Charlotte (2021) Poster

(III) (2021)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
life? or theater?
dromasca26 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
'Charlotte', made in 2021 by French animators Tahir Rana and Éric Warin, belongs to the category of animated films for adults that has been strengthening in recent decades and which already includes some exceptional achievements. The film can be called an animated biopic, whose heroine is Charlotte Salomon, a young German Jewish artist who was murdered at the age of 26 in Auschwitz. However, she left behind a treasure of artistic materials - around a thousand drawings -, a personal diary and letters that remain testimony to an exceptional talent and a tragic destiny. Charlotte Salomon is perhaps not well known in the art world. Excluded from formal studies and working in unconventional environments, she did not have the chance to express her formidable talent in many works whose formats are preserved in the great art museums, and most of her works that have come down to us are preserved in the archives of a foundations associated with the Jewish Museum in Amsterdam. But art history and simply history are catching up with her. Her volume of works is considered today as a forerunner of the comic book format, and as a document it is a graphic diary similar to that of Anne Frank. A German film from the 80s, a novel by a well-known French writer, theater plays, ballets and two musical shows have already been dedicated to him. To these is now added this film.

The film linearly tells the biography of the young woman born in Berlin in a wealthy family where her father and grandfather were famous doctors. As a child, Charlotte expressed in painting the trauma caused by the disappearance of her mother (a series of suicides had marked that branch of the family) and the terror inspired by the persecution to which the family is subjected because of its Jewish origin. She is talented and dreams of becoming an artist, but is expelled from the School of Fine Arts after the Nazis come to power. Refugee in France with her grandparents, she knows a few years of light, friendship and even love, but war and racial persecution will follow her here as well.

There is one very problematic aspect to 'Charlotte'. The screenwriters (Erik Rutherford and David Bezmozgis) chose to change one of the essential aspects of Charlotte's biography, related to the circumstances of her grandfather's death. The motivations were positive, but the effect is the diminishment of the credibility of the entire biographical account. The murder of Charlotte Salomon cannot be justified, nor can the death of any innocent man in the Holocaust or other genocides. But she was not a saint, but a human being, a young woman with dreams and immense talent, but also with dark sides in her character. Turning her into a role model by sweetening her biography was not, in my opinion, necessary.

Graphically, the filmmakers tried a technique similar to that of Dorota Kobiela and Hugh Welchman's excellent 'Loving Vincent' from 2017 by drawing in a style close to that of the film's heroine artist and including scenes depicting the creative process of some among his works. The effect is quite successful, without reaching the sophistication of the film dedicated to Vincent. Of course, that one had a huge investment behind it and Charlotte Salomon was no Van Gogh either. However, the drawn characters have individuality, and the way Charlotte is represented attracts the viewers' empathy. I also thought the dubbing of the voices was excellent. I saw the French version in which the role of Charlotte is spoken by Marion Cotillard, in the English version we hear the voice of Keira Knightley.

Charlotte Salomon titled her graphic journal 'Life? Or Theater?' If we accept the theater metaphor, her life was certainly a tragedy. The vast majority of the six million victims of the Holocaust are anonymous. Only descendants still remember them and sometimes their names are mentioned at commemorations. However, some of the exceptional destinies are known. Working frantically to complete her work, Charlotte Salomon seemed to know that fate would not grant her much time. Wanting to leave a mark, she sent us a shout through her art. This film adds to the effort to defeat oblivion.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not very engaging
TheDome813 October 2022
For a film about Jews during WWII, I thought I'd be more moved by the story. It just seemed kind of bland, shallow, and lifeless. Part of the problem is with the animation. These days, I guess we're a bit spoiled by the amazing and lifelike animation by studios like Disney and Pixar. The animation in Charlotte was very simple and seemed out of date. I also found the dialogue quite stilted and unemotional. Then there's the whole issue about her poisoning her grandfather. It was barely mentioned in the movie. Another reviewer mentioned that she admitted to killing him in 2015. Rather difficult since she died in a concentration camp in 1943. And that's another thing that was glossed over. Her dying at Auschwitz wasn't mentioned until the recap at the end of the film. Truthfully, I was relatively unmoved by this lifeless film.
6 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
heartbreaking beauty
Blue-Grotto5 October 2021
It means more that we love life than that life loves us.

The tragically beautiful true story of Charlotte Salomon, a courageous young Jewish artist who paints every moment of her life in a Chagallish, raw, and surreal style that foreshadows the arrival of graphic novels. "True art reveals the chaos inside us," says Charlotte. Her whimsical and provocative paintings of Berlin in the 1930s, Southern France during World War II, and the people she encountered, help her come to terms with trauma in her life that includes suicide, Nazis, betrayal, violence, splendor, and love. Sad moments are more truthful for Charlotte than happy ones. The artwork helps settle her nerves.

There is so much heartbreaking beauty in Charlotte that it is hard to know where to look; the luminous green necklace that she treasures from her mother, snowfall in Berlin that swirls through cruelty and fire, haunting premonitions, and more. Keira Knightley is the voice of the imaginative, insightful, and strong-willed Charlotte. Those who saw this film and rated it three and a half stars or less probably were looking for something else and did not appreciate the depth or how different it is from other World War II stories. I am mesmerized by this determined and insightful woman who lived life as best she could even with the viciousness and sadness whirling all around her, and despite knowing that it would consume her too sooner than later.

Seen at the Toronto international film festival.
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Where did the budget go?
oscarb-1439129 April 2023
"Charlotte" is a a daring film, dealing with importan and heavy topics. One can be thankful to the directors for that they dare to tell the story of a too easily forgotten artist, that I didn'tknow about before. Having it be animated seems like a good choice, considering Charlotte's world already exists in paintings.

But There are just SO many questionable artistic decisions!

Starting from the animation style that is rendering everything lifeless. Because it's not hand animated but seemingly just floating lines, from a to b. It was most obvious in some of the walking animation, but so many more to wonder about!

The many reoccurring Kissing scenes that where weirdly long and didnt work in this toonboom cutout animation style Then the super thick character lines? Who thought that was a good idea? Especially with the way the backgrounds looked?

And the writing & directing... going through plot points like it was the most unemotional roadmap. There where so many dramatic, heartbreaking moments with enormous potential! But it never seemed like anyone on the film team cared much for them, the was no sense that the directors emotionally connected to what they where showing.

The film was surely a great effort and I am thankful for having learned about Charlotte. The unusually high budget suggests that there must have been some unexpected twists and turns in the making of this film, since it doesnt translate to quality on the screen. I'm sure there's an other, very interesting story there about the making of this project. And someone tells this story one day because I'm eager to learn from the many undoubtedly interesting experiences in the making of this film.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
It was a mistake to make this an animated film
ligonlaw31 October 2022
The producers and decision-makers who conceived this film made a serious error at the outset. This is not appropriate material for an animated film. It is understandable that a film about an artist would be look like art, especially since Charlotte Salomon is credited with having produced the first Graphic Novel. She produced hundreds of paintings about the events in her life as a young woman living in Germany as it was becoming an authoritarian hell for Jewish people. The animation is old fashioned and flat unlike what we have come to expect from Pixar, where the images and the characters are so fully developed. That kind of animation might have enhanced our experience of her life, but it would not solve the problem of animation. This is a heart-wrenching complex story about a woman who was complex and odd for her time or any time. Her family was consumed in unbelievable tragedy apart from the fact that so many of them were murdered in concentration camps. Animation is a step removed from life and this form of animation is wooden and stilted. The lives in Charlotte's story are highly emotional and such drama requires the services of excellent acting. We are too removed from the emotions and the reality of this story.
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Charlotte Was Not Depicted Truthfully
ericgoldberg-501596 August 2022
The Holocaust was cruel and vicious. So was the real Charlotte Salomon who poisoned her grandfather. She admitted to killing him in 2015. This movie's animation is beautiful but it doesn't depict the truth. Art should depict some truth. That is one of it's functions.

EDIT: Charlotte Salomon's letters where she admitted killing her grandfather were released in 2015. Sorry for the confusion.
6 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed