Saving the Titanic (TV Movie 2012) Poster

(2012 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Great docu-drama without being overly tacky
HellspawnAlice31 March 2012
This docu-drama focuses on the various struggles of the engineers, electricians and workers in the bowls of the Titanic. The struggles present in the film not only relate to the sinking of the ship, but also ethnic and religious tensions which were prevalent in 1912.

The best thing about this docu-drama is that it is extremely informative while being entertaining. The set is actually quite good considering its budget and that it is a release-to-TV film. Yes, there are cheesy parts to create a connection with the characters in the film, and no it does not offer the heart-wrenching story expressed in Cameron's 'Titanic'. But it sets out what is intended, to tell the untold story of those who fought and died to keep the Titanic afloat for more than an hour and a half than what was expected, saving countless lives.

The reason for giving this docu-drama an 8 is that it offers a good story, decent acting (for a release-to-TV film), good effects, and its educational aspect. Improvements in the acting and the omittance of certain unnecessary story development would have made this film even better.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Good Tribute To The Engineers And Electricians Of Titanic
sddavis6312 April 2012
We are not talking here about a Hollywood blockbuster with mega-stars in a soap opera love story about the sinking of the Titanic. Far from it. This is really more of a behind the scenes docu-drama, offering a look at the struggles of the engineering and electrical crew on the great ship as they fight to keep Titanic afloat as long as possible so that more people can be saved, many sacrificing themselves in the process. It's a nice tribute, certainly mostly dramatized but believable, and it makes no real attempt to dazzle the viewer. It just tells the story.

It's slow starting, picking up with the Titanic undergoing sea trials before the beginning of her doomed voyage, and introducing us to the various characters, supposedly based on the testimony of one of the engineers to a tribunal set up in New York City, which is desperately trying to create heroes out of the disaster. We get a sense of the grandeur of the Titanic, but mostly we get a very believable sense of the hot and grimy work taking place deep in the bowels of the ship, as coal is shovelled and the engines are kept burning. The entire focus is on the engineering crew and a handful of electricians. We never see the rest of the crew and no mention is made of anyone else, although there are a handful of scenes including passengers. As the water pours in, you do feel the increasing desperation and your admiration for these men grows as they fight the odds.

There's a good depiction of religious tensions in this (the Protestant- Catholic rivalry in Ireland is very present) and we see the class divisions of the Titanic, not among the passengers, but among the crew themselves, who are segregated into increasingly less comfortable quarters depending on their jobs. All in all, it's a pretty straightforward account of a chaotic event, and of how people handled the chaos. (7/10)
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very well-made and produced
catnapbc11 April 2023
I have to agree with many others here that this take on what happened with the sinking of the Titanic is both new and interesting. There were parts of it that felt and looked similar to the German version of 'Das Boot'. The pace, acting, detailed camera work and production are above average in their execution. Apart from a few 'unnecessary' scenarios (like the singing of 'Kelly'), and perhaps a bit too drawn out at times, the tension, grit and determination by these hard-working lowly crew members makes you realize how insignificant we truly are, despite the technology and expertise we have, against natural forces. The inclusion of factual narration that brought out new (to me at least) facts about this event added to the entertainment and historical context in which it is forever set. A solid drama that shows another aspect of both the event and technical issues that led to this disaster. Worth watching!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I liked this slant on the well-known story
business_kid23 November 2022
History can only be written by survivors, and winners.

I found this engaging, as I have laboured for hours on factory floors (in Electronic Maintenance) and know the spirit and cameraderie that develops there. I probably will watch it again. The depiction is flawed, as Titanic buffs point out here. The contempt for the "lower classes," the actual onscreen events are inaccurate. I don't think this was meant to be accurate. It doesn't stop it grabbing you.

The Catholic-Protestant thing with Ireland was there, and ever present. But people remember it flaring up 5-10 years after the Titanic went down. Nearly all third class passengers (steerage - the cheapest tickets) went down with the ship, because there wasn't lifeboats for them. The story of the men who took such pride in their work that they kept the ship afloat bears telling. Also,it meant that they went down with the ship. They probably would have done anyhow, as they were lower class. People tend to forget the Titanic was built by working class Protestants. A Catholic couldn't get work in Harland & Wolfe then.

The sets, acting were great. Direction and script less so; too much time wasted on the wrong things.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Brilliant informative docu-drama about this maritime tragedy
howardmorley6 August 2018
I concur with L.K.'s review of 11/4/12 and awarded the highest rating accordingly.The two outstanding characters in this production are chief engineering officer Joseph Bell and leading fireman Frederick Barrett.The producers have highlighted the crew below decks, mainly the electricians who bravely kept the lights on until the last moment and the stokers/firemen who fed the many boilers to provide the power.Both historic characters are famous in their own way.Joseph Bell who made a sagacious remembrance comment from his childhood about the Danish king Canute, from British history, who did not believe his courtiers' flattering comments that he was more powerful than nature by having the power to turn back the waves.Meanwhile Frederick Barrett was one of the few survivors to give testimony to the official enquiry about how the sinking affected the men under his control in the boiler room.

Although "A Night to Remember " (1958) was excellent with scenes of life in the engine/boiler rooms, this production concentrated more on the personalities of the afore-mentioned electricians and stokers and firemen, most of whom were not saved. and produced in a modern docudrama style with no Hollywood stars getting in the way.One actor I did recognise was the Northern Irish supervisor who played in another brilliant docudrama production about the birth of RMS Olympic & Titanic.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The documentary of the unsung heroes of 1912...
paul_haakonsen5 February 2021
I stumbled upon this 2012 "Saving the Titanic", and believed it to be an unrealistic movie in the likes of the 1980 movie "Raise the Titanic". So I checked it out on IMDb and saw that it was a dramatized documentary, so I sat down to watch it.

And this is without a doubt a compelling documentary, made entertaining - for a lack of better words - or easy watching with dramatization of the events. But nonetheless, "Saving the Titanic" tells the story of the boiler room workers hidden well beneath the deck of the Titanic and their heroic efforts to keep the sinking ship afloat. And these people are usually hardly ever mentioned in most other documentaries. So this 2012 documentary was just phenomenal.

The documentary brought so much new information out in the light for me, and definitely revealed a whole side of the disaster that I was only vaguely familiar with, as I knew there were boiler room workers on the boat of course. But the documentaries just never told their stories.

And the way that it was dramatized - if that is the right term - and made into a movie like event, was just a great way of bringing their stories to the screen, making it enjoyable and entertaining, whilst keeping it information and documentary at the same time. This was definitely a very pleasing aspect of this 2012 documentary.

I have watched many a documentary about the tragic accident that befell Titanic, and I must admit that this 2012 documentary titled "Saving the Titanic" is among the best and most informative of documentaries out there.

If you enjoy watching documentaries about the Titanic, then you most certainly have to sit down to watch this particular documentary. Sure, it may not revolve around the actual collision, the first class passengers, the important crew and captain, or the like, but it most definitely have a more vital story to tell about these unsung heroes that kept the ship afloat for about an additional hour and a half, saving countless of lives by doing so, and perishing with the ship themselves.

This was so well-worth the time. My rating of "Saving the Titanic" lands on a very much deserved eight out of ten stars.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellence.
khw-3939722 June 2023
Well written, well directed, excellent in every craft area. I'm so glad I stumbled upon it. The acting is especially good, as is the casting, and the cinematography is gorgeous. I especially loved the story of the chief engineer and his son, but all of the stories were well told and the ending was perfect.

It seems to be accurate and well-documented. It tells the stories of the men who were heroes and made great sacrifices and whose names deserve to be known.

I don't agree that it is slow starting. I thought every second of it was fascinating. But full disclosure: I've always been a disaster junkie and I became fascinated with the story of the Titanic long before it was trendy.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Very Historically Inaccurate Documentary
herman113423 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Great idea to show the crew's efforts to keep Titanic afloat, but poor execution. Anyone who has done any detailed research of the testimony of that night would see fairly quickly that there wasn't much research done for this documentary. Names of people are correct, and the actors do look like their characters, but this film makes too much up and only bares superficial resemblance to real events. Spoilers follow.

The first scene insults the crew of Titanic. Fred Barret is in front of an inquiry that seems to be desperately looking to rewrite history so that the engineers are made to be heroes. Not only did this not happen, and it contradicts the whole thesis of the film, the scene is a result of bad writing, just to try to insert the point that the Engineers and firemen might not be heroes simply because they died or survived.

The first half consists of entirely made up scenes meant to show how Titanic was called unsinkable, that there were probable tensions between a new crew and that there was a coal fire. The Irish religious divide is overplayed. Normally, invented exposition scenes would not be a problem, but the film does not even try to take advantage of actual primary sources to color this. Instead we are forced to sit through quiet scenes, and a purely invented conflict between Fred Barret and Chief Bell instead of actually getting to the important stuff, which there is less and less time for. There is only 1 exception (for approximately 1 minute) when some actual letters are read from the engineers.

The 2nd half is where the inaccuracies truly show. There is a clock throughout showing what time things happened which you are just going to have to ignore while watching this. It notes for example that they started inserting the pumps & emptying boilers an hour after they actually did. It also shows Fred Barret down below emptying dampers when in reality he had already left and was probably on Lifeboat 13 already. The scene where Barret pins Bell to a wall with a knife is pure fantasy as is the ending.

Many important things are omitted. Just after the collision, Chief Bell was on the Boat Deck and had a conversation with Ismay where he convinced him the pumps would keep the ship afloat. This is not even hinted at in the film and contradicted by it. We see Andrews talk to Bell but not the Captain. The distress signal the film claims is the 1st one is wrong. The rockets shoot from the wrong place. Much testimony from survivors like Lawrence Beesley shows the ship kept moving after the collision, stopped, started again at dead slow and finally stopped forever; this is not shown. The firemen were emptying dampers and engineers were using pumps long before Lifeboat 7 was lowered. By approximately 1:00, just after the 1st lifeboat left, it was already too late to save the ship and Boiler Room 6&5 were flooded.

In reality, we are not sure if the Coal Bunker Fire contributed to the disaster and recently, doubt has been cast as to whether it was between Boiler Room 5 & 6 or 6 & the Fireman's Passage. One author has suggested that the grounding of Titanic damaged Boiler Room 6 and 4 but not 5, and not fatally. Thomas Dillon (in the film) noted flooding in Boiler Room 4 (not in the film). Edward Wilding, Harland and Wolff's design representative, testified that the initial damage to Titanic was not enough to sink it. The pumps may have failed and flooded Boiler Room 5, or the bulkhead may have broke (neither are in the film). How Barret survived is also depicted incorrectly. Soon after Shepherd broke his leg, water rushed in from between boilers. Harvey ordered Barret out of the Boiler Room on deck, and all of the engineers there died behind him. This is not even showed.

The film gets some things right. Just after the collision, the lights went dark and were turned back on just when Barrett got the oil lamps. A red light did inform Barret that something was amiss. Alfred White was sent up to investigate. Jonathan Shepherd did break his leg in a manhole, but the Boiler Room was dry when he did it, and the Titanic struck an iceberg. But the numerous mistakes ruin the film. There were also little things I expected to see but didn't. One example, we know Engineer Alfred White (in the film) did brew some coffee in the Engine Room while the Firemen were working; this is not shown. We know Fred Scott freed a trapped crewman in the propeller shaft room, but that's not in the film. We know a lot about what Asst 2nd Engineer Hesketh did, but he's not in the film. I also expected to see the crew help with the lifeboats, and Fred Barret helping to save Lifeboat 13 but that wasn't in the film (the latter is shown briefly in James Cameron's movie).

I'm giving this 4 stars for the idea, the acting, the sets, cinematography, and some technical details which might be the only thing they actually researched. Read A Night to Remember, Barret's British inquiry testimony (as well as other crew members) or David G Brown's new book Titanic Myths, Titanic Truths to get a better idea of what happened down below that night. The sloppy research of this film becomes an insult to the memory of those that died. I find it frustrating that there was so much testimony that could have been used despite all of the engineers dying--that of the firemen, trimmers and greasers who saw them & survived--to reenact so many events the film wants to depict but doesn't.
16 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed