26 July 2010
This film is truly a wonder to behold. An excellent film in every aspect. For me, this is the only Disney movie in which the music is comparable to that in "The Little Mermaid". Visually, "Beauty" is a great example of how CGI can complement hand-drawn artwork without taking over it, like in later Disney films (most notably "The Hunchback of Notre-Dame" and "Tarzan"). The ballroom sequence was truly groundbreaking but that's about the only "computerized" part in the film, thankfully. Belle herself is a fantastic heroine, one who dreams of adventure and not about a lover. I don't see why so many people were let down by the prince in his human form. I thought he was done very well. "Beauty and the Beast" is definitely up there with "The Little Mermaid".
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Little Mermaid
25 July 2010
This glorious Disney take on the Hans Christian Andersen fairy tale is one of the company's most successful and beloved films. It was an instant smash right from the start and is equally popular today. It's easy to see why. The music is top-notch Disney: including Sebastian's two show stoppers (Under The Sea and Kiss The Girl) and Ariel's now-legendary ballad, Part Of Your World). The artwork direction is spectacular: beautifully animated characters against detailed backgrounds of mainly deep blues and aquamarine. Ariel is the first Disney princess who actually helps move the plot forward and Ursula is the ultimate Disney villain. We own this film in 3 editions (1990 and 1998 VHS; 2006 DVD) as this has been a favorite of ours from the get-go. The Little Mermaid is excellent entertainment which I recommend to everyone. A definite 10/10.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed