Reviews

11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Bad acting
3 May 2024
Lame. The actors are stiffs. Looks like it was their very first movie. I think the director just did everything on the first take and put it in the can. Looks like he didn't even try to get any decent acting out of the players. Obviously, a low budget film. No real effort on set design or lighting. The Director needed to watch some real filmmakers and learn some lessons. The script is terrible and there are no interesting camera angles. The painting of this movie was so slow. It took forever to get to the sex. I've seen a lot of Italian movies from the same timeframe and earlier, and they managed to make really good movies with much sexier women and excellent acting and directing. The entire movie suffered from a total lack of talent.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Romance (1999)
1/10
Stick a gun in your mouth and pull the trigger
15 July 2023
This movie is a massive dose of depression. Lots of nudity, but the woman is neither sexy or attractive. She's built like a 13-year-old girl that never eats. Typical French movie where the character who has IQ of a peanut, tries to sound profound and poetic. How could anyone find this entertaining? Who waste their time writing such dribble. The movie was so depressing. I couldn't watch it all the way through. I got to the point that I just couldn't take anymore of it. This movie feels like it's just drones on and on. Completely boring and an interesting. Don't waste your time on this one. I would have given it a -1.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Disappointing
15 December 2022
I've seen a few films directed by Jim Wynorski and they've all been pretty good. But the casting Director in this movie delivered a bunch of really terrible actors for him to work with. As usual in a Wynorski film there are some really sexy great looking women. No disappointment there. But the script was pretty darn bad and Jim failed to reel in a really bad acting. Some of the female actors were actually pretty good and believable. But the majority of the male actors were some of the worst actors I've ever seen and I'm speaking of Tony Todd, and Ted Monte. Beautifully shot and good camera angles no problem there. I just can't stand bad acting and the Director of the film is responsible for getting them to do their job well or booting them. Seems like this movie was just being shot in a hurry, and not taking the time to get the best out of the actors.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Beware the Lake (III) (2017)
1/10
The best part of the movie was before the opening credits
15 July 2022
Seriously the only good part of the movie was the beginning with the Rumanians who lost her daughter before the opening titles. Those were the only people that can act and they hardly said anything. The rest of the movie was one of the dumbest, poorly written and poorly acted movies I have ever seen. Not one person after the opening titles could act at all. Worst bunch of amateur acting ever.. The littlest boy of the family was the only one that was believable when he was scared by the ghost.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I would've write this -10.
14 June 2022
I would've write this -10. Got to be the dumbest waste of time movie I've ever seen. This movie had to be written and directed and video recorded by a bunch of college-age film students. Not a single person in this movie ever had any acting experience. The worst acting I've seen in a long time. How does movie ever got produced and distributed is well beyond me. Looked like it was videoed with a cell phone.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lie with Me (2005)
1/10
Depressing to the bone. BORING!
13 May 2022
This movie is so depressing I feel like it's just drawing all the happiness out of your soul. Lauren Lee Smith has a pretty face and that's absolutely all there is to her. She's really good at acting I'll give her that. There's nothing arousing or sexy about her. Tall skinny narrow assed no meat no curves is not sexy when nude. I'll 5'3 with a woman' ass and curves every time. That's a turn on when she's walking around your bedroom naked. This movie was a total bore.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Soap opera actors
10 February 2022
Samantha Robinson has to be one of the worst actresses I've ever seen in my life. This movie had the feel of a movie from the 50s or the 60s with that type of typical overly emotive acting of that time. Laura Waddell was the only good actor in the whole movie. I would like to see more of her then Samantha Robinson. The articles and the lighting we're really good but, The script was terrible. Disappointing movie kind of a waste of time.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A typical Hammer film of the time.
26 November 2021
Hammer films of this time period are really beautifully done. The opticals the lighting and camera work are excellent. The story in the script are well done. The women are very beautiful and sexy. I enjoyed seeing their sexy bodies even though there really wasn't that much nudity. I would've rated this film higher Except for the bad acting of Ingrid Pit and some of the other actors. Ingrid Pit is a sexy woman but her acting is absolutely horrible. She's one of the worst over actors I've ever seen. She is so far over the top in every scene. It makes you wanna gag. I still enjoy the movie in spite of some of the pitiful acting. It was much better than some of the French horror films of that time. The French horror films follow no consecutive timeline. The articles are terrible the lighting is terrible the women are scrawny and unattractive they have weird music that doesn't fit the movie whatsoever. And they always try to put forth some convoluted philosophy.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2050 (II) (2018)
2/10
Bore Bore Bore !!!!!
25 November 2021
This movie is a slow stupid story. The Director is absolutely terrible. All kinds of ridiculous camera angles and ridiculous lighting all of which are drug out for such a long time. I can't say anything bad about the actors. I think they did OK with what they had to work with. The script was just stupid and the characters of the story are flat boring. Fantastic music playing throughout the movie. Only problem with it is it doesn't fit the movie. One of the lamest movies I've ever seen.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Complete waste of time.
29 October 2021
Complete waste of time. The writing the dialogue the acting are all horrible. None of the cheerleaders are attractive and the other one they show naked is built like a tongue depressor. Has to be one of the stupidest movies I've ever seen.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This movie surprised me.
15 July 2021
I thought this movie would be stupid or sort of campy but it turned out to be a lot better than I thought. To begin with the acting was really good for most all of the actors other than Aneta Corsaut. I've always found her to be an over actor and not believable in her roles. I got a kick out of watching this movie because of the time period where it was shot ; I was the same age as the teenage actors during that time and everybody in the movie look exactly like what I remember of that time.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed