The affair between King Edward VIII and American divorcée Wallis Simpson, and a contemporary romance between a married woman and a Russian security guard.
Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends.
If your account is linked with Facebook and you have turned on sharing, this will show up in your activity feed. If not, you can turn on sharing
here
.
After spending the night together on the night of their college graduation Dexter and Em are shown each year on the same date to see where they are in their lives. They are sometimes together, sometimes not, on that day.
Director:
Lone Scherfig
Stars:
Anne Hathaway,
Jim Sturgess,
Patricia Clarkson
A romantically challenged morning show producer is reluctantly embroiled in a series of outrageous tests by her chauvinistic correspondent to prove his theories on relationships and help ... See full summary »
Anna Brady plans to travel to Dublin, Ireland to propose to her boyfriend Jeremy on February 29, leap day, because, according to Irish tradition, a man who receives a marriage proposal on a leap day must accept it.
On a weekend trip to Hawaii, a plastic surgeon convinces his loyal assistant to pose as his soon-to-be-divorced wife in order to cover up a careless lie he told to his much-younger girlfriend.
Director:
Dennis Dugan
Stars:
Adam Sandler,
Jennifer Aniston,
Brooklyn Decker
A romantic comedy centered on a guy and a gal who try to keep their love alive as they shuttle back and forth between New York and San Francisco to see one another.
Director:
Nanette Burstein
Stars:
Drew Barrymore,
Justin Long,
Ron Livingston
In 1998, an auction of the estate of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor causes great excitement. For one woman, Wally Winthrop, it has much more meaning. Wally becomes obsessed by their historic love story. As she learns more about the sacrifices involved, Wally gains her own courage to find happiness. Written by
Anonymous
Fashion house Christian Dior recreated three dresses for this film that it had previously made for the real Wallis Simpson. See more »
Goofs
In the newsreel scene from 1936 showing the funeral procession of Edward's father the King, the voiceover announcer says that "King George the Third has died and the nation mourns". It should of course have been King George the Fifth. See more »
Quotes
Edward:
How do you find living in England Mrs Simpson?
Wallis Simpson:
I'm always cold.
Edward:
Maybe you need someone to keep you warm?
Wallis Simpson:
Isn't that what husbands are for?
See more »
There have been a lot of mixed reactions to this film. There's a reason
for that: it's both good and bad. I didn't enjoy it but staying away
from the obvious tendency to judge this film based solely on the fact
it's Madonna who's directed/co-wrote it there are some diamonds in
the (very) rough.
The film tries to take two story lines which are set in completely
different times and places, and merge them into one film. One of these
plots are really good, the other really bad. The good one is the story
of Edward VIII who abdicated from his place on the throne in order to
marry a commoner, Wallis Simpson. The bad one is the story of an
ordinary New York woman who's in the process of leaving an abusive
relationship. The second story is trashy, melodramatic pulp. Any
relation between these two story lines is contrived and every time it
cuts between the two, it feels very awkward, forced, meaningless and
confusing.
It's a real shame, because the story of the Edward VIII is an extremely
interesting one. There's so much there to write about: his
controversial lifestyle, marriage to Wallis Simpson, abdication,
relationship with George VI and the rest of the royal family not to
mention his alleged Nazi sympathies and friendship with Adolf Hitler!
As a straight historical drama, this story would be truly riveting and
I personally think it deserves a big budget treatment. It could even do
well as a glossy romantic drama or a gritty political drama or a
mixture of both.
I do appreciate that Madge has tried to tell this story (which has been
done in film and TV before) from an alternative perspective: through
the eyes of Wallis Simpson. This is a credible idea but the film
doesn't focus enough on it. Instead, it's needlessly confused by a
boring, ambiguous plot featuring a deluded and emotionally erratic
protagonist nobody can relate to.
The film is occasionally historically inaccurate and utterly bizarre in
places. There is a point where a news reporter states that Edward is
succeeding King George III, when it is in fact King George V (the
former died more than a century before). There are also several
absurdities and moments of sheer bad taste, most notably a scene where
Edward and Wallis are popping pills at a party as they dance to the Sex
Pistols in the 1930s! The fact Madonna chose the song 'Pretty Vacant'
is probably more fitting than she'll realise. There is a consistent
stream of these absurdities which cause serious detriment to the film's
tone and coherency as if it wasn't already hard enough to understand.
There is no conclusion to this film either. By the end nothing is
resolved, everything becomes wholly ambiguous and no explanation is
given as to the meaning or core purpose of the film. Just before the
credits role, as the camera pans up from nothingness to yet more
nothingness, you're left thinking "what was the point in all of that?"
Credit where credit's due though: the film has some nice
cinematography. The fashion and costume design is great too. It's
visually very good and you can tell there are some people working on
this film who know what they're doing, but it's all wasted on a rotten
script. The film seems to concentrate on fashion, materialism,
aesthetics and stylistic elements more than telling a compelling story.
It's just superficial.
For me, the bad outweighs the good, and W.E. appears as nothing more
than an opportunistic derivative of a sub-plot from the King's Speech,
with potential that would never be realised here. Madonna's film is
brash and contrived at best, random and pointless at worst.
48 of 70 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
There have been a lot of mixed reactions to this film. There's a reason for that: it's both good and bad. I didn't enjoy it but staying away from the obvious tendency to judge this film based solely on the fact it's Madonna who's directed/co-wrote it there are some diamonds in the (very) rough. The film tries to take two story lines which are set in completely different times and places, and merge them into one film. One of these plots are really good, the other really bad. The good one is the story of Edward VIII who abdicated from his place on the throne in order to marry a commoner, Wallis Simpson. The bad one is the story of an ordinary New York woman who's in the process of leaving an abusive relationship. The second story is trashy, melodramatic pulp. Any relation between these two story lines is contrived and every time it cuts between the two, it feels very awkward, forced, meaningless and confusing. It's a real shame, because the story of the Edward VIII is an extremely interesting one. There's so much there to write about: his controversial lifestyle, marriage to Wallis Simpson, abdication, relationship with George VI and the rest of the royal family not to mention his alleged Nazi sympathies and friendship with Adolf Hitler! As a straight historical drama, this story would be truly riveting and I personally think it deserves a big budget treatment. It could even do well as a glossy romantic drama or a gritty political drama or a mixture of both. I do appreciate that Madge has tried to tell this story (which has been done in film and TV before) from an alternative perspective: through the eyes of Wallis Simpson. This is a credible idea but the film doesn't focus enough on it. Instead, it's needlessly confused by a boring, ambiguous plot featuring a deluded and emotionally erratic protagonist nobody can relate to. The film is occasionally historically inaccurate and utterly bizarre in places. There is a point where a news reporter states that Edward is succeeding King George III, when it is in fact King George V (the former died more than a century before). There are also several absurdities and moments of sheer bad taste, most notably a scene where Edward and Wallis are popping pills at a party as they dance to the Sex Pistols in the 1930s! The fact Madonna chose the song 'Pretty Vacant' is probably more fitting than she'll realise. There is a consistent stream of these absurdities which cause serious detriment to the film's tone and coherency as if it wasn't already hard enough to understand. There is no conclusion to this film either. By the end nothing is resolved, everything becomes wholly ambiguous and no explanation is given as to the meaning or core purpose of the film. Just before the credits role, as the camera pans up from nothingness to yet more nothingness, you're left thinking "what was the point in all of that?" Credit where credit's due though: the film has some nice cinematography. The fashion and costume design is great too. It's visually very good and you can tell there are some people working on this film who know what they're doing, but it's all wasted on a rotten script. The film seems to concentrate on fashion, materialism, aesthetics and stylistic elements more than telling a compelling story. It's just superficial. For me, the bad outweighs the good, and W.E. appears as nothing more than an opportunistic derivative of a sub-plot from the King's Speech, with potential that would never be realised here. Madonna's film is brash and contrived at best, random and pointless at worst.