Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Garfield Show (2008–2016)
Are we having fun yet?
15 October 2020
Warning: Spoilers
It is kind of hard to talk about modern Garfield-stuff. Not only because the property has slowly devolved into a shapeless nothing for Davis to mold into whatever he pleases (knowing full well he will make tons of money no matter what), but also because it serves as a painful reminder that we can never truly go back to what made Garfield such an enjoyable property because of it.

Case and point, while the comics are still somewhat fun and enjoyable (even if a lot of the jokes fall flat), there will most likely never be a show, movie or special that is on par with Garfield & Friends. Is it an unfair comparison? Probably, but rest assured that this show, The Garfield Show, doesn't suck because Garfield & Friends set the benchmark so unattainably high.

No, it sucks completely by its own merits; the fact that it is a much worse show than its vastly superior predecessor is just salt in the wound. In fact, one could make the argument that both of these shows act as a representation of the standards and quality of the property as a whole. In other words, if Garfield & Friends represents everything that was good about Garfield, The Garfield Show represents everything that is currently bad about Garfield.

It is one of those shows where the problems become evident right from second one of the intro sequence. Besides having a theme song that doesn't at all match the tone of the rest of the show, the animation manages the impossible task of being too fast and too slow at the same time. In other words, it moves so fast that it looks as though everything is having problem catching up. The one positive is that this animation speed is not an indication of what the show will be like, but the point still stands; the animation isn't very good.

Sure, the animation and character movement are decent at best, but the one thing the CGI proves is that these characters just weren't meant to be portrayed in 3D. A lot of the time the character models and facial expressions look stiff (for instance, Nermal often looks as if he has a constant smile on his face, even though he isn't smiling), and the fact that this was originally made in France means that the lip-synching is almost always off in the American dub.

The voice acting is fairly decent (even if Frank Welker is a poor man's Lorenzo Music), but the things these poor actors get to say range from unfunny to mind-numbing. While Garfield isn't all that deep in the comedy department, he could, at the very least, make you snicker. In The Garfield Show, I didn't laugh even once; even at the stuff that was properly set up and delivered. I would mostly blame the fact that the comedic timing is way off, but I would also like to make the argument that they just limit Garfield to the things he's best known for: eating, sleeping, being mean to those around him. Those are three very prominent traits in Garfield's character, but come on; Garfield & Friends gave him lots more to work with.

As for what the episodes themselves are about... hoo boy. Talk about generic. Besides the large number of 'alien' episodes (there's like nine), and besides the few retreads of episodes from Garfield & Friends (but a lot worse), there really aren't any standout or noteworthy episodes of this show. A lot of the episodes could very well appear in any other below average cartoon show. In other words, it doesn't even feel like the show is specifically about Garfield most of the time, which is odd, given how the title is 'The GARFIELD Show'.

I'm not gonna sit here and act like Garfield & Friends is a masterpiece, but a lot of what it set out to do worked incredibly well; it had an identity, it had charm, and it had a lot of things going on besides the bare minimum. The Garfield Show has none of that; it has something, but it isn't anything I would consider good. Plus, a Garfield-show without U.S. Acres feels out of place to me.

In other words, this show is just another Monday.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not good, not bad... not anything, really.
25 June 2020
People have, ever since the inception of the franchise, debated over whether or not the first few My Little Pony-iterations were actually good. However, it doesn't seem to matter if you were a fan from the beginning or if you found yourself in the 'brony'-end of the spectrum; everyone seemed to agree that My Little Pony Tales (AKA Gen 3.5) was absolute garbage.

Now we have a new 'in-betweener' show, and it seems to go in a similar direction (AKA, it's not very good). After finishing the long-running critical success that was My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic, it only makes sense that Hasbro wants to keep the brand alive while waiting for Gen 5 to come out. However, setting it in the same universe as Gen 4 was probably not the best creative decision on Hasbro's part, because those horseshoes proved too big to fill.

Personally, I became a fan of Gen 4 around the second season, and while I didn't expect to get sucked in, there was a certain something about the production that spoke to me. Granted, I lost interest around season 6, and that was mostly because the show was slowly replacing charming character-driven stories with talks about diplomacy, warfare, bland backstories, and other tired storytelling tropes that only people without imaginations would care about.

However, as much as the later seasons sucked, at least the good parts were really good; the slow pace allowed the characters a lot of room to breathe and grow, the animation was very fluid and expressive, the colors were muted yet felt earthy and vibrant in tone, and the whole framing device of learning about friendship and all its nuances was a genius way to move the plot and characters forward. The first few seasons even poked fun of itself a lot by showing how a horse-centric society would look like, all while telling amusing horse-puns.

Pony Life is a whole different beast altogether. Running at half the running time of a normal Gen 4 episode, this show strips the whole character interaction and growth bit from the equation and turns it into strictly a comedy show. That in itself is not a bad move, and there are enough differences in mood and behavior to distinguish this from the better show. For what it is worth, the show is very bouncy, it is animated alright and it is intermittently chuckle-worthy for a younger audience.

However, in terms of the technical aspects, the show feels very sloppy. The muted earthy color schemes and depth of field have both been replaced with more stark colors and flat shapes. Everything's framed on the same level, making the world feel flat and poorly composited. These would probably be very minor offenses had the show been its own thing, but it is a continuation of a show that did all these things a whole lot better; it is not living up to its superior predecessor.

All in all, it is just kind of meh. It isn't awful, but it isn't very good either. It will probably be fun for your kids, but a bit exhausting for anyone else who watches it for too long.
25 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed