Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Romance (1999)
10/10
More than you would expect.
11 October 1999
This is a much better movie than I was expecting. It leaves you thinking, and at the same time it is successful as eroticism. The director and lead actors have actually done something new and courageous. There may just be some things here that will influence the direction of future movies.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not at all what you'd expect.
22 June 1999
Fascinating, disturbing, and not at all pornographic. This is one of those movies that will make your friends wonder about you. Worth watching if you're in a thoughtful mood, it's self-consciously arty. There are a number of scenes that will stay with you for a long time. Was this really the same director as Leaving Las Vegas?
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
See it, Love it, Read the Book!
22 June 1999
An important movie that is a joy to watch. This one brings Vonnegut to life better than anything else I've seen. I absolutely adore every minute -- but especially the dome on Trafamador. See it!!!
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sirens meets Dangerous Liaisons
9 June 1999
Beautifully produced with amazing scenes of old Venice, an orchestral score, nice costumes, and attractive actors, this film is certainly worth watching. Some of the dialog is borrowed from real historical manuscripts, and the poetry is worth re-winding to hear again. But, somehow it just doesn't add up. This film carries it's message on it's sleeve, and it's not quite in synch with the period. While boldly promoting a feminist perspective, the film comes off more as soft core porn. The female lead (Catherine McCormack) is exceptional. See it, and think of how good it could have been.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed