The Last Witness (2018) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
46 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
THOUGHTFUL FILM about a sad day on world history
allanmichael3018 January 2019
This tell another story from WW2 which shows just how but the war was many people that were just civilian died for no reason at the hand of dictators and many country had their moments of sin. This is just one case where it shows that it was not just hitler who would be tried of war crimes if it happened today. The film show how millitary died but not deep enough to show Those who died at Katyn included an, admiral, two generals, colonels, lieutenant colonels, majors, captains, naval captains, privates, non-commissioned officers, and chaplains, pilots, government representatives and royalty a prince, officials, and civilians three landowners, refugees, university professors, physicians; lawyers, engineers, and teachers; and writers and journalists and Polish generals.This was all on the orders of starlin and churchil knew about it but did nothing. The fullstory is on wikipedia. If only this was isolated case look at World_War_II_massacres on wiki.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not a Thriller
jeepgirl227 May 2022
I know this film is labeled a thriller. Even the director called it that in an interview. But it's not. It should have been. The true story upon which the film is based has plenty of intrigue and is rich for story-telling. It's just this film misses the mark. It was intended to be a thriller but fails - in pacing, in music (sets the wrong pace entirely!), in some of the acting. It comes off more as a depressing drama. I love Alex Pettyfer but his character shows little emotion the entire film, except one scene with his brother. His character is way too dialed down. He doesn't come across as ambitious as described, just terribly unhappy and depressed with his life in general. I would have loved to have seen his character fleshed out more. The films pace never changes so there is nothing thrilling in the story telling. It just chugs along like a steady, slow train. It's a very clean film - little to no profanity, no nudity or sex scenes, which is great! I wish more movies today told stories without adding in all of that. And the lighting is a bit off in some scenes, too dark to really see what's going on. It's obvious the film is low budget, but it doesn't look cheap. The cinematography is good. The music terrible - it doesn't add, it just detracts and annoys. Ok film. Could have been so much better.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An interesting and engaging film about a stubborn journalist investigating the Katyn massacre
ma-cortes16 October 2022
Breathtaking film based on facts that are well played by a nice plethora of Brit actors . An ambitious young journalist -Alex Pettyfer who produces as well- uncovers the horrific slaughter of twenty-two thousand Polish officers during World War II . He meets a Polish soldier who has survived and whose companions were killed at Katyn , but he keeps silence , being chased by military spies . The journalist lives in hopes the polish man tells the actual events , but he's obligated to accuse the Nazis of the horrible deaths . The final credits states : "In 1990, Soviet President Gorbachev admitted that the Soviet Union was responsible for the murders of Polish prisoners of war at Katyn in 1940. No one was ever prosecuted. In 2012, declassified documents proved that the U. S. government suppressed information that attested to Soviet guilt. No British government has ever publicly charged the Soviet Union with responsibility for the Katyn Massacre. This film is dedicated to the 22,000 Polish prisoners of war murdered in the Katyn Massacre and to those murdered in the years that followed so that the truth would remain buried forever."

This notable movie is a vivid portrayal about war and post-war along with a criminal intrigue in which an obstinate journalist attempts to find out real identity of an Eastern European refugee resulting in unexpected consequences . War has rarely been rendered in such an horrid, utterly grim manner, especially in its final part . Harrowing, unnerving drama which depicts the horror of war with a terrible massacre , a secret that has been kept hidden for far too many years and maintaining his possible connection to the British government's collusion in the cover up of one of Joseph Stalin's most notorious crimes. The story contains some overwhelming sequences as the massacre across the Katyn wood and including some actual documentary. Stars Alex Pettyfer who gives an acceptable acting as a young, ambitious journalist who risks love, career, and ultimately his life to uncover the surprising true by taking a notebook . He's well accompanied by a good cast , such as : Robert Wieckiewicz , Talulah Riley and special mention for the veteran Michael Gambon as a chief editor . The motion picture was professionally directed by Piotr Szkopiak, an ordinary TV director.

The historic events in which this movie are based result to be the following ones : Hitler wanted to avoid facing a possible alliance of the Soviet Union , Britain and France. The Western democracies were equally aware of the Soviets' potential to deter German expansion but their negotiations with Stalin did not lead to any agreement. At the same time, however, Hitler had set aside his ideological differences with Stalin in the hopes of making an alliance. In August 1939 he offered Stalin a deal : If the Soviets allowed Germany to attack Western Poland , they would receive eastern Poland and Baltic states. The Munich capitulation of France and Britain to Hitler's demands convinced that they would be unreliable allies . He decided that he had to cope with German expansion eastward on his own, without their help. In late August 1939, German foreign Secretary Joachin Von Ribentropp visited Moscow to sign with Molotov a German-Soviet Nonagression Pact , which included the deal over territory. The agreement between two nations at opposite political extremes, fascism on one side , communism on the other, shocked the world. It also left Hitler with a free hand in Poland. Hitler used an apparent Polish raid on a Radio Station in the German border town of Gleiwitz as an excuse to invade Poland the following day , September 1, 1939. Two days later, on September 3, France and Britain declared war on Germany, WWII had begun. Beaten back by the Germans, Polish forces were now attacked from the east. The Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin ordered his Red Army to cross into eastern Poland. He claimed that he wanted to prevent anarchy caused by the collapse of Polish government. Thousands of Soviet troops poured across the border and raced west to link up with German troops. Organized Polish resistance to the invaders collapsed. In the last week of September Polish troops in Modlin and Warsaw surrounded to the Germans, A small garrison of 4.500 men held out on the Hel Peninsula near Danzing until October 2. Some 694.000 Polish were seized by the victorious Germans and more than 217.000 Poles were rounded up by the Red Army. Both the Germans and Soviets treated the Poles with great brutality. Stalin ordered most of his prisoners deported to the Gulag (a system brutal labor camps) and later taking more than 20.000 officer prisoners were executed in secret.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Awesome
freeteach-7783616 July 2019
I was so happy to have learned about this. I had no idea. It was a very crucial time at the end of the war but it should have never been covered up and those two men lost their lives just trying to tell the truth. It's amazing the number of lives that were lost for no really reason. Hitler and the Soviets were evil.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's right in the events pertaining to Katyn, but so wrong in everything else.
apjc1 June 2018
The events in Katyn, Kozelsk , Ostashkov , Starobelsk, Jukhnovo , Yuzhe , Tyotkino , Kozelshchyna, Oranki, Vologda, Gryazovets are well documented. These were Soviet extermination centres for Poles who might resist the new partition of Poland. Katyn is simply the easiest as it's the best known, as far back as 1943. The German advance into Belarus uncovers the mass grave of Polish officers, priests, rabbis, lecturers etc. The Nazi's release this as a major propaganda coup, the Polish government in exile calls for an investigation by the International Red Cross. The Soviets cut off all communication with them, does anyone still wonder why the Soviet advance stalled outside Warsaw when the free poles launched an uprising ? The cover-up, yes obviously, the Soviets have destroyed the best of German armies, you don't upset a good ally. When the Cold War starts fingers start to point, only journalist I can find who called this out was Epstein. He basically said Voice of America had and was still covering up the facts because they're commies as well, was an age of McCarthyism remember.
11 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It is really a pity...
giolael16 October 2018
Because of the extreme importance of the matter, I am really uncomfortable to saying this movie is quite a misfire. It could have been so much better, it should have been better. Directing and editing are very confusing: you are not allowed to easily understand the settings or the whole post-war background, there's no difference between the fighting age and the reconstruction time. You can't appreciate any shades that suggeste you are in Russia, England or Poland. The whole movie seems to take place in the same few exteriors. The assembly rythm is terrible: the editing is very boring, so slow that loses all the tension and the final suspense (there's none!), some scenes unnecessary. Nor it helps in taking time to get deep in the characterization of the personages: their portraits are very flat, their evolving in the storyline and the following awareness of human monstrosity (in war and politics both) are superficial. Main character is tedious and pale, as well as being not quite an eagle... Because, maybe, the production tried to avoid volgar spectacularization of the massacres, I guess, it eventually ends up to minimize the real tragedy: the movie turns out to depersonalize victims of Katyn, merely corps, lack of scenes, lack of details... so wrong! The acting is also quite poor and Michael Gambon's performance is completely wasted in two minor scenes...somebody would ask please why in hell he accepted this part...again: bad final editing, quite sure, and not such a good screenplay. Pretty enough are the cinematography and the original soundtracks. Good basic plot, shaking movie structure and timing. In the end, all these aspects stop you to have any kind of "transfert" or to reach a deep empathy that the movie should have inspired. Its greatest fault is the lack of passion and heart: the claim and the reckoning of one of the worst slaughters in the 20th century, I feel, should have been shouted and screamed loudly like a running train to the truth, instead you hear just a whisper. You would have liked to be moved instead of simply Learning an excruciating truth....but, sometimes, could it be enough?
14 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Little confusing at times
sunnya-306476 June 2018
I like quite a a lot of different movies, I just got lost a bit along the way watching this one . I am gathering the plot is a cover up that is at all Costs trying to remain one . It did drag in some Areas for me . Guess it's to each person to find out if it's their cup of tea.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Poor casting and a story not well told
qui_j30 April 2021
This film casts a very dour looking lead actor to play the main character. He gives the appearance of someone in need of a good wash! The story itself is not well told and the viewer has to fill in too many gaps. This decreases the level of viewer engagement and interest. It's fine as a history lesson but not that great of a dramatic production!
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Harrowing true WW2 story thoughtfully told
wrxsti5425 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This joint British- Polish movie delves into one of the darkest corners of WW2 history, that of the horrific and systematic execution of 22,000 Poles by the Soviet Army at a forest near Katyn in eastern Poland in 1940. Even before the horrendous indignities imposed on Poland in WW2, it had been regularly overrun and dominated by the neighboring earlier European powers (Prussia then united Germany, Austro-Hungary and Tsarist Russia). When Nazi Germany invaded Poland in 1939 triggering WW2, Stalin (who long harbored ambitions over eastern Poland), invaded Poland from the east and rounded up tens of thousands of not just Polish troops but the Soviets targeted officers and the elites and leaders of Polish society there (doctors, lawyers, academics, teachers, mayors and businessmen) and they were brutally killed in execution style shots to the head into shallow graves. These graves were discovered by the Germans when they invaded Russia in 1941 but when the Red Army swept west driving back the Germans in 1944, to cover their horrific crime against humanity, they blamed the atrocity on the Nazis, a fiction the Allies were happy to publicly believe so as to appease Stalin in the fragile Cold War environment post war.

The movie tracks the efforts of small town journalist Stephen Underwood (Alex Pettyfer) to unearth the truth of what really happened at Katyn. He lived near a camp of Polish soldiers of the Free Polish Army that had fled Poland and by 1947, no longer enjoyed the support of the British government due to the harsh realities of Cold War diplomacy. Underwood's key contact is Colonel Janusz Pietrowski (Will Thorp) who knows the truth but can do nothing with it. Underwood wants to unearth the proof and publish it but is discouraged at every turn, by his editor Frank Hamilton (Michael Gambon), by local Army Intelligence and even by his own Army officer brother but who eventually ends up providing crucial help.

A major breakthrough occurs when it becomes apparent that a Russian peasant called Michael Loboda (Robert Wieckiewicz) living in Eastern Poland, was a witness to the original atrocity and, when helping the Germans uncover some of the graves, finds the journal of a young Polish soldier and takes and hides it. It chronicles this boy's time and treatment in Soviet captivity as he'd managed to keep it hidden. Loboda miraculously escapes to England before the Russians invade again. Underwood tries to persuade Michael to give up the dairy but he refuses fearing for his life so Underwood sneaks into the camp and steals it from Michael whilst sleeping drunk. Underwood gets his typist's Polish father to translate the diary and then he knows that with the diary and Michael's eye witness testimony, he holds the irrefutable proof of what really happened. Col. Pietrowski persuades Michael to give his account to Stephen and it is recorded with a primitive record disc recorder.

The story takes the ultimate sinister turn. Stephen has been having an affair with Jeanette Mitchell (Tulalah Riley) who's husband Mason Mitchell (Henry Lloyd-Hughes) is a crucial Army intelligence officer tasked with finding the incriminating diary and who persuades his wife to report on progress with Underwood's investigation in exchange for turning a blind eye to the affair. In steps MI5 (Britain's Security Service), who, in cahoots with Soviet agents, track and find Michael thanks to a tip off from Jeanette. A Soviet agent offers Michael a happy life back in Russia with his farm and family restored to him if he but signs a declaration attesting to the lie (that the Nazis did it), he refuses and is killed. MI5 heavy Underwood's boss and he is fired, they transfer Stephen's brother and he is followed when he is able to see the secret files at the National Archives (organized by an army colleague of his brother) and they break in and steal off him the diary which is burnt by Mitchell. Underwood is finally shot by an agent to keep the truth from coming out. Jeanette however has the handwritten translation and she manages to get an American newspaper to publish it and so the story does come out although it takes many decades (until after the collapse of communism) before the Russians finally admit to their role in the atrocity but nothing was ever done about the sinister British cover up.

It is a ponderous task to re-enact this awful and shabby part of British post war history so the movie moves meticulously and carefully. Such a dour and lonely quest undertaken by Underwood, who is an impoverished disheveled man who drinks heavily, makes for the opposite of the type of breezy, handsome and sociable characters that Alex Pettyfer habitually played through his teens and early adulthood so this was a gritty and workmanlike performance. Thorp was excellent as the Polish colonel at the heart of this, walking a delicate diplomatic line and Wieckiewicz was intense and believable as the tragic figure of Michael Loboda.

This movie is not an easy one to watch because of the subject matter but it is an important film in that it meticulously honors the 22,000 Poles who were the victims of this horrible chapter of the war.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Acting is really appalling
saraje9 April 2022
It's potentially a good story but the acting - lead character dressed in 1920/30s costume with Rudy loud hair and moustache - is woeful. It's good historical story if only they'd executed it better.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
For all discerning film viewers this is a film well worth seeing
kinsmanivan13 May 2018
Being an Englishman who has been living in Poland for the last 16 years I was interested to see this joint Polish-Anglo production and it is definitely worth it for those viewers who are interested in this period of history just after the end of World War II.

The film, based on a true story, covers the British and American cover up of the Katyn massacre in 1940 by the Russian NKVD of around 22,000 Poles from the intelligentsia, military, church i.e. the country's elite. The victims were shot in the back of the head and buried in mass graves in the Katyn Forest, to be discovered a year later by German forces who were building a road thru the forest. In efforts to maintain the Russian commitment to defeating the Nazis, the massacre was blamed on the Germans.

Alex Pettyfer is very convincing in the role of Stephen Underwood, the young journalist who sets out to discover the mystery of why so many Polish soldiers are committing suicide in his area of Bristol. This is a mission that is of no interest to his editor (Michael Gambon) and he meets several obstacles along the way in his quest to find out the truth.

He is assisted in his quest by his lover, Jeanette Mitchell (Talulah Riley) who gives a good (but a times a little stilted ) performance and his efforts are being monitored by the British, headed by Mason Mitchell (Jeanette's homosexual husband played by Henry Lloyd-Hughes, who also puts in a convincing performance). The witness is played by the well-known actor, Robert Wieckiewicz, and his role is at the crux of the film's plot.

So, all in all a definite recommendation to see this film. Piotr Szkopiak (born to Polish parents in London - they were deported from Poland in 1939), who is both the film's director and co-writer, looks like a promising young director to watch out for.
91 out of 105 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Guilty of poor budget
bryangary6519 January 2019
Interesting story about an important subject matter

But acting was very poor, and suffered for what came across as a restricted budget
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
An important story poorly told
Boreas744 March 2021
As other reviews have said this is a film that fails to live up to the importance of the story it tells. A real pity.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Ivan's Story
nogodnomasters4 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The film is based upon a true story, another one I never heard about. In England 1946, Stephen Underwood is a second rate reporter who likes his drink. He is also seeing a married woman. Upon investigating numerous suicides among Polish refugees he uncovers a vast conspiracy concerning the Russian massacre at Katyn being covered up by both the British and Americans.

The film was a slow moving historical. The colors were drab. The dialogue was stale. There were no shown action scenes and the "climax" was the credit role. It mildly held my interest.
2 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Suitably gloomy
dierregi4 May 2023
One car hardly expect a cheerful movie about a massacre and The Last Witness delivers perfect gloominess in the tense atmosphere of post-WWII Britain.

At the end of the war Europe was left in ruins with millions of refugees, many of whom had no home to return to. This was especially true for citizen of what had just become the "Soviet block", and specifically the Polish citizen who'd suffer terrible hardship at the hands of both the Germans and the Russian.

The movie opens with the suicide of a Polish citizen residing in a military camp in Bristol. Journalist Stephen Underwood thinks too many Polish citizens residing in the area are killing themselves and sniffs around for a story. Unfortunately, he has no idea whatsoever of what he's about to stumble into and that's the massive cover up of the Katyn massacre, a most notorious crime ordered by Stalin.

There are a few plots holes in the movie, such as the role of the Polish colonel and Underwood's lover role into betraying the witness, but the result is still a solid, gloomy melancholic movie.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
How to belittle the greater story
ikanboy13 May 2021
If you want to find out about Katyn, don't watch this plodding nonsense. As usual the focus is on the deep state and it's penchant for killing off whistle blowers. The bigger story, the massacres, the lies and the cover up is reduced to a dull plebeian C grade movie which focuses more on the private lives of the people than he story. Michael Gambon, the only name actor in it, has precious little to do until the end. It looks like a made for TV movie, one for Fox not MSNBC.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A story that needs to be told
ianrprice9 April 2022
This is a story that needs telling and the premise - that a journalist stumbles on the story and tries to expose it (that's the fictional bit) - is a great storyline. Sadly, the film is let down by some wooden acting. Talulah Riley is - frankly - terrible. Alex Pettyfer, as the moody journalist with a history is better but some of his acting leaves a bit to be desired.

Historically, it's well done. I could quibble over all the military personnel wandering around with their coats flapping in the breeze (I'd have got a right bollocking), and Military Policemen guarding the Foreign Office archives(!) - who let some random 'officer' in without so much as a raised eyebrow - but I'll forgive those. What I do want to know is who thought it was a good idea (and realistic?) to have a reporter working in a local newspaper in 1947 who doesn't seem to shave (or wear a tie), let alone a Polish army colonel with a face that hasn't seen a razor in days!

I've given it seven stars because, fundamentally, I like the film and I like the story. If you're looking for award-winning acting, however, look somewhere else.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A missed opportunity
brockfal5 April 2022
The story of how the Katyn massacre was discovered deserves to be told. Unfortunately this badly cast, weakly written and produced film failed to engage in any way. It really is a missed chance.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Amazing story poorly done.
rodrigul-373213 January 2019
What a pity. The film tells historical events of great importance, but it is plagued with bad/weak performances.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Whoever gave this 1 is crazy!
roguegrafix31 May 2018
The Katyn massacre by the Soviets in 1940 remained officially undisclosed until 1990 when Gorbachev admitted it. The unofficial truth was known by the British and American governments during World War II and by the public since the late 1940s. This film follows a journalist's fight to tell the truth to the public and the repercussions of his actions.

Whoever gave this film a 1 must be crazy. Extremely well shot and acted, this is a good film especially if you are interested in the Katyn massacre. An Anglo- Polish production, it is not a Hollywood blockbuster but a very poignant tale told in a non-Hollywood way..I enjoyed it.
63 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
For historical purposes.
gnvvclark10 February 2019
The characters and intrigue are well played. However, the lead actor left very little room for empathy involving his interest in the plot. This would have made a much better film with different casting.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
History re-enacted
Jossaboss1 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Yet another perfectly timed piece to educate the new generation about the demons in our neighborhood.
8 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
History.
Robot_Chikn_n_a_Biscuit30 November 2022
I was very interested in this bit of history. After watching this movie, though, I think it would have been better if it was made as a straight documentary. Doing so would have allowed the film maker to better explore the entire history.

As it stands, this movie is painfully slow and lacks intensity. The musical score is somber and forlorn. It does not add to the movie, but subtracts from it. Alex Pettyfer, plays the lead character as somber and forlorn, as well. I think that was the intent of the director, but it makes the audience lose interest quickly. I think there is a good movie to be made, about these events. It is simply not this movie, though.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Total disastre
Pegiromini6 August 2018
It is a very interesting history and very serious one to make sucha a bad film. The direction is a disaster and the actors are very, very bad. That director sudnt make another film- Pedro
7 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very interesting
phd_travel10 February 2019
This movie isn't from the point of view of the Polish victims of Stalin's massacre. It's about the coverup by the Soviets and surprisingly suppression of the truth by the British government for appeasement reasons and finally the revelation of the massacre by a by a journalist.

Alex Pettyfer is a bit dour looking here in a costume that looks more 20s than 40s and not too expressive but he shouldn't overshadow the story anyway.

Don't expect an action packed war movie. It's about revelation of the massacre.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed