Suitable Flesh (2023) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
46 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A Weird Lovecraftian Love...Polyhedron.
meddlecore29 October 2023
As far as Lovecraftian adaptations go...this one is pretty good (most are quite bad, mind you).

Honestly, what would a Lovecraft adaptation be without a little cheese?

Of course this is cheesy.

It's too weird a tale to take itself too seriously.

As it's about a bizarre, slightly incestual, love triangle.

Between a boy, his ailing father, and cougar psychiatrist.

Although, it quickly mutates into more of a love polyhedron, of sorts.

As characters keep switching from body to body...with most ending up banging each other.

In what is eventually revealed to be the works of an ancient curse.

All-in-all, it's cheesy, twisted, entertaining fun.

As all Lovecraft films should be.

6 out of 10.
26 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Ancient curse for you and you and you...
JK-WhatsUpWeirdoPodcast29 October 2023
Didn't completely do it for me but on the bright side Judah Lewis reeeally did the most (perhaps served a little Chuck Bass?), and it had some lines that made me cackle: "Demon octopus.. awesome 😒" "Then I must've really wanted to F my old man" 🤣

Was definitely intentionally campy, 80's, soap opera-y, so don't go into it expecting a straight-forward or serious horror movie. I think it's important for critics to remember that horror is one of the only genres where people can get weird with it. It may not be your thing, and it may not be Oscar worthy, but just be glad the creativity is alive and happening.

For fans of Malignant, Tales from the Crypt.
17 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Suitable Flesh
CinemaSerf2 November 2023
Heather Graham is the successful psychiatrist "Elizabeth" who finds her daily routine interrupted by a visit from the seemingly paranoid "Asa" (Judah Lewis). Initially sceptical, she begins to become intrigued with his story that he is being persecuted by a man, on the phone, who is threatening him. Indeed one such call induces a sort of fit from the young man! A visit to his home, and she is hooked into a mystery that is somewhat reminiscent of "Fallen" (1998) as it turns our erstwhile respectable physician into someone reduced to some rather lively, impromptu, nookie before incarceration in a padded cell trying to convince her close friend "Dr. Dani" (Barbara Crampton) that she's not completely deranged. This starts off quite interestingly, with a solid effort from Lewis as the troubled youth - but as it progresses and it becomes clear to us just what is going on, the film begins to fall away and lose any potency. The last half hour is violent and brutal, but suffers from a lack of plausibility - in this or any other dimension - and it becomes repetitive and shows up the really mediocre quality of both the writing and the acting. It is watchable, if only for Lewis, but equally forgettable stuff.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I Struggled.
destiny_west5 December 2023
I was looking forward to watching Suitable Flesh, it seemed like something I would love, however, I was left rather disappointed. I couldn't get into it at all, it just seemed to aggravate me to the point that I was struggling not to turn it off.

I know it's meant to be campy 80s-like horror. I get it. I just couldn't get past the acting which is flat and robotic to me.

I think the best thing about this film is Barbara, My god she looks amazing. (big Reanimator fan here) So perhaps it was worth watching it for that reason alone. I may go back and give this film another go, as I really want to like it.
27 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A love letter to 80s/90s camp B-grade horror
FilmsCanChangeTheWorld28 October 2023
I really enjoyed this. It felt consciously crafted to honour the style and work of both H. P. Lovecraft and Stuart Gordon. It conveys a purposeful lack of factual reality in service of creating a special story-world tone that was commonly found in the 80s/90s Lovecraftian horror. At times it becomes a campy melodrama which adds to its fun, while at other times walking a fine line between emotional truth and absurdity. I get the feeling that modern audiences may not like this due to the association with H. P. Lovecraft and/or the lack of medical or emotional realism, but for me, that is exactly the point. I grew up on horror movies just like this - fun, campy, fleshy, sexy, they didn't take themselves or life too seriously while still conveying a message worth exploring. They weren't afraid to take some risks, and they didn't expect to win any oscars. These types of films have so much value. They offer us a glimpse into the depravity of our deepest desires and a shedding of the internalised scripts of social civility and explore the craziness that lives in all of us, challenging us beyond the comforts of our social conditioning and into our primal nature. Plus I'm a big fan of Barbara Crampton so this film very easily won me over.
27 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Utter Trash
valzey-6862817 November 2023
The movie in question was an utterly repulsive experience for me. It left me feeling that it was a complete waste of both my time and money. The storyline appeared to be utterly pointless, devoid of any substance or meaning. It was painfully evident that minimal effort, time, or thought had been invested in the creation of this film.

What distressed me the most was the lackluster performance by the cast. Their acting was so pathetically subpar that it bordered on cringeworthy. The characters they portrayed failed to evoke any genuine emotion or connection, leaving me completely disengaged from the narrative.

From the very first 20 minutes, the movie's predictability became glaringly apparent. I continued to watch, hoping for some redeeming quality or an intriguing twist in the plot that would salvage the viewing experience. Regrettably, what followed were unnecessarily prolonged and explicit sex scenes that added nothing to the story's development. These scenes felt gratuitous and distracting, detracting further from the film's already meager merits.

To compound matters, the use of a rotating screen, which appeared to serve no discernible purpose, came across as a foolish gimmick. It neither enhanced the storytelling nor added any artistic value; instead, it only served to intensify the sense of confusion and frustration that had been steadily building throughout the movie.

In summary, the movie was a disappointment on multiple fronts - from its lackluster storytelling and poor acting to its predictability, gratuitous content, and misguided attempts at innovation. It left me scarred, not by its intended emotional impact, but by the sheer disappointment of witnessing such a cinematic debacle. I cannot in good conscience recommend this film to anyone, as it offers little more than a frustrating and unsatisfying viewing experience.
24 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a good long episode of 80s Tales of the crypt kind off. some camp...
surfisfun31 October 2023
I went into this expecting ,and wanting, a serious horror base on Lovecraft stories of sort, so i was disappointed at first with some of the camp acting at times. But i really liked the story, except a major plot hole at the end.

With what seem a lower budget, it worked well wt camera effect and some gore. Sexy scenes where exceptionnaly well done too.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Still , im waiting for a well directed and produced serious horrors based or adapted work of Lovecraft, it sure not humorous horror literature.

------------------------------------------------------------ so ,its a watchable film, just do not expect more then tale of the crypt 80s n 90s, or a moody like 70s invasion of the body snatchers.
17 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A Disappointing Dive into Horror
rodgere30 October 2023
Suitable Flesh (2023), directed by Joe Lynch, ventured into the realms of horror and mystery thriller but ended up delivering a confusing and uninspiring narrative. The movie, drawn from H. P. Lovecraft's short story "The Thing on the Doorstep," fails to capture the eerie essence of Lovecraftian horror.

The plot unfolds around a psychiatrist who becomes obsessed with one of her young patients, later discovering that he's linked to an ancient curse. Despite the intriguing premise, the storyline descends into a muddled mess as it progresses.

A major downside was the acting, which was woefully inadequate from the entire cast, including Heather Graham and Judah Lewis. The performances lacked depth and authenticity, rendering the characters unrelatable and the plot more confusing.

The inclusion of four unnecessary sex scenes added nothing to the plot and felt like a desperate attempt to add some flair to an otherwise dull narrative. These scenes were distasteful and detracted from the already scant storyline.

The gore, which could have been a redeeming factor, was neither shocking nor well-executed. The scenes intended to be horrifying were rather bland, failing to evoke the desired reactions from the audience.

The runtime of 1h 40m felt much longer due to the lack of engaging content and coherent storytelling. The film's attempt to be "campy and creepy" was poorly executed, as noted by Rotten Tomatoes.

Overall, "Suitable Flesh" is a disappointing venture into horror that fails to entertain or scare, garnering a generous 4 stars for the occasional decent cinematography and a few well-done special effects. The movie is a forgettable addition to the 2023 horror genre, lacking the spine-chilling essence that horror enthusiasts crave.
30 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not as bad as I thought! Plus Points go to the Beautiful Heather Graham!
pibl-8782429 November 2023
When I saw the metascore I was really excited for the film. But when I read the first bad user reviews, I lost my joy and avoided the film. Then came the evening when I had nothing interesting to watch and after much deliberation I decided to give the film a chance. And I have to say, the film pleasantly surprised me in some ways. Heather Graham alone is worth a look and if you know Heather Graham, you know she's not afraid to show a little more of herself. She is also beautiful to look at and for her age she can be seen in nude scenes.

I like actress Heather Graham and am always happy to see her in a film. She dares to do something, and if the script had a little more to offer, she could of course do more acting. Unfortunately, the story is not new and we already know it from some better horror films. Unfortunately you can't get much out of the story. If you know this beforehand, you can still watch the film once. The film seems rather exaggerated, funny and trashy Horror comedy with some sex scenes that don't blow you away, but are still worth a watch because of Heather Gramma. The actors put in a little effort, but that's enough for an H. P. Lovecraft adoption that feels more like a comedy. I would have liked a little more blood in this film! And I have to say that the film was my first H. P. Lovecraft film and I had a bit of fun for a horror movie night. In the end, I didn't care enough to watch the film. I was also impressed by Joy Lynch's film work! Her directing style suited the film...but I still would have liked a bit more of a '70s look.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Wasn't for me
jtindahouse1 October 2023
Quick review: I wanted to like this film so much. It hurt me that I didn't enjoy it. To be fair it wasn't really my kind of film to begin with. I should've known better than to get my hopes up.

The story just never gripped me. It was too lazy and wildly unrealistic. There's also some real B-grade acting which was quite distracting. A lot of characters just feel like their lines are being read off a prompter.

The ending gets crazy and tries to make up some lost ground, but I had already checked out by that point. The film is also very erotic, however it's also very cut and paste with all of those scenes. This one wasn't for me. 3/10.
42 out of 79 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Thoroughly enjoyed this Lovecraftian ride
HorrorFilmHellion28 October 2023
I thought this was a great spin on Lovecraft and it had all the expected elements: It was gory, it was sexy, it had otherworldly presence to get where it was going, and it had mind-bending perverse twists. And the cast- who better to play these parts than the 4 chosen leads, which includes a still-got-it Heather Graham and Barbara Crampton? The script, acting, and on-screen charisma was great, and I stayed entertained and engaged the full run time. Maybe my score is slightly generous, but this is not a cheapy production with lousy technique. I thought the experience was solid, and Lovecraftian done well. Definitely recommend for Lovecraft fans, and good bendy horror in general.
21 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting and Fun Adaptation
icocleric4 February 2024
I found it a really fun adaption of Lovecraft's work. Of course it was a little bit campy, that was expected; but it had some nice touches going on. The cinematography has some pretty interesting things too, I was pleasantly surprised. Nice nods to the Cthulhu mythos even though it is not a huge part of the plot.

The acting was really good. Because there's some body snatching horror going on, you have characters who were meant to be in the body of another person, and I think you could tell who was who. I enjoyed the overall story.

It wasn't as scary or as tense as some horror out there, but it was still an interesting watch.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Lovecraft would not have liked it
theladyjustina6 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This movie has so many uncomfortable sex acts mostly between a teen boy and a fifty five year old, at one point (through body swapping) a teen and his father? The Director seemed to think that sexuality was enough of a motivation for the characters and interest for the scenes. Heather Graham did a good job as the leading actor but nothing could save this screenplay. It was probably a fun role with bragging rights for young Judah Lewis. I didn't get Lovecraft from this film at all. There was an extremely small amount of occult, horror, or science fiction. The plot was very thin. It felt like a Women's Network movie. The characters often did not react plausibly or have any depth.
13 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Another worthy nomination for the Worst Lovecraft Adaptation award
mercenaryntx28 December 2023
I have a conspiracy theory that there's an active competition in the film industry among directors who can do the worst Lovecraft adaptation ever. How else could you explain all these terrible adaptations that make the same mistakes over and over and over again?! They don't even try to do a decent adaptation.

If the actual challenge was to make all the mistakes possible then Joe Lynch really did his homework, otherwise he failed miserably. And it all seems pretty intentional to me.

Wanna ruin a Lovecraft adaptation?

  • Move it to the present. (CHECK)
  • Add lots and lots of sex. (CHECK)
  • Remove the fear from the unknown (CHECK) and replace it with lame body horror elements (CHECK).


  • Remove logic (CHECK), tension (CHECK) and the disturbing narrative process where the bad things already have happened and the protagonist is already dead or went insane (CHECK)
  • Remove everything else that made Lovecraft great (CHECK) and keep some Cthulhu related props (CHECK) and famous names like Arkham and Miskatonic only (CHECK).


Shame on you Joe Lynch, shame on you!
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Decent but forgettable
aronharde2 November 2023
In Suitable Flesh the makers of Re-Animator and From Beyond once again team up with Barbara Crampton to tell one of HP Lovecrafts's stories. On top of that a gorgeous looking Heather Graham is starring as our main protagonist Dr. Elizabeth Derby. Also you have Judah Lewis from The Babysitter movies who is playing an entirely different character in this. The movie looks visually good and has some great shots and also some trippy scenes. You have an interesting story with characters swapping bodies and therefore behaving like total lunatics. While I had my fun watching this I don't think that this movie will be remembered for long. I think it's rather forgettable but for this one time watch it definitely was decent enough. [5,5/10]
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
3 stars for Heather's boobs
anthonyiaclaims30 October 2023
Unless you just have to see Heathers boob occasionally fall out of her robe there is no reason to suffer through this. Just really bad. I like her in some movies but she can't carry a movie. Plus the writing and directing were a crap fest.

This is a poor copy of many movies that have used a demon who constantly changes bodies. Just watch one of those, you'll be better off.

Unless you just have to see Heathers boob occasionally fall out of her robe there is no reason to suffer through this. Just really bad. I like her in some movies but she can't carry a movie. Plus the writing and directing were a crap fest.

This is a poor copy of many movies that have used a demon who constantly changes bodies. Just watch one of those, you'll be better off.
22 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Suitable Flesh possesses enough commendable aspects to warrant a watch, though it doesn't stand out significantly in its genre
kevin_robbins1 February 2024
I recently viewed Suitable Flesh (2023) on Shudder. The plot revolves around a psychiatrist encountering a troubled young man who claims someone is attempting to seize control of his body. He expresses fear of his father and insists there's something inside him. As the psychiatrist aids him, she realizes that what's inside him might be fixated on entering her own body.

Directed by Joe Lynch (Wrong Turn 2), the film stars Heather Graham (Boogie Nights), Judah Lewis (The Babysitter), Bruce Davison (X-Men), Barbara Crampton (From Beyond), and Johnathon Schaech (Prom Night).

The movie introduces unique elements and a compelling premise that maintains viewer interest. Heather Graham's performance is solid, and although some circumstances feel more authentic than others, the fall scenes fall short. However, the kills, gore, and blood splatter are executed excellently. The cinematography adds a creative and enjoyable touch, and the unconventional resolution, not culminating in a happy ending, left me satisfied.

In summary, Suitable Flesh possesses enough commendable aspects to warrant a watch, though it doesn't stand out significantly in its genre. I'd give it a 6/10 and suggest seeing it once.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Film Makers didn't even bother to fact check their script
kirstenholmes-2371627 October 2023
The tone is silly. The acting is sketchy. The psychiatric diagnoses are a mess. If you want to write a movie about DID (still calling it by its defunkt name, multiple personality disorder) at the very least learn that it is not schizophrenia or a schizotypal disorder. These are three different things, and if you keep using them as synonyms, you look a bit silly. SURELY you would check this kind of thing before spending god knows how much money making an arse of yourself?

It wouldn't have helped, anyway. The movie was boring, primarily because it leaned too heavily into the story without bothering to develop any of its characters. Every character feels like a paper cutout. It's very hard to take them seriously.

I also found the perpetual score a bit distracting. If you're playing your music over 90% of your scenes, it's going to lose its power. That effect becomes even worse when you're using Nineties "Oh my gosh" music.

But you should have fact checked your script. This is just humiliating.
30 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Solid Modern Adaptation to Lovecraft
Reviews_of_the_Dead8 January 2024
This is a movie that I wanted to see when it was playing at the Gateway Film Center, but I couldn't get the showtimes to work. This is one instead that I rented on VOD. I heard mixed reactions to it, but I'm an H. P. Lovecraft fan and I knew this is loosely based on one of his stories. These are the reasons that I checked this out ahead of my end of year list.

Synopsis: a psychiatrist becomes obsessed with one of her young patients, who she later discovers is linked to an ancient curse.

We start this one at the end. Dr. Daniella Upton (Barbara Crampton) is looking at a body that has been badly mutilated in the morgue with a pathologist, played by Graham Skipper. Dr. Upton then goes to a padded room where her friend, Dr. Elizabeth Derby (Heather Graham) is held. Dr. Upton wants Liz to tell her what led her to be where she is.

Liz is the psychiatrist from the synopsis. She works with a patient and when their time ends, they leave. Asa Waite (Judah Lewis) comes into her office. Liz tells him that he needs an appointment, but when she sees how troubled he is, she talks to him. Asa gets a phone call and then goes into what looks like a seizure. It is from there that his personality completely changes. He then leaves and Liz can't stop thinking about him.

This continues even when she's home. Her husband, Edward (Jonathon Schaech), tries talking to her and he notices that she's distant. This continues from here. That is until Liz leaves a patient in a hypnotic trance to talk to him. She even makes a house call when she shouldn't. It is there that she meets Asa's father, Ephraim (Bruce Davison). He is a nasty old man that has gone through a stroke, heart attack and cancer. He even cuts Liz with a long knife that he has. We see the blood absorbed in an old journal on his desk.

Things take a dark turn from here when she goes to Waite's house at night when getting a panicked call, beginning for help. Edward doesn't think it is a good idea. Ephraim does a ritual to take over the body of his son and in turn, gets into the body of Liz. She makes a horrible decision as well to have sex with her patient. It is then a fight for survival as whatever was inside of Ephraim and Asa, now has its sights on Liz.

That is where I'll leave my recap and introduction to the characters. Where I'll start is that this is an interesting, updated version of this Lovecraft story, The Thing on the Door Step. Now I knew that I read this one but couldn't fully remember what this story was about. I did go on to Wikipedia to read through the synopsis to realize that this incorporated more than I even realized, which I'll credit writer Dennis Paoli and director Joe Lynch for. They captured that Lovecraftian vibe in a modern setting. There are things here like names with Ephraim Waite and Edward Derby, to things that happen in the framework of the story as well. Also, I'd say how Liz narrates the story fits in with Lovecraft stories.

Then to delve a bit more into this, I love that this is taking place with doctors in important positions. Liz is a psychiatrist and I believe that Dani Upton is as well. Nearby is Miskatonic University which is another nod to Lovecraft. These are intelligent people. Liz thinks that Asa has split personalities. She sees there is more to it when she is taken over by whatever took over Ephraim and now the son. Liz struggles to get Dani to believe before it is too late. I like that these characters struggle to understand since it is fantastical. This is also a terrifying idea to have another entity take over their body. I do have a slight issue that we don't get the name of what is taking everyone over. Doesn't ruin it, but a slight negative from me.

What makes this better though is the acting of these characters. I love that we see a baseline from Liz, Asa and Dani before whatever is in Ephraim takes over. That is what we need. Graham is great at showing this change. What is interesting there is that Edward doesn't notice. That makes me believe their marriage had issues before Liz cheats on him with Asa. Lewis also has a great performance when mid-scene he changes. There were little cues that him and Graham did to mimic Davison's Ephraim, who was also solid in a limited role. He does a baseline for others so that's good. Credit to all of them for that. Crampton and Graham look amazing here. The former doesn't have a lot to work with here, but she's a good secondary character that plays into the climax. I'll also say here that Schaech, Skipper and the rest of the cast rounded this out for what was needed. We do also get a cameo by director Lynch as well.

The last things to go into would be filmmaking. For the most part, the cinematography is good. There is an iris effect used to focus in on things before we cut to black. I don't know if that was needed. It made me think of older Lovecraft adaptations, so I will say that. The framing of things was solid. There are also good practical effects here. Those were great, especially with a body moving at the end. Now there is CGI with people falling out of windows that I didn't care for. We also use them in other spots as well. It is fine in the grand scheme, but I noticed. Other than that, the soundtrack fit what was needed.

In conclusion, this is a solid adaptation of a Lovecraft story. I do like what they do to update this to a modern world. I thought the acting was good. Special credit there to Graham and Lewis. The rest of the cast push them to where they end up. There are moments here where get good filmmaking. The framing and practical effects lead the way. The quibbles come from framing techniques and CGI. I rather enjoyed my time here and incorporating sexuality here adds another dimension as well. If you like Lovecraft and adaptations of his work, then give this a watch. It was a solid movie in my opinion.

My Rating: 7 out of 10.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Who do you think you are?
chand-suhas31 October 2023
Elizabeth Derby (Heather Graham) has an happy marriage and a good career as a psychiatrist. All of this changes, when she comes across a patient named Asa Waite, seeking her assistance with a weird issue. Elizabeth who prefers to believe science gets late to understand what Asa got her into. His dying father has the ability to body swap via an incantation and so he does, switching into his son's body as well as Elizabeth's. With her life turned upside down and not getting the help she needs from her friend Danielle Upton, she is forced to take matters into her own hands. Will she able to stop this forms rest of the story.

Based on an H. P. Lovecraft's short story, this is as old school as it gets with the ever dependent Heather Graham and Barabara Crampton in the lead. It doesn't try to deliver anything extraordinary, instead it aims for a proper 90mins entertainer with a controlled budget and it almost succeeds. For a while, the entire body swapping is fun with a crazy baddie and desperate Elizabeth along with this being an erotic horror thriller. It does drag on in third act till that climax twist, predictable all along yet mostly serviceable. Overall, it makes up for a one time watch.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An incredibly enjoyable if somewhat confusing adaptation
kannibalcorpsegrinder20 October 2023
After a bizarre incident, a doctor tries to help a psychiatrist uncover what happened that involves her experiences with a client that she believes has a rare form of multiple personality disorder that needs to be treated only to turn into a race to save him from other forces trying to rob him of his body.

This was a highly enjoyable and likable effort with plenty going for it. One of the better aspects here is the solid and engrossing setup that brings about a rather fun time here with setting everything up. The main setup here involving the flashbacks to what came before including the bizarre therapy session that sets everything up, the growing obsession with maintaining the relationship despite all the warning signs there being to leave, and the exposition that we get diving into the medical condition he suffers from that drags her into this massive conspiracy about the body and consciousness transferring between each other that gives this a fantastic starting point to everything. That creates a strong second half that delves nicely into the discovery of the condition that has been explored. The use of soul transference and body swapping being the root of everything happening is explained nicely through the occult rituals that are put into practice creating a fine framework for exploring how the actual process works. This gets physically explored in the graphic scenes with everything taking place as the two share violent seizure-like symptoms to switch places and take over the bodies of the other that gets quite interesting with the kinky sexual role play that gets brought up as a means to show the change in personality that's taken place. It all gets brought together in the wild finale where the full context of the body-swapping has meaning and results in the series of wild confrontations that take place within the confines of the mental facility and lead to some really fun confrontations with some graphic outcomes that are in place here. As the situation escalates, though, it soon becomes apparent that the whole thing is way more confusing than it really should be which is the main drawback to this one. Since there are only brief glimpses about the nature of the possession, how it works, and the manner in which they're possessed, it all tends to make the film feel more confusing than it needs to try to balance the concept at play here. Without any kind of tick as to how to differentiate what's going on or who's in what body, this can be a bit of a struggle at times to keep it straight which ends up being the main issue holding it down.

Rated Unrated/R: Graphic Violence, Graphic Language, sexual content, Brief Nudity, and drug use.
18 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
In the flesh
kosmasp30 August 2023
No pun intended - Joe Lynch knows what he did here. And make no mistake about it, so do the actors and the movie itself. Yes the movie as an entity. Now you may not like what you get served here. But the movie stays true to its origins and the people it admires - Roger Corman would be proud of this for sure. Or he may be proud if he is able to watch this.

Will you be proud watching it? Your moral compass and your ability to watch people getting it on on screen (plus how you can handle blood and violence, though you should be expecting the latter for sure) will inform that. There are scenes that seem to go on for a long time. And Heather is back in form - she came ... to deliver! And coming ... I mean delivering she does! Quite a lot ... like sometimes many times at once! Innuendo? Never heard of it.

All kidding aside, the story is predictable, certain things seem badly acted .. but it is all part of the game ... as is all the blood that is going to be spilled ... the obvious aside for a second though: another thing I liked about the movie! The role reversal - some may even call it the w word ... ok(e) - you get it I am certain of it. Jonathan Schaech who is amazing has a thankless role of sorts.... A role usually being played by the (female) love interest .. you see what I did here? Well actually the movie is the one who did it (and Heather! She did it a lot ... have I mentioned that already?) ... Joe pre-emptively said that people will go on (add a different site that is famous for reviews here) and write something evil about his movie .. that may be the case, but I know that most actually liked the movie at Frighfest ...
33 out of 86 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Shudder horror
SnoopyStyle19 January 2024
Psychiatrist Dr. Elizabeth Derby (Heather Graham) is held in the psych ward under the care of her friend Dr. Daniella Upton (Barbara Crampton). The happily married Beth is the unlikely suspect in a murder. She recounts how it all started. Out of the blue, Asa Waite (Judah Lewis) barges into her office and claims that his father Ephraim Waite (Bruce Davison) is trying to steal his body.

This is a lesser horror on Shudder. There are some intriguing ideas and it has Heather Graham. Basically, it's following the Blumhouse formula of a low budget horror with a former A-list star. It does have some drawbacks. First, Graham has never been known for her great acting skills. The possession transfer scenes come off as a bit campy. The transfer process is a bit muddled. On the other hand, I really love the car reversing scene and the closing section has some compelling turns. This is a marginal fail case.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Switching Up...
azathothpwiggins12 March 2024
SUITABLE FLESH is loosely based on "The Thing On The Doorstep", by H. P. Lovecraft.

Psychiatrist, Dr. Elizabeth Derby (Heather Graham) has a loving husband (Johnathan Schaech) and a thriving practice. One day, a young man (Judah Lewis) shows up at her office, unannounced. Once Elizabeth agrees to see him, her life begins to change in bizarre, uncontrollable ways. Soon, she is caught up in a whirlwind of sex, murder, and the supernatural.

This is an occult tale of demonic soul / spirit transference, where an ancient entity jumps from body to body, causing mayhem. Both Ms. Graham and Mr. Lewis do an admirable job during their personality shifts / exchanges. Barbara Crampton has a vital supporting role as Elizabeth's best friend, Dr. Daniella Upton. Don't miss her during the jaw-dropping, gore-drenched final act!

A well-realized horror film, it's the sort of movie the late Stuart Gordon might have made...
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Horrendous
lotheravanti8 January 2024
Never in my life have I watched a horror movie and felt like I was watching a cheap prn half the time. The only thing that comes close is the last season of Fortitude.

Bad writing, bad ACTING, cringe scenes, ridiculous plot holes and they have the AUDACITY to cite Lovecraft as one of the "authors". No people, this has NOTHING remotely to do with anything Lovecraft has written.

There's a new trend in horror where talentless writers will try to use well established stories from Lovecraft to prop up their own pitiful attempts.

Finally, when the villain said "the future is female", I simply turned the movie off. Enough is enough.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed