Reviews

6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The magic is lost! And he stole it!
26 July 2004
I'm sorry to put it this hard, but the director ruined the movie entirely!!!

Lets see, where do I begin? Locations. Hogwarts is a school of Magic, where everything looks and really is magical. It is NOT a common educational institution where students busy themselves on their assignments. In this movie, the School of Magic looks more like a respectable British university located in some antique building. Even the paintings in the walls have lost their fantastical charm, they seem like some portraits hanging from the walls of a pretentious country club (they should have been inanimate, it would have been preferred). The haunting and fearful Forbidden Forest, where mystical (and sometimes evil) creatures lure, looks in this film like a botanical garden in the middle of suburban boredom. The Hogwart's Express is no longer that magnificent and beautifully preserved old engine, that takes the audience on a fabulous journey to a enchanted land; now it looks like they shot the whole train scene in a neglected West Line Coach or so. Throughout the movie, ALL the magic is just gone.

The story is very poorly underdeveloped. I had read the book beforehand, so I was able to understand it. But after the film ended, I had to explain the plot to my friends (and about a dozen other people that remained sitting at the theatre listening to my explanation) because barely anyone got it. Even some key elements of the story (Crookshanks, Ron and Hermione conflict, the relation of Moony and friends, who was Peter Pettigrew and what was his role, how the hell Black escaped from Azkaban? Etc.) are just ignored.

Acting… Oh dear! Let me be clear, it is NOT the actors fault. It is A DISGRACEFUL DIRECTING!!. The Dursleys seem to have grown bored of despising and fearing Harry, they almost treat him like one of their own. Aunt Marge is not annoying enough to deserve being blown up. The mischievous Wesley twins may as well have reformed. Hagrid doesn't seem to give a damn in the end about Buckbeack's fate. Ron could have been erased completely from the film and nobody would have noticed. Hermione has lost all of her annoying but charming know-it-all attitude. Malfoy is no more Harry's nemesis, but a pathetic coward kid that gets butt-kicked by a girl and just runs away crying. Sirius Black looks as menacing as a poor homeless man who cleans windshields for a penny. Dumbledore is no longer the wise and powerful Head Wizard, but a pitifuly senile circus magician. Even Harry himself looks plain and bland… ALL the characters, for that matter, are flat, insipid and bland. That can not be blamed on ALL the actors, can it?

And the final scene… well, that was just insulting!!!!.

In summary, the movie is sadly (if not infuriatingly!) disappointing. This was a Mexican teledrama (yuck!!!), not the fantastic and enchantingly imaginative world of wizardry and magic that the books and the previous films portray. Even my 9 years old nephew was bored (and actually angered) at it! Did Cuaron at least SAW the previous two films before ... perpetrating the third!? Or did he watch "Batman & Robin" instead?!!!!!

If the first movie had been like this one, I seriously doubt a second and third and fourth would have followed. Cuaron just ruined it all. And his mother too!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Unbreakable (2000)
The movie is not what it is about.
31 January 2001
Warning: Spoilers
Maybe because I didn't want to spoil it before actually seeing the film, I went to the cinema with no preconceived ideas about it. Three quarters of the movie went by and I hardly noticed them passing, it was so interesting, so mind gripping that I could never guess what would happen next. Almost near the end, when Willis' character reveals his `powers', I began to feel that the story would turn into a silly comic-book-like plot. And when Jackson's character reveals himself, (a so clever twist that I even couldn't get it at first), I still got a feeling that the story had gone a little too dumb. So, the movie ended, I left the cinema, went to the parking lot, started the motor.... And then it struck me! The story is NOT what it seems to be about! The movie is NOT about David Dunn having supernatural powers that make him Unbreakable. The movie is NOT the good vs. evil tale, the superhero vs. the villain, the comic book plot. I wouldn't want to turn this comment into a spoiler, so I won't tell what is it about, but if you are intelligent enough, you will see the hidden story behind the tale. Clue: Jackson's character's psyche.

Mr. Shyamalan does it again. It's amazing how he plays with your mind letting you see something and hiding the trick under the sleeve all the time, just as a magician. Like Sixth Sense, (which was not and never intended to be a horror movie, it was an outstanding psychological thriller); Unbreakable leads you towards a seemingly simple storyline and suddenly twist you around to an entirely different path so fast that you get dizzy and it takes you some time to figure out what happened. As a director, he proves again the quality he is made of. Of course, his movies are not for the average audience (in spite of the commercial success of the last two), because you need to see beyond the images in the screen to actually get the story. Most people don't (or perhaps can't?) do that, so they are disappointed at how the movie turns in the end. Well, Charlie's Angels and MI2 are the kind of movies made for Most People.

Other attributes of the movie itself do not fall behind. Performances are topmost. Willis will not continue being overlooked as an outstanding actor much longer, unless everyone in Hollywood is stupidly blind (or blindly stupid). Jackson is brilliant; he keeps his character mysterious, intriguing and yet plainly visible all the same time. Even Spence Clark (Shyamalan has a way with kids, no doubt) injects a special (and key) element to the movie trough an outstanding performance.

I'm looking forward for the next work from Shyamalan. My compliments.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Sad, oh, so sad! A cartoon would have been better.
6 March 1999
If it had been made by Disney, if it had been made in the 50's, if we haven't had Tim Burton's as comparison, this "cartoon" by Joel Shumacher "may" have been acceptable. Even the old TV series with all those "whams" and "bams" was at least forgivable, for the decade it was made. But after Tim Burton brilliantly captured a certain dark side of the winged hero, and created villains with deep, intense personalities, this Batman and Robin is just unbearable.

I don't like "ER", so I am not really a fan of George Clooney, but if this is the best he has... well, no offence intended. Chris O'Donnell can't give any life to his character, which was a bad idea in the first place. Batgirl has nothing to do there, the story would have been better off without her, although Alicia is so cute that she can be forgiven anything. As for the villains, the plot is so "childish" (to say the least) that nothing could have saved them. Uma Thurman looks just plainly ridiculous, she is a much better actress than that. Arnold probably wore all that make up because he didn't want to be recognised. The only performance worth saving is Michael Gough's Alfred, but the soap opera "daddy, I love you!, (sob! sob!)" situation in which the story places him is just depressing.

Even the dialogs... I hadn't seen such intellectual, clever, mind-blowing lines in the deepest works of Kafka. The plot is so powerfully... boring! that my 5 year old nephew asked me to change it for a Scooby Doo cartoon. And the worst of it all is that at the end, there is this treat hanging that there may be a Batman 5... Please! Have mercy!

After this, Joel Shumacher heads my list of the worst directors of all times. My vote? Is there anything less than zero?
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
These are not lions. They are The Ghost and The Darkness.
23 February 1999
I was another victim of those self apointed critics that were giving bad reviews about this movie. I believed it was not good, until out of curiosity I got it on video one of these days. Then I found what I'd been missing.

It is a very good movie. It may not be the shocking terror that many expected, but the story is absorbing and it keeps you waiting for something to happen all the time. And the fact that many criticize about the incredibility of the story, is set aside by something even the characters say: "These are not lions. They are The Ghost and The Darness." Now is up to you, un-believers to understand.

There is only one part that disapointed me about the movie: the end.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Groundhog Day (1993)
9/10
EXCELLENT. Although, is it not more like a "terror" movie?
21 February 1999
Just imagine that. Having to repeat one day or your life over and over, again and again. There is no escape, no way out, not even Death will set you free. Is it not that utterly scary? And yet, if you think carefully, that is what most of us common mortals do. Wake up, go to work, come back home, same next day. Isn't it everyday Groundhog Day?

Well, this movie converts a philosophical dilemma into a superb romantic comedy. Bill Murray proves he is not just a common funnyman. I would consider his play in Groundhog Day his best role, and director Harold Ramis best work. Is the kind of movie you want to see again, over and over, day after day... it gives you hope that one day, you will find true Love, and it will change your life...

Positively, a 10!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Motorama (1991)
10/10
The strangest, most bizarre, and best movie ever starred by a young boy.
21 February 1999
Let's start from this point: This is not a movie intended for the common audience. Utterly bizarre, somehow incomprehensible, totally unpredictable, it just keep you stoned watching at the screen trying to figure out what will happen next. If that by itself doesn't make you agree it is an excellent movie, then go back to your "family" movies and forget about MOTORAMA. It has material to be considered a cult movie, it can be placed in the same category with movies that win awards in Cannes or other intellectual film festivals, but, sadly, Hollywood already let if fall in oblivion, simply because it is not commercial. The performance of young Jordan Christopher Michael may not be Oscar material, but he gives the right touch to the story. Even the genre is difficult to describe; it is not a comedy in the proper sense, you don't know if you are supposed to laugh at the strange situations in which Gus gets involved. It is more like an impossible adventure that some kids may wish to have, but don't let them watch it either... it is not a movie for kids. So, if you like Disney movies or are looking for a "Home Alone" style, this one is definitively not for you. But if you enjoy reading Edgar Alan Poe or the works of Tim Burton, then you will like Motorama. So, jump in your red Mustang, get a tattoo spelling "Tora" and cruise Strangeland with Gus. I'd like that...
27 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed