When Jennifer Pan calls 911 to report that her parents have been shot, she becomes the primary focus of a captivating criminal case.When Jennifer Pan calls 911 to report that her parents have been shot, she becomes the primary focus of a captivating criminal case.When Jennifer Pan calls 911 to report that her parents have been shot, she becomes the primary focus of a captivating criminal case.
Photos
David MacDonald
- Self - Field Investigator
- (as David Macdonald)
Fred Moffatt
- Self - York Regional Police
- (archive footage)
Jennifer Pan
- Self
- (archive footage)
John Vennavally-Rao
- Self
- (archive footage)
Daniel Wong
- Self
- (archive footage)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaA few days after its release, fans and news outlets accused Netflix of using AI-manipulated images while presenting some of its images.
Featured review
Use of A.I. generated images in deceptive manner and stolen content from hobby YouTuber
Attentive people noticed that there was something amiss with images used for this "documentary." As always, it was the fingers and hair first giving it away and later research confirmed it: The "documentary" makers created A. I. images of a happy Jennifer throwing peace signs to i dicate she was unbothered by the attack on her parents. This is shameful and dangerous both, as it falsifies reality.
There is no doubt Jennifer planned this heinous crime but that information, along with ACTUAL evidence, must be enough. There lies a great danger in creating false images to implant an impression in people's minds. In this case, it is clear the offender had no conscience and no remorse for what she did. What about other cases? Cases still on trial, or being investigated? There have been such documentaries; and an added issue is elements such as trial by media, resulting in biased juries, and/or the fact that judges may be up for re-election and feel pressured to come to a certain verdict, all directly influenced by A. I. lies.
Such images or even deep-faked video footage can severely impact a case to a magnitude we haven't seen yet and can't even fully calculate - in terms of ultimate ripple effect and results - yet.
So yes, here comes a new low of people feigning to show us the unadulterated truth. The old adage "An image says more than a thousand words" has never fully held true to begin with but has now lost all meaning. I hope laws will be put in place to prevent misleading viewers and steering opinions in that manner in the future.
Also, ans this has been said multiple times, the whole crockumentary was a sad and unsuccessful rip-off of the brilliant YouTube channel JCS Psychology whose creator both examined the case as well as the young offender's mental state. (The latter which this "documentary" entirely neglected.) To steal for monetary gain from a little YouTube channel is embarrassing enough but that with all that fantastic source material the end product was but a tedious, excruciatingly boring and thanks to the A. I. issue factually dubious affair is simply unforgivable.
There is no doubt Jennifer planned this heinous crime but that information, along with ACTUAL evidence, must be enough. There lies a great danger in creating false images to implant an impression in people's minds. In this case, it is clear the offender had no conscience and no remorse for what she did. What about other cases? Cases still on trial, or being investigated? There have been such documentaries; and an added issue is elements such as trial by media, resulting in biased juries, and/or the fact that judges may be up for re-election and feel pressured to come to a certain verdict, all directly influenced by A. I. lies.
Such images or even deep-faked video footage can severely impact a case to a magnitude we haven't seen yet and can't even fully calculate - in terms of ultimate ripple effect and results - yet.
So yes, here comes a new low of people feigning to show us the unadulterated truth. The old adage "An image says more than a thousand words" has never fully held true to begin with but has now lost all meaning. I hope laws will be put in place to prevent misleading viewers and steering opinions in that manner in the future.
Also, ans this has been said multiple times, the whole crockumentary was a sad and unsuccessful rip-off of the brilliant YouTube channel JCS Psychology whose creator both examined the case as well as the young offender's mental state. (The latter which this "documentary" entirely neglected.) To steal for monetary gain from a little YouTube channel is embarrassing enough but that with all that fantastic source material the end product was but a tedious, excruciatingly boring and thanks to the A. I. issue factually dubious affair is simply unforgivable.
helpful•70
- amelieduchenne
- Apr 26, 2024
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Що зробила Дженніфер
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 27 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content