First let me say I believe we have been to the moon. However very credible evidence is put forward in this and no good explanations given why untrue. One example was to prove the fire on Apollo 1 was real they set up an experiment with FRAYED WIRES to show how NASA's theory to explain the fire was correct. Why a brand new module would have frayed wires is not explained. Thomas Baron wrote a 500 page report explaining how poorly NASA was fulfilling their contract and gave testimony to Congress. He predicted a fire could happen and it did costing three astronauts their lives. Baron, his wife and child died in a suspicious accident when his car was hit by a train a week later. The train belonged to and was driven by NASA. His 500 page report was then discovered missing. A man that worked with Baron said Baron was a malcontent who brought nothing to the table and was disliked. Fit NASA's story to the hilt. Sadly one of the people involved in this discussion was astronaut Leland Melvin. Instead of praising Baron as a man who was looking out for the astronauts and their families he went along with the narrative NASA fronted every inch of the way. Not worth watching.
Reviews
4 Reviews
Dunkirk
(2017)
Don't waste your time and money
7 September 2017
I'm 66 and have heard about about the actual Dunkirk throughout my life. I heard nothing but good to excellent reviews and went to see it yesterday with high anticipation. I was 1 of only 3 people in the theater. As I watched I kept waiting for excitement and story to develop. - It never did. Throughout I felt like leaving but kept thinking soon the real entertainment would begin. - It never did. This movie barely resembled anything I ever read or saw concerning the evacuation of Dunkirk. The person I went with gave it a (-2). The movie had confusing characters and scenes. If you want to see a good representation of Dunkirk see "World At War" - episode 4 - ALONE.
Next Doctor?
1 July 2017
This isn't so much a review as a suggestion. The Doctor is trying to stop from regenerating at the end of the episode. I would like to see the Doctor fail and regenerate looking like and being Jon Simm (who plays The Master). I think Jon Simm would have been an excellent choice in the past to have been the next Doctor and now how delicious would that be if the Doctor regenerated and looked just like The Master.
Unusual Suspects
(2010–2016)
Unusual Suspects
11 December 2015
I think the show is well executed and documented. However sometimes the facts are blurred. An example is how a 1985 case was solved using DNA which wasn't in use at that time. The only other thing that stands out is that seemingly every case is about the murder of a female. I say this because in every single show the producers will replay the victims screaming at least 15 times. There is always multiple suspects and they replay the screams with each one as they might have committed the crime as well as catch ups after commercials. In almost every case there were no I witnesses so there is no evidence there was any screaming to begin with. It may be a minor point to many people but it drives me to distraction.
Tell Your Friends