Reviews

22 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Solid and tense but not especially enjoyable thriller
21 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Pour Elle is the most recent high-profile French thriller to receive a limited cinematic release on British shores. With superior acting from Vincent Lindon and Diane Kruger as strong, sympathetic leading characters and a good, conundrum-driven plot line, there is every reason to expect a gripping experience along the lines of "Tell No One" - a comparison emphasised by the advertisers.

Unfortunately, although in acting a dialogue there is a lot to recommend here, the film does not form as exciting a package as Tell No One.

But first the good: as with many French movies, the representations of family life and the everyday interactions between spouses or parents with children are represented with a care and accuracy that is simply not found in most English language films. France seems to have a surfeit of fantastic child actors and directors who know how to use them. Similarly, the quality of the acting amongst the cast as a whole is superb, hitting the right note of realism without slipping into the cartoonishly grim and dour found in many British films.

The problems with the movie are largely related to the fact that the story is somewhat simplistic for a thriller, with no real twists or anything to engage the intellect, as well as the fact that the constant emphasis of the hardship and injustice faced by the family as a result of the wife's wrongful imprisonment simply makes the movie difficult to actually enjoy watching.

I found myself becoming increasingly depressed at the wife's prospect of spending the next 20 years trying to ward off suicide in a prison cell knowing that she was innocent. A fact that was driven home often enough that the ending did provide enough catharsis to warrant the misery of the first hour.

Although the point is made that this is the story of an ordinary man trying to perform an act that, as the multiple-escapist at the beginning of the film assures us, can only be done by a "born criminal", the film seems to present the escape as surprisingly easy to plan. There is very little attempt to guide us through the process - with much of the interesting, intricate work presented in montage. Rather than focusing on the nuts and bolts of the escape plan, as we would expect from a thriller, these are passed through in a cursory manner as the tension is built around the increasing strain placed on the characters. Although there is nothing wrong with this approach, it doesn't entirely sit at ease with the rushed escape that ends the film (although the ending does involve the cleverest moment in the story, involving an internet car-share website).

Although far from a bad film, Pour Elle is an uneasy mix of personal drama and thriller which achieves much more as the former than the latter. As someone expecting a movie more like "Tell No One", I can't say I enjoyed the film as much I could have.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9 Songs (2004)
3/10
Unpleasant couple listen to bad indie music and have sex
28 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I bet that the assumption of most people reading these reviews is that if you're offended by sex, you'll hate the movie and if you're not, you'll like it. That assumption's not true in this case.

I actually think that introducing realistic (or in this case, actual) sex into a mainstream love story is a pretty good idea. Why is that when we've voyeuristically watched a couple falling in love, there should still be a taboo on the sexual side of things? The problem here is that we haven't watched a couple fall in love. We've seen a pair of obnoxious metropolitan London stereotypes bump into each other at one of an increasingly irritating series of concerts by flavour-of-the-month indie bands. To be honest, I can't imagine a less lovable pair of characters and a less interesting set-up.

There are a few interesting cinematic devices at work in the movie which temporarily make it interesting in an academic sense. The idea of the film as representative of the male character's fading memory of the short relationship (remembering the exciting bits - music, sex, arguments) is fairly novel and the modern updating of the classic French "art house" movie concepts of the 1970s (affluent couple struck by ennui meet for series of meaningless sexual encounters) is relatively astute. The main problem with all this technical, academic exercise is that there's no heart or soul to the movie and nothing to make the viewer actually want to keep watching unless they happen to be fans of the musical acts.

The much publicised sex is actually quite inoffensive. There's no sexual violence or physically harmful practices which would justify the uproar surrounding this film. It's consentual sex between adults. Nothing that the majority of viewers wouldn't have tried out themselves.

So you have a film that seems designed to shock or to be an exercise in experimental cinema. But the "shocking" sex is simply ordinary lovemaking, the music is forgettable bordering on awful and the characters aren't in any way engaging enough to carry a plot less film.

Dull. 3/10
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of my favourite martial arts movies of recent years
24 March 2008
A few recent movies have raised the bar for Hong Kong action cinema. Aside from the obvious "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" which introduced a moving plot and quality acting to the genre, "Ong Bak" raised the stakes for action by replacing gracefully balletic Wu Shu fights with acrobatic but brutal, hard-hitting action. Similarly, the Korean movie "Fighter in the Wind" also followed the hard hitting formula but added stylish camera-work to the mix. Luckily, "Dragon Tiger Gate" shows that Hong Kong kung fu cinema does have the skills to match these foreign usurpers.

The first thing that jumps out at the viewer is the rather contrived but undeniably stylish air of "cool" that surrounds the lead characters with their snappy streetwear and (quite amusing) emo haircuts. These guys are ass kicking metrosexuals! Luckily they ass-kick very well! Following the Ong Bak formula, the opening fight scene shows foot hitting face with real force and the fighting style replaces the graceful wu shu of traditional Hong Kong cinema with something that looks more like Japanese karate or one of the harder, external forms of kung fu - not much posing or flowery stances but lots of straight to the point slamming strikes.

So the film looks great and the fights are cool - how about the plotting? Crouching Tiger standard? Of course not! It's a standard formula about estranged brothers on different sides of the tracks coming back together to defeat evil. But this really isn't the kind of movie where the plotting makes much difference (and, to be honest, when Hong Kong cinema tries intricate plotting you usually get an over-long and unfollowable movie, so fair play to them for keeping it simple!) - what you really want is quality fighting and stylish visuals and this movie more than delivers. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend it to kung fu movie fans.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Casino Royale (2006)
7/10
Poor story, great action, superb Bond!
19 November 2006
Let's be honest, Sean Connery had it easy. He was making a cold war spy thriller during the cold war itself. Nothing had dated, nothing needed modernising: he was making a period film set in the period he was living in. Is it any wonder he was always considered the best Bond?

It's been much harder for the later actors to make the role their own, but Daniel Craig has succeeded. Combining Sean Connery's rough-around-the-edges charm with Timothy Dalton's steely-eyed ruthlessness and adding a good measure of something new: military hard-man dangerousness! While Roger Moore, as always, played Bond as a charming dandy and Pierce Brosnan played him as a slimy Americanized business executive, Daniel Craig is the very picture of a field-tested military officer. Someone you might genuinely feel safe trusting to safeguard your country. Aside from making Bond "hard" again, Craig also delivers Bond's charm with great confidence. Rather than hamming up his lines for laughs in the Moore/Brosnan fashion or playing down his charming side like Dalton, Craig delivers a genuinely believable sly wit which gets the audience on side immediately.

Eva Green is also superb as "Bond girl" Vesper Lynd. Not a helpless dumb blonde waiting to be bedded by Bond or a PC-pleasing hard-woman, Green is attractive, composed, charming and human. She is possibly the first genuinely *attractive* rather than just beautiful Bond girl.

Sadly, despite great turns from the two leads, the film doesn't provide a quality backdrop for their top-notch performances. The action scenes are very well-handled and exciting but the story often seems nothing more than a series of things that happen in sequence rather than a plot per se. The card-playing scenes are badly handled with very little tension built up. They should possibly have edited the dull and unnecessary action scene at the airport and spent more time building tension in the card games. Some of the use of technology in the film is unnecessary and clearly added gratuitously to please gadget-fans.

On the whole, this is a very enjoyable action film, but not a well-made spy thriller (which is what the Bond franchise really needs!). People who enjoy Bond for the camp-factor, with cheesy camp humour and self-aware parody will probably enjoy this much less than some of the other movies, but the lack of camp made me enjoy it a whole lot more.

And Daniel Craig is a superb Bond.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wolf Creek (2005)
3/10
Do you love graphic sadistic violence - your answer will help you decide whether to watch this
30 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
There isn't a lot to say about this movie really. It starts out in an almost Blair Witch "faux realism" style with shaky camera-work and no interfering background music. The irritating characters and aimless scripting I can write off as an attempt at realism (after all, there are plenty of dull and irritating backpackers out there). But all that comes to pass as an excuse for a story is a long series of violent encounters and vignettes of torture with a few half-hearted escape attempts by the victims. No catharsis, no resolution, just a nutty Aussie guy being violently horrible to some kids.

This is the definition of gratuitous. The violence isn't there to support the story. The story is a weak framework to link the scenes of violence which are clearly the purpose of the movie. If you're a person who enjoys watching sadistic violence, you'll like this. I don't enjoy aimless sadism, so I didn't like it.

Simple as that really.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Not a "martial arts film" but a great film about martial arts!
8 July 2006
A romanticised biopic of karate legend Mas Oyama (here called "Choi Baedal") this is rare gem in Korean cinema and the genre of martial arts films. As many reviewers have mentioned, the fight scenes in this movie are shorter and more brutal than the average Hong Kong action film, but this is easily forgiven as the quality of the film-making is so high. Most people watching martial arts movies will find themselves dozing through the story waiting for the next fight, but the good storytelling, quality acting, beautiful cinematography and stylish editing make the story elements of "Fighter in the Wind" a pleasure to watch.

The cast all seem perfectly at home in their roles, making it easy to love or hate the characters as required. Dong-kun Yang plays Baedal with the right mix of naive idealism and hard-headed brutality. The stunning Aya Hirayama provides a likable love-interest. Taewoo Jeong is charming as Baedals cheeky con-man friend Chunbae, and Masaya Kato is suitably arrogant and superior as old-fashioned karate master Kato.

This may be a film based around martial arts, but it is not a typical martial arts movie. The story features some spectacular fighting techniques from the surprisingly acrobatic Yang, but the fighting is an embellishment to an otherwise fascinating and well-told story rather than the focus of the movie.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
One of the worst films I've seen in quite a while
26 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
One of the things that tends to make non-English-speaking films more interesting than their Hollywood counterparts is the degree of imagination that filmmakers are free to exercise. Since there appears to be less pressure to conform to the marketing men's ideas of what should make a profitable movie, these films often have a degree of originality not found in conventional blockbusters. Sadly, in this case, Mr Ozon has chosen to use this freedom to make a tedious, generic, mindless story which the watcher suspects is just thinly disguised sexual fantasy played out in the form of a thriller.

The main issues I have with this film are:

1. The lack of imagination. There are no twists, no unexpected surprises, nothing that suggests that the writer put any thought into the story. Indeed the story seems only to be the means to an end - with the end being the boy's "sexual awakening" (being tied up and buggered by a hermit in a log cabin - seriously!).

2. The characters have absolutely no depth. The girl is just malicious and unpleasant (females = bad) and does next to nothing in the entire film, the boy is limp and aimless (poor confused boy - all he needed was a good raping!) and the hermit was a generic filthy villain who's purpose was just to, well, "awaken" the boy.

3. The subtext. Imagine the boy was a female character instead. Imagine, in this move, that she was raped by a nasty mountain man and discovered that it was what she wanted all along. Offensive? I'd say so!

Technically, the cinematography is fine, the sound is fine etc etc, but in the end the story is paper-thin, the characters are bland and poorly-written, and the message is questionable.
11 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
MPD Psycho (2000)
9/10
A great Japanese sci-fi/horror mini series
4 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Before reviewing this great Japanese mini-series I'd just like to comment that the people who reviewed the series having only seen the first two episodes made a very strange decision. A story should surely by seen completely before the viewer makes their mind up about it! This is no exception!

I'm not particularly familiar with Takashi Miike's work but this mini series marks him (and the screenwriters and original comic book artists) out as very stylish and intelligent creator of sci-fi horror. Essentially based around the horrific murders of a series of people seemingly connected only by a barcode tattooed beneath their eyelid, this series introduces us to the mysterious detective Amamiya Kazuhiko and his previous identity of Kobayashi Yosuke as well as the murderous influence of Nishizono Shinji and Lucy Monostone.

Initially incredibly confusing, the series actually resolves into a fairly neat ending as, throughout the episodes, more information about the origins of Amamiya Kazuhiko and the nature of Nishizono Shinji is revealed. As everyone has commented, Twin Peaks is certainly a good comparison with this series as the viewer is initially left to puzzle over strange and seemingly inexplicable occurrences in a surreal world. Unlike Twin Peaks, MPD Psycho is not slow and meandering - it moves at a crackling pace and leads the viewer through a clever merger of conspiracy, paranormal thriller and science fiction.

The visuals in the series are cleverly stylised; initially adding to the confusion, but making more sense as the plot is revealed. Computer effects are used heavily in both foreground special effects and in the scenery as a whole making a attractively surreal landscape for the story. The much maligned blurring out of particular shots was a creative decision by the director and works very well - not cheapening the unpleasant shots by allowing you to acclimatise to them but leaving just enough red visible for your imagination to do the rest.

On the whole, this is a very enjoyable serial, with lots of familiar elements of Japanese horror. The use of different killers under the influence of Nishizono Shinji (who deserves to be a film icon in the same way as Yamamura Sadako of Ring) keeps the tension high and the disgustingly creative killings are sick enough to keep you on your toes. I would strongly recommend this serial!
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Chopper (2000)
Great acting by Eric Bana lifts this above your average gangster flick
7 February 2006
I want to start by saying that I hate gangster movies. I thoroughly dislike being asked to identify with murderers and criminals and to treat organised criminals as "anti-heroes". With this in mind I was quite surprised to find that I really enjoyed "Chopper".

As previous reviewers have said, this is essentially a character study rather than a story. The reason it works so well is that Mark Brandon Read is a compelling character beautifully impersonated by Eric Bana. Anyone who's ever seen an interview with Read himself can appreciate what a close impersonation Bana achieves; his sudden guffawing laugh and light-hearted way of talking about his really unpleasant deeds being perfectly copied. The movie manages to do what I'm sure Read himself has achieved in real life - it tricks you into liking him before revealing that his hair-trigger temper and propensity for paranoia and violence make him a dangerous person to be around. The thing that keeps you watching is Chopper's jovial nature but also his unpredictability. In circumstances where other gangsters would have gone on a killing spree, Chopper just shrugs and takes it in his stride. But likewise, in throughly innocuous circumstances, his paranoia can kick in at any moment and send him on a violent outburst.
26 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A fantastic film with an awful ending
11 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
For the most part this film is amazing. A twisty psychological thriller where you're never sure what is real and what is part of a dream. There's a long and engaging set-up which always seems to be leading you towards a huge revelation as an ending. Unfortunately, the makers then decided to tack the plot of "Total Recall" onto this previously non-sci-fi thriller. The jump from psychological thriller to deus ex machina sci-fi movie is jarring and seems somehow inappropriate. A "cop out" in which the clever twists of the plot are undermined by the cinematic equivalent of "...and then I woke up". Which is a real shame as this is such an enjoyable film.

Should you see it? definitely! Is the end disappointing? Unfortunately so.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Oldboy (2003)
9/10
Stylish!
25 March 2005
This was a real surprise to me. I'd heard various tales of how violent the film is and was expecting some kind of lame gangster thriller. In fact, Old Boy is a very handsomely made, stylish revenge thriller which has the feel of a David Fincher (Seven, Fight Club) movie. The production values are top notch; excellent cinematography and musical score, and a number of surreal, dreamlike scenes which create the kind of edgy, not-quite-real atmosphere which the best Asian cinema does so well.

There is violence in this film, and indeed violence which could be called gratuitous, but the surreal world inhabited by this story makes the violence less disturbing than than the kind of gangland unpleasantness seen in films about South Central Los Angeles or East-end London. This is a comic-book adaptation with a clear 'anti-hero', heroine and villain and it delivers a fantastic twist on the standard Hollywood revenge thriller ending. I hope it doesn't give too much away to say that, at the end, the villain dies, the hero lives and he gets the girl. But the circumstances of this denouement are so dark and twisted that it takes a while to sink in.

A very good, very stylish, very twisted film; I'd love to see more like it.
14 out of 92 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ringu (1998)
One of the most tense movies out there
23 March 2004
I'd really like to write this review without reference to the U.S. remake; "The Ring", but I guess that'd be ignoring a major influence on many people's desire to see this film. So I'll say this; "The Ring" is a poor schlocky Americanised film which takes a good idea and stamps it into a mediocre mold. "Ring" or "Ringu" is a very good film. If you're trying to decide which one to see, use that as your guide. In fact, an interesting point about the films can be summed up looking at the titles. "The Ring" has an added 'definite article' indicator; "The". This implies that the film is about a ring. It isn't. Enough said. There's a lot more ambiguity in the one-word translation of the Japanese film's title; "Ring". It's ambiguous, maybe even... thought provoking! I think that sums up the differences.

So, yes, Ring is a good, tense, movie. It runs almost like a detective story rather than a traditional horror film as the main character works her way closer to finding the facts behind the mysterious video tape. But all the while there's an ever-mounting tension as her numbered days expire. In this way it's reminiscent of Angel Heart, another dark, tense, supernatural detective story which demonstrates that the big American studios will sometimes make a good dark thriller. In fact, the tension, partly thanks to the minimal music and synthesizer noises as well as the excellent subdued lighting and camerawork, is the making of a film in which very little actually happens. Ring is a lesson in how to make an everyday cityscape seem scary and bleak while the addition of supernatural overtones, which I'm told weren't in the original books to the same extent, are a welcome addition and source of mystery. I suspect, although I cannot read Japanese, that the film is probably an improvement on the books.

Perhaps the main skill in creating a popular horror movie is to create a viable adversary. Sadako is perhaps the best example of this in film making. She is just a damp, bedraggled figure in an off-white night-dress whose hair obscures her features and who, as far as I can remember, isn't even seen until the last few minutes. Yet she invokes a real sense of menace, you know she is powerful and malevolent through the characters' reactions to her, even if she doesn't graphically do anything horrifying. Say "Sadako" to anyone who's seen the film and watch their face tense up for an instant.

So, should you watch this film? Yes.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Best Action Film of Recent Years
22 March 2004
What a spectacularly silly movie this is! It has a completely unfollowable plot. Unrealistic action. A few pointless characters. And it's FANTASTIC! After years of playing quirky but ultimately serious roles, Johnny Depp seems to have recently found his niche playing tongue-in-cheek characters. His corrupt and thoroughly devious CIA agent (complete with "CIA" printed in big letters on his T-Shirt...) steals the show in the way only a good remorseless villain can. Antonio Banderas smoulders suitably, without taking himself too seriously, as the straight-arrow hero, and there's a suitably menacing turn from Danny Trejo as a truly comic-book henchman.

But don't get me wrong. This isn't one of those "so bad it's good" movies. It's a truly brilliant high-speed brawl of a film with non-stop gunfights, one-liners and sight gags. If you're an action movie fan, the benchmark of the moment seems to be Kill Bill, so maybe I should just say that this is considerably better than Kill Bill and leave it at that. You won't be sitting stroking your beard and thinking about the subtleties of the movie's dialogue, but you will acknowledge, as I did, that this is a superb piece of entertainment.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An absolute Classic!
20 August 2003
This is possibly the best film ever. The story of a group of British nannies and a captured spy and their conflicts with the Chinese secret service over the recipe for the mysterious "lotus x" produces a miraculously silly slapstick festival of idiocy that is probably the most watchable film ever to come from Britain. Forget the grossly overrrated "The Full Monty" - One Of Our Dinosaurs is Missing is the funniest film ever to escape our sceptered isle. Of course the British actors playing Chinese characters are unconvincing, but this isn't about realism or diplomacy; it's about non-stop tomfoolery, which it supplies in bucketloads.

This is what British films should be about! Not dark, brooding council estates; tower-blocks filled with the destitute; or the collapse of industry; instead, the power of self-belief and good honest values overcoming adversity.

An absolute film classic, sadly overlooked at the Oscars, this deserves a cinema re-release at some point. Failing that, buy the video - you won't regret it!
19 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Intacto (2001)
One great idea turned into 2 hours of film
13 May 2003
I went in to see Intacto with very high hopes, having read a preview of it ages ago. The description sounded like a real dark twisty surreal thriller (a la Donnie Darko, as someone else said) so I was a little bit disappointed to see a very linear gambling flick with the single good idea of replacing 'money' with 'luck'. This definitely doesn't make Intacto a bad film; far from it - it's entertaining, the cinematography's great and the acting is fine, but there just aren't enough ideas or depths to the story. The structure is almost video-game-like in that the main character has to defeat a series of lackeys before the big fight with the boss - as another commentor has said, very much like Highlander. The movie also had similarities with David Cronenberg's "Scanners" in the existence of a secret sub-culture with unusual gifts, but the movie lacked the weirdness of Scanners and instead became almost procedural (although is still a better movie on the whole, I would say).

There is some brilliant camerawork and acting in Intacto, and it rightly deserves to be an international hit, even if just to bring recognition to the achievements of Spanish film-making. It's just not BRILLIANT, which I was expecting.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very Very Good!
7 April 2003
There really is a lot to recommend about this film. The story of a lone assassin taking in a orphaned girl and finding his redemption sounds cliched and awful, but some great acting and intelligent direction makes this a movie that's a pleasure to watch. The real standouts here are Natalie Portman and Jean Reno in the lead roles. Portman proves herself to be an amazing actress, playing an emotionally deep character and some powerful scenes with absolute perfection. Reno is no less impressive; making the obsessive and reclusive but immensely skillful Leon an hugely likeable character despite his less-than-savoury occupation. The contrast of the independent adult and scared child with the fact that Leon is rather bumbling and awkward in everyday life, whereas Mathilde is outgoing and sharp makes for a fascinating character-based movie.

Of course it isn't all good. Particularly, Gary Oldman is dreadful. His neck-twisting, face-pulling pantomime performance is embarrasing to watch, especially in comparison to the reserved performance by Jean Reno. That's the only real flaw with this movie though. It is "comic book" enough to be entertaining but has enough emotional interplay to be engaging. Top marks!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mallrats (1995)
10/10
Utterly Class
10 January 2003
The publicity for this film totally did not do it justice. Rather than a run-of-the-mill teen flick as the posters imply, or a weak and uneven comedy as the critics say, this is a stylish, funny and witty comedy/parody. The only problem that immediately hits the viewer is that the delivery of the dialogue is a bit stilted, but that's just the style in many of Kevin Smith's films and it just adds to the tongue-in-cheek atmosphere. The characters are all likeable charicatures and the over the top cartoony humour is a perfect antidote to the usual oh-so-sincere heartfelt nonsense in teen romance films.

Mallrats is also the movie which makes best use of loveable pot-heads Jay and Silent Bob. Their small cameo appearances manage to almost steal the film as every short snippet is hilarious, rather than dragging the jokes out until they aren't funny as in Dogma.

It's really hard to express how much this ISN'T a typical teen comedy in the vain of American Pie, it's almost the anti-Pie! The humour varies from wit to slapstick and the plot falls together at the end in a wonderful fantasy ending. This is also the only romantic comedy I've ever seen that appeals to guys!

This is one damn funny movie and everyone should buy the video immediately.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The X-Files (1993–2018)
A good case for euthanasia
1 August 2002
The first time I saw this show I just caught the start and spent the whole programme wondering whether this was meant to be serious (one of those "real life mystery reconstuction" shows) or an "Outer Limits"-style screenplay. The shaky camerawork, unknown actors and dreadful wooden acting actually made me decide it must be the former. By the end I found that I really enjoyed this. What a great idea - a sci-fi/horror series filmed in the style of a "real-life reconstruction" crime show. David Duchovny's wooden acting and monotone delivery and Gillian Anderson's FBI-agent-next-door style really gave the show a realistic edge ('cause believe it or not, some people aren't hyperbolically emotive or stunningly beautiful in real life!). The unusual stories, realisic settings and darkly mysterious cityscapes (along with the grainy film quality) gave the show a strange fantasy/realism crossover which was very appealing. Sadly, the show became big. The stars' fees and egos became bigger. And the edgy faux realism was replaced by showbiz glitz.

THE X-FILES WORKED AS A SCI-FI SHOW, NOT A SOAP OPERA! I for one couldn't give a monkeys whether Scully and Mulder were ever going to "get it on". The bigger Scully's hair got, the less she looked like a working FBI agent, the less convincing the show was. And then the sci-fi fan writers moved in. Goodbye any complex characterisation; from now on character progression must be heavy-handed. Worst of all, the oh-my-God-so-tiresome unfunny in-joke tripe of episodes like "Jose Chung's From Outer Space" began. Perhaps you can see the contrast between this and the show which had me wondering whether it was a documentary or not.

I stopped watching eventually but have caught a few of the recent episodes with Robert Patrick as Doggett. While Patrick himself has some charisma, the show has the air of being just plain stretched too thin. It's a weary old dog now, tired of being forced to work any longer and waiting for it's nice dog basket in cancellation land.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Event Horizon (1997)
Disturbingly impressive & impressively disturbing
8 July 2002
A movie that starts out as a run-of-the-mill sci-fi creeper in the vain of Alien, this soon proves itself to be the equal of that film in terms of building and maintaining tension. The cast works excellently together, using, in a similar manner to Alien, a mixture of US movie actors and British TV actors to provide both grit and bravado (apologies for the stereotyping). While it's immediately noticable that all Sean Pertwee ever does is swear (can you find a line where he doesn't?) most of the other characters manage to maintain the tension through their dialogue while avoiding tacky horror cliches or glossing over them with enough dark cinematography and soundtrack that the cheapness of the dialogue is lost in the overwhelming atmosphere of tension.

If you're wondering why I've used the word "tension" so much in the above paragraph, it's because that is the whole raison d'etre of this movie. It aims to create tension and successfully does so. It is also quite genuinely disturbing at times, through the contrast of suspense techniques such as empty corridors and clattering noises, with outright gore (the guy suspended above the operating table actually made me go "eeeurrrgh" which no film has in quite a while). I'm suspicious that the people claiming "this didn't scare me" are attempting to give themselses a cinematic ego-boost.

As for the bad points; the dialogue isn't wonderful throughout (phrases like "the darkness inside me" sound a bit comic-book). Sam Neill is exceptionally boring in everything he's ever been in, including this - please, film producers, stop casting this man! And yes, the effects are quite shaky in places (mainly on the burning man that appears occasionally). On the whole though, the sets are good, the atmosphere is great, and it does what it sets out to do. A good, solid, horrifying, horror-film!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Spider-Man (2002)
Amazingly Spectacularly Great
26 June 2002
Having seen the trailers for this film I have to say that I didn't walk into the cinema with high hopes. The computer effects looked badly integrated, the Green Goblin's costume looked awful and comic book adaptations usually have such painful scripting and plotting. Thankfully I was wrong on most counts (The Goblin still looks rubbish).

As it turns out, this is probably the best super-hero film I've yet seen - certainly up there with Superman and Batman. People seem to automatically comment that the script and acting was bad because they expect it to be the case in these films; and indeed it usually is. But if you go into Spider-man without this prejudicial attitude you'll be pleasently suprised. The acting is generally great - there is never a time when anyone is not believable as their character and you think "Hey, that's an actor, not Peter Parker". The effects do look artificial but the pace of the movie means you don't have time to dwell on this and the script is fine! What do people want, Shakespearian soliloquies? That would sound incredibly out-of-place in modern day New York. There are few of the painful cliches or dreadful dialogue that plague films like The Phantom Menace and the catchphrases like "friendly neighbourhood spider-man" are fully in-keeping with the character.

The comic turns from J.J. Jameson hit the mark, the snarling facial contortions of Willem Defoe were suitably evil-looking (and the conversation with his mirror-image was a great touch). My only gripe was with the Green Goblin's costume. Very monotone green and not very scary.

All-in-all a great film that I wouldn't hesitate for a second in recommending.
158 out of 209 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Oh dear, this always happens to cult stories
11 May 2002
I bet this film is great if you're a 7-year-old kid who just likes a funny lighthearted sci-fi romp. Unfortunately, Lucas should have realised that what made the Star Wars Trilogy and the Indiana Jones Trilogy so good was that they never patronised the watcher. There were some tongue-in-cheek moments and a cheerful old fashioned plot about wicked generals (be they nazis or space armies) and travelling pirates. Adults could enjoy these films in all their gripping saturday-matinee glory.

However, with Episode I, the winning method seems to have been filed away somewhere as Lucas referred instead to the Hollywood book of generic moneyspinners. The horribly horribly irritating kid was a major ruination of this film (children don't have to be whiny, squeaky little American-apple-pie poppets do they?). Admittedly it may not be the poor lad's fault being given such a poor script, but perhaps getting someone a little older and with a less irritating delivery may have done this film no end of good.

I won't mention Jar-Jar as everyone else has pretty much summed up his 'appeal'.

An why did Ewan McGregor have to try and impersonate Alec Guinness? Yes, Guinness had a distinctive voice which became associated with the role, but it would have been easier to suspend our disbelief and accept that a different actor was playing the role than sit through McGregor's impersonation.

Perhaps the two saving graces of this film were Ian McDiarmid as the Senator Palpatine; he was great and exuded menace, and Natalie Portman just because she's sweet (it's not objective criticism, but you know it's true!).

A one-word summary of this film would be "irritating", whether you're looking at it as a film fan or Star Wars fan.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pale Rider (1985)
Enjoyable despite its flaws
10 April 2002
From the slightly-too-long opening shots to the hurriedly cut-off ending, Pale Rider gives the impression of a great film that needed just a bit more time spent on polishing off the rough edges.

Eastwood plays the steely-eyed stranger as proficiently as ever (although you occasionally get the Jack-Nicholson-esque feeling that he's perfected one character and re-cycles it as often as possible) and Sydney Penny plays the doe-eyed youngster to perfection. The main problems with Pale rider lie in the predictability of the plotline and the pretty shaky script. You can imagine Clint Eastwood being flattered that he's written into the story as being irresistable to women from ages 14 to 40, but the out-of-the-blue 'cabin' scene with Carrie seems tacked-on and the, albeit well acted, scene in the woods with Megan is cringeworthy in its scripting.

The lack of a memorable "big boss" bad guy is also unfortunate, as Richard Dyshart's character never really chills the watcher (although Chris Penn plays his snotty son very well) and the sudden addition of 'old-school' cowboy Stockburn at the end seems a last-minute attempt to add real adversity.

Nevertheless, Pale Rider is very watchable. The supernatural element is never explored to its full potential; occasionally seeming that items such as the parallel between the Preacher and the biblical "rider on a pale horse" are forgotten about (as Hell never does follow behind him in the same way High Plains Drifter invokes this), but overall the good acting usually makes up for the poor script and leaves a film that is not amazing but never disappointing.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed