March of the Penguins 2: The Next Step (2017) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
For a Sequel, it is Very Good
Hollywood_Yoda26 November 2019
With Morgan Freeman returning as the narrator, how could this film fail? It was surprising to find out that Disneynature had a hand in creating this film. Just too bad it didn't get a theatrical release in the U.S. Instead, it was a Hulu exclusive.

And furthermore, is not available on DVD in the United States as of this writing. That's too bad, because a great many people will miss this gem. If you have the means, try to get a copy of the region 2 DVD.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The march continues
Horst_In_Translation7 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"L'empereur" or "March of the Penguins 2" is a French documentary movie from this year (2017) and it is of course a sequel to the 2005 movie "La marche de l'empereur" that won an Oscar back then and had the makers funnily bring little cuddly toy penguins bring to the stage. And after director Luc Jacquet worked on several other nature/environment films in the last over ten years, here he returns to what is the biggest success of his career still. At roughly 80 minutes, this new film has the same duration like the original. Sadly, it's been a long time since I watched that one, so it is a bit difficult to speak about parallels and crucial differences, but I still felt that this one here had a bit of a recycled feeling to it, like a best-of of the old movie from 12 years ago. That doesn't mean it's really bad or anything, but it did not feel so fresh and innovative anymore. The photography and recordings of the animals and Pole landscapes are without a doubt breathtaking once again and the film is also informative telling some of the most important aspects from penguin (family) life.

The problem is that you have heard these already if you have seen the first. But a bit of repetition is also somewhat inevitable I guess because the characters are the same as from the first, so it really is by definition a sequel too. The major focus this time is on the child's perspective. The pre-hatching part is kept at a minimal level really, but it is about the first year of growing and finding his place in this spectacular new world and the penguin community. The parts with the main characters talking or how we hear their thoughts was removed from the original. A bit of a pity. At least in the German version, the one I saw. This one was narrated by Udo Wachtveitl and as I never cared for Tatort, I have no connection with him really. But he did a good job all in all I guess. If there were weaknesses with the narration, then it was more because of what he said and not because of how he said it. Still, next to all the criticism I have here, let me emphasize again that in terms of the visual perspective this was a really beautiful film. And hey penguins are simply amazing, especially if they are almost as big as their parents, but still look like young birds. Cuteness overflow! One of the parts I liked the most was the one when the penguin basically "transformed into another animal" as the narrator said and yes it is somewhat true. Even if they may be birds, their inability to fly and great swimming/diving talents make them resemble fish so much and their bodies look like mini-Orcas when they are in the water. Also I want to add that this is not 100% documentary. There is a big fictionalized aspect in the story-telling of the script and narrator. Remember how they said how hard it must be for the parents to find their young one? How hard must it be for the cameramen? Anyway, lets not be too picky here. And opposing my comments on how it all was done before already, I must say in the filmmaker's favor that it is somewhat original again from the moment the mother disappears and the focus is even more on the (not anymore so) little one. These last 20 minutes do stand out more than the rest. They probably won't win another Oscar here, but another nomination would not be undeserving. I give this film certainly a thumbs-up. Also a good watch for younger audiences. And for those who have not seen the 2005 version. And for those who may have seen the first and just can't get enough of penguins. Like myself. Go check it out.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Following the march
TheLittleSongbird12 April 2021
Absolutely love the first 'March of the Penguins'. It is visually stunning, informative, cute, fun to watch, emotionally investable and with adorable without being too much so penguins. It does help if already a major fan of nature documentaries and if one has a lifelong adoration for penguins, both the case with me ('Pingu' plays a major role in my love for penguins). Hearing that there was a follow up, part of me was intrigued but part of me also thought "is this really necessary?"

'March of the Penguins 2', or 'L'Empereur' was a worthwhile watch and is recommended. Am not raving about it but liked it just about enough. It doesn't disgrace 'March of the Penguins' at all and has a lot of its great things, though it doesn't have the same amount of charm and magic and in a way it wasn't really needed. Morgan Freeman returning was a very good move and the right one, genius really and it would not have worked as well with somebody else.

Shall start with what 'March of the Penguins 2' does well, which is a lot. It looks beautiful first and foremost. Especially the majestic scenery, that has sheer beauty and at times a suitably harsh atmosphere to show that such a beautiful environment is not all idyllic. The music has some playfulness, some lushness and some dramatic sweep, not feeling too intrusive which sometimes was the case with DisneyNature documentaries.

Furthermore, 'March of the Penguins 2' entertains and educates. Doing a great job with making the viewer relate to the penguins, the offspring being particularly adorable. While there are playful moments, a good deal of the journey/story is poignant. Freeman is a perfect choice for narrator, and he brings booming gravitas and subtlety to the nice mix of facts and human-like story.

Will agree though that some of the material did feel a bit too derivative from looking as if it was lifted from elsewhere or too similar to footage in the first and at times repetitive from lacking sometimes variety.

There are times too when the cuteness early on is a little overkill. Other documentaries have information that is more illuminating and that is fresher, which added to the derivative feel.

Overall, not great but very worthwhile. 7/10.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great
0U20 February 2020
The March of the Penguins story could continue indefinitely, but only if the penguins survive long enough to keep the franchise alive
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A work of art
Valid_ID20 March 2023
This second installment to the famous "March of the Penguins" focuses on the penguin chicks. The adorable creatures can melt a heart of stone - or ice.

At one point, a little chick tumbles on the ice in a hilarious, endearing way.

I was blown over by the way in which the camera captured the scenery, making every shot the best shot.

The work and effort that went into making this documentary cannot be overstated.

The camera not only captures amazing details, such as the penguin chick fluffy down and feathers, but also offers an eagle view of the multitudes of birds in the colony, and even under water action of staggering beauty.

The image of the sunset (or is it sunrise?) over the endless ice, for example, looks like a painting.

Most of the scenery is obviously something very few people will be able to experience in their lifetime.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed