My heart ached throughout most of this movie. I loved the first "The Falls" and was sad that it had to end the way it did, not knowing how Chris and RJ's lives would pan out. Well now we know! Perhaps for me it is nice to see a gay relationship movie about fairly run of the mill characters. They aren't buff, don't have fabulous jobs and don't hang out at nude beaches or bars 24/7. in fact it seems both the boys lives have come to be in somewhat of a rut. But what they do have is an extraordinary desire to be happy with themselves, even when the odds are stacked against them. For this reason the film has a lot of soul. I felt like a warm blanket had been wrapped around me when these two finally meet up again. Chris's self inflicted pain is palpable and we are never too sure how in fact their lives may continue. As friends? As enemies? As lovers? For some unfortunate reason the audio in parts, is terrible, which is a shame given the high standard of everything else about the movie. I also found the Anniversary party scene to be unnecessary, and unlikely. I felt it added a selfishness to the main characters that tainted my opinion slightly. In the end however, I fell overwhelming in love, again, with the unmistakable bond between Chris and RJ. Warning, some full frontal nudity. (Oh go on, go see it just for that!).
26 Reviews
"You broke that girl's heart"
bkoganbing28 November 2014
The post mission world of Mormon kids Nick Ferucci and Benjamin Farmer is the subject of Testament Of Love. Unfortunately if you didn't see the first film The Falls you might have trouble picking things up. The first film concentrated on Ferucci and his family, in Testament Of Love it is Farmer and his family that are the focal point.
Ironic since it was Farmer who initiated things on their mission it was Ferucci who went back home and came out of the closet. He went on the promised three month road trip with Farmer from the first film and then when both returned communication ceased from Farmer's end.
Word that their friend Brian Allard whom they met on the mission has passed on. That reunites them. And Ferucci finds out that Farmer is now married to Hannah Barefoot. Farmer has never come out of the closet and now he's leading the typical Mormon lifestyle married to a nice Mormon girl who is expected to bear lots of Mormon kids.
When Ferucci who breaks up with a boy friend he has and incidentally breaks that young man's heart goes to Salt Lake City to find Farmer the inevitable happens. A story told many times over in thousands of homes, maybe told best in Brokeback Mountain where both Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal are married.
I have no doubt this is played out in many a Mormon household as well. Worse there since the Church of Latter Days Saints is the focal point of the community not just a place you go on Sunday to communicate with the Deity. Still the alternatives are either suicide or a life of repression. Too many choose those alternatives.
Hannah Barefoot's story is also a tale told many times. The woman who marries a closet case and then wonders what she did wrong. She gives the best performance in the film.
I hope Testament Of Love gets a few showings in Salt Lake City, but I doubt it. Still you never know.
Ironic since it was Farmer who initiated things on their mission it was Ferucci who went back home and came out of the closet. He went on the promised three month road trip with Farmer from the first film and then when both returned communication ceased from Farmer's end.
Word that their friend Brian Allard whom they met on the mission has passed on. That reunites them. And Ferucci finds out that Farmer is now married to Hannah Barefoot. Farmer has never come out of the closet and now he's leading the typical Mormon lifestyle married to a nice Mormon girl who is expected to bear lots of Mormon kids.
When Ferucci who breaks up with a boy friend he has and incidentally breaks that young man's heart goes to Salt Lake City to find Farmer the inevitable happens. A story told many times over in thousands of homes, maybe told best in Brokeback Mountain where both Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal are married.
I have no doubt this is played out in many a Mormon household as well. Worse there since the Church of Latter Days Saints is the focal point of the community not just a place you go on Sunday to communicate with the Deity. Still the alternatives are either suicide or a life of repression. Too many choose those alternatives.
Hannah Barefoot's story is also a tale told many times. The woman who marries a closet case and then wonders what she did wrong. She gives the best performance in the film.
I hope Testament Of Love gets a few showings in Salt Lake City, but I doubt it. Still you never know.
A fair followup
djvaast22 February 2015
Warning: Spoilers
*** There may be spoilers ***
Having watched both The Falls and Testament of Love, I feel the need to post my thoughts. As a gay man myself and having never been indoctrinated into a religion, I find watching movies about religious angst fascinating. I can only imagine the difficulties faced by gay men and women in the face of religious dogma and doctrine. And this movie plays out as you would expect it to. Mostly.
You really do need to watch the first movie for this one to make any real sense and it feels like a serialized dramatic series of movies that are tied together rather well. The initial device of a flashback montage and recap was good to bring viewers up to speed.
There were parts of this movie that worked well and others not so well. For most, the acting was believable. Hanna Barefoot is clearly the standout here. But it was nice to watch Benjamin Farmer and Nick Ferrucci again as well. But Ms. Barefoot's performance especially after (SPOILER ALERT) finding out the truth was portrayed with depth and pathos.
Others have argued that the chemistry between Chris and RJ wasn't there and for the most part I would agree. The inner turmoil that Chris feels as he struggles with what he feels and what is expected is palpable. And this standoffishness could be the felt in the "disconnection" between the two. He didn't want to feel what he felt. And it was accurately portrayed on screen.
The only scene that fell flat for me was the (spoiler alert again) anniversary dinner where RJ shows up and kisses Chris in front of the gathered family and guests. AND THEN he "dumps" Chris and leaves him standing there alone and exposed. Really? "To save you $100 on stamps????" Seriously? I was very mad at this. Here he has come to Salt Lake, involved himself in a closeted man's life, ruined his marriage, destroyed his family, excommunicated him from the church (one would imagine) AND THEN DUMPS HIM? After being invited to Chris's coming out speech to his family and having Chris proclaim his love to him publicly, he decides to walk out?
That didn't play well. It was hollow and selfish. I don't know if it was necessarily in RJ's character and seemed flat.
There was no real reason for his abandonment. At least not in the drama on screen. It wasn't obvious to the viewer aside from creating a bittersweet ending and setting up a potential three-quel.
What are your thoughts on this movie?
Having watched both The Falls and Testament of Love, I feel the need to post my thoughts. As a gay man myself and having never been indoctrinated into a religion, I find watching movies about religious angst fascinating. I can only imagine the difficulties faced by gay men and women in the face of religious dogma and doctrine. And this movie plays out as you would expect it to. Mostly.
You really do need to watch the first movie for this one to make any real sense and it feels like a serialized dramatic series of movies that are tied together rather well. The initial device of a flashback montage and recap was good to bring viewers up to speed.
There were parts of this movie that worked well and others not so well. For most, the acting was believable. Hanna Barefoot is clearly the standout here. But it was nice to watch Benjamin Farmer and Nick Ferrucci again as well. But Ms. Barefoot's performance especially after (SPOILER ALERT) finding out the truth was portrayed with depth and pathos.
Others have argued that the chemistry between Chris and RJ wasn't there and for the most part I would agree. The inner turmoil that Chris feels as he struggles with what he feels and what is expected is palpable. And this standoffishness could be the felt in the "disconnection" between the two. He didn't want to feel what he felt. And it was accurately portrayed on screen.
The only scene that fell flat for me was the (spoiler alert again) anniversary dinner where RJ shows up and kisses Chris in front of the gathered family and guests. AND THEN he "dumps" Chris and leaves him standing there alone and exposed. Really? "To save you $100 on stamps????" Seriously? I was very mad at this. Here he has come to Salt Lake, involved himself in a closeted man's life, ruined his marriage, destroyed his family, excommunicated him from the church (one would imagine) AND THEN DUMPS HIM? After being invited to Chris's coming out speech to his family and having Chris proclaim his love to him publicly, he decides to walk out?
That didn't play well. It was hollow and selfish. I don't know if it was necessarily in RJ's character and seemed flat.
There was no real reason for his abandonment. At least not in the drama on screen. It wasn't obvious to the viewer aside from creating a bittersweet ending and setting up a potential three-quel.
What are your thoughts on this movie?
correct
Kirpianuscus28 February 2024
I saw this part of The Falls as the last one. And I consider it the best The Falls. For sensitive problems and their inspired exploration, for the clash between faith and love, for the relation RJ - Paul, for the end. Indeed, you recognize the recipe, so familiar and easy used . You reminds the story from the first part and the evolution of events becomes not so surprising. But The Falls: Testament of Love proposes more than familiar romance in gay frame.
I saw it as correct story about connection between a young man and his church who, indeed, is more than only a church but axis of his entire life, the fight against sexual impulses and the effort to build an ordinary life, exactly the expected by community one.
Nice acting, fair story and just clever - useful exploration of details about mormons life , rules, way to assume delicate problems , interesting for a guy like me, Greek - Orthodox believer, so far by life of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -day Saints.
So, correct.
I saw it as correct story about connection between a young man and his church who, indeed, is more than only a church but axis of his entire life, the fight against sexual impulses and the effort to build an ordinary life, exactly the expected by community one.
Nice acting, fair story and just clever - useful exploration of details about mormons life , rules, way to assume delicate problems , interesting for a guy like me, Greek - Orthodox believer, so far by life of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -day Saints.
So, correct.
Beautiful sequel
brian-wiz2 March 2019
I generally liked it, but it was not without flaws
dallas_viewer27 February 2017
Warning: Spoilers
---SPOILERS AHEAD---
I'm watching this trilogy backwards, since I started with Covenant of Grace (the final film) and have just finished Testament of Love.
Overall I liked it. Having already seen the final film, I did not have the frustration a lot of folks had regarding the ambiguous ending of ToL. (Film three showed us what ends up happening.) Also, not having seen the first film, I had no sense of "I've seen this before," etc.
While I enjoyed the story, and give high praise to Hannah Barefoot and that little scene stealer Kaitlyn Taylor Graves for jobs well done, there were several aspects that fell short.
1. As someone already mentioned, there was that incredible house and the looming question, how Chris could afford it? Even if Chris were comfortably well off due to some sort of trust fund, the house itself was really distracting! How do I focus on the story when I'm wondering how many rooms there are in this house and how much it's worth? I wondered if it had its own Facebook page.
2. When Chris invites RJ to his home during the family confrontation, RJ bears the brunt of everyone's anger and rage. Chris says he needs him there, though, presumably in order to have the courage to come out. Wow, way to be selfish, Chris! I needed a later scene where Chris apologizes to RJ for exposing him to all that vitriol. I wanted Chris to say that in his own need, he had not realized how it would be for RJ. And I wanted RJ to forgive him, saying it was worth it just to hear Chris admit he loved him. Alas, there was no such scene, if I recall correctly.
3. I also wanted a scene where Chris says he's taken the first step but he still has things to figure out. He has a career and a child and family, etc. This would have given RJ a reason to LEAVE, perhaps in some frustration. But there was no such scene, so it made no sense to me that RJ left--especially since Chris had just declared his feelings for him. RJ was finally (it seemed) getting what he wanted. Wouldn't he postpone going home?
4. If RJ's leaving made no sense, it especially made no sense for him to go about it by crashing the anniversary party and abruptly telling Chris he's leaving (with no explanation). I get that the director really liked the drama of this scenario, but come on, you need a better thought-out setup.
5. The editing was poor in places, in my opinion.
On the one hand, you have long conversations or arguments or whatever, and they seem unedited. That is, IRL we may pause to think about what someone says before we respond. We might pace a little bit before responding. That's fine, but on the screen it's boring to see that. Those scenes needed to be edited down. (And may I say that I did not need to see so much of Ben Farmer wanking off in the bathroom, either. I'm pretty sure I understood what the director was trying to say with that scene within about 15 seconds of the action starting. Chris is frustrated and angry, he can't get off with his wife--indeed, he is probably fixated on RJ at that very moment--and he hates himself and the fact that he can't stop wanting to be with men and that it's men who "do" it for him, and not women. See? I got that well before being treated to the side view of Mr. Farmer masturbating. Just my 2 cents there.)
On the other hand, some scenes were too edited. For example, you've got this climactic scene where RJ unexpectedly kisses Chris in front of family and friends. But the editing is really choppy. We go from hands down at the sides to hands suddenly around each other's neck, but there's no transition. And there are Chris and RJ mashing their mouths together, but again, where's the build-up? Where is the soft, insistent kiss from RJ that slowly coaxes Chris to surrender all resistance and kiss him back, with passion slowly building from that point? All I could think was that what we saw was the best of the film footage available--maybe there were problems with the sound or something that prevented the director from providing a (to me) more complete and logical scene.
Despite the above-mentioned shortcomings, I still liked this movie. Now I just have to watch the first one in the trilogy...
I'm watching this trilogy backwards, since I started with Covenant of Grace (the final film) and have just finished Testament of Love.
Overall I liked it. Having already seen the final film, I did not have the frustration a lot of folks had regarding the ambiguous ending of ToL. (Film three showed us what ends up happening.) Also, not having seen the first film, I had no sense of "I've seen this before," etc.
While I enjoyed the story, and give high praise to Hannah Barefoot and that little scene stealer Kaitlyn Taylor Graves for jobs well done, there were several aspects that fell short.
1. As someone already mentioned, there was that incredible house and the looming question, how Chris could afford it? Even if Chris were comfortably well off due to some sort of trust fund, the house itself was really distracting! How do I focus on the story when I'm wondering how many rooms there are in this house and how much it's worth? I wondered if it had its own Facebook page.
2. When Chris invites RJ to his home during the family confrontation, RJ bears the brunt of everyone's anger and rage. Chris says he needs him there, though, presumably in order to have the courage to come out. Wow, way to be selfish, Chris! I needed a later scene where Chris apologizes to RJ for exposing him to all that vitriol. I wanted Chris to say that in his own need, he had not realized how it would be for RJ. And I wanted RJ to forgive him, saying it was worth it just to hear Chris admit he loved him. Alas, there was no such scene, if I recall correctly.
3. I also wanted a scene where Chris says he's taken the first step but he still has things to figure out. He has a career and a child and family, etc. This would have given RJ a reason to LEAVE, perhaps in some frustration. But there was no such scene, so it made no sense to me that RJ left--especially since Chris had just declared his feelings for him. RJ was finally (it seemed) getting what he wanted. Wouldn't he postpone going home?
4. If RJ's leaving made no sense, it especially made no sense for him to go about it by crashing the anniversary party and abruptly telling Chris he's leaving (with no explanation). I get that the director really liked the drama of this scenario, but come on, you need a better thought-out setup.
5. The editing was poor in places, in my opinion.
On the one hand, you have long conversations or arguments or whatever, and they seem unedited. That is, IRL we may pause to think about what someone says before we respond. We might pace a little bit before responding. That's fine, but on the screen it's boring to see that. Those scenes needed to be edited down. (And may I say that I did not need to see so much of Ben Farmer wanking off in the bathroom, either. I'm pretty sure I understood what the director was trying to say with that scene within about 15 seconds of the action starting. Chris is frustrated and angry, he can't get off with his wife--indeed, he is probably fixated on RJ at that very moment--and he hates himself and the fact that he can't stop wanting to be with men and that it's men who "do" it for him, and not women. See? I got that well before being treated to the side view of Mr. Farmer masturbating. Just my 2 cents there.)
On the other hand, some scenes were too edited. For example, you've got this climactic scene where RJ unexpectedly kisses Chris in front of family and friends. But the editing is really choppy. We go from hands down at the sides to hands suddenly around each other's neck, but there's no transition. And there are Chris and RJ mashing their mouths together, but again, where's the build-up? Where is the soft, insistent kiss from RJ that slowly coaxes Chris to surrender all resistance and kiss him back, with passion slowly building from that point? All I could think was that what we saw was the best of the film footage available--maybe there were problems with the sound or something that prevented the director from providing a (to me) more complete and logical scene.
Despite the above-mentioned shortcomings, I still liked this movie. Now I just have to watch the first one in the trilogy...
A very close to heart, life-like movie. Recommended.
hihibyebye61699 September 2014
I've created this IMDb account solely to write a review on this movie and the prequel as I think they haven't been given enough credit. First of all, no, this is not a disappointing sequel, in fact it's a great one and Jon Garcia did a marvelous job in making it realistic and not the cliché kind of gay-movie continuation. The first movie reflects so many experiences and thoughts that I've been going through throughout my life and I think most of other religious people's lives, even though we may not be Mormon. And that was what made it really close to heart and made it an almost realistic drama that had me attached to the characters as if they're myself.
Testament of Love touched me way more than the first one did though, as the movie narrates basically all of my life expectations and vague planning that I have been developing since I found out about myself. I am a religious Muslim man and have been struggling with my sexuality for a long time now and I haven't came out to anyone. Due to my strong faith in God, I have been relieving myself by saying that this is one of the strongest challenges God can give to His servants and that I'd get the best of rewards in the hereafter for going through this on the right path until I die. And In Islam, God doesn't specifically condemn the feelings of homosexuality and He'd only give worldly challenges that the servant can bear.
Because of that, this movie speaks to me like no other movie, or even, no other person has before. The main characters resonate a strong emotion of love, guilt, sadness, frustration and hope without needing lengthy or even detailed dialogue. And the fact that the RJ and Chris had gone on separate "lifestyles" that are common choices to Religious gay men, just screams to me about the (frustrating) realities of my life expectations as a Religious gay man.
Moreover, I love the grayness of the plot and characters of this movie such as RJ's strong faith in God even though he's not a practicing Mormon anymore and the complex scenes where the gay- relationship, family and religious issues are being tackled. The characters in this movie are individuals, and even though they are tied to certain societal and religious views, they have their own individual thoughts. And that's what I really love. It makes the movie really realistic.
Yes, some may say the movie is quite too long and a bit draggy, but I don't mind that as those are what makes this movie life like and not just another gay-problem-suicide or gay-coming out-happy/unhappy movie. And I don't mind the length as I really want to know more about their lives, even if they're fictional.
Thus, I applaud the director, producers and actors for producing such a realistic, close to heart (and much more cinematic) movie and I really hope that you guys can make another sequel, perhaps for a proper closure to myself and the other viewers, and to relieve my already bad movie-depression that I'm having. By the way, I regretted not watching this movie and the prequel much much earlier.
Testament of Love touched me way more than the first one did though, as the movie narrates basically all of my life expectations and vague planning that I have been developing since I found out about myself. I am a religious Muslim man and have been struggling with my sexuality for a long time now and I haven't came out to anyone. Due to my strong faith in God, I have been relieving myself by saying that this is one of the strongest challenges God can give to His servants and that I'd get the best of rewards in the hereafter for going through this on the right path until I die. And In Islam, God doesn't specifically condemn the feelings of homosexuality and He'd only give worldly challenges that the servant can bear.
Because of that, this movie speaks to me like no other movie, or even, no other person has before. The main characters resonate a strong emotion of love, guilt, sadness, frustration and hope without needing lengthy or even detailed dialogue. And the fact that the RJ and Chris had gone on separate "lifestyles" that are common choices to Religious gay men, just screams to me about the (frustrating) realities of my life expectations as a Religious gay man.
Moreover, I love the grayness of the plot and characters of this movie such as RJ's strong faith in God even though he's not a practicing Mormon anymore and the complex scenes where the gay- relationship, family and religious issues are being tackled. The characters in this movie are individuals, and even though they are tied to certain societal and religious views, they have their own individual thoughts. And that's what I really love. It makes the movie really realistic.
Yes, some may say the movie is quite too long and a bit draggy, but I don't mind that as those are what makes this movie life like and not just another gay-problem-suicide or gay-coming out-happy/unhappy movie. And I don't mind the length as I really want to know more about their lives, even if they're fictional.
Thus, I applaud the director, producers and actors for producing such a realistic, close to heart (and much more cinematic) movie and I really hope that you guys can make another sequel, perhaps for a proper closure to myself and the other viewers, and to relieve my already bad movie-depression that I'm having. By the way, I regretted not watching this movie and the prequel much much earlier.
Poignant & Human
dfwenigma28 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I am not LDS - so let me start the review in that fashion. I grew up amongst judgmental people who seem to have nothing one could call an open mind. This movie brings to the fore painful experiences because I have known so many closeted people in very sad situations including LDS members. My impression is that whether Catholic, LDS, Baptist, Jehova's Witness, Orthodox Jewish - some of the shared beliefs about our relationships with one another create the kinds of dynamics one sees in this movie. That sense of profound shame. That acute need to be accepted. The message that God rejects you (when in fact it's man's interpretation of God's word that is the slap in the face.) The movie points to this fact a couple of times. The script isn't golden. It's a tough "sell" to the viewer if you've had a variety of experiences and have known LDS people. But the shared experiences of pain and closetedness are alive and well. Anyone who has not been accepted can clearly see that being "other" is a terrible thing. The sad part about this film is that it points out the train wreck that lying to oneself can create in order to live with who we are. Little wonder suicide amongst mainline faiths is so commonplace. If you can't tolerate some discomfort and pain this is a good movie. The house in the movie by the way, a mid-century modern is absolutely fabulous. You feel for everyone in the movie because no one escapes unscathed.
Underrated
hjames-9782225 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Sequel to the original "The Falls" I am reviewing only this film. For a number of reasons, not the least of which is the first film is ploddingly slow. This time, they got it right.
LDS Church members are a bit of an easy mark. They are the poster people of choice for all conservative religious orders. Not just Christian but Muslim and Jew as well as others. Many, if not most gay people would say it is probably deserved. But they are certainly the most visible.
Every actor in this ensemble is just great. They have these characters nailed. Hannah Barefoot as the devoted wife begging to hold on to her husband is a marvel. Her character sees herself not just losing her husband and home to a gay man. She sees herself losing her very identity as a Mormon. She is drowning here.
Nick and Ben who play the two truly star crossed lovers RJ and Chris are something to see. They literally drag you into their scenes and make you feel as though you are a part of their lives. The most wrenching, intimate scene IMHO is not one of their sexual trysts. It's the living room at Chris' house. He has brought together his wife, parents, brother, sister and his lover RJ to totally reject all their religious values and proclaim his love for one man--the only human being he has ever held in such regard. And Jesus and Joseph Smith can't forestall the whirlwind that comes through that room into that scene. Every single actor is fully clothed and yet, they are metaphorically stripped naked. The character of Chris literally hoists him self and RJ onto a cross and then drives in the nails.
One personal note: There is some minor male frontal nudity. This usually sends up all my red flags. It's usually an easy out for directors and is usually uncalled for. Most film and theatrical producers do it for a cheap PR play and media buzz to stir up viewer-ship and sell some tickets. They literally use an actor not for the story but for their own financial gain. (Think Ben Hardy in Judas Kiss. Or Dan Radcliffe in Equus.) Here there is a powerful scene in which actor Ben Farmer is showering. He has just reunited sexually with his one and only real lover, RJ. In his head he has lost his soul, his family, maybe his little daughter and dishonored every ancestor he ever had. He is desperate to wash away the sin. He stands under the water and then soaps his penis and tries to scrub his sin away. Impossible, of course. Whatever "sin" there was is in his heart, not between his legs. I say this because this is one of the few times I understand a director asking an actor to so perform. It is totally un-sexual. Instead it it sad, revealing and in a way, really very modest. And heartbreaking that organized religion has caused him to be so tortured.
You will not, I believe, be disappointed. A wonderful film.
LDS Church members are a bit of an easy mark. They are the poster people of choice for all conservative religious orders. Not just Christian but Muslim and Jew as well as others. Many, if not most gay people would say it is probably deserved. But they are certainly the most visible.
Every actor in this ensemble is just great. They have these characters nailed. Hannah Barefoot as the devoted wife begging to hold on to her husband is a marvel. Her character sees herself not just losing her husband and home to a gay man. She sees herself losing her very identity as a Mormon. She is drowning here.
Nick and Ben who play the two truly star crossed lovers RJ and Chris are something to see. They literally drag you into their scenes and make you feel as though you are a part of their lives. The most wrenching, intimate scene IMHO is not one of their sexual trysts. It's the living room at Chris' house. He has brought together his wife, parents, brother, sister and his lover RJ to totally reject all their religious values and proclaim his love for one man--the only human being he has ever held in such regard. And Jesus and Joseph Smith can't forestall the whirlwind that comes through that room into that scene. Every single actor is fully clothed and yet, they are metaphorically stripped naked. The character of Chris literally hoists him self and RJ onto a cross and then drives in the nails.
One personal note: There is some minor male frontal nudity. This usually sends up all my red flags. It's usually an easy out for directors and is usually uncalled for. Most film and theatrical producers do it for a cheap PR play and media buzz to stir up viewer-ship and sell some tickets. They literally use an actor not for the story but for their own financial gain. (Think Ben Hardy in Judas Kiss. Or Dan Radcliffe in Equus.) Here there is a powerful scene in which actor Ben Farmer is showering. He has just reunited sexually with his one and only real lover, RJ. In his head he has lost his soul, his family, maybe his little daughter and dishonored every ancestor he ever had. He is desperate to wash away the sin. He stands under the water and then soaps his penis and tries to scrub his sin away. Impossible, of course. Whatever "sin" there was is in his heart, not between his legs. I say this because this is one of the few times I understand a director asking an actor to so perform. It is totally un-sexual. Instead it it sad, revealing and in a way, really very modest. And heartbreaking that organized religion has caused him to be so tortured.
You will not, I believe, be disappointed. A wonderful film.
Not the film I saw
scottinhawaii-128 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I read all these pretty good reviews and high average rating and gave this film a shot. I found it boring and amateurish. It's one note seriousness from start to finish. There's not even a joyous moment when the men get together. The writing needs to be exceptional to carry a tone this serious for 2 hours. The characters are mostly acting in a monotone voice with downtrodden emphasis to drive home that this is a heavy subject. Awkward pauses are too numerous to count. The pacing is relentlessly slow. One note played on a piano for two hours does a symphony make. Maybe you need to be a gay ex Mormon to connect with this film. I'm not.
Touching & Powerful
spadrine26 May 2015
I happened to see this quite by accident after I saw Part 1 The Falls just this weekend--also by accident. Didn't know a sequel was done, and I'm so glad there was one. I felt the story wasn't complete. Anyway, I fell in love with both characters. In particular, RJ's character comes across as the epitome of genuineness; unafraid to say what he's thinking and feeling, and unashamed of who he is becoming. Testament of Love gave me the closure I needed to this story. Both actors were brilliant, and my heart ached for both. Being from the church, I could totally relate to what they were going through and for that reason, I was deeply moved. I've seen lots of gay-themed movies, but this one was one of the most powerful I've seen in decades. The entire cast was incredible and showed such powerful emotions. I really cannot praise this movie enough.
Um... no.
jmrmrogers27 October 2018
A Matter of Opinion
eastonkellan_ru8 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
If you have watched The Falls you will like this 2nd installment
First: it is a solid continuation where they left off because it was explained well what happened to the 2 main characters at the start of the movie
Second: The Attraction between RJ (Nick Ferrucci) and Chris (Benjamin Farmer)is there and very strong...... They're different (RJ is dark while Chris is fair) but same (watch it and you'll know what i mean)
The sex scene between the 2 is meant to be compulsive and not erotic since it's been 5 years since they've had sex with each other
Benjamin Farmer's eyes is so effective that it gets softer at his tender moments but will go steel cold the moment he tries to hide his feelings and you can feel his inner sufferings while delivering his monologues (to Nick)
Third: I don't mind a third installment of this movie considering it's not a big budgeted film and yet it's quite good.....
Lastly:Big Budgeted Sci Fi films in comparison with a small budgeted gay themed film...... really ????? and for the record George Lucas only directed Star Wars and not Empire Strikes Back nor Return of the Jedi for that matter
First: it is a solid continuation where they left off because it was explained well what happened to the 2 main characters at the start of the movie
Second: The Attraction between RJ (Nick Ferrucci) and Chris (Benjamin Farmer)is there and very strong...... They're different (RJ is dark while Chris is fair) but same (watch it and you'll know what i mean)
The sex scene between the 2 is meant to be compulsive and not erotic since it's been 5 years since they've had sex with each other
Benjamin Farmer's eyes is so effective that it gets softer at his tender moments but will go steel cold the moment he tries to hide his feelings and you can feel his inner sufferings while delivering his monologues (to Nick)
Third: I don't mind a third installment of this movie considering it's not a big budgeted film and yet it's quite good.....
Lastly:Big Budgeted Sci Fi films in comparison with a small budgeted gay themed film...... really ????? and for the record George Lucas only directed Star Wars and not Empire Strikes Back nor Return of the Jedi for that matter
Longing for Each Other
gadbearr21 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This movie was better than the first one to me. Don't get me wrong, the first one was excellent. I bought this DVD because of seeing the first movie "The Falls" on Netflix and checking on IMDb to find out more about the actors and director and saw there was a continuation movie. This movie really built more on the two main character's longing for each other. RJ (Nick Ferrucci) knew there was something still missing in his life even though he was dating Paul (Thomas Stroppel). RJ went in search of it. He knew the missing part to his life was Chris. You could feel the pain that Chris (Benjamin Farmer) was going through and his conflict of being someone everyone else wanted him to be and not being true to himself. Writer/Director Jon Garcia did a wonderful job of making these characters so realistic. The love scene between RJ and Chris was very tastefully done with just the right amount of flashes between both his lives to give a wonderful synchronicity. When you have characters interact with each other in such a way as this you are left feeling very satisfied as a viewer yet wanting to see even more of them as they live out their lives. I would vote YES for a third movie in a heartbeat. Hello Jon Garcia, are you listening? :)
Excellent film for the reported budget
Historian-319 July 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I share the opinion of other reviewers that this and its prequel are both excellent films. And if one takes into account the exceptionally low budgets on which they were made, they are both SUPERB films! And as far as that goes, I say "Bring on the third and make it a trilogy!"
Yes, the on screen chemistry in the second is different from the first. But as a couple of reviewers noted, the nature of the relationship between RJ and Chris is likewise quite different. I thought the chemistry in the sequel was precisely where it needed to be: "compulsive," as one reviewer put it. In the prequel, we experienced a degree of innocence as RJ and Chris discovered each other and themselves. In Testament, that innocence has been utterly replaced by desperation on the part of both characters as each attempts to come to terms with himself and to find the life his essential "self" must have in order to be fulfilled and happy.
Picky details:
While a viewer need not necessarily know anything about the LDS faith, I think it does help give the film a much deeper resonance if you do. Many small but very meaningful details get lost otherwise. I am thinking particularly of RJ's defiling of his temple garments, of the sign on the wall in Chris's living room "Family Is Forever," and of Chris's father's specific position in the church hierarchy. Without having checked to verify, I have the strong impression that Jon Garcia must himself be or have been an LDS. And though I am not myself LDS and never have been (I'm atheist), I do know quite a lot about it ... and that knowledge contributed to my greater understanding of the characters' journey in the film.
Chris's home: This element was hugely distracting. In the film Chris is 25 years old and a pharmaceutical sales rep. Yes, drug salesmen make pretty decent money. But come on! The set designer would have us believe that Chris went through reparative therapy (6 months?), finished a university degree (2 years at least following his mission, and pretty much a basic pre-hire requirement for any pharmaceutical sales rep), and following all that, or between roughly the ages of 22 and 25, was able to bank enough money to buy that house??? Even in Utah, that house would have a high-6-figure or low-7-figure price tag. Custom-made front door, glass walls, natural stone floors, at least 3000 square feet of living space, a custom pool, a back lawn and garden clearly done by a landscape architect. And the furniture and original artwork on the walls? Add another $100K. It beggars belief that a 25-year- old pharm rep would be able to afford all that plus a $75K Mercedes. Dial it back, set designer! Or were you given free use of someone's home and car in exchange for a screen credit?
Yes, the on screen chemistry in the second is different from the first. But as a couple of reviewers noted, the nature of the relationship between RJ and Chris is likewise quite different. I thought the chemistry in the sequel was precisely where it needed to be: "compulsive," as one reviewer put it. In the prequel, we experienced a degree of innocence as RJ and Chris discovered each other and themselves. In Testament, that innocence has been utterly replaced by desperation on the part of both characters as each attempts to come to terms with himself and to find the life his essential "self" must have in order to be fulfilled and happy.
Picky details:
While a viewer need not necessarily know anything about the LDS faith, I think it does help give the film a much deeper resonance if you do. Many small but very meaningful details get lost otherwise. I am thinking particularly of RJ's defiling of his temple garments, of the sign on the wall in Chris's living room "Family Is Forever," and of Chris's father's specific position in the church hierarchy. Without having checked to verify, I have the strong impression that Jon Garcia must himself be or have been an LDS. And though I am not myself LDS and never have been (I'm atheist), I do know quite a lot about it ... and that knowledge contributed to my greater understanding of the characters' journey in the film.
Chris's home: This element was hugely distracting. In the film Chris is 25 years old and a pharmaceutical sales rep. Yes, drug salesmen make pretty decent money. But come on! The set designer would have us believe that Chris went through reparative therapy (6 months?), finished a university degree (2 years at least following his mission, and pretty much a basic pre-hire requirement for any pharmaceutical sales rep), and following all that, or between roughly the ages of 22 and 25, was able to bank enough money to buy that house??? Even in Utah, that house would have a high-6-figure or low-7-figure price tag. Custom-made front door, glass walls, natural stone floors, at least 3000 square feet of living space, a custom pool, a back lawn and garden clearly done by a landscape architect. And the furniture and original artwork on the walls? Add another $100K. It beggars belief that a 25-year- old pharm rep would be able to afford all that plus a $75K Mercedes. Dial it back, set designer! Or were you given free use of someone's home and car in exchange for a screen credit?
Not as good as the first
justahunch-7054910 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I can't truly say I disliked this as I couldn't stop watching it for a moment, but I was disappointed. This is a sequel to a small, simple and very good film about two young men in love and their conflicts with their religious beliefs and the Mormon church. That conflict still exists, at least for one of them that this time around takes place five years later, but this is a much more intricate story involving more than just the two principle characters in the first performed appealing by Nick Ferrucci as R. J. and Benjamin Franklin as Chris. This time around their so-called forbidden love has victims, something the first did not. There is a very loving wife, a child and a sweet and seemingly deeply in love boyfriend whose lives are damaged by the love between these two.
The writing is just not as good this time around, though some of it is moving in some intimate conversations first between the two men, the character Chris and his wife and then another between him and his mother, but some of it is unrealistic most particularly an absurdly unkind gathering created by Chris with his wife, siblings, parents and R. J. The cruel and selfish situation he creates here hurts everyone involved. One has to wonder just what of person he has turned into in the five years that have passed. There's more to it in the latter stages, but some of it nears melodrama. I'm no prude and haven't any problem with nudity that serves a purpose, but there is a complete nude scene of one of these young men that serves no purpose whatsoever other than to see a naked man shower for a while. This struck me as very odd given the approach of the writer/director Joe Garcia in the first film. The focal point of the first film was primarily R. J., but this time around it is Chris' turn and he is more complex and selfish than one realized the first time around. To give him a little credit, he is also more conflicted than the other. These two actors both gave terrific performances in the first film, but stumble a bit in this one, but it may simply be the writing's fault. I didn't find the ending at all satisfying or particularly believable, but it clearly is set up for a third film which there is. I hope it is better than this on.
The writing is just not as good this time around, though some of it is moving in some intimate conversations first between the two men, the character Chris and his wife and then another between him and his mother, but some of it is unrealistic most particularly an absurdly unkind gathering created by Chris with his wife, siblings, parents and R. J. The cruel and selfish situation he creates here hurts everyone involved. One has to wonder just what of person he has turned into in the five years that have passed. There's more to it in the latter stages, but some of it nears melodrama. I'm no prude and haven't any problem with nudity that serves a purpose, but there is a complete nude scene of one of these young men that serves no purpose whatsoever other than to see a naked man shower for a while. This struck me as very odd given the approach of the writer/director Joe Garcia in the first film. The focal point of the first film was primarily R. J., but this time around it is Chris' turn and he is more complex and selfish than one realized the first time around. To give him a little credit, he is also more conflicted than the other. These two actors both gave terrific performances in the first film, but stumble a bit in this one, but it may simply be the writing's fault. I didn't find the ending at all satisfying or particularly believable, but it clearly is set up for a third film which there is. I hope it is better than this on.
Attention! Calling all hopeless romantics
winstonma16 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I finally came around and watched this film (and the prequel) and both made such an impact on me, I wanted to post my first IMDb review on it. While I may not be Mormon nor overtly religious in general, I think anyone who has ever been in love and/or ever experienced such an intense feeling for someone that it still resonates with you to this day will absolutely fall for this film and its two leading actors. Yes, The Falls definitely focuses on religion and the characters' own experiences/torment with coming to terms with their own sexuality and what it means with regards to religion. However, I think at the end of the day for me, this film is about love and all that comes with it: hope, despair, yearning for this one person, connection but most of all, being at ease with this person.
As many other posters have noted, in order for you to really get an understanding of The Falls' world, I would highly suggest watching the prequel first, and then watching this sequel. While these two films are considered "low budget"/indie, I thought Garcia and the whole cast did a phenomenal job. Not only were both films so believable (that's the beauty of "indie" films), the story really hooked me. Sure, some may say that this is just a typical "gay film about characters coming out and dealing with it", but I think they are missing the point. I've seen A LOT of LGBTQ films and there are only a handful that haunt/linger with me afterwards. These two movies - and in particular, this sequel - left me in such a daze. Like I said, for me this movie was about love and watching this, reminded me of my first love and the emotional roller coaster that ensued. Much like the film's story, we met up years after losing touch and that surrealness (that RJ so brilliantly talked about) was so palpable in our meet. Then came the memories: the yearning and longing for this person and the "what if" feelings. I may be digressing but what I am trying to point out is that this movie was so authentic in its portrayal of lost love and the re-kindling of feelings.
I can't post this review without applauding both leads, Nick Ferrucci (RJ) and Ben Farmer (Chris). Both actors did a stupendous job of portraying their characters' emotions, struggles, and love. Now some reviewers were criticizing the "lack of affection" between the leads. I wholeheartedly disagree - I thought if anything, the affection and emotions were stronger in this sequel than in the prequel. The love was so palpable and real on screen that if I didn't know any better, I would honestly think they were a couple in real life. Bravo because too often, the actors that play gay roles, while good, aren't truly believable. Nick and Ben? I'm actually mad that they aren't together in real life (half joking)! For me, I truly cared for them. Yes, this is a film and make-believe, but you know when a film is so well made (and its actors did their jobs) you are pulled into its world and for a couple hours you believe that the characters are real - or at least pretend that they exist. Like I said earlier, only a handful of films have lingered with me including Beautiful Thing where both Jamie & Ste's characters were so well acted and believable, you wanted them to live happily ever after. With The Falls, you want both RJ and Chris to live that fairy tale life...and while you don't see it on screen, the ending gives you hope. Yes, that may sound corny to many, but what is life without love and hope? The Falls and its two leading actors make you want to believe - it certainly did with me!
There were many scenes that really stood out (most of them towards the middle/end), and after watching the film, I went back to re-watch. The emotion and realness of these scenes were so authentic that watching some of them, will break your heart. Make sure to pay close attention to:
I can go on but I'm approaching my word limit! One last note, the music was perfect - especially "With My Heart Held Up High" by Owen Duff...brilliantly sets the mood for the scene(s). Thank you to everyone who made this series happen - I wouldn't be mad if a third instalment was made #justsaying
As many other posters have noted, in order for you to really get an understanding of The Falls' world, I would highly suggest watching the prequel first, and then watching this sequel. While these two films are considered "low budget"/indie, I thought Garcia and the whole cast did a phenomenal job. Not only were both films so believable (that's the beauty of "indie" films), the story really hooked me. Sure, some may say that this is just a typical "gay film about characters coming out and dealing with it", but I think they are missing the point. I've seen A LOT of LGBTQ films and there are only a handful that haunt/linger with me afterwards. These two movies - and in particular, this sequel - left me in such a daze. Like I said, for me this movie was about love and watching this, reminded me of my first love and the emotional roller coaster that ensued. Much like the film's story, we met up years after losing touch and that surrealness (that RJ so brilliantly talked about) was so palpable in our meet. Then came the memories: the yearning and longing for this person and the "what if" feelings. I may be digressing but what I am trying to point out is that this movie was so authentic in its portrayal of lost love and the re-kindling of feelings.
I can't post this review without applauding both leads, Nick Ferrucci (RJ) and Ben Farmer (Chris). Both actors did a stupendous job of portraying their characters' emotions, struggles, and love. Now some reviewers were criticizing the "lack of affection" between the leads. I wholeheartedly disagree - I thought if anything, the affection and emotions were stronger in this sequel than in the prequel. The love was so palpable and real on screen that if I didn't know any better, I would honestly think they were a couple in real life. Bravo because too often, the actors that play gay roles, while good, aren't truly believable. Nick and Ben? I'm actually mad that they aren't together in real life (half joking)! For me, I truly cared for them. Yes, this is a film and make-believe, but you know when a film is so well made (and its actors did their jobs) you are pulled into its world and for a couple hours you believe that the characters are real - or at least pretend that they exist. Like I said earlier, only a handful of films have lingered with me including Beautiful Thing where both Jamie & Ste's characters were so well acted and believable, you wanted them to live happily ever after. With The Falls, you want both RJ and Chris to live that fairy tale life...and while you don't see it on screen, the ending gives you hope. Yes, that may sound corny to many, but what is life without love and hope? The Falls and its two leading actors make you want to believe - it certainly did with me!
There were many scenes that really stood out (most of them towards the middle/end), and after watching the film, I went back to re-watch. The emotion and realness of these scenes were so authentic that watching some of them, will break your heart. Make sure to pay close attention to:
- the sequence where RJ and Chris see each other for the first time in what appears to be the hotel dining area, and there's that elephant in the room but neither are going to bring it up until the next scene where RJ walks Chris up to his room...the emotion and acting that ensued were phenomenal. It will make you want to shout at your screen, cry in anger and out of empathy all in one swoop.
- the scene in RJ's room where they finally "connect", both Ben & Nick were SO believable that it made you forget that you were watching a film. Especially the ending of the "erotic" scene, both actors didn't say anything, but they didn't have to, their facial expressions (the eyes) said everything for them...this was when I was so mad that they weren't a couple in real life!
- while messed up, the scene where Chris comes out to his family with RJ present was done with such conviction and love...I teared up when Chris said the line "I'm gay...and I'm in love with him." RJ's reaction was so tender yet sad (it was the moment that RJ has been waiting for for 5 years)...and yes, Hannah Barefoot (the wife) did a standup job
- the aftermath that ensued...you have to watch it to understand the pure emotion (of love and everything that comes with it) that was portrayed
I can go on but I'm approaching my word limit! One last note, the music was perfect - especially "With My Heart Held Up High" by Owen Duff...brilliantly sets the mood for the scene(s). Thank you to everyone who made this series happen - I wouldn't be mad if a third instalment was made #justsaying
heartbreaking, but still fairly good.
pabald94809 May 2014
Warning: Spoilers
For those who have seen the original, but are still considering the sequel hesitantly, go for it! Even if you aren't gay or Mormon, you still may get something out of it. I wasn't too crazy about Chris in the sequel's beginning after RJ comes to see him in Utah, but their love was rekindled rather quickly, even though this ending was bittersweet. I was impressed once again, with the direct approach to religious hypocrisy and intolerance, but also the two male leads, in the end, RJ was very self sacrificing in regards to Chris: not letting him leave his new life for him, which was very moving. Watch the scene with tissues handy, you may need them, I certainly did.
Another Must Watch! RAW! Beautiful! Reality! Don't fall for the ratings
desperate_one26 August 2020
2nd installment of this movie is even better. As i reviewed in my first installment and another top review here pointed out this movie relates so much to religiously persecuted yet still religious communities. The most closest one that come is Islam. And as a closeted muslim man this one touched heart.
I felt every emotion that portrayed. I felt every body move they made. I felt their longing. I felt their pain. i imagined my lover's touch while watching them.
Also the soundtracks were gold. The one played during their forbidden love making (Once I believed) is clearly gonna play nonstop in my ears for next week. I even can see i am marrying to this soundtrack.
Again this all may seem so cringe to average people and i dont blame. But this brings up so much emotions. And unless you have been to this position theres no way one can understand this pain no matter how much considerate and sympathetic they are.
i applaud the directors and main cast to be so realistic and such a good performance. And i demand a 4th installment.
I felt every emotion that portrayed. I felt every body move they made. I felt their longing. I felt their pain. i imagined my lover's touch while watching them.
Also the soundtracks were gold. The one played during their forbidden love making (Once I believed) is clearly gonna play nonstop in my ears for next week. I even can see i am marrying to this soundtrack.
Again this all may seem so cringe to average people and i dont blame. But this brings up so much emotions. And unless you have been to this position theres no way one can understand this pain no matter how much considerate and sympathetic they are.
i applaud the directors and main cast to be so realistic and such a good performance. And i demand a 4th installment.
A sequel to rival the original
kentlamoreux28 December 2015
It isn't often a sequel bests an original. I loved the original film, The Falls, and said it left me wanting more. Well, this is more in a BIG, BIG way, but don't watch it until you've seen the first one! It focuses more on Chris where the first film focused on RJ, which sets the stage well for what is to come. I am not Mormon, so I can only imagine the degree to which gay Mormons suffer trying to be faithful to themselves and their religion despite their religion not being faithful to them. This film deals with that in a very straightforward way, and we can feel for not just what the boys go through but how tortured their families become as well when trying to deal with a gay child, sibling or mate. This is a powerful film, and leaves the door wide open for yet a 3rd installment if they so choose...this is one viewer who would stand in a very long line to see it!
Beautiful, divine, emotionally overwhelming...a triumph of sparkling love!
prasanttrimurthy29 December 2017
Who needs acrimonious reality when movies like this serve Utopian fantasy?
The Falls Testament of Love is a vivid portrayal of lingering love, longings and affection, and how lost feelings are reclaimed - and how it implores for liberty from God, religion, society and surrounding inhibitions. This movie is a masterly exploration of the process of regaining lost love and developing courage to be who you are.
The movie captures conversations between characters that go deeper and argumentative, creating a space for emotional catharsis where we find ourselves enthralled. It is literally hard to resist what its lead gay characters make you feel. RJ and Chris are two estranged lovers poised between the spirit of love and the price of love.
This film, which is an extension of the first part, has illuminated the fact that you will never be able to shroud your true self or entrap your eternally unfulfilled desire. No matter how mighty-hearted you pretend to be - no matter how many layers of denial you manufacture against your wants - it will eventually explode and leave you vulnerable.
The movie is an absolute triumph of love, indeed. Nick is fascinating to watch, a feast to your gay eyes...he has got a face that reflects unstudied emotions. And Hats Off to Mr Garcia for bringing it to us.
The Falls Testament of Love is a vivid portrayal of lingering love, longings and affection, and how lost feelings are reclaimed - and how it implores for liberty from God, religion, society and surrounding inhibitions. This movie is a masterly exploration of the process of regaining lost love and developing courage to be who you are.
The movie captures conversations between characters that go deeper and argumentative, creating a space for emotional catharsis where we find ourselves enthralled. It is literally hard to resist what its lead gay characters make you feel. RJ and Chris are two estranged lovers poised between the spirit of love and the price of love.
This film, which is an extension of the first part, has illuminated the fact that you will never be able to shroud your true self or entrap your eternally unfulfilled desire. No matter how mighty-hearted you pretend to be - no matter how many layers of denial you manufacture against your wants - it will eventually explode and leave you vulnerable.
The movie is an absolute triumph of love, indeed. Nick is fascinating to watch, a feast to your gay eyes...he has got a face that reflects unstudied emotions. And Hats Off to Mr Garcia for bringing it to us.
I love this story
mhubbard-5465724 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The Falls' Mormon missionary characters captivated me, so I was very glad a second film had funding.
This is the story of RJ and Chris 5 years later. They went their separate ways, and unfortunately, Chris fell victim to Mormon gay reparative therapy. He is now married to a woman, Emily, and has a child. Benjamin Farmer does a great job portraying a man living a lie, with his facial expressions and body language. Although he lives in a mansion, and is superficially very successful, we can sense his anguish.
RJ is now living as an openly gay man, and has a long time companion, Paul. Although RJ is living more honestly, we can sense his anguish as well. Nick Ferrucci is excellent, very believable. RJ tries, but he can't completely forget his LDS upbringing. His partner Paul is a great guy, but at some level, RJ realizes that he doesn't love him the way he loves Chris.
An unexpected event brings Chris and RJ together. Chris initially rejects him, but RJ pushes the issue, wanting at least some closure for what happened on their mission. With RJ in town, Chris is suddenly impotent with his wife. Chris and RJ get together, talk over old times, and eventually make love. His wife catches them in the act, and Chris finally comes out to his very conservative family. There is a great deal of anger and tears, including for RJ, who trashes his hotel room in frustration.
There are some really great performances here. Hannah Barefoot does a fabulous job playing Emily, the scorned wife.
The plot has minor holes but most of the supporting cast is quite good, as well as the two leads, who have great chemistry. The pacing of the film is more like a soap opera or a documentary, but that is part of the charm.
This is the story of RJ and Chris 5 years later. They went their separate ways, and unfortunately, Chris fell victim to Mormon gay reparative therapy. He is now married to a woman, Emily, and has a child. Benjamin Farmer does a great job portraying a man living a lie, with his facial expressions and body language. Although he lives in a mansion, and is superficially very successful, we can sense his anguish.
RJ is now living as an openly gay man, and has a long time companion, Paul. Although RJ is living more honestly, we can sense his anguish as well. Nick Ferrucci is excellent, very believable. RJ tries, but he can't completely forget his LDS upbringing. His partner Paul is a great guy, but at some level, RJ realizes that he doesn't love him the way he loves Chris.
An unexpected event brings Chris and RJ together. Chris initially rejects him, but RJ pushes the issue, wanting at least some closure for what happened on their mission. With RJ in town, Chris is suddenly impotent with his wife. Chris and RJ get together, talk over old times, and eventually make love. His wife catches them in the act, and Chris finally comes out to his very conservative family. There is a great deal of anger and tears, including for RJ, who trashes his hotel room in frustration.
There are some really great performances here. Hannah Barefoot does a fabulous job playing Emily, the scorned wife.
The plot has minor holes but most of the supporting cast is quite good, as well as the two leads, who have great chemistry. The pacing of the film is more like a soap opera or a documentary, but that is part of the charm.
Disappointing sequel to The Falls
jm1070113 December 2013
I'm going to assume that anyone considering this movie has already seen The Falls. If you haven't, you should. This is a sequel, and you need to have seen The Falls first. Therefore, I won't waste time telling who RJ and Chris are and what happened between them in the past.
I suspect that most fans of The Falls are going to love this one too, so you may want to stop reading now and just see the movie. It continues the gay Mormon theme of the original in a different setting.
It's five years later. Chris is back in Salt Lake, has been reabsorbed into Mormonism, has turned hetero through therapy and self-control, is making oodles of moolah as a pharma rep, is happily married and has a daughter.
RJ has not returned to Mormonism (although he still wears the underwear and believes most of the teachings), has a dreamboat lover named Paul who adores him, and is making ends meet writing for a magazine in Seattle.
RJ and Chris meet again for the first time at Rodney the stoner's funeral. RJ dumps Paul (a real catch and played by the best actor in either movie) and goes to Salt Lake to get Chris back. Much drama ensues. I'll stop there.
I LOVED The Falls - it was SO much better than the highly overrated Latter Days. But I have three problems with the sequel.
First, it adds nothing significant to the original, just recycles the same angst in a new town. Maybe gay Mormons need an endless series of Star Wars-like sequels and prequels, but this non-Mormon gay has had enough of it already.
Second, there's no believable attraction between RJ and Chris this time. It's compulsive, not erotic at all. Not one spark. Totally unbelievable, unless both guys are so neurotic now that they will do anything to be miserable. (Besides, the guy who plays Chris has gotten creepy looking - really weird eyes like a lizard).
Third, this sequel has the gall to set up for yet ANOTHER sequel, just as The Empire Strikes Back did. Lucas pulled it off, but Jon Garcia should have stopped at one.
I suspect that most fans of The Falls are going to love this one too, so you may want to stop reading now and just see the movie. It continues the gay Mormon theme of the original in a different setting.
It's five years later. Chris is back in Salt Lake, has been reabsorbed into Mormonism, has turned hetero through therapy and self-control, is making oodles of moolah as a pharma rep, is happily married and has a daughter.
RJ has not returned to Mormonism (although he still wears the underwear and believes most of the teachings), has a dreamboat lover named Paul who adores him, and is making ends meet writing for a magazine in Seattle.
RJ and Chris meet again for the first time at Rodney the stoner's funeral. RJ dumps Paul (a real catch and played by the best actor in either movie) and goes to Salt Lake to get Chris back. Much drama ensues. I'll stop there.
I LOVED The Falls - it was SO much better than the highly overrated Latter Days. But I have three problems with the sequel.
First, it adds nothing significant to the original, just recycles the same angst in a new town. Maybe gay Mormons need an endless series of Star Wars-like sequels and prequels, but this non-Mormon gay has had enough of it already.
Second, there's no believable attraction between RJ and Chris this time. It's compulsive, not erotic at all. Not one spark. Totally unbelievable, unless both guys are so neurotic now that they will do anything to be miserable. (Besides, the guy who plays Chris has gotten creepy looking - really weird eyes like a lizard).
Third, this sequel has the gall to set up for yet ANOTHER sequel, just as The Empire Strikes Back did. Lucas pulled it off, but Jon Garcia should have stopped at one.
From risk to rewards - a trilogy filled with faith, hope and love...
souldancer-7214915 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Producer, Writer and Director Jon Garcia's trilogy spanning, The Falls, The Falls: Testament of Love and now The Falls: Covenant of Grace allows me to wander around emotions of wonder, inspiration, hope as well as despair. I wonder why Garcia (a straight man) chose to dedicate precious resources (time, money, reputation) to write, produce and direct three content rich docudramas focused on dogma all too many same-sex oriented souls daily face.
How did Garcia inspire two clearly talented straight actors (Benjamin Farmer and Nick Ferrucci) to dive deep enough into their respective characters that I thought they were members of my tribe (gay men). Garcia's trilogy direction tenderly allowed Farmer ("Chris Merrill") and Ferrucci ("RJ Smith") to blossom from tormented closeted characters to a happy, out gay couple ready, willing and able to face the entrenched dogma of their chosen faith. I wonder - will Garcia's aptly portrayed real-life chaos within same-sex Mormon families create adequate discussion inside and out of The Church of Latter-day Saints (LDS) to inspire action to resolve the despair it intentionally creates?
Garcia's decision to shape his lead characters (Chris and RJ) into potential LDS change agents inspires hope. Hope based on the positive portrayal of healthy, stable gay married couple ready to live life with no regrets (regardless of the despair their dogma creates).
In the final of this trilogy - The Falls: Covenant of Grace - thanks to the vision of both Garcia and co-writer Rodney Moore LDS has a road map in which to evolve. Will LDS choose to walk this road or will it decide - much like other dying faiths - choose self-inflicted extinction as decades melt into centuries.
Buy this trilogy. (imdb.com/name/nm4296517/) Witness a solid portrayal of the wisdom within Margaret Mead's wisdom (quote): "Never believe that a few caring people can't change the world. For, indeed, that's all who ever have.
Thank you to Garcia, Moore and the entire cast and crew for showing us how to be the change our world needs.
How did Garcia inspire two clearly talented straight actors (Benjamin Farmer and Nick Ferrucci) to dive deep enough into their respective characters that I thought they were members of my tribe (gay men). Garcia's trilogy direction tenderly allowed Farmer ("Chris Merrill") and Ferrucci ("RJ Smith") to blossom from tormented closeted characters to a happy, out gay couple ready, willing and able to face the entrenched dogma of their chosen faith. I wonder - will Garcia's aptly portrayed real-life chaos within same-sex Mormon families create adequate discussion inside and out of The Church of Latter-day Saints (LDS) to inspire action to resolve the despair it intentionally creates?
Garcia's decision to shape his lead characters (Chris and RJ) into potential LDS change agents inspires hope. Hope based on the positive portrayal of healthy, stable gay married couple ready to live life with no regrets (regardless of the despair their dogma creates).
In the final of this trilogy - The Falls: Covenant of Grace - thanks to the vision of both Garcia and co-writer Rodney Moore LDS has a road map in which to evolve. Will LDS choose to walk this road or will it decide - much like other dying faiths - choose self-inflicted extinction as decades melt into centuries.
Buy this trilogy. (imdb.com/name/nm4296517/) Witness a solid portrayal of the wisdom within Margaret Mead's wisdom (quote): "Never believe that a few caring people can't change the world. For, indeed, that's all who ever have.
Thank you to Garcia, Moore and the entire cast and crew for showing us how to be the change our world needs.
You would feel loved up again by the two men!
Irishchatter28 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
If you haven't seen the first movie, then you are very much missing out big time on what really had happened. So after 5 years of being found out they were both gay and loved each other, Chris decided to continue his missionary and RJ moved to Seattle. Then Chris got married to a beautiful Mormon girl named Emily and both had a baby daughter. Hannah Barefoot is just a really stunning talented actress. For RJ, he got himself a wonderful boyfriend whom he unfortunately dumped on because he still cant get over Chris. That was really emotional like, the guy couldn't stop loving RJ. There is more tear jerking by the way as you watch this film.
It was a very distressing and depressing moment that Emily and Chris admitted to their families that they were separating because of the fact, she found him kissing RJ at a hotel. I felt really sorry and angry for her but she should realise that his parents pushed him to marry a woman and not RJ. She should've at least been happy for him including his parents! I suppose, they hadn't dealt with a family member being gay before and its all new to them but at the same time, its not a extremely bad thing! This is such a powerful film and you will feel tears in your eyes after watching this!
It was a very distressing and depressing moment that Emily and Chris admitted to their families that they were separating because of the fact, she found him kissing RJ at a hotel. I felt really sorry and angry for her but she should realise that his parents pushed him to marry a woman and not RJ. She should've at least been happy for him including his parents! I suppose, they hadn't dealt with a family member being gay before and its all new to them but at the same time, its not a extremely bad thing! This is such a powerful film and you will feel tears in your eyes after watching this!
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
