Reviews

36 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Struggle (2003)
9/10
the meticulous precision of Ruth Mader
16 July 2004
From the opening wish of Bill Wither's song, "Just the Two of Us," to the film's final curtain call, the subject is love. STRUGGLE is a wrenching look at immigrants bussed into Austria to perform the menial labor jobs for Austria, driving past the meticulously clean homes, then showing a nearly 30 minute, near wordless montage, shot after shot of workers in the field picking strawberries, or gutting turkeys in a slaughterhouse, or polishing glasses and placing them in a case, or scrubbing down someone's pool – where we witness a young man bring her a glass of water and report `my mother wishes me to tell you that you may take a short break now.' The accumulated evidence of boring, repetitious labor, for near minimal wages, all perfectly framed by the camera, shot after shot, day after day, leaves little doubt that the demeaning, dehumanizing system is little more than indentured servitude, working in the fields from 5 am to 6 pm. While there are small moments captured near bedtime where the children want to play and the mothers are too dog-tired, peace comes only when they are asleep, tightly packed into small quarters that resemble an overcrowded cattle car. At one point, as the bus takes workers back across the boarder, one woman and her child run away. The child thinks it's all a game, but one understands the desperation of such a move. What this leads to is standing in a designated area on the side of the highway where cars will pull up and ask for cheap labor, where groups of immigrant workers plead for work – a place where no children are wanted or allowed, and children mysteriously get separated from their mothers. At one point, the area is raided, and they split up, all running in different directions at once, the camera follows one woman who runs past an entire field, then over a hill to apparent safety, where she breaks down in tears.

Cut to a man driving in a BMW improbably singing to the upbeat sounds of the Nilsson song `Everybody's Talkin' – think MIDNIGHT COWBOY, as he's on his way to work, inspecting factory warehouses, one story buildings where he's in charge of inspecting a plethora of nothing but empty, locked rooms, a chore which resembles his empty, solitary life. He makes a pitiful visit to his daughter, neither showing any affection nor understanding one another, which is mirrored in a later scene when he visits his mother in a senior home. What we witness is a man as pathetic as the earlier illegal laborers who have no choice but to work in those subhuman conditions. This gentleman has choices, but he is heartless and soulless, an empty shell of what it is to be human.

It appears many of the viewers missed the point if they see no connection between the first and second halves of the film.

This is a documentary film that concisely, with agonizing detail, compares an exploitive class of workers, in this case Polish illegal immigrants for hire, who perform the dirty, menial jobs that no Austrians would dare do, who are completely dismissed as a subhuman species, yet they are no less exploited than the so-called successful middle class, who are commercially exploited by false expectations that happiness can be bought and paid for, languishing in a spiritual void, leading meaningless lives that are empty of love and affection. This dichotomy is explored with meticulous precision by first time Austrian director Ruth Mader, who uses an economy of stark imagery to combine what seems like two entirely opposite worlds into one brilliantly detached observation of the human race.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
this is literally an odyssey of images
8 August 2003
While this may sound totally implausible to most, the film this most resembled, for me, was Claire Denis's recent release FRIDAY NIGHT (VENDREDI SOIR), a French-European film with little or no dialogue, but it is an impressionistic mosaic which the viewer can follow. Here, in a French-Mauritanian film that, culturally, more closely resembles an Iranian film, like THE DAY I BECAME A WOMAN, it is literally an odyssey of images, with little to no narrative, only the images tell the story, and it ends up being an exhilarating experience, suitable for nearly all ages, that is a rare treat "outside" experimental film. This is one of the most tender, gentlest films I've ever seen, which relies in large degree, on the Malian West African music by Oumou Sangare which is featured prominently throughout, particularly at the finale which I found excruciatingly beautiful. A rare treat.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
an odyssey of images
5 August 2003
While this may sound totally implausible to most, the film this most resembled, for me, was Claire Denis's recent release FRIDAY NIGHT (VENDREDI SOIR), a French European film with little or no dialogue, but it is an impressionistic mosaic which the viewer can follow. Here, in a film that, culturally, more closely resembles an Iranian film, like THE DAY I BECAME A WOMAN, it is literally an odyssey of images, with little to no narrative, only the images tell the story, and it ends up being an exhilarating experience, suitable for nearly all ages, that is a rare treat "outside" experimental film. This is one of the most tender, gentlest films I've ever seen, which relies in large degree, on the West African music which is featured prominently throughout, particularly at the finale which I found excruciatingly beautiful. A rare treat.
23 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"Only from the mind of Maddin"
4 July 2003
What an absolute thrill, from start to finish, just experiencing the `artistic conception' of this reverent homage to silent film, featuring Canada's Royal Winnipeg Ballet, a stunning performance by Zhang Wei-Qiang as Dracula, and the brilliant production design of Deanne Rohde. Once again, Guy Maddin has created a unique, conceptualized universe all his own; there's nothing else in cinema quite like his eerie, dreamlike imagery. This film is immersed in the thundering power of Mahler's `Resurrection' 2nd Symphony, a work which itself features an ascension from all things human and earthly, and rises into the glorious heavens, a transcendent experience which, musically, grounds this film. From this theme, we add vampires, whose lust for blood promises life everlasting. The performance of Zhang Wei-Qiang dominates throughout, as he is easily the most fascinating stage personality, filled with a mesmerizing ability to seduce and ultimately possess his willing screen sirens, and while I can't speak for anyone else, I always root for him against his puritanesque nemesis, Dr Van Helsing, the leader of the repressed gang of vampire slayers. Ballet director Mark Godden choreographed the ballet adapted by Maddin for this film, so there is constant motion on screen. All this is done in image and in dance, with exaggerated gestures and with an extreme grace in movements, magnificently sensuous and macabre, shrouded in fog and black and white shadows, with only the tiniest color tints. Each frame, by itself, is a still masterpiece; the imagery is that overpowering. But when put in motion by such gifted hands as Maddin's, the film experience is indescribable, but unforgettable.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lilya 4-Ever (2002)
9/10
"Do not go gentle into that good night"
16 June 2003
I'm one who believes that in a film like this, so intelligent, well-written, well-acted, all points of view are valid, some may be more intensely personal than others, as I believe that's what this film is - intensely personal; it spares no one, we are all in this same predicament, together. Many sing the praises of TOGETHER, no less than Ingmar Bergman has called SHOW ME LOVE a masterpiece, I believe this is Moodysson's best work, largely due to the way in which he brings to the forefront such socially relevant issues. I didn't believe he was laying it on thick, but even if you believe he was, isn't the film successful in inspiring a personal sense of urgency that contrasts the alleged safety and protection of our relatively smug lives and the largely unseen horrors - - the unstoppable, unspeakable acts - - that continue to take place *against* children here in this country, or

around the world, every second, minute by minute, more horrors? No neighborhood is spared. I appreciate the immediacy this director brings to a subject that is filled with too much heartbreak when it happens to you.

This film bears a resemblance with the nearly unwatchable 9 minute rape sequence in IRREVERSIBLE, but here, the child sexual victimization continues for an uncountable number of days, leading ultimately to the same end. The violence is portrayed with a montage of assault after assault of male bodies. In IRREVERSIBLE, we hear the unforgettable sound of the woman's anguish; here, the girl is silent while the sounds and noises of the assembly line of men is a violent, continuous punishment to the senses, one of the most despairing sequences anyone could endure.

Put yourself in her position, the filmmaker may ask. Multiply that by the thousands or millions of teens around the world in similar situations, then one begins to imagine the magnitude of what's being examined here in this film. Who's even talking about this subject? It's rarely a film subject. Who portrays it with the same degree of thoroughness? What's unbearable here is that anyone would choose to do this to themselves. And there are so many ramifications.

Lilya is only 16, and in Moodysson's hands, she is meant to stand for millions of other children who are all but invisible. I felt Lilya's act of kindness to Volodya, delivering on her promise to give him a terrific birthday present, was heartfelt, and came with no strings attached - an intentional contrast against the horrid example set by the adults in her life, which I saw as a sign of hope. Actually there were little brief offerings of hope throughout this film. I loved the innocent interplay between the two abandoned children, also the imagery of an equally innocent heaven. But for a 16 year old, who's not even old enough to be allowed entrance into the theater, again - she continually has "hopes," of America, of Sweden, of getting out of school, of finding a friend, of getting away, of getting a job, of finding love, of being free. I thought Oksana Akinshina as Lilya was simply stunning, even more so because she was able to make me believe she was not selfish; she was kind, still innocent, all the more significant for the unbelievable sequence of living behind a locked door. I could barely contain myself, witnessing what no one should ever endure, but there it was - impossible to turn away from, the revolt and disgust happening before our eyes. In the duty-free shop at the airport, where she was left on her own, and she was thinking of dressing herself up for the trip, I was reminded of the Jews who similarly dressed in their finest, having no idea what was in store for them during their hellish WWII transport. Witnessing such realistic circumstances in the hands of a master like Moodysson, witnessing what happened to those two children, and subsequently, thinking of all the others, unseen, continuously invisible - is there anything sadder than a teenager committing suicide? I can't help but be moved by that.

I was impressed with Moodysson's determination to resolutely *refuse* to shy away from this material: `This film is dedicated to the millions of children around the world exploited by the sex trade.' Well it's more than that. The severity of the subject matter, which includes an extremely naturalistic portrait of two teen suicides, is in fact relentless, and is justifiably serious throughout. This is one of the best films I've ever seen on the subject of teen suicide, actually laying down an argument in favor of taking one's life, which, I think, separates it from other films on the subject, including ROSETTA, not to suggest one should, but respecting the indisputable fact that so many children do decide to take their own lives, asking how can that be, and in that vein, it bears a very strong resemblance, at least in the seriousness of tone and subject matter, with Fassbinder's IN A YEAR OF 13 MOONS. In that film, which deals with an adult suicide, the story follows the final 5 days in a man's life, laying a groundwork so that no further days will follow, a decision that is (in a quote from Fassbinder himself): "somehow understandable, or perhaps is even acceptable.'

"Do not go gentle into that good night,

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;

Rage, rage against the dying of the light..." (D. Thomas)

We the living need to carry a good deal of that rage, or is it outrage? Like the toxic smoke billowing from the rancid smokestacks at the beginning and end of this film, supposedly from Moodysson's hometown of Malmo, the noise of German metal band Rämmstein rages against an endless and empty sky, "My Heart Burns!!!'......to whoever's listening.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
a new image of the Ugly American
13 June 2003
I particularly liked John Petrakis's Tribune review where he writes in bold print: "not recommended for young children." There is no blood, no violence, no profanity, but this rating is due to the high emotional content. You have to search through your vocabulary for superlatives here, featured throughout are extraordinary glimpses of faces framed in their own natural environment, the underlying original music is superb and perfectly balanced, there is a wonderful golden-orange sunrise on a quiet riverbank following her first night in Vietnam where the camera finds a dragonfly resting atop the highest leaf, when her Vietnamese childhood memories return they appear to be almost sketched onto a canvas in an impressionistic blur, all beautifully layered together.

This film begins in 1975 as the Vietnam War was ending with Operation Babylift, (an event which, on it's own, is worthy of it's own documentary, particularly the newsreel footage seen here of an American social worker attempting to convince Vietnamese women to send their children to the USA under the guise of an airlift for war orphans), when a 7 year old Amerasian girl is separated from her family and sent to the USA for adoption, supposedly for her betterment, and she becomes `101% Americanized.' Yet in her 20's, when she yearns to meet her real mother, she discovers her mother feels the same way about missing her, so after 22 years of separation, she travels back to Vietnam in what turns out to be one incredible re-unification, beautifully capturing unanticipated depths of an experience that even the filmmakers could never have imagined. Both the mother and daughter are immensely appealing and couldn't express more genuine affection, but both are overwhelmed and completely flabbergasted by the personal and historical abyss that exists between them, leaving them both reeling, as if stepping on a land mine, from the unseen, misunderstood emotional scars left behind from the aftermath of the war. What starts out as a well-meaning attempt to wipe away bad childhood memories only ends up compounded with still more complicated, bad adult memories. One irony here is that her Vietnamese name means `united.' Sometimes in a documentary, the most difficult decision is to let the cameras continue to roll when you know you are intruding into the personal regions of someone's private anguish. But here, it is the best part of the film – a heart-wrenching, emotional jolt for the whole world to see that is simply unforgettable. What this film has to say about love, that it is so much more than just saying words, that sometimes you are called upon to demonstrate your love with deeds, is indescribable.

There may be an inclination to consider the girl too naive and spoiled and to disregard her out of hand. But I would urge people to reconsider this view, as she was unexplainably (to her) separated from her own family, raised instead by a single mother who eventually had no use for her at all, was also raised in one of the more racially intolerant communities in America, which might explain why she was so unprepared emotionally to handle something as simple as affection, a family notion completely alien to her, and which she found, at the time, completely suffocating. ("Get away from me!") Is it any wonder that she might prefer the more emotionally distant relationship with her adopted American family, as that's all she really knows? It should also be viewed in another perspective, as the translator reminded her, that the family pressure and the cultural differences would diminish the longer she stayed. Contrarily, by shortening her visit, which she herself chose, she put even more pressure on herself and her Vietnamese family to finalize what was missing for 22 years into one final day - a sheer impossibility. From a Vietnamese perspective, they were simply trying to include her, permanently, as a member of the family, not just in words, but in deeds.

But what I found so compelling in this girl, who was born in Vietnam, was that she really had no more sensitivity or understanding of Vietnam than the US government, namely none, which certainly demonstrates how easily we can learn to drop bombs on one another, and how inadvertently, by being so Americanized, besides living in material comfort, she was also taught the arrogance and narrow-mindedness of our American values when it comes to understanding the importance or significance of cultures from other nations. What have we learned since Vietnam? Look at our Government in action today, and the contempt we show to other nations unless they agree with us in lock step. What I found so compelling about this girl is how she represents, through no fault of her own, a new image of the ugly American, that looks different but thinks so much like the old image, how little progress we've made on that front, and how far we have to go.
28 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lilya 4-Ever (2002)
9/10
"Do not go gentle into that good night"
13 June 2003
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS** I'm one who believes that in a film like this, so intelligent, well-written, well-acted, all points of view are valid, some may be more intensely personal than others, as I believe that's what this film is - intensely personal; it spares no one, we are all in this same predicament, together. Many sing the praises of TOGETHER, no less than Ingmar Bergman has called SHOW ME LOVE a masterpiece, I believe this is Moodysson's best work, largely due to the way in which he brings to the forefront such socially relevant issues. I didn't believe he was laying it on thick, but even if you believe he was, isn't the film successful in inspiring a personal sense of urgency that contrasts the alleged safety and protection of our relatively smug lives and the largely unseen horrors - - the unstoppable, unspeakable acts - - that continue to take place *against* children here in this country, or around the world, every second, minute by minute, more horrors? No neighborhood is spared. I appreciate the immediacy this director brings to a subject that is too filled with heartbreak when it happens to you.

This film bears a resemblance with the nearly unwatchable 9 minute rape sequence in IRREVERSIBLE, but here, the child sexual victimization continues for an uncountable number of days, leading ultimately to the same end. The violence is portrayed with a montage of assault after assault of male bodies. In IRREVERSIBLE, we hear the unforgettable sound of the woman's anguish; here, the girl is silent while the sounds and noises of the assembly line of men is a violent, continuous punishment to the senses, one of the most despairing sequences anyone could endure.

Put yourself in her position, the filmmaker may ask. Multiply that by the thousands or millions of teens around the world in similar situations, then one begins to imagine the magnitude of what's being examined here in this film. Who's even talking about this subject? It's rarely a film subject. Who portrays it with the same degree of thoroughness? What's unbearable here is that anyone would choose to do this to themselves. And there are so many ramifications. When I was a kid in high school, one of my neighbor's father committed suicide, so of course, she was ostracized at school, turned into an outcast, kids simply stopped talking to her. And "she" didn't do anything. Another kid on my block overdosed from sniffing glue. Not a word was ever spoken about either event. I'm not sure much has changed in this arena, much as we would love to claim otherwise.

Lilya is only 16, and in Moodysson's hands, she is meant to stand for millions of other children who are all but invisible. I felt Lilya's act of kindness to Volodya, delivering on her promise to give him a terrific birthday present, was heartfelt, and came with no strings attached - an intentional contrast against the horrid example set by the adults in her life, which I saw as a sign of hope. Actually there were little brief offerings of hope throughout this film. I loved the innocent interplay between the two abandoned children, also the imagery of an equally innocent heaven. But for a 16 year old, who's not even old enough to be allowed entrance into the theater, again - she continually has "hopes," of America, of Sweden, of getting out of school, of finding a friend, of getting away, of getting a job, of finding love, of being free. I thought Oksana Akinshina as Lilya was simply stunning, even more so because she was able to make me believe she was not selfish; she was kind, still innocent, all the more significant for the unbelievable sequence of living behind a locked door. I could barely contain myself, witnessing what no one should ever endure, but there it was - impossible to turn away from, the revolt and disgust happening before our eyes. In the duty-free shop at the airport, where she was left on her own, and she was thinking of dressing herself up for the trip, I was reminded of the Jews who similarly dressed in their finest, having no idea what was in store for them during their hellish WWII transport. I admit, I worked in a world of welfare for 30 years, so I have a personal history with cruelty to children, but witnessing such realistic circumstances in the hands of a master like Moodysson, witnessing what happened to those two children, and subsequently, thinking of all the others, unseen, continuously invisible - is there anything sadder than a teenager committing suicide? I can't help but be moved by that.

I was impressed with Moodysson's determination to resolutely *refuse* to shy away from this material: `This film is dedicated to the millions of children around the world exploited by the sex trade.' Well it's more than that. The severity of the subject matter, which includes an extremely naturalistic portrait of two teen suicides, is in fact relentless, and is justifiably serious throughout. This is one of the best films I've ever seen on the subject of teen suicide, actually laying down an argument in favor of taking one's life, which, I think, separates it from other films on the subject, including ROSETTA, not to suggest one should, but respecting the indisputable fact that so many children do decide to take their own lives, asking how can that be, and in that vein, it bears a very strong resemblance, at least in the seriousness of tone and subject matter, with Fassbinder's IN A YEAR OF 13 MOONS. In that film, which deals with an adult suicide, the story follows the final 5 days in a man's life, laying a groundwork so that no further days will follow, a decision that is (in a quote from Fassbinder himself): "somehow understandable, or perhaps is even acceptable.'



"Do not go gentle into that good night,

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;

Rage, rage against the dying of the light..." (D. Thomas)

We the living need to carry a good deal of that rage, or is it outrage? Like the toxic smoke billowing from the rancid smokestacks at the beginning and end of this film, supposedly from Moodysson's hometown of Malmo, the noise of German metal band Rämmstein rages against an endless and empty sky, "My Heart Burns!!!"......to whoever's listening
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
it's our lives that magically reappear onscreen
13 June 2003
This played at Sundance and was released very quickly afterwards. I found the script refreshingly original and more accessible, not so oblique as GEORGE WASHINGTON, as it's about heartbreak, something we've all experienced, and somehow, it's our lives that magically reappear onscreen. This film has a wonderful intensity level that grows stronger as the film progresses, as we become personally involved with the outcome. Much of the opening ensemble sequences were damn near incomprehensible, multiple Southern drawls all talking at once, like David Gordon Green was using one of Altman's sound men. And as brilliant and powerful as this film is, my only disappointment was it was missing an ending that knocks your socks off, like the rest of the film does. Instead, it just moves quietly into another day. To be a film for the ages, which I felt it came so close to being, I felt it needed more.

David Gordon Green on Zooey Deschanel: "That was all her. That was rehearsal. That's her heart and her soul. Those little whispers and little moments; it's not a witty screenwriter behind there, it's a genuine girl that feels things and has a sensitivity you fall in love with. At least I do. It's those little moments that make relationships I've had memorable. It's the weird little quirks in girls' mannerisms and behavior. Going on a structured date and going through the routines of relationships is inconsequential and ultimately forgettable. But it's those little things that just stab you when they're gone, when you know you're not going to get that whisper in your ear anymore."

One could easily mistake this for a Terence Malick film, which is an exceptional compliment, co-written by the director and the leading man, Paul Schneider, as it thrives in a world filled with tenderness and an understated, poetic elegance. The power of this film evolves slowly with the exposure of tiny revelations from each carefully nuanced character, all so beautifully etched into this small-town Southern environment of Marshall, a North Carolina mill town, perfectly captured by the extraordinary ‘Scope work of cinematographer Tim Orr. But this is some of the best ensemble acting on screen today, particularly poignant is the performance of Zooey Deschanel, who is nothing short of brilliant, and the supporting performances of Patricia Clarkson (Schneider's mother) and Shea Wingham (Deschanel's brother and Schneider's best friend). I loved this story of two would-be lovers who can't make a move without the whole town knowing about it, so they act in ways they never intend, and then hardly recognize themselves afterwards.

This film has a familiar feel with THE SLAUGHTER RULE, another film exquisitely acted that beautifully captures small-town Montana, but Green broadens his vision in this film by creating long, extended sequences of wonderfully small moments, working on cars, hanging out in a playground, sitting by a riverside, talking on a porch, or in an industrial wasteland, in a café, in a bedroom, some moments seem lost and disconnected, but others are achingly real, and in combination with the luminous imagery, there are moments of brilliance in this film, the power of which is that they are just so damned believable. This is one gorgeous film experience with a terrific musical score, where the emotional authenticity from the characters perfectly matches the visually rich power of the images.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
...that elusive thing called truth
11 June 2003
This film is a continuous surprise, as events keep evolving that contradict what the viewer believes is the premise, and by the end, it is as hellish an experience as IRREVERSIBLE. What appears, at first, to be a closely-knit, middle class family with a penchant for home movies, capturing every waking moment on film, including the typically happy horseplay of children, turns instead into a cinematic revelation of each and every embarrassing family moment. The power of this film is the subject matter, pedophilia, in the manicured affluence of Great Neck, Long Island. Charged are the father and his teen-age son, who may himself have been abused by his father at an early age, but the individuals involved, the alleged perpetrators, the alleged victims, the neighbors, the police, an investigative reporter, the Sexual Crimes Unit, the defense attorneys, the District Attorneys, and even the presiding judge, all are scrutinized by the filmmaker when a host of contradictory information is revealed. The editing is extremely effective, as little by little, bits and pieces of information are carefully revealed, each continuously changing the complexion of the issues being examined. This myriad of `evidence' doesn't come close to revealing the truth, not as you and I would like to believe, not to a degree of certainty, but is instead a bizarre RASHOMON-experience of mixed-up, partial truths, with plenty of never-ending denials. These denials, on the part of the father, the son, and the loving family that simply can't bear to believe these allegations, are perhaps the most heartbreaking aspect of the film, as such intimate, personal awkwardness repeatedly captured on film, simply makes the viewer cringe with discomfort.

However, the film is beautifully composed, mixing family photographs and videos with documentary footage, the subject is thoroughly examined. There was a little of the secrecy of AUTO FOCUS to this film, only unlike the outlandish sexual activism and nonchalance shown there, the repression here is so severe it's emotionally suffocating, and we are left with the devastating after-effects, literally, of chaos and turmoil. These broken parts will never be put back in place again, and the sick feeling in our stomach is likely to be our own unease with our failed attempts to come to terms with so gripping a subject. This is a shattering film experience.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
From the Other Side (I) (2002)
8/10
exquisitely filmed, small cinematic portraits in time
23 May 2003
This is an exquisitely filmed and well-directed investigative look at the devastating consequences of the seemingly unstoppable, illegal entries into some sparsely populated Mexican/Arizona border crossings. Alternating between interviews and landscapes, Akerman uses a minimalist technique, documenting small, cinematic portraits in time that speak for themselves, opening with stories of stark faces of family members who have lost loved ones attempting to "cross over" to the other side, returning frequently to examine the jarringly raw desolation of the dusty landscapes on the dirt-poor Mexican side of the border wall. Later, we hear the opinions of people on the American side, landowners, restaurant entrepreneurs, who are worried about how the "invasion" of illegal immigrants might bring diseases, how they are considered trespassers and are viewed as a constant threat to their freedom, sequences which are ever-so-slightly underscored with the lush music of Chopin, a contrast to the utter emptiness "from the other side."

This is a film that continuously gets better, and continues to provoke, even days afterwards, largely due to such a haunting, avant-garde style that gets under your skin. I felt an emotional surge as the film progressed, as the sum of all information from both sides sunk in. Particularly stunning is one seemingly endless, tracking shot of cars stacked up on the American side of the border that follows one car after another, while on the Mexican side, cars whiz by, as there is no line at all, but the shot continues on into a barely-lit street of nearly empty Mexican establishments, continuing on into the darkness. Both sides view the wall from differing perspectives, Americans view the wall as staunch defenders of their own freedom, while the Mexicans see it as a path to freedom. Akerman maintains her objective distance, interviewing Mexicans in Spanish, Americans in English, returning to her native French language only when the film builds to it's highly poetic conclusion, where the filmmaker herself describes the fate of a Mexican woman who disappeared after a seemingly successful border crossing, who briefly led a quiet life but then hadn't been heard from since, who may be alive, who may be dead; she is someone who may no longer claim either "side" as her own, but who has become, instead, a non-being, a persona non grata, a ghost of one of "los desaparecidos."
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
25th Hour (2002)
9/10
"...life that almost didn't happen"
16 January 2003
A bold, beautifully filmed, raw and poignant look at the underbelly of America, as seen through some of the soiled and seamy lives of a few individuals in NYC, all searching for redemption, for another chance to do it right, with some terrific performances all around, but easily what is most powerful are the poetic references to 09-11, and how the strength of the characters is so indelibly rooted to NYC.

This film accentuates neither black nor white, but focuses on human beings, as if the collective sum of the consequences of their individual choices represents a vision of a newly emerging morality...

"...life that almost didn't happen"

What a searing sequence of images, so exquisitely haunted by the chilling reminder of the unspoken, unseen ghosts of those missing lives, and the lives that will never be, images filled with such an appreciation for life, that continually promises a world that might have been, before reminding us, instead, with a kind of effortless sock-in-the face, of how frail and vulnerable we really are, particularly in the aftermath of 09-11, despite our swaggering bravado.

This is a farewell to freedom, from the world we once thought we knew, revealing instead such a powerful portrait of people struggling to overcome their own personal traumas, both internally and externally, and like the lights that shone where the towers used to be, a shining testament to the resiliency of the human soul, what we have, finally, is a work of art, a film that achieves a moving and enduring spirit of humanity.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lan Yu (2001)
9/10
the way this story is filmed is anything but ordinary
1 August 2002
Locally, this film played to mixed critical reviews, but I am absolutely enamored by Stanley Kwan's brilliant, understated film style. While LAN YU is a fairly ordinary love story, a rich man falls for a younger, more humble male novice from the country, and what was supposed to be a one night stand turns out to be the subject of this 9 year film exploration, taken from the popular e-novel BEIJING STORY released anonymously on the Internet in 1996, and while one would believe that this story has been told over and over again in nearly every culture, the way that this story is filmed is anything but ordinary. Stanley Kwan is simply a superb director, visually stunning with layers of rich texture, subtle with very dark interiors, extremely detailed with only glimpses of color, a slow measured pace that examines the psychological inner needs of these characters, both of whom are superb in this film, Jun Hu as the older businessman and especially Liu Ye as the younger character of Lan Yu. The obvious comparisons would be Leslie Cheung and Tony Leung in Wong Kar-wei's HAPPY TOGETHER, which has much more razzle dazzle and high energy than this film, or perhaps Leslie Cheung and Fengyi Zhang in Chen Kaige's FAREWELL MY CONCUBINE, which has a much more broad and epic subject matter. Here the film confines itself to two men almost exclusively, and their screen chemistry IS the film, as how they react and what they have to say to one another is remarkably moving in it's brevity as well as it's honesty. I found the last half of Hou Hsiao-hsien's 2001 film MILLENNIUM MAMBO was very much in the style of Stanley Kwan, the energy simply stops and the film crawls into a ghost-like crevasse, a mind-numbing, desolate despair, while LAN YU, also filmed in 2001, adds Hou's ritual of letting his camera hover over a festive table of people eating and catching the power of human interplay in their most ordinary moments. My chief complaint is how the ending misses the mark. Maybe I'm missing something here, but the entire film builds to an emotional intensity that simply dissipates, like letting the air out of a balloon, and I, for one, was disappointed. Again, while a simple story, this film has extraordinary emotional complexity which makes this one of the best films I've seen this year.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
a wonderful, experimental film poem
30 July 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Another near wordless, somewhat brooding black and white film written and directed by Vlacil with a quirky, experimental style, featuring some really wild imagery by cinematographer Jan Curik, in this children's story that is a cross between THE RED BALLOON and, say, THE DOVE WHISPERER. SPOILERS FOLLOW! The film opens on a hill with hundreds of pigeons released simultaneously in flight, but a white dove remains in its cage; a young girl fondles it affectionately. The films moves simultaneously to another story where a man in a loft apartment, with plenty of unusual artworks, discovers a white dove and delivers him to a young boy in a wheelchair. The bird is alive, but it appears dead, it's not moving, and it needs to be nursed back to health. A flashback shows this same young boy climbing a fence. Other boys are throwing stones at him. The boy reaches for a parachute which is stuck at the very top, and while the boy falls off screen, the parachute gently flies free and lands gracefully on the ground. With the camera facing a glass window, the window is smeared with heavy brush strokes to create a background canvas. What appears to be a sun is drawn, with wild grass and budding flowers. The sun turns into a white dove which is then rolled into a beautiful print, which the man in the loft leaves with the boy. The mood changes to the music of American jazz, as there is a seaside resort. A young bohemian man has his eyes on a young girl who sits alone reading her book, oblivious to his flirtatious advances. This has the feel of Vadim's AND GOD CREATED WOMAN with Bridgitte Bardot. Amazingly, a door opens to the sea and the young girl walks out the door and continues walking on the water. Back to the other story the dove comes to life and the young boy is actually seen walking. The man makes a sculpture of this boy, but the boy refuses to let the man see the dove, so in anger, the man cuts off the face of the sculpture. Back to the driving American jazz, this time the young man hops into a jeep that appears to be driving into the water out to a stretch of sand dune where the girl is reading. He hands her a print of the white dove sent by the artist. She leaps for joy, thrilled at this gift, which cuts to the boy in the loft letting the white dove fly free. There is a slow pan of all the rooftops that can be seen until it returns to the loft where these unusual artworks take on spectacular shapes, ending with the sculpture of the young boy that is now completed. This film has multiple white doves that appear in different places throughout Europe, interspersed with various expressions of art, each represents a kind of positive hope. Here art heals all wounds and the doves help bridge all distances.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Hansel and Hansel
24 July 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Spoilers Alert! Somewhat reminiscent of Fassbinder, in particular QUERELLE, with characters appearing as the Angels of Death, this film could be titled HANSEL AND HANSEL. The story comes from the novel by Josef Capek, and is one of Vlacil's wordiest, more philosophical films, as two young men are caught in the woods by the gameskeeper killing a deer So they kill him as well, still another senseless act, and spend the rest of the film running away, hiding in the woods, plagued by their crimes. The two talk incessantly, pledge to never leave one another, and enter into a homosexual bond which is never actually realized, as they rarely even touch, but they can't exist without one another. As they get deeper in the woods, memories, fantasies, and hallucinations appear more prevalent. One, the shooter, the more dominant of the two, walks naked to the waist through the funeral procession of the gameskeeper they just shot, while the other looks on horrified. Another beautiful recollection is a sepia-tinged image of the two sitting on a front step, back to back, while one plays the accordian and they sing a wonderful duet, until they stop, and one of them, the shooter, pulverizes the other repeatedly. As they get deeper into the woods, they hear their names called out by the dead, in this case the gameskeeper reappears like the witch in HANSEL AND GRETEL, and laughs at their futility. Or they find a beautiful outdoor beer garden where the townsfolk are drinking and dancing, all whispering about the murderers in their midst, while a local drunk has a fabulous scene commenting on their status as wealthy farmers, as they are buying enough alcohol to feed a regiment. One take on this film is the hatred of the workers, particularly in the Communist State, that they always feel justified to hate the outside world, which they imagine as living in bliss. Always, they seem to wake in a beautiful green meadow where the world appears in perfect harmony, except for these two, perfectly realized in a scene where one observes, `At least the world will have all this beauty,' while the dominant partner tries to rip up the field, tearing it apart, while the sound of bees buzzing seems driving his actions. My favorite scene was when they sit on a hill above a rural landscape that is harvesting their fields, again a scene of community harmony, a world where they are not allowed. But the townsfolk close in on them, real or imagined, it's never really explained, again their names are called out by the dead, like the voice of DON GIOVANNI, calling them into hell. First one, then the other is shot, they lie cuddled next to one another, while the dead gameskeeper gleefully comments: `They can't escape their punishment.' The camera moves to the entrance of a dark cave, which enlarges into total darkness.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
images of flight
24 July 2002
After an opening comment about the poem upon which this story is based, this is a wordless film in color about a young boy who is obsessed with flying, whether it is a model glider that he flies off the rooftops, or actual jet fighters, where he climbs into the cockpit at a nearby, nearly abandoned airport out in the countryside, aided by what appears to be his father or grandfather, at any rate a kindly old man who takes him under his wing and allows the boy to keep dreaming about soaring into the skies.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"One must suffer to find God."
24 July 2002
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** ***SPOILERS*** A widescreen black and white 13th century Middle Ages drama that, with a few spoilers here, opens with a wedding A shy young boy offers his gift of flower petals to the bride, but underneath are bats, so his father, in a rage, literally throws his son against a brick wall, promising to offer this child to God if he survives. Later, the boy is seen joining the Order of the Teutonic Knights, befriending one of the brethren there by lying naked in the cold sea together, nearly numb from the cold as the waves continuously roll over their bodies, concluding `One must suffer to find God.' Oddly, they remain friends, but develop differing religious views, which pits one against the other. The boy returns home to his village after his father dies and develops an attraction for his step-mother, which evolves into one of the best sequences in the film. There is a procession of children singing and chanting, a sign of complete innocence, while the boy, now a young man, assumes his father's position and takes hunting dogs out into the countryside where they release a young deer, then let the dogs give chase until they consume the deer. This is juxtaposed against the scenes of the children, while the step-mother enters a private room that resembles a dungeon, removes her garments above the waist and flagellates herself, but the young man catches her in the act. She rejects him, claiming `I am your mother,' but then in the next scene, leads him out into the woods where she proclaims they can be married, and lo and behold, they are lovers, only to be spotted by the other brethren from the Order, who has maintained his religious zealotry, and feels the need to stop humans from behaving like dogs. So of course, the prominent scenes in this film are scenes of humans being mangled by wild, hunting dogs, who were thought of as werewolves, possessors of evil, supernatural powers. The contrast of this kind of paganism and a more ordered, structured religion, both equally intolerant, both causing a great deal of suffering, frames the story, while outside the Order's walls, the ocean is ever present, timeless, and never ceases to cleanse man's sins away.
22 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Adelheid (1969)
8/10
"This is the end of the road."
24 July 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Spoilers alert! As the camera moves in and out of train tunnels, stuck sometimes in the darkness, this film examines the post-war, built-in prejudices that remain in a war's aftermath, and how such intolerant views prevent any society from advancing very far in the reconstruction stage. A young Czech Lieutenant returns from the war, weakened and still mentally and physically damaged, but is allowed to recover in a giant mansion that was the property of a wealthy German war criminal during the war, and discovers the young German maid that is allowed out of the camps each day to help is actually the daughter, Adelheid, of that former Nazi resident. In a near wordless exchange, he finds himself enamored by her even though she is really his servant and has little choice under the circumstances, but he allows her to stay and tries to build her trust and affection. But the ever watchful eyes of the police are more interested in hanging her father and tracking down her still missing brother, seeing Germans as little more than dogs. Love is simply out of the question. So, in a rather extended sequence, all appear to be losers in this little Bohemian village, and our lieutenant is seen at the end walking in the snow past a gravestone that was seen in the opening, marked, `This is the end of the road.' Further on lie minefields; so he walks further on, in a blanket of white snow.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hadí jed (1981)
9/10
an endlessly bleak and weary wintry landscape where people are small afterthoughts
24 July 2002
One of the best films about alcoholism in Eastern Europe that I've ever seen, and how it paralyzes the best men by the millions, wiping them out just as effectively as if by a military maneuver. This is a devastating portrait, beautifully written, with simply brilliant and extraordinary acting by a father and daughter, overweight and alcoholic Josef Vinklar contrasted against the stunningly gorgeous appeal of Ilona Svobodova, revealing such tenderness in the discovery of one another. The daughter searches for the man who has been sending her mother child support payments, and discovers her never-before-seen father after her mother dies of the `worst' kind of death. He and 2 other men work alone in the outer reaches of an oil drilling site, but her father is a binge drinker with no hope of any recovery, revealed by panoramas of an endlessly bleak and weary wintry landscape where people are small afterthoughts It also includes a huge dog that the father found chained to a tree, which has been following him ever since, but he sleeps outdoors. The daughter hopes that her love will bring an end to his drinking, the cause of his sadness and misery, and that she can offer him a new start in life. But men are blind to their bad habits, and eventually, he drives everyone out of his life, even chaining his dog to a tree, the mirror image of his wretched existence. The contrast of these two characters couldn't be more dissimilar, resembling that of the same contrasts in MARKETA LAZAROVA. The incredible vulnerability of these two very extraordinary women is completely useless and all but forgotten in the painfully empty lives of these world-weary men. A stunning film.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
a small community under occupation
24 July 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Once more, Vlacil's films are largely about subjects that are not seen on screen. With some spoilers, here we have a story set in 1947 when Ukrainian right-wing anti-Communist guerillas, looking like and feeling like Nazi's, are trying to fight their way through Czechoslovakia to Austria. They come out of the forest to occupy a family's countryside farm house, kidnapping a doctor to help heal one of their wounded, but this could just as easily be about the post-war occupying forces in Eastern Europe, or the occupying Soviet forces in the 60's, as there is an initial belief that there is nothing anyone can do, or to coin a STAR TREK phrase, `Resistance is futile.' The film has a very languid pace which establishes the mood and pace of this small village, much of it is wordless, with a Sergio Leone acid-western feel, easily the most outstanding feature is the original music by Zdenek Liska, which plays on the inner psychological turmoil, providing an unseen character in the film. The father gives the appearance of passivity, as he is outmanned and outgunned, while his eager young son wants a taste of immediate revenge. But a wiser course of action is called for, waiting, giving the impression he is yielding to their demands, as the father wants to protect the lives of his wife and children, which allows for large doses of screen time where various family members are performing daily farm chores, just trying to survive this ordeal, while interspersed in each frame are men with machine guns who sadistically threaten their every impulse. This farmhouse under occupation represents a country under occupation, all feel like helpless victims where every moment is spent in fear, any minute things could spin helplessly out of control, and this film skillfully gets under everyone's skin.
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"That's not allowed! What are you, crazy?"
24 July 2002
A measured, evenly paced, extremely controlled, psychologically mesmerizing film about a doctor's split with his wife, and his subsequent return to his Communist homeland, brilliantly underplayed by Rudolf Hrusinsky, a man in real life who was blacklisted in Czechoslovakia for his anti-Communist leanings, and only the slightest movement in his face could ever be detected. But he was superb in this role, his dignity challenged at every turn, but always remaining intact. He is introduced to a countryside clinic by the local Communist lackey, his quarters are spare and without possessions. Immediately, as the outsider, he is the object of the entire town's suspicion, represented in a single scene where he is smoking potatoes, something he must have learned as a child, in a small attempt to gather some semblance of himself. Yet across the landscape a cry is heard for him to put out the fire; that's not allowed; what is he, crazy? Every attempt to help someone is met with whispers behind his back and with the town's scorn. The psychological pressure to allow so little to be shown, always holding everything inside, as who knows, someone near could, and would use any piece of information against you. This film reminded me of some of the early Kieslowski films, such as the rarely seen CURRICULUM VITAE, where in that film the Communist Party pressure is relentless to obtain confessions from your neighbors for the most ordinary actions of men. To live under the pressure of such a constant cloud of suspicion, where the Party representative is rarely even seen or heard, is wonderfully transparent in this film.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
humanity becomes unhinged
24 July 2002
Warning: Spoilers
A sweeping, widescreen black and white 13th century historical epic, voted the best Czech film ever by a survey of Czech film critics in 1998 on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of Czech cinema, some truly spectacular imagery by Bedrick Batka, endless snowy landscapes with wolves running in the snow, original Medieval sounding chorus music written by Zdenek Liska which throbs throughout, like an unseen heart. With a FEW SPOILERS, this is truly a heartless story of two rival families, both are nearly indistinguishable, one is described as having more sons than sows, both appear equally cruel and tormenting, abducting one of the King's family, the kidnapped victim then falls in love with one of the earthy daughters, then one of the families kidnaps Marketa, an unbelievable performance by Magda Vasaryova, who plays the innocent, virginal daughter who has been promised by her father to the convent, a complete contrast to everything else seen on screen, which appears vile and dirty, rotten to the core, except Marketa. But she becomes the lover of the kidnapper, more like his slave, knowing no other protector, all have abandoned her, as her family was nearly wiped out in her capture, her father crucified to the entrance fence of her family's fortress. Evil is everywhere. But the King's Sheriff, representing the rule of German Christians, decides to hunt down the evil-doers, the hunters become the hunted, which results in a ferocious, mass slaughter, humanity becomes unhinged. Hell raises it's weary head. In an extraordinary transformation, the earthy daughter plunges a rock to her lover's head after his King wipes out her family, so much for love, and Marketa is led to the convent, nuns are arranged like paintings on the walls, a ritual of God's peace and forgiveness is rejected by Marketa. Unbelievably, she returns to be married to her kidnapper in his last, dying breath. She has become transformed into pure evil, with nowhere to wander in the desolate, wintry countryside except with a simpleton with a flair for Biblical verse, who chases off after a goat instead of tending to Marketa, who wanders alone, seemingly forever.
16 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Platform (2000)
9/10
a collection of haunting, understated images that speak for themselves
21 May 2002
I found this to be an extremely understated film style, so emotionally detached throughout, a very oblique presentation, with little or no narrative, this played like a documentary with very little embellishments.

The film is set in the decade of the 1980's, which opens needing Communist Party approval for all State sponsored art, so kids are seen bored stiff at lifeless cultural performances singing the praises of China only in the most affirmative manner, something akin to pre-school exhibitions here, glorified by an always shining sun and by beautiful bright colors, but in this film, no one is fooled by this. Initial images are shot in near darkness or with the bleakest of light and there's a kind of feint, glowing aura surrounding such diminished light.

Initially there is obviously no heat or electricity in this cold, barren, wintry landscape, so each image features frost on the breath and the cold, desolate interior brick rooms, occasionally, people gather around a stove for warmth, they really don't want to move at all, bricks dominate the exteriors as well, the obvious poverty in the images is similar to many Iranian films, as there is absolutely nothing to grab the interest of the graduating high school class, who have no expectations of a better life, yet they are constantly seen interacting, but largely avoiding one another, smoking, staring off into the barren landscape, saying little or nothing, unbelievably detached from the rest of the world, and each other.



The imagery was quite unique, as this small town is, in fact, a rural Communist collective work farm, complete with required Party meetings where all are asked to voice their opinions or stand up to the critical discussions led by the Communist group leader, again, the decade opens with a criticism of individual dissent, like the wearing of bell-bottom pants, establishing an absolute need for individualism, which drives a whirlwind of changes within the Party, leading to the introduction of electricity to the most outer rural regions, and to concepts like privatization, owning your own farm, and, why not, western style pop music, which gives rise to an opportunity for this little group of would be artists to form a band and hit the road through some of the most desolate and empty terrain on the planet, always they travel on the back of the truck searching for the world outside.

Two of the most powerful images in the film, both very much in the Kiarostami-style end shot, a long, drawn out shot that by itself, reveals the story of the film...

There is a long shot of a group of rolling hills with nothing growing on them, round and bare, and the infamous truck winds it's way along a wind-swept, dirt road around a myriad of curves until it is finally close to the camera, but then the truck mysteriously stops, and turns around in the most deliberate and laborious manner before heading back into those rolling hills, while this is seen, the audience hears the sound of the truck radio providing a weather report, powerful, changing winds are heading their way...

There is a long, distant shot of this same, infamous truck and it appears to be stuck in the middle of nowhere, far off, in the distance, the sound of the engine gunning is all that's heard, but no wheels are turning, they ar e going nowhere, so there is a cut to the blue door of the truck, one of the artists climbs into the front seat and turns on the radio which plays the title song, "Platform," "We are waiting, our whole hearts are waiting, waiting forever..." In this unique moment, the first time rock music is heard in the film, the audience is made aware that from this barren desolation there are now "possibilities."

However, as the decade comes to a close, this image is contrasted against a later scene where the actual band plays this song, "Platform," and one can only describe it as laughable, the audience is throwing things at them, the lead singer attempts to go out into the crowd and touch hands but he is nearly beaten up until he retreats to the safety of the stage, yet still under the barrage of the audience, certainly this reflects the end of possibilities...

Yet another scene must be mentioned, one of their former girl friends who chose not to go on the road, but to stay at home, is seen alone in a bureaucratic office, again, dimly lit, she waters her plants in the corner, shuffles some papers around, but the music heard on the radio causes her to stir, she stops her routine, makes the briefest of moves as if she wants to dance, but stops herself, until this slowly evolves into one of the most beautiful traditional Chinese dances, alone, in the dark, dancing.

True to the peculiarity of this film, one character appears with the band, he has long black hair, and he's dressed all in black, the band manager tells him to get his lazy ass back to the group, as he's outside smoking a cigarette, one of the most prevalent images throughout the film is the constant smoking of cigarettes, but this guy never says a word to anybody, nor is he ever seen performing with the band, he just exists totally outside the universe of any known reality, later on, he is seen cutting his hair, this character is not seen in the entire film interacting with anyone, yet he is seen on the fringes definitely a unique character, but totally alone.

In many ways this is largely a wordless film, as the words are so meaningless, instead, eyes drift off into the distant landscape, and the sound of the film is filled with the noises of humans, street sounds, traffic, trucks, tractors, distant shouts or street chatter, radios, the noises of humans, this is really the theme of the film, the individuals are incidental, they come, they go, but the constant is the noise.
16 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
a poetic post-Stalinist Russian artistic awakening
28 April 2002
Warning: Spoilers
1956 was the 20th Congress of the Communist Party and the Soviet Premier Krushchev made a speech denouncing Stalin and the Stalinist purges and the gulag labor systems, revealing information that was previously forbidden, publicly revealing horrible new truths, which opened the door for a new Soviet Cinema led by Mikhail Kalatozov, once Stalin's head of film production. This film features a Red Army that is NOT victorious, in fact they are encircled, in a retreat mode, with many people dying, including the hero, in a film set after 06-02-41, the German invasion of Russia when Germany introduced the Barbarossa Plan, a blitzkrieg invasion intended to bring about a quick victory and the ultimate enslavement of the Slavs, and very nearly succeeded, actually getting within 20 miles of Moscow in what was a Red Army wipe out, a devastation of human losses, 15 to 20 million Russians died, or 20% of the entire population. Historically, this was a moment of great trauma and suffering, a psychological shock to the Russian people, but the Red Army held and prolonged the war 4 more years until they were ultimately victorious.

During the war, Stalin used the war genre in films for obvious morale boosting, introducing female heroines who were ultra-patriotic and strong and idealistic, suggesting that if females could be so successful and patriotic, then Russia could expect at least as much from their soldiers. Stalin eliminated the mass hero of the proletariat and replaced it with an individual, bold leader who was successful at killing many of the enemy, an obvious reference to Stalin himself, who was always portrayed in film as a bold, wise and victorious leader. But Kalatozov changed this depiction, as THE CRANES ARE FLYING was made after Stalin's death, causing a political thaw and creating a worldwide sensation, winning the Cannes Film Festival Palm D'Or, as well as the Best Director and Best Actress (Tatyana Samoilova), reawakening the West to Soviet Cinema for the first time since Eisenstein's IVAN THE TERRIBLE in the 40's.

This film featured brilliant, breathtaking, and extremely mobile camera work from his extraordinary cinematographer Sergei Uresevsky, using spectacular crane and tracking shots, images of wartime, battlefields, Moscow and crowded streets that are extremely vivid and real. Another brilliant scene features the lead heroine, Veronica, who hasn't heard from her lover, Boris, in the 4 years at war, so he is presumed dead, but she continues to love him, expressed in a scene where she runs towards a bridge with a train following behind her, a moment when the viewer was wondering if she might throw herself in front of that train, instead she saves a 3 yr old boy named Boris who was about to be hit by a car. Another scene captures the death of Boris on the battlefield, who dies a senseless death, and his thoughts spin and whirl in a beautiful montage of trees, sky, leaves, all spinning in a kaleidoscope of his own thoughts and dreams, including an imaginary wedding with Veronica. This film features the famous line, "You can dream when the war is over." In the final sequence, when the war is over, the soldiers are returning in a mass scene on the streets, Veronica learns Boris died, all are happy and excited with the soldier's return, but Veronica is in despair, passing out flowers to soldiers and strangers on the street in an extreme gesture of generosity and selflessness revealing "cranes white and gray floating in the sky."

The film was released in 1957 in Russia, and according to some reviews, "the silence in the theater was profound, the wall between art and living life had fallen...and tears unlocked the doors."
66 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Esther Kahn (2000)
9/10
watching this film "IS" like watching a novel unfold
13 February 2002
This is an extremely dense, somber, and complicated film that unravels quite slowly, revealing excruciating detail, like the attention paid in a novel, and watching this film "IS" like watching a novel unfold. While I didn't care for the narrator, as I felt he was out of balance with the rest of the performances, this film features some of the best ensemble acting I have ever seen, and the lead, Summer Phoenix, is fabulous. Her innocence and naivete some might find implausible, sort of a cross between Cinderella and Alice in Wonderland. I can buy that critique, but she's still fabulous, partially because she's unlike anything I've ever seen before.

This film is unbelievably beautiful, filmed by Eric Gautier, and part of what is so unique about this film is how it doesn't ever show what you'd expect. It's always surprising, and despite it's length, the film never reveals more than it needs to. At 163 minutes, it's extremely concise, to a fault, I'd say, which is one of the wonders of this film. It's filled with brief moments which are simply stunning, some of the best you're likely to see all year, and all these moments add up in the end to an extraordinary film experience. The family moments are unique, Ian Holm is brilliant, and what this film has to say about the theater hasn't been seen in films since Cassavetes' "Opening Night," or perhaps Chaplin's "Limelight." But, believe it or not, this film is much "less" conventional. I never knew where this film was going, and now, having seen it, it still has multiple possibilities. This is a powerful, incredibly provocative film.
16 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Satantango (1994)
10/10
in Tarr's version, humanity is sealing themselves into his all-consuming darkness
13 February 2002
Warning: Spoilers
This is a film that features such powerful imagery, that years from now, after having seen this film, images will continue to circulate in our collective imaginations. Revealing very "mild spoilers," without giving away anything vital about the storyline, but only to suggest some of the powerful themes and imagery which interconnect throughout this 7 hour film, the opening sequence features cows fornicating in the mud and rain which renders no harm to anyone, and is in complete balance with nature, but then sequence after sequence of tortured souls reveals the unbalanced state of man that thrives on lies, deceit and treachery, believing in false icons, following false prophets, captured in the net of their own fear, like the image of the spiders weaving their tiny nets over the satantango dancers in the bar sequence, only to do it again night after night so that their delusions, and the hold this falseness has over them, reoccurs again every day just as sure as the sun rises...

...and the bells, bells, bells, bells, bells, bells, bells...

...like Edgar Allan Poe, who knows who sounds the bells that captures the attention of our imaginations? What about Odysseus tied to the mast by his shipmates as he sails past the luring voices of the Sirens, whose sound is intoxicating, but is the key to luring unknowing sailors only to be eaten alive when they set foot on land... ...or like the false Prince in Tarr's most recent film, "Werckmeister Harmonies," who knows the source of evil? How many of us ever see the face? But we are lured by so many influences, not the least of which are the temptations of man so prominently featured in this film, the face of evil... ...fear, conspiracy, perdition, and all the many demons that live inside the human soul that perpetuate delusions of grandeur and evil, the evil that is human...

SATANTANGO is a unique film experience requiring the audience to sit through the incredible duration and severity of this film, filled with unbelievably compelling images of bleakness and despair, literally holding the audience captive, sealed into the already darkened room of a movie theater. In Tarr's version, humanity, it seems, is sealing themselves into the same total darkness. In this film, there is no light, there is only rain and a consuming darkness, and in the distance, the sound of bells...

"And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee..."
20 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed