The Integrity of Joseph Chambers (2022) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Not bad at all.
Sleepin_Dragon6 July 2023
Insurance Salesman Joe decides to champion his inner Bear Grylls and challenge his surgical skills in the wild. Armed with a rifle, he aims to shoot a deer.

This surprised me somewhat, I rather enjoyed it, a story of foolishness and trying to prove a point. It doesn't go as I expected, which is in its favour. Pacing has been pointed out by several as an issue, but if argue it's purposefully slow, feeling as though it was done in real time, it doesn't lurch from one action scene to the next. Efforts were made to make the film seem realistic.

A film about masculinity, it actually made for something of a change to the recent films I've seen, where masculinity is simply deemed bad, here it does at least explore and question it.

Considering Clayne Crawford does most of the film solo, he does a pretty fine job, a good performance.

Overall, this was much better than I expected.

7/10.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Very strange, slow paced, independent, well meaning but flawed
stevelivesey-3718318 July 2023
As you can see I have very mixed feelings about this curate's egg.

The set up is great. A city boy has married a country girl and wants to prove that he can go hunting in local woods in his own Alexander Supertramp moment. He has no experience, no idea and no chance of success. Every stumble over a twig or branch is torture. His fumbling loading of the gun is cringeworthy. The ease with which he gets distracted is mind numbing.

I won't say how all this plays out but we can see it coming a mile away. This is mostly because of the interminable slow pace of the film which will have the average viewer anxiously looking at their watch fro a half hour in.

Could have been a short story.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Different and Brilliantly Understated
tdwillis-262731 March 2023
As I was watching this film, it wasn't long into it, that I start noticing the stupidity of the characters. I suppose that in itself is entertaining, but usually it's more frustrating and maddening. This film definitely doesn't lead you into laughing about the ridiculousness of stupidity either.

I asked myself WHY I continued to watch this movie....clear up to the last 15 minutes. And that is when it became clear.

Then the ending left me with different questions.

I like that!!

I bet many people will not understand or like this movie. I'm not sure I understand it....

All I can say is I liked it. It made me think and feel.
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Should've been a short film
What-a-Punk2 May 2023
I get the point of this movie, it's not bad in that sense, as it has one.

Overall it looks quite realistic and you can relate to the characters, they are believable.

There are some quite lengthy parts in this movie that seemingly do nothing.

And the biggest problem is the abrupt ending with no good conclusion other than the obvious.

So what I'd like to say is that you can have all those lengthy parts in the movie, where the character is explored and developed and etc, even if nothing much happens, but it is only reasonable and justifiable if you then have an ending where the character and the whole story blooms and all of this previous stalling now gets a meaning. But there was no such thing in this one.

So there is clearly no reason to stretch this story to 90 minutes. This whole movie could've been 15 minutes long and conceptually it would lose absolutely nothing.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Choices Choices Choices
billcr129 March 2023
Joseph Chambers sells insurance for a living and he apparently makes a good living doing so. He is seen at the start of the story dressing up for a solo hunting adventure, much to the displeasure of his wife. Against her wise advice, the city slicker borrows a deer rifle from a friend for his first expedition.

His trek eventually turns out badly and the second half of the movie has Joseph making a few important decisions.

His future is dependent upon what moral choices he will ultimately make. Clayne Crawford is on screen alone for most of the film and he is excellent as Joseph Chambers. Will he or won't he do what is right?
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Disappointing covid movie
suespy2 July 2023
Yet another covid movie with few actors and constant navel inspection. These movies should come with a 'dont bother' warning. As you sit waiting for something to happen you wonder how come the star doesnt get lost which is typical of in the woods scenarios. How come this and that without giving too much away. HOWEVER the real audience insult is the non ending where you rise from your chair and swear at the tv for wasting those minutes from your life you wont get back. Some Directors think this is 'arty' or forced thought provoking but in this case it needed a conclusion. As society no longer automatically rewards the good and virtuous and if happy to punish the innocent this was one movie that badly needed a conclusion. If time is a consideration cut out all the aimless wandering and give us a result.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
SPOILERS
Cenobite8715 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
As a hunter I'll say we all gotta start somewhere. We've all been an amateur at some point! But as soon as Joe started wielding a gun it was truly cringeworthy. The foreshadowing was in place once he racked that round in before starting his walk. We all knew where the story was going by this point. The only thing I found truely unbelievable was how he made a reflex 180 shot on the homeless guy. Center of mass 40 yards away or so. I'm just impressed with the marksmanship after showing how incompetent he was with the gun.

Overall not a bad movie, a bit slow but that's ok. Definitely makes me a little more afraid of hunting public land with the thought of other joe chambers running around out there.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
AWFUL with a capital A
marieweb11 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I Don't even know where to begin. It started off like there was a story to it, but after he left and got the shotgun and truck from friend it went downhill from there. So to be honest the first 15 mins was starting to be interesting then it stopped. The next hr and 15 mins was a waste of time. Don't bother with this movie. If you have ever watched the movie NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN and agree that the ending which just stopped like this one did you'd be very correct. The story of this whole movie is that there's a guy named Joe that has a wife and 2 kids. He wants to go hunt to show his wife that he can do it but goes alone being impatient instead of waiting for his friend to go with him the following weekend. He finally gets to area his friend that he borrowed gun from has land to hunt. He gets to a deer stand in tree and falls asleep. Gets up and goes looking for a deer. The deer is to far away so he chases it. He gets startled and accidentally shoots a homeless man, eventually killing him. Joe bury's him but then has a lot of emotions going on to whether he made right decision. No words in a lot of movie. So Joe decided to take him to police station because the hospital wasn't an option at that time(the man was serverly wounded while Joe was digging a hole and the man got up and starting running yelling help. Joe caught up to him, they fight a few mins then Joe and him talk and Joe wants man to go to hospital but man refused and guy dies.) then we spend a forever amount of time for Joe to drag body back down to hole then bury, semi clean himself up and unbury guy which now he takes to police station. Joe is froze and can't talk, sheriff was someone he knew, Joe never said what happened nor do we know anything else. The black screen comes on and you are like WTF are you kidding me. There's the story all typed out in less than a five-seven min read and comprehend. No need in watching movie. It wraps up nothing, that is nothing I tell you. If you want to sit And watch be my guest, you will be bored and end up with no closure. I did it with husband and we are ready to go to sleep at 9:30.
13 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
What a LONG wait to get absolutely Nowhere!
kaleikaimana1 April 2023
I am rarely this negative on a movie, but the fact that all those reviews that gave this a great rating got me suckered into wasting my time watching this...? Don't be fooled like I was!

This movie simply is not working h the time it takes to watch. It is one of the SLOWEST moving movies that I have ever seen! And it's not like a "Good" slow, either. You know, the kinda that actually rewards your anticipation with a great scene. Nope. This movie is literally filled with scenes that drag on, and on, and on, and on... and the fact that there is hardly ANY dialogue going on in this movie only makes these scenes MORE brutal! It truly feels like the film maker was just trying to fill in a bunch of "dead time" to make this movie as long as it is. Because honestly, this story could have been told 20-30 minutes.

What an utter waste of time. Don't bother!
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
He cannot live with a guilty conscience
Little_Tyke30 June 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This movie tells the story of a city slicker who fancies himself as a hunter. He has absolutely no outdoor skills whatsoever and is as clumsy as heck. With a borrowed rifle, which he has no idea how to handle and in fact handles it very dangerously, shoving a bullet into the clip that fell on the ground and got a bit muddy, he says goodbye to his wife and young family and sets off into the forest to kill a deer for the freezer.

On reaching the woods he makes his way along a trail, then through thick undergrowth. I was waiting for the moment when the fool would trip over and shoot himself in the head, but he was lucky. So far. Finally, he espied a deer quite a way away and set off in pursuit. At some point, whether by accident of design, he fired the rifle at random. Didn't get the deer. But a short while later, he stumbles upon a man lying unconscious, probably dead, on the ground, obviously shot and bleeding. Suddenly, it dawns upon our Mr Hunter that he was the one who shot this chap. Full of remorse, he then plans to evade punishment by burying the body. He grabs a shovel and pickaxe from his truck and traipses back to the site. As he is digging, the "corpse" on the ground comes alive again. He was never dead.

Now our hero - I use the term advisedly - is overcome with joy. He didn't murder anyone after all. So he stops digging the shallow grave and tries to help the victim, who turns out to be some kind of loner living off grid. For a while they engage in conversation. Maybe at this point, if the hunter had really tried to get the guy to hospital, or at least call for help, the loner could have survived. But instead, they talked for a bit more and all the while the victim was getting weaker and weaker.

And then the old guy goes and dies, so back to Plan A, which is to bury the body. Expending considerable effort, the nutcase with the rifle manages to manhandle the body into the grave and cover it over with leaves and brushwood. Then he goes down to a creek to wash off the blood on his hands. As he is doing this he gets some kind of premonition from his wife. And suddenly, the man realises he cannot carry on living with this awful secret that he planned to tell no one about. In the next scene, he is back at the grave, fishing the old guy out again. Again, I wondered: is the old guy going to come alive again? Nope. He is well and truly deceased by now.

Finally, we observe the hunter dragging the corpse to his pickup. He then drives it to the local police station and hands himself in. We never get to see the final outcome, as he can barely speak to the duty police officer, let alone describe what has happened.

The film ends.

Now, we can only surmise what happens next. He will probably be arrested and charged with attempting to pervert the course of justice by initially hiding the body. But I don't know whether any charges would stick, as it was obviously an accidental death caused by utter stupidity. He will never forget what happened for as long as he lives, but having, belatedly, done the right thing, society might just forgive him for being such a fool, and he won't need to lie to his wife and kids.

The message this movie sends out loud and clear to anyone who thinks he can easily become macho man and get a gun: Just don't, okay! Stick with the day job. Choose a hobby that isn't going to endanger complete strangers. It really made me think of the times I have walked through woods just for the fresh air and heard gunshots far away.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Fortunately I did not have to pay to see this.
jacobmeudt10 May 2023
Wow. I love a good slow movie, but The Integrity of Joesph Chambers is only one of these two.... and good is not it.

I would say the only reason I did not give up on it within the first thirty minutes is that I was substitute teaching and had a two hour break. I would be a bit more pissed that my time was wasted had I been at home and watched this incredible bore on my personal time.

I remember when I first graduated film school I wished that all movies were the hours long. I wanted to see more and be entertained. As I have gotten older I realized that not everything is worthy of being made into a movie and that many stories can be told in a quarter of the time.

Maybe I would have enjoyed this a year more had all the fat been cut off and it was thirty minutes.

Boring. Go watch something better.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Too long
kasrarahimi-3882415 October 2023
City guy tries to step out of his element and go into the wilderness to hunt by himself and as expected, it goes horribly wrong. You can see that coming just from the car he drives. He's not a rugged guys, he's an idiot.

So I understand the point of the movie. What I don't understand is why it's soon freaking long. It's an hour and 20 minutes too long. There's only one event the entire time. There's so little happening they dragged every scene to the point of causing me to have fits of rage! So I watched it on fast forward speed and didn't miss a thing. The movie should have been maybe 20 minutes.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Could have been half the runtime.
cjaymet24 December 2023
A family man, hoping to prove his survivalist capabilities and manliness to his family, decides to irresponsibly head off into the woods and go deer hunting by himself.

The second feature narrative I saw at Southern Screen and it was intriguing if for no other reason that the trailers kept it pretty shady as far as what actually ends up happening. This set up has plenty of potential so as long as it wasn't just a man walking around the woods with no shake-ups at all I assumed I'd like it all right. Thankfully something DOES happen.... but not much.

My friend watching this movie with me at one points in the first third said "I guess this is a slow burn" and he wasn't kidding because everything in this movie is slow. And that's mostly because they show nearly everything that happens and then hold on every shot FOREVER. Somewhere out there there is a 40 minute cut of this 1h36m movie and it changes nothing about the story. We see very little but him doing mundane tasks for the first half; getting ready, walking through the woods, looking around, walking through the woods some more, etc. Many of these are long takes which would be impressive if more was actually happening.

Highlighting that is the very misguided sound mixing. I'm guessing in post they realized the film didn't have much to hold interest for these incredibly long moments so they decided to jazz it up with some loud music stings and overbearing score moments. They feel like they are trying to convert what's happening on screen as something alarming. Just when you think nothings gonna happen 🎵 DUN-DUN! 🎶....nothing happens. They all feel like purposeful ruses to keep you awake. "Be scared by this!" Other times I wanted spoken moments louder or at the very least to have subtitles to understand the whispery deliveries.

Near the halfway mark we finally get our shake-up moment that gives this some actual stakes. I won't spoil it much but it does give our main character a moral dilemma to grapple with. However it does come with its own annoyances and moments where characters make odd decisions "just because."

Switching to some positives, I have to give props to Clayne Crawford who basically has to hold the film together. If his performance had been subpar I don't think the film would be worth anything but he has to hold the camera for pretty much the entire film. He has to convey most of his emotions with very little dialogueI, and any time it is spoken he has the task of trying to make talking to yourself look realistic. I also like the moments where Joe is reenacting something in his head and we hear what he hears. At one point he is throwing dirt clod in the woods imagining he's pitching at the World Series and we actually hear the crowds cheering and other sfx. It's a relatable peek into his mind, a nice way of showing it, and feeds into his insecurities about how he sees himself. He's a guy who wants to be taken seriously and prove he can provide outside of his career as an insurance salesman, this being the reasoning behind why he takes off on this solo hunting venture in the first place.

When faced with two choices the movie does ultimately end up going the direction I was hoping for but there were still plenty of other routes I was hoping for prior to that. While the integrity of the title character can be admired, the movie as a whole still leaves much to be desired.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
But, is it art?
beispsyd-1852325 February 2023
Is this the eclectic art and croissant crowd that mistakes ind film projects as a level of depth in an abstraction, professed with transcendence of varying topography of hypocrisy, and.... (What the hell?)

It's not an experiment in anything but delusions: is probably too real to be a thing else.

Money from business, that " good" at ("you're a great insurance salesman") never mind the pronoun (for shame).

Makes money, check. Nice house and wife, double check.

Arse and incompetent... Yeah, that's about right.

So the the Ineptitude of Joseph Chambers involves an idiot, no training, maybe on the spectrum, Rich friend won't stop him just send of to have fun with a rifle not sure which end is which.

Yeah, brilliant.
10 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Parody of modern man sidetracked by coming moral dilemma
onewhoseesme30 January 2024
Self portrait of just how unprepared we are, for just about everything. This is a bit of a dark comedy in that a regular working joe who's a good guy decides to go deer hunting on land owned by a friend, but he knows nothing about shooting hunting or even how to walk thru the woods. After much distraction contemplation and singing to himself, a deer finally appears in a field just ahead of him easily within rifle range. He is totally clueless as what to do next and starts running after the deer with his rifle, when something completely unexpected happens, leaving him to do something men are actually good at. Messing things up, then trying to cover it up. Worth watching to observe what modernity convenience and easy living have made us into, even with our best intentions.

This is not a shoot 'em up or an action flick, with the one shot actually fired occurring almost by accident. The real meaning is to be found only in the message, which is both clever and delivered subtly. Pay attention to the beliefs of the family that are revealed in just a few lines of dialogue. Modern moviegoers don't like having to pay attention.

Muchgrace.church.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Beautiful & Endearing
heybecka21 February 2023
Beautiful film. I love the way the story slowly unfolds for the viewer you are just pulled into this world so effortlessly. The landscape, the characters make you feel at home but also uneasy, uncertain where they are going to take you. I like to go into a movie not 100% certain which direction is going to go. Being able to put my face in the hands of the writer, Director and the actors.snd this team definitely did not disappoint! What an amazing journey this film was!! I think it's pretty amazing that the film could be so slow paced while holding me on the edge of my seat the entire time. Bravo! Definitely looking forward to seeing more of what this director has to offer!!
10 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed