Reviews

18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Us vs. Them: Nobody Wins
12 June 2007
This film is about the legacy left by a man with altruistic intentions of providing a college education to students who would otherwise not have been able to afford one, and another man who mutated the original idea to his own ends.

In the late 1950s, Rex Clemens, the 'hero' (per se) of this film saw the writing on the wall regarding the decline of the timber industry in Oregon, and wanted to give the children of Philomath, Oregon an opportunity to get an education that would save them from a dismal and uncertain career in a town were the timber industry that once reigned unfettered had come to a screeching halt--and branch out into more promising fields. His motivation was to give the youth of Philomath, a town he dearly loved, the chance to compete in a changing world economy. Thus, he created a foundation that supported school-building projects and provided a 4-year college scholarship to any student that graduated from Philomath High School.

After Clemens' death, Steve Lowther, Clemens' nephew--who is now in charge of the foundation--lost sight of his uncle's original mission by using his personal religious and ideological agendas to keep 'undesirable' students from taking advantage of the generous opportunity his uncle created.

During the film Mr. Lowther proves to be his own worst enemy: In one of many times Mr. Lowther contradicts himself, he states that one of the objectives of the education process was to teach children social skills, but in another statement he accuses the school superintendent, Dr. Terry Kneisler (whom Lowther shows an open contempt for) of pursuing a "social agenda". (BTW, Dr. Kneisler, now the Superintendent of Reynolds School District in Oregon, is an intelligent, well-liked and respected man in his district.) A public forum was held--overseen by an impartial arbitrator--wherein all interested parties were encouraged to participate and express their views regarding Dr. Kneisler and his position as superintendent; a decision was later made that he should continue as superintendent. This decision enraged Mr. Lowther who, in the film smirked, "We took our toys and went home," meaning he withdrew the scholarship altogether. This 'my way or the highway' attitude, and his choice of words used to describe his disdain for the board's decision, personified the childish attitude he embraced when he didn't get what he wanted.

Additionally, the above-referenced forum was considered by Mr. Lowther to be underhanded, and declared that their differences be settled 'like men', behind closed doors, without the benefit of others listening to both sides of the issue and communicating their concerns, if any. Apparently, Mr. Lowther was either unaware of, or had no regard for Oregon state law that mandates School Board meetings OPEN to the PUBLIC (with limited exceptions, such as personnel contract negotiations, or consultation with attorneys).

Another example of Mr. Lowther's dubious beliefs was when he spoke of his strong religious Christian values, then declared his wish to 'tar and feather' Kneisler, a value I find quite the contrary to Christian values.

Ultimately, Mr. Lowther reinstated the foundation funding by attaching an admission restriction to students who had no "background" (i.e. who didn't come from families) in timber, mining and/or agriculture fields.

The point that this documentary drives home is that, while Mr. Lowther thought he was hurting Dr. Kneisler and his supporters by dismantling the foundation his uncle had created, he was actually 'clear-cutting' the young men and women whose opportunity to create a better way of life for themselves was felled by a man with an ax to grind. Timber.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Walking in the shoes of others...
12 June 2007
I was initially interested in this film for two reasons: 1) I am a Buddhist, and was greatly distressed--as were many others--to hear of the destruction of the sculptures of the Buddhas of Bamiyan in 2001 by the Taliban, and 2) I am particularly interested in Middle Eastern cultures and the challenges and conflicts that the people face, especially in regard to the political exhibition being played out since the United States' military involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq.

This documentary is evidence of the turmoil and hardship suffered by a particular 'cave dwelling' Shia family of Afghanistan refugees, seen through the eyes of an eight year old boy named Mir.

There are no happy endings in subject matter concerning war-torn countries and the innocent civilians who suffer at the hands of the 'liberators' as well as the 'invaders', and this documentary is no exception. However, the smile on the face of young Mir is a testament to the enduring shining spirit that lies within even the most downtrodden and oppressed members of humanity.

This is a must see for those willing to put aside political ideologies long enough to tap into the compassion that lay within all of us.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Songbirds (2005)
9/10
Tragic and Beautiful
12 June 2007
I found "Songbirds" to be an excellent film featuring great music of unique and uncommon themes.

This documentary portrays the heartrending lives and intimate experiences of women trapped behind the tangible and emotional bars that constitute their daily existence.

The featured women share personal pain and hope through music, in an array of styles and approaches. While some songs seem staged--presented in the fashion of a 'musical'--others feature raw emotion-driven performances by artists whose voices would most certainly never be heard, had it not been for this cinematic representation.

It makes one wonder if confinement quashes dreams of creative expression or strengthens them.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Raines (2007)
8/10
Goldblum, Once Again, Gets To Prove His Mettle
17 March 2007
I LOVED the pilot of "Raines"; being a HUGE JG fan, I couldn't wait to watch it (holding my breath all the while, hoping that the creators would do credit to JG's highly underrated acting prowess). I was NOT disappointed.

His POV throughout the pilot episode was so unique; I was concerned that this was another in a long line of 'kooky detective' series (see Monk, Psych, etc.). But my fears were soon allayed.

The most interesting aspect of this show was that, while I watched it, I truly ran the gamut of emotions (if I may employ such an over-used cliché); I laughed, I was intrigued, and the ending not only completely caught me off-guard, I found myself in a pool of tears. Sounds corny, right? Well, shucks, it's the truth.

I suggest to those who haven't seen the pilot do so before watching the following episodes, as it is the essential building block for the series (yea, I know that's what a pilot is supposed to be, but so often that is not the case--I have seen the ol' bait and hook method used in a variety of pilots that went on to a series that didn't follow the original premise).

I can't wait for the upcoming episodes; I just hope the networks give it the chance that it deserves.
24 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Andy Barker, P.I.: Pilot (2007)
Season 1, Episode 1
7/10
Let's See What's In Store For Andy....
17 March 2007
I have been an Andy Richter fan from the Conan days; his dry wit never failed to crack me up. Additionally, he was funny in "Arrested Development" where he plays himself and his four brothers, Donnie Richter, Chareth Richter, Rocky Richter-Wang and Emmett Richter. IMO he's always a stitch, and in this show he follows suit.

Secondly, my interest in this series was piqued due to the fact that the FAB Tony Hale is in it, because he was as so amazingly funny in "Arrested Development" I HAD to see him in a different role (having browsed through his body of work, I realized just how much he's done that I wasn't ever aware of!). Not surprisingly, he is great in his role of "Simon", the owner of the video store that is located directly underneath Andy's accounting office.

I can't wait to see if the follow-up episode(a) lives up to the funny and original pilot.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Less Complicated Account of the Book
15 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
***MAY contain spoilers (in the broader sense)***

For those of you who are Buddhists, are interested in Buddhism from a layperson's viewpoint, or enjoy documentaries that showcase non-American culture(s), I would highly recommend "The Tibetan Book of the Dead". The crux of this film reflects the crux of Buddhism (Tibetan or not): Live knowing that you will die, and die a good death.

A "good death" in the context of this film is to recognize the various stages (bardos) at the moment of death, and for 49 days following--through the practice of phowa. This ritual is performed by a guru, monk or lama (or a practicing Buddhist with expertise and/or experience in performing phowa), using the script originally written by Guru Padmasambhava (who first brought Buddhism to Tibet), to help the dead achieve enlightenment, or if not, a precious human rebirth.

Leonard Cohen--singer/songwriter extraordinaire--narrates this film, and rightly so: In 1996 he was ordained as a Zen monk after practicing Buddhism for 20+ years, so he understands the significance of this topic. Additionally, his voice is beautiful and uniquely calm--respectful of the sacred nature of this topic.

Though parts of this documentary look as though they may have been "staged", my opinion is that this small Tibetan community allowed the cameras to capture a profoundly revered Buddhist ceremony for the benefit of all sentient beings everywhere.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Cut-ups and cut up
1 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This was one of the funniest roasts I've seen, even though it was obviously, as MovieAddict2006 commented, cut to hell and back. (But my cable company is showing the uncut version on pay-per-view, which I think would be a worthwhile indulgence.)

It was clear that William Shatner ("the past-tense of 'Shitner" as one comic put it) was a big enough man to laugh at the comic jabs and oft-times full-out thrusts hurled in his direction. From his weight, to his hair-piece, to his acting/singing talents, nothing was deemed to sacred to mock, and he welcomed it all with humor and good nature.

Also, George Takei seemed genuinely entertained at the jokes made at his expense, although many of them would appear to be the pinnancle of "gay-bashing" (at least to those without a sense of humor).

Unfortunately, Farrah Fawcett's bit was like watching a train wreck having a bad-hair day in slooooow motion. Where, oh where was the stage hook when we needed it most?

The only person I couldn't quite figure out was Andy Dick; his back- and on-stage antics made the news, but while he was taking a good a**-kicking from others (and others were taking a not-so-good face-licking from him), he was often seen shaking his head "No, no, no" and mouthing the words, "That's not true" (he even flipped someone the bird, at one point). The thing is, he seemed REALLY stoned and/or drunk, and I couldn't tell if it was all part of the scheme of things or if, in his substance-induced stupor, he was really insulted.

No matter, it was great fodder for the taint-of-heart, and a welcome alternative to the regular Comedy Central programming.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Shirley Ghostman--a HIT!
5 August 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Marc Wootten is a GENIUS as Shirley Ghostman, a spirit guide who channels celebrity spirits. This show, "High Spirits with Shirley Ghostman" is a spoof of mediums (can you say John Edward?) and alleged paranormal experts who make a living speaking with the long-departed.

Shirley Ghostman's appearance may be as funny, if not funnier, than the show itself. 'Her' approximate 6 foot+, 250 pound frame is ensconced with a white pantsuit, matching white cape and shoes, while her make-up consists of peach lip gloss, frosted eye-shadow, mascara and all I can describe as an Angie Dickinson hairdo: a blonde, puffy, to-the-shoulders bob-type thing (which may, or may not, be Marc's real hair...either that, or a dang good wig).

I've only seen one episode of this show, but I loved every campy minute of it. Not only did it feature a "slice-of-life" scene featuring Shirley visiting a local gym for a workout with a personal trainer, it ended with her engaging a live audience (who didn't quite know what to make of the whole shebang), and channeling the spirit of a cantankerous, ill-tempered and foul-mouthed Frank Sinatra (whose rousing rendition spoofing "My Way" was a hit with the audience).

Even though the show became a bit corny at times, if you're even a bit wary of the whole supernatural/spiritual contact thing, you'll appreciate this royal send-up.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Matango (1963)
10/10
Attack of the Mushroom People (english title)
22 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was featured on late night horror shows in the Detroit area where I grew up. I saw it at least three times in my early teens, but it's been about 30 years since my last viewing, so my memory's a bit foggy on the details.

The tale surrounds the survivors of a shipwreck on a murky, misty island, to which they discover the majority of flora are strange, large, unusual looking mushrooms.

After the crew and passengers run out of food, they decide to start eating the mushrooms. Little do they know, the mushrooms transform them into mushrooms themselves! D'OH!

The story is told in narrative style, by the lone survivor of the shipwreck, whose face is hidden by the camera while he relates the events to a room full of interested parties (doctors, scientists, et al).

This film has an original story line, and quite memorable special effects, script and actors' performances (even if it was dubbed in English). Some would consider this Le Bad Cinema, but as far as horror/fantasy genre of the time goes, I consider it a classic.

The most memorable part, in my opinion, was near the end when the investigators listening to the story asked the survivor why they should believe such an utterly ridiculous tale, and the man turns to the camera, revealing a face riddled with fungal growth, shouting, "Because I ate them too!". Creepy music--end film.

Too good to pass up.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An Poignant, Amazing Film
22 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
In a world awash in frivolous, inconsequential movies targeting the lowest common denominator (not that all of such are without a certain amount of entertainment value), "The United States of Leland" is a blessedly thought-provoking film, full of substance and significance.

Ryan Gosling is extraordinary as Leland P. Fitzgerald, a detached teenager coming to grips with his feelings of disillusionment and disconcertion regarding the meaning of his life, and in doing so, commits an unforgivable and seemingly meaningless act of violence.

Don Cheadle, playing Pearl Madison, the teacher at the juvenile detention facility to which Leland is sent, is as always, fantastic. The complexity of his character fluctuates between infidelity with his girlfriend; to a genuine concern for Leland; to his self-serving struggling, part-time writer alter-ego that pushes him to find the reason and circumstances behind Leland's inextricable actions.

Kevin Spacey plays a part he seems to have been born to play: A self-absorbed, callous man, insensitive to those around him who suffer his wrath. Playing a successful writer (Albert T. Fitzgerald, Leland's father), his condescension and distance toward others lays, in part, the foundation of the implied decline of his marriage, and perhaps, the reason lurking behind his son's ultimate horrific decision.

Jena Malone (who played 'Mary' in "Saved!") portrays Leland's girlfriend, a young teen fraught with personal demons, the least of which is a drug addiction that threatens to destroy her most intimate relationships, as well as herself.

An extremely well-written script, and a supporting cast of actors such as Lena Olin, Chris Klein, Ann Magnuson, and Sherilyn Fenn contributing fine performances, create an unforgettable portrayal of a teenager's life in emotional turmoil.

This film is not for anyone looking for a quick fix to boredom, or a picker-upper for those feeling down or depressed. It is an utterly absorbing character study filled with heartache and desolation, as well as a very telling example of life in these United States.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Coen Bros masterpiece
19 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I don't know of anyone familiar with the Coen brothers that doesn't like at least 1 of their films. Miller's Crossing happens to be my fave of them all, with Raising Arizona coming in a close second.

First of all, let's talk about star power: Gabriel Byrne, Marcia Gay Harden, John Turturro, Albert Finney, Steve Buscemi and Jon Polito are a few of the big names in this film, but there are many character actors who help to round things out nicely (Michael Jeter, J.E. Freeman, et al).

Albert Finney was absolutely magnificent in this movie: The scene where the mobsters try to put a hit on him with the song, "Danny Boy" blaring in the background has got to be one of the best scenes EVAHHH! Marcia Gay Harden, the babe with a heart of coal, is excellent as the gun moll, who tries to save the life of her brother, played by Turturro. Jon Polito as the Italian mobster does a phenomenal job, and his intensity kicks up the action more than a notch.

With beautiful cinematography, an excellent script, and not a slacking actor in the mix, I rated this film a 10.

For those of you who like period action/dramas (this movie takes place in the 30s-40s) with a punch, and LOTS of plot twists, this film is for you.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sexy Beast (2000)
10/10
Sexy Beasties
18 June 2005
I originally rented this film because of a trailer I saw for it. After my first viewing, I knew I had to own it, so I bought the DVD. I won't provide spoilers, cuz I don't want to spoil it for you.

Those of you familiar with Ben Kingsley's work will be shocked and amazed at his complete immersion in the character of Don Logan, which is the antithesis of his most famous role, Gandhi. I've never been disappointed with a Ben Kingsley vehicle yet, but this film really blew me away.

The actors worked with an excellent script, and all the performances were utterly believable. Ian McShane plays Teddy Bass, one of the freakiest freaks to freak-out on film. Ray Winstone, as Gal, plays such a likable character that I was riveted, watching his story unfold.

The plot has some wonderful twists and turns, which leave the ending a complete surprise. The conversational tone was like rapid-fire machine guns--you have to pay attention, due to the thick English accents and the film's pacing, in order to get all of the lines.

Directed by Jonathan Glazer, who previously directed Blur, Radiohead and Massive Attack in their own music video dvds, this first attempt at a feature-length film was EXCELLENT. I'm looking forward to his future projects.

I HIGHLY recommend this movie to those interested in action/thrillers and of course, fans of UK cinema.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Mighty Wind (2003)
10/10
The naches that I'm feeling right now...
17 June 2005
Right from giddy-up, I'm a HUGE SCTV fan, as well as the guys from Spinal Tap, and this movie is right at the top of my DVD library list. I'm also a Simpson suckah, and dig Harry Shearer and his contribution to the show.

But who knew that I'd become a bona-fide Ed Begley Jr. fan at this stage in my life? I mean, his tiny role in Spinal Tap had me shooting milk out of my nose in hysteria, but his 'Lars Olfen' shtick --A Swede with the heart of a Jew-- was one of the funniest aspects of AMW. As Lars talks about a past musical history, he delivers one of the funniest lines I've ever heard in ANY movie (pay attention--his wit can sneak up on you!). Looking at Begley's career, it's easy to surmise an under-appreciation of his talent, as well as the occasional mis-direction of his energies (I mean, come on, this guy's been acting since 1969! Sheesh!).

The music in this movie seems SO genuine that sometimes I would forget that this was heavy-duty satire; from the awesome "Never Did No Wanderin'" to the sweet and innocent "Kiss at the End of the Rainbow", these songs could easily stand alone as pieces of musical and lyrical masterpieces. But when you add the lampooning element, it becomes downright fun-on-a-bun!! As most folks know, Guest/Levy very often work with a ghost script and give the characters a wide berth to improvise. There are times when that aspect of the film shines through, and then there are the finely detailed musical performances in which, yes, everyone acting like a musician IS actually playing their instrument and/or singing, and performing 'live'. These two contrasting things: improvisation and rote-memory dedication play on each other beautifully.

To put a fine point on it, this movie will appeal *obviously* to folk music fans (with a sense of humor), to Guest/Levy fans, and to those of us that enjoy a slightly skewed sense of purpose to get the heck away from mainstream movie mania and move closer to the edge of real movie making.

This is good shtuff: you'll find yourself laughing out loud, and then humming the tunes later... I give it a 10.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Moby: Play - The DVD (2001 Video)
10/10
Play with it
16 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I'm a late-comer regarding Moby's music, videos, career, et al. SO I rented 'Moby: Play' and he reeled my a*s in, hook, line and stinker! He's included among his videos "Bodyrock" (Auditions), which features a dozen or more men (well, to tell the truth, there was one I wasn't so sure about) who perform a dance audition to Moby's 'Bodyrock'. That video is the freshest, sexiest and most fun bit of cinema verite I have ever seen. In fact, I'd go so far as to say (she's gonna testify!) that this DVD, while wholly grand and beautiful, is worth the price just to see "Bodyrock".

My favorite dancer (and by the look of the Google search returns I recently got a whole lotta other folks are on his vibe, too) is hands-down Phizzo Jobson. I wanna gobble him UP! Amazing energy and a hunk-a-hunk-a burnin' man-meat! Like I said, the whole DVD is excellent, with some of Moby's own cartoons making the video grade, as well as Moby taking some campy home movies incognito... and of course, he includes his 'Natural Blues' hit video (remember how much MTV play that vid got? Sheesh!!), and there's lots more stuff, too.

SO I would highly recommend this DVD for not only trance fans, and Moby enthusiasts, but for music lovers of all kinds. There are some bright and shiny treasures lurking in 'Play', and they're all ours for the taking!

So, dig it, diane ps... PHIZZO PHREAKS RISE UP!!!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Black devil doll from somebody's shaky 8 mm home movie
2 June 2005
I agree with the poster who said it has to be seen to be believed.

I saw this movie in the mid '80s; I rented it from a video store that I worked at, and this was one of a thousand titles my company had just purchased. Because I'm somewhat a horror fan, one look at the box told me I HAD to rent it.

This movie is not bad-bad, it's BAD bad-bad! I sat through the majority of the movie with my mouth agape, amazed at how one movie could fit so much crappy acting, poor camera technique, and just plain tackiness into it.

If you're a fan of 'le bad cinema', or if you just feel like laughing through a TRULY awful film, put this one at the top of your list.

And by the by, had IMDb.com provided a "zero" rating option, I wudda taken it and thanked them for it.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Mm-mm! That's gooood brains!
29 April 2005
If you're a fan of the genre, this is definitely worth a look. And, keep your eyes peeled for Ken Foree (as the televangelist), who starred in the original '76 movie of the same name...while you're at it, check out Tom Savini (horror make-up/special effects man extraordinaire) as the sheriff! Same plot as the 1st one, but different ending, and much better special effects/make-up than way back in the olden days of the first. Also, Ving Rhames is nothing' to sneeze at, either, and pulls off a great 'bruiser with a heart of gold' act. Although there were some predictable parts, the acting and the tech aspects of the film worked very well, and presented an excellent new-millennium perspective.

Eat your heart out, Romero!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Blackboards (2000)
8/10
Do you want to learn?
18 May 2004
Beautiful film about what happens when loftier ideas of learning and education meet the stark reality of day-to-day existence of nomadic Kurdish refugees.

This story moves through the dusty Iran/Iraq landscapes like a painful wheeze, yet compels you stay on the path, mindful of every step.

I find this especially moving now, during these gut-wrenching times in which we live, and considering the US's tattered and torn relationship with the people of the Middle East.

If you're looking for star power, look elsewhere. I've not seen or heard of any of these actors, but I was completely satisfied with their genuine performances. This film is also subtitled, so some may consider that a deterrent but I didn't because the pacing of this movie allowed for it.

Definitely worth a view, especially if you are a person who enjoys films that juxtapose the behavior of mankind vs. the human spirit.

peace.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
We've Come A Long Way, Romero!
18 October 2003
Warning: Spoilers
I will try my best NOT to resort to easy pot-shots and movie review-esque sarcasm. But dang, it's gonna be tough.

**You may be SPOILED by reading this tripe** (possible spoilers)

The good shtuff: The make-up and prosthetic work in this flick kicked butt! Lots and lots of gratuitous blood and guts, and isn't that one of the prerequisites we have to watch horror films? The point is: it was done with at least a modicum of panache, and there was a serious effort to make it look believable.

This was a VERY well-acted movie, for the most part. Jonathan Cherry played his role perfectly, and looked like a hunk while doing it. Tyron Leitso did a great job, and combined with the fact that he's pretty dang easy on the peepers, I'm surprised that I haven't seen him in more features. Ona Grauer had the whole 'kitten with a whip' thing down: sexy, smart & strong, and convincing. Clint Howard was cool as the slightly-off-center 1st Mate. He played his character in a very legit way, but there was a sense that he knew this movie was really spoofing other zombie-genre movies. Jürgen Prochnow did a fantastic job as Captain Kirk, and didn't rest on his laurels--which so many actors with his studio creds do in smaller roles, for smaller films. Ellie Cornell, whom I had never seen before, was the actor that I most liked and believed. Here was a strong woman, whose character didn't rely on cleavage or thigh to get attention. (She also happens to be part owner of Mindfire Entertainment, one of the movie's production companies.)

Beautiful set--supposed to be taking place in Washington, but I think it might be Canada. The island set was amazing, with lots and lots of greenery, and in the midst of it all, a REALLY CREEPY LOOKING house sitting on a lot peppered with tombstones. I'm not sure how much was filmed on location, but I think the setting alone made up for some of the movie's downfalls.

GREAT eye candy during the rave--in fact, everybody in this movie is beautiful, except the zombies. But, if you gotta have zombies, better to have these--the kind that REALLY look real. No pancake-make-up-to-the-neck-then-stop stuff. No more crappily applied skull-caps and fake wounds. These lil biters are looking like they really could, and really would.

The crud: First and foremost, a more appropriate title for the film should be "The Island of the Dead", not only because one of the movie's central figures mentions twice--not once, but twice--of the story about "La Isla de Muerto" (the Island of the Dead), but because only a fraction of the movie takes place in the house, but most of it takes place on the island.

I saw this movie with my 13 year old son. He informed me that the idea was taken from a video game of the same name. Throughout the movie, in images are flashed on the screen that are taken from the game. In my opinion, those little distracting shots add nothing to the film, and in fact, break the continuity throughout the entire movie, making it impossible to build and sustain 'scared' or suspensful feelings. And isn't that the whole point of a 'scary' movie?

This script has got to be one of the WORST ever written. In the theater I attended, there were several times when the audience started cracking up at seemingly non-funny parts. I realized quickly that they weren't laughing at the inept acting--it was at the ridiculous lines the actors were spouting. The script did contain funny parts, like characters' names that mimic television characters (ie, McGyver, Capt.Kirk, Casper), but they were few and far between. And the storyline surrounding Castillo was very interesting; I wish they would've have developed that a bit more.

This movie contains the usual continuity goofs, but the biggest was when the group gets their first peek at the scary house, and all around the graves there were torches ablaze; but when they further approached the house (about 5 seconds later), all of the torches were out. Nobody mentioned it, nobody noticed it, nobody gave a hoot. And it was pretty rootin-tootin noticeable, too, considering it was shot at night and the main light source was supposed to be coming from the torches.

So, I guess, if I had to put a fine point on it, I'd give it:

***** 5/10 Yea, it's got some really crappy aspects (script), but the good stuff (Jonathan Cherry, make-up, the acting, set design, Ellie Cornell), balances it back out.

keep flickin'! peace!
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed