In Country (2014) Poster

(2014)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Revisiting Vietnam
westsideschl20 August 2015
A blend of Vietnam war footage, about 10% of film time but would like to have seen more, with a contemporary mix of about a dozen reenact ors, including veterans ranging from, approximately, Vietnam (2), Iraq & Afghanistan (2), as well as individuals with an interest in the Vietnam war. All taking place in Oregon. "In Country" joins the list of over a hundred movies with that war as an integral part of the storyline. Pre-enactment rituals include preparing their Vietnam era gear, then mapping the couple of days reconnaissance trek. Finally, giving outcome cards (e.g. whether you are to be a casualty, etc.) to each squad member. Also, coordinating with an outside group to act as enemy (gooks). Not explained in the film is who this surrogate enemy actually was and what their exact roles were to be. Another pre-trek ritual was showing the film "Easy Rider" (a popular anti-war film at the time) as well as a chalk board litany disparaging those in the US that were against the war. Also not explained was how this event was funded and how it was organized. Oddly, one of the central figures, Sgt. Hayden Baumgartner, who played a significant role in the film is not listed in the film's credits nor amongst the names of participants in the films's IMDb cast list. He died in 2011 even though the film was released in 2014.

One of the participants says, "that he thinks about it (the war) every day, the brutality of it; you don't forget stuff like that." As a twist of fate, today Vietnam has close relations with the US.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A historical anachronism gets this film off to a bad start
RudeArtAndDesign_Com12 September 2019
I'm not trying to be a cranky old fart here but, when watching any historical movie, show whatever it really ruins it for me when any (especially easily avoided) anachronism makes the final cut, frankly, just annoys me.

My problem with the movie? Why circa 1968 are the actors drinking from modern coke cans? Cans with pop-tops, barcodes and narrowed tops and bottoms which wouldnt exsist for atleast more than a decade. I don't know if it was maybe a lazy prop person and maybe a bad director that didnt notice or care. I dont know maybe it was a due to budget issues, they could not afford the extra $2.50 to buy a six pack of the classic bottles, which would have looked much more the part. In a movie that should be trying to be as historically accurate as possible it didn't get off to a great start.

Now you probably think this may be splitting hairs, and maybe it is. But here we are just 57 seconds in and I spot something that just shouldnt be there, how much else did they miss? So admittedly not having watched the movie I really just can't give this movie a "fair" review, therefore the "5" rating. I guess i just wanted to warn anyone else like me out there like me (and I know there's many) if you demand accuracy in a period piece whether it's historical fiction or true you might get annoyed as i was in the first minute of this film.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed