For Facts Sake (2018– ) User Reviews

Needed a comedian on the panel.

[facebook-524-719286 · 3/10 · 16 November 2019]

Such awkward viewing, the family members were trying to bounce off the members of the public on the panels and it just kept falling flat.

Would have been better with only one member of the public and a guest comedian or interesting celebrity on each panel.

Fun but nothing special

[darthbraindrain · 4/10 · 22 October 2018]

Even though the show does have a lot of laughs it does feels like Brendon and his family are looking for another vehicle when they should have stuck with mrs browns boys. If you're bored and looking for a laugh give it a go but if you're looking for a show with actual facts then maybe give this one a miss. one out of the latest show just for an example : they claimed elvis was a drug enforcement officer but he wasnt he collected police badges and asked nixon for one personally (which he was given) he was never made an officer just given a badge

Awful unfunny garbage

[ianay-92589 · 1/10 · 16 October 2018]

How on earth did this utter 'drivel' ever get on television?? My goldfish can write better material than this, and hes been dead for 7 years I really cannot understand how Brendan O'Carrel gets any job on TV, especially this garbage and its on a Major channel!! If it was on Challenge or something then fair enough, its still dreadful but at least its easier to avoid.

The BBC should be embarassed

[jillbramsay · 1/10 · 30 October 2018]

I suppose the only saving grace about this show is that it was so bad, we watched the whole thing (episode 1) open-mouthed, like viewing a train wreck. The combination of day-time bad jokes and coochy-choochy crowd pleasing is bizarrely set off by foul language and crass innuendo. When they embarked on a 'Fact Hunt' with much sniggering, it was the zenith. I have no idea what the BBC were thinking.