Change Your Image
kogansasha-69394
Reviews
The Great Outdoors (1988)
Great 80s movie
The cinematic gem I'm about to dissect is an absolute riot, primarily propelled into hilarity orbit by the dynamic comedic tag team of none other than John Candy and Dan Aykroyd. These two maestros of mirth form a duo so uproarious that they could probably coax laughter out of a stoic rock. And here's the kicker - my childhood was practically built on a cinematic diet of John Hughes films, making this particular flick a certified sidesplitter in my book.
Now, let's dive into the comedic genius that makes this movie a rollercoaster of laughter. Picture this: Chet's bear saga. A tale so absurdly funny, it's like comedy ambrosia for the soul. Chet's storytelling prowess reaches mythical heights as he regales everyone with the epic (and slightly embellished) chronicles of his encounters with bears. It's the kind of humor that leaves you in stitches, wondering how someone can spin such a yarn with a straight face.
Then there's the subplot involving the kids - innocent mischief taken to a whole new level. Kissing Mr. Tompkins, who, let's face it, has seen far better days. It's a comedic twist that takes gallows humor to an entirely unexpected realm, leaving the audience simultaneously cringing and chuckling at the audacity of it all. The juxtaposition of innocence and dark humor is a delicate balancing act executed with finesse.
But wait, the pièce de résistance: the bar scene with the stuttering guy. Picture this - a character with a stutter, navigating the linguistic obstacle course with such finesse that it transforms into a comedic symphony. It's not just a few chuckles; it's a full-blown laugh track on steroids. I defy anyone to watch that scene without succumbing to fits of uncontrollable laughter. It's comedic gold that transcends the boundaries of mere entertainment and ventures into the realm of pure, unadulterated hilarity.
Now, as we navigate through the comedic landscape of this film, it's essential to acknowledge the mastery in the crafting of these humorous elements. The timing, the delivery, and the sheer audacity to push the boundaries of conventional humor - it all coalesces into a cinematic experience that's more than just a movie; it's a laughter-infused journey.
However, no cinematic masterpiece is without its quirks. One quibble that niggles at the comedic perfection is the film's insistence on delving into the romantic entanglements of Buck and Cammie. It's like interrupting a perfectly orchestrated symphony with an out-of-place note. While the intention might be to add depth and emotional resonance, it sometimes feels like an unwarranted detour from the laughter-laden expressway that the movie initially promises.
Yet, even in these moments of romantic diversion, the film manages to retain a certain charm. The tension and emotion injected into the narrative towards the end, while deviating from the comedic crescendo, serve as a testament to the movie's versatility. It's not afraid to dabble in various emotional hues, proving that beneath the layers of laughter, there's a nuanced storytelling prowess at play.
Now, about the occasional lull that might befall the narrative - the moments when the laughter subsides, and the pacing takes a leisurely stroll. It's a natural ebb and flow in the rhythm of the film, a brief respite before the next wave of hilarity crashes in. These are the moments where the audience catches their breath, eagerly anticipating the next comedic onslaught.
And, of course, let's not overlook the grand finale - the dancing extravaganza that unfolds during the end credits. It's a delightful denouement that adds an exclamation point to the comedic symphony we've experienced. The infectious joy emanating from those final moments encapsulates the essence of the entire film - a celebration of laughter, camaraderie, and the unbridled joy that cinema, at its best, can deliver.
In conclusion, this cinematic marvel, propelled by the comedic prowess of John Candy and Dan Aykroyd, transcends the realm of mere entertainment. It's a laughter-inducing masterpiece that, despite minor detours and occasional lulls, orchestrates a symphony of humor, emotion, and unabashed joy. Each scene, each quirk, and each stuttering punchline contribute to a comedic legacy that cements this film as a timeless gem in the pantheon of cinematic hilarity.
Jury Duty (1995)
Jury duty
Jury Duty, a 1995 comedy film starring Pauly Shore, is a mixed bag. On one hand, it offers plenty of laughs and humorous moments, but on the other hand, it falls short of being a great film.
Pauly Shore's character, Tommy Collins, is a slacker who is called for jury duty and sees it as an opportunity to avoid work and party with his fellow jurors. The film is filled with wacky antics and absurd scenarios, such as when Tommy decides to dress up as a woman to gain the sympathy of the other jurors. The supporting cast also delivers some great comedic performances, including Tia Carrere as a fellow juror who catches Tommy's eye and Abe Vigoda as a grumpy old man who always seems to be napping.
However, despite its comedic strengths, Jury Duty falls short in other areas. The plot feels disjointed at times, and the pacing is uneven. Additionally, some of the jokes feel forced and fall flat, which can be disappointing for a comedy film.
In the end, Jury Duty is a fun and entertaining film that offers plenty of laughs, but it's not a masterpiece. Fans of Pauly Shore and absurd comedies will likely enjoy it, but others may find it lacking in substance.